Skip to main content
Log in

Chinese and Canadian Identity on Responses to the Experience of Shame and Guilt

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Negative self-conscious emotions (shame, guilt) support self-regulation to social norms, which may be part of the identity development process. This study addressed whether cultural background affected this process. European Canadian (EC, N = 99), Chinese Canadian (CC, N = 86), international Chinese students in Canada (IC, N = 65) and mainland Chinese (MC, N = 69) undergraduates read 18 scenarios describing norm violations, rating each scenario on a Shame and Guilt Self-Regulation Scale (SGSRS). MANOVAs showed that MCs endorsed more approach responses (i.e., problem focus coping, support seeking) to the scenarios than CC and EC. Gender differences also emerged; women endorsed more approach strategies to shame than men and less withdrawal (denial). Cultural differences to both shame and guilt did not extend to first generation CCs, who had grown up in North America. Results suggest that cultural norms moderate how self-conscious emotions affect the development of some aspects of identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For responses to guilt scenarios, the scree plot indicated four factors, which were rotated using a direct oblimin rotation procedure. Item loading at least 0.40 on each factor were retained. Item loading at 0.40 and higher on the first factor, “problem-focused coping,” contained the items “Confront the problem directly,” “Find a good method to solve the problem,” and “Apologize for my bad behavior.” The factor “problem-focused coping” accounted for 30.92% of the item variance. The second factor “denial and avoidance” yielded two items “Not think about the event” (item 4: denial) and “Keep my distance from the people who had seen what I had done” (item 5: avoidance), which accounted for 15.49% of the item variance. The third factor “counterfactual thinking” had three items, which were “Imagine a different outcome of this event,” “Tell myself never do this again,” and “Wish that I had never done it or done it in another way.” This variable accounted for 9.81% of the item variance. The fourth factor, “support seeking,” was comprised of two items “Tell this story to someone else to get some advice” and “Tell others about my unhappy feelings,” which accounted for 5.83% of the item variance.

    For responses to shame scenarios, the scree plot indicated five factors that explained 64.38% of the variance. The first factor contained two items “Imagine a different outcome of this event” and “Wish that I had never done it or done it in another way.” This is clearly “counterfactual thinking.” The “counterfactual thinking” factor accounted for 31.88% of the item variance. The second factor contained the items “Confront the problem directly,” “Find a good method to solve the problem,” and “Apologize for my bad behavior.” This is clearly “problem-focused coping.” The “problem-focused coping” factor accounted for 10.96% of the item variance. The third factor contained two items “Tell this story to someone else to get some advice” and “Tell others about my unhappy feelings.” This was labeled “support seeking.” The “support seeking” factor accounted for 9.05% of the item variance. The fourth factor contained one item “Not think about the event.” This was labeled “denial” and accounted for 7.22% of the item variance. The fifth factor contained one item “Keep my distance from the people who had seen what I had done.” This is clearly “avoidance.” The “avoidance” factor accounted for 5.27% of the item variance.

References

  • Adolphs, R., & Andler, D. (2018). Investigating emotions as functional states distinct from feelings. Emotion Review, 10(3), 191–201.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • AYÇĐÇEĞĐ-DINN, Ayşe, & CALDWELL-HARRIS, L., C. (2013). Vertical collectivism, family-consciousness and urbanization in Turkey. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 12(47), 232–251.

  • Baez, S., Flichtentrei, D., Prats, M., Mastandueno, R., Garcia, M. A., Cetkovich, M., & Ibanez, A. (2017). Men, women … who cares? A population-based study on sex differences and gender roles in empathy and moral cognition. PLoS One, 12(6), E0179336.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Verbeke, W., & Gavino, J. C. (2003). Culture moderates the self-regulation of shame and its effects on performance: The case of salespersons in the Netherlands and the Philippines. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, O., & Yeh, K. H. (2019). The history and the future of the psychology of filial piety: Chinese norms to contextualized personality construct. Frontiers in Psychology, 30(100), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benetti-McQuoid, J., & Bursik, K. (2005). Individual differences in experiences of and responses to guilt and shame: examining the lenses of gender and gender role. Sex Roles, 53, 133–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, T. M., & Aldao, A. (2013). Gender differences in emotion expression in children: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 735–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, K., Hynie, M., & Su, C. (Jun. 2011). Do self-concepts mediate cultural differences in the self-regulation of shame? Toronto, Canada: Canadian Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, M. J., & Robins, W. R. (2015). Exploring cultural differences in the recognition of the self-conscious emotions. PLoS One, 10(8), e0136411.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, V. (2014). Children’s developing identity. In: Reed, Michael and Rosie, Walker eds. A Critical Companion to Early Childhood. London: Sage, pp. 281–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, K. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2017). Cultural differences in shame and guilt as understandable reasons for suicide. Psychological Reports, 121(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117728288.

  • Dean, K. K., & Fles, H. E. (2016). The effects of independent and interdependent self-construals on reactions to transgressions: distinguishing between guilt and shame. Self and Identity, 15(1), 90–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2007). Self-theories: the mindset of a champion. In T. Morris, P. Terry, & S. Gordon (Eds.), Sport and exercise psychology: international perspectives. Fitness Information Technology: Morgantown, WV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2012). Implicit theories. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & T. Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2) (pp. 43–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endendijk, J. J., Groeneveld, M. G., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Mesman, J. (2016). Gender-Differentiated Parenting Revisited: Meta-Analysis Reveals Very Few Differencesin Parental Control of Boys and Girls. PLoS One, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159193.

  • Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(2), 168–192.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, H. (2006). Comparison of the performance of varimax and promax rotations: factor structure recovery for dichotomous items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(1), 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H. A., Kret, E. M., & Broekens, J. (2018). Gender differences in emotion perception and self-reported emotional intelligence: a test of the emotion sensitivity hypothesis. PLoS One, 13(1), e0190712.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Freis, S. D., Brown, A. A., Carroll, P. J., & Arkin, R. M. (2015). Shame, rage, and unsuccessful motivated reasoning in vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34(10), 877–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furukawa, E., Tangney, J., & Higashibara, F. (2012). Cross-cultural continuities and discontinuities in shame, guilt, and pride: a study of children residing in Japan, Korea and the USA. Self and Identity, 11(1), 90–113.

  • Hamamura, T. (2012). Are cultures becoming individualistic a cross-temporal comparison of individualism-collectivism in the United States. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 3–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hur, T., Roese, J. N., & Namkoong, J. E. (2009). Regrets in the east and west: role of intrapersonal versus interpersonal norms. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(2), 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. A. (2018). Comparing prescriptive and descriptive gender stereotypes about children, adults and the elderly. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1086 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6028777/.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kroger, J. (2017). Identity development in adolescence and adulthood. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. http://psychology.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-54?print=pdf

  • Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Lickel, B., Kushlev, K., Savalei, V., Matta, S., & Schmader, T. (2014). Shame and the motivation to change the self. Emotion., 6, 1049–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutwak, N., Panish, J., & Ferrari, J. R. (2003). Shame and guilt: characterological vs. behavioral self-blame and their relationship to fear of intimacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(4), 909–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, S. A. (2019). Social identity theory. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/social-identity-theory.html

  • Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Frías, M. D., & Tur, A. M. (2009). Are women more empathetic than men? A longitudinal study in adolescence. Span Journal of Psychology., 12(1), 76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C. (2018). Reconsidering the differences between shame and guilt. Europe’s Journal of Psychology., 14(3), 710–733.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mizuta, I., Zahn-Waxler, C., Cole, P. M., & Hiruma, N. (1996). A cross-cultural study of preschoolers’ attachment: security and sensitivity in Japanese and US dyads. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19, 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogihara, Y., Fujita, H., Tominaga, H., Ishigaki, S., Kashimoto, T., Takahashi, A., Toyohara, K., & Uchida, Y. (2015). Are common names becoming less common? The rise in uniqueness and individualism in Japan. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, article 1490.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Matos, M. (2011). Can shame memories become a key to identity? The centrality of shame memories predicts psychopathology. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poless, G. P., Torstveit, L., Lugo, G. R., Andreassen, M., & Sutterlin, S. (2016). Guilt and proneness to shame: unethical behavior in vulnerable and grandiose narcissism. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, M. Y., Liu, J., & Zhang, Z. Y. (2003). The difference of shame proneness and coping style towards shame stories. Acta Psychologica Sinica (China), 35(3), 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roese, N., & Epstude, K. (2017). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking: new evidence, new challenges, new insights. InAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 56, pp. 1–79).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh-Manoux, A. (2000). Culture and gender issues in adolescence: evidence from studies on emotion. Psicothema, 12, 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, C., & Hynie, M. (2010). The cross-cultural study of the experiences of shame and guilt in mainland China and Canada. Canadian Psychological Association, Winnipeg, Canada.

  • Sugimura, K., Nakama, R., Mizokami, S., Hatano, K., Tsuzuki, M., & Schwartz, S. J. (2016). Working together or separately? The role of identity and cultural self-construal in well-being among Japanese youth. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(4), 362–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S., & Jalaliyoon, N. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis; concepts and theory. In J. Balicki (Ed.), Advances in Pure and Applied Mathematics (pp. 375–382).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P. (1991). Moral affect: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 598–607.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P. (1992). Situational determinants of shame and guilt in young adulthood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(2), 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256–1269.

  • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., Mashek, D., & Hastings, M. (2011). Assessing jail inmates’ proneness to shame and guilt: feeling bad about the behaviour or the self? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(7), 710–734.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Torstveit, L., Sütterlin, S., & Lugo, R. G. (2016). Empathy, guilt proneness, and gender: relative contributions to prosocial behaviour. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 260–270.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. New York, NY 10017, USA: Published by Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velotti, P., Garofalo, C., Bottazzi, F., & Caretti, V. (2016). Faces of shame: Implications for self-esteem, emotion regulation, aggression, and well-being. The Journal of Psychology., 151(2), 171–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vienna, M. (2016). Women, shame and mental health: a systematic review of approaches in psychotherapy. InRetrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine: University repository website https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. J., & Dodou, D. (2012). Factor recovery by principal axis factoring and maximum likelihood factor analysis as a function of factor pattern and sample size. Journal of Applied Statistics., 39(4), 695–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, X. (2017). Reconceptualizing Confucian philosophy in the 21st century. Springer: Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ying, Y., Lee, P. A., & Tsai, J. L. (2000). Cultural orientation and racial discrimination: predictors of coherence in Chinese American young adults. Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 427–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, J., & Bresnahan, J. M. (2016). Does shame still prevail in China and guilt prevail in the U.S.A

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Su.

Ethics declarations

The procedure was approved by the University Human Participants Review Committee. Participants were asked to read and sign the consent form.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1. Selected items of self-regulation of shame and guilt

Please read the following scenarios carefully. Try to imagine yourself in each scenario:

  1. 1.

    You are at a party and talking with some friends about the classes you took last term. You make a joke about how easy one class is, and how dumb a person would have to be not to get an A in this class. One of your friends looks shocked and hurt and you suddenly remember her telling you that she only got a D in the course last term and had to take the course again. You realize that she must think you are talking about her.

Imagine that you were in this situation. How likely is it that you would do the following?

 

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

 

Never use this strategy

Unsure

Definitely use this strategy

I would:

1.

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

Confront the problem directly.

2.

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

Find a good method to solve the problem.

3.

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

Apologize for my bad behavior.

4.

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

Not think about the event.

5.

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

Keep my distance from the people who had seen what I had done.

6.

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

Imagine a different outcome of this event.

7.

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

Tell myself never do this again.

8.

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

Wish that I had never done it or done it in another way.

9.

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

Realize that everyone has similar things happen to them.

10.

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

Tell myself that these feelings are not so bad.

11.

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

Tell this story to someone else to get some advice.

12.

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

Tell others about my unhappy feelings.

13.

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

Other—not included in above lists:

Explain: _____________________________

(Each scenario has the same questions as above.)

  1. 2.

    It is the first real snowfall of the year, and you and some friends are throwing snowballs and laughing and chasing one another. Another friend shows up and calls your name. You have a snowball in your hand so you playfully throw it at him. But you throw it harder than you had intended, and it hits him in the face, breaking his glasses. He shouts and covers his face as blood starts to run from a cut above his eye.

  2. 3.

    You are looking to buy a used computer and find a great laptop that is advertised for about $100 more than you can afford. You ask a friend if you can borrow the $100 so that you can buy the computer, and promise to pay him back after you get your next paycheck. Right after you get the computer, several major events happen in your life, and you completely forget about the money and do not pay him back.

  3. 4.

    A good friend confides in you about how much she is attracted to a man you both know, even though he already has a girlfriend and is clearly not interested in your friend. You promise that you will not tell anyone about this, but several weeks later this man’s name comes up at a party, and you tell the people you are talking to about your friend’s crush on this man.

  4. 5.

    You are in a store with some friends of yours and you see a pen with a funny picture on it. You think it’s cute, but do not think it’s worth the $10 they are asking for it. You look around and see that the store owner is talking to your friends and not paying attention to you. On an impulse, you grab the pen and slip it inside your coat. You then leave with your friends, without paying for the pen.

Appendix 2

Table 3 Factor loadings for self-regulation of guilt in mainland Chinese
Table 4 Factor loadings for self-regulation of guilt in Chinese Canadians
Table 5 Factor loadings for self-regulation of guilt in European Canadians
Table 6 Factor loadings for self-regulation of shame in international Chinese

Appendix 3

Table 7 Factor loadings for self-regulation of shame and guilt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, C., Hynie, M. Chinese and Canadian Identity on Responses to the Experience of Shame and Guilt. Int J Ment Health Addiction 20, 211–229 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00350-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00350-9

Keywords

Navigation