Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Race/Ethnicity, Community of Residence, and DUI Arrest After Beginning Treatment for an Alcohol Use Disorder

  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether racial/ethnic disparities in post-treatment arrests for driving under the influence (DUI) exist among clients receiving outpatient treatment for an alcohol use disorder (AUD) and to assess whether community characteristics were associated with this outcome. The sample included adults with an AUD entering publicly funded outpatient treatment in Washington State in 2012. Treatment data were linked with criminal justice and US Census data. Multilevel time-to-event analysis was employed to answer the research questions. Key independent variables included client race/ethnicity, community-level economic disadvantage, and racial/ethnic composition of the community. Latino clients and clients residing in communities with a higher proportion of Black residents had higher hazards of a DUI arrest post-treatment admission. Future research should examine whether disparities in DUI arrests are related to differences in treatment effectiveness or other factors (e.g., inequities in law enforcement) so that these disparities can be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bouchery EE, Harwood HJ, Sacks JJ, et al. Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., 2006. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2011;41(5):516–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lipari RN, Hughes A, Bose J. Driving under the influence of alcohol and illicit drugs. In: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, ed. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2016.

  3. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic safety facts: alcohol impaired driving. Washington, District of Columbia, 2017. DOT-HS-812-450.

  4. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 2005–2015. National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services. In. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dill PL, Wells-Parker E. Court-mandated treatment for convicted drinking drivers. Alcohol Research. 2006;29(1):41.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller PG, Curtis A, Sønderlund A, et al. Effectiveness of interventions for convicted DUI offenders in reducing recidivism: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed scientific literature. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2015;41(1):16–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hser Y-I, Evans E. Cross-system data linkage for treatment outcome evaluation: lessons learned from the California Treatment Outcome Project. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2008;31(2):125–135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook B, Alegría M. Racial-ethnic disparities in substance abuse treatment: the role of criminal history and socioeconomic status. Psychiatric Services. 2011;62(11):1273–1281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasin DS, Grant BF. The National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) Waves 1 and 2: review and summary of findings. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2015;50(11):1609–1640.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Saloner B, Cook BL. Blacks and Hispanics are less likely than Whites to complete addiction treatment, largely due to socioeconomic factors. Health Affairs. 2013;32(1):135–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Acevedo A, Miles J, Garnick DW, et al. Employment after beginning treatment for substance use disorders: the impact of race/ethnicity and client community of residence. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2018;87:31–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Acevedo A, Garnick DW, Dunigan R, et al. Performance measures and racial/ethnic disparities in the treatment of substance use disorders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 2015;76(1):57–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Luchansky B, Nordlund D, Estee S, et al. Substance abuse treatment and criminal justice involvement for SSI recipients: results from Washington state. American Journal on Addictions. 2006;15(5):370–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garnick DW, Horgan CM, Acevedo A, et al. Criminal justice outcomes after engagement in outpatient substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2014;46(3):295–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: summary of national findings. Rockville, MD 2017. HHS Publication No. SMA 17–5044.

  16. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Arrests by race and ethnicity, 2016. Washington, DC 2016.

  17. Chou SP, Grant BF, Dawson DA, et al. Twelve-month prevalence and changes in driving after drinking: United States, 1991–1992 and 2001–2002. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2005;80(2):223–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Caetano R, McGrath C. Driving under the influence (DUI) among U.S. ethnic groups. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2005;37(2):217–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Caetano R, Clark CL. Hispanics, Blacks and Whites driving under the influence of alcohol: results from the 1995 National Alcohol Survey. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2000;32(1):57–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kerr WC, Greenfield TK. Racial/ethnic disparities in the self-reported number of drinks in 2 hours before driving becomes impaired. American Journal of Public Health. 2015;105(7):1409–1414.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones-Webb R, Karriker-Jaffe KJ. Neighborhood disadvantage, high alcohol content beverage consumption, drinking norms, and drinking consequences: a mediation analysis. Journal of Urban Health. 2013;90(4):667–684.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Acevedo A, Panas L, Garnick D, et al. Disparities in the treatment of substance use disorders: does where you live matter? The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2018;45(4):533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Molina KM, Alegría M, Chen C. Neighborhood context and substance use disorders: a comparative analysis of racial and ethnic groups in the United States. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2012;125:S35-S43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Campbell K. Impact of record-linkage methodology on performance indicators and multivariate relationships. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2009;36(1):110–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Whalen D, Pepitone A, Graver L, et al. Linking client records from substance abuse, mental health and Medicaid state agencies. Rockville, MD 2001. SMA-01-3500.

  26. Campbell KM, Deck D, Krupski A. Record linkage software in the public domain: a comparison of Link Plus, The Link King, and a basic deterministic algorithm. Health Informatics Journal. 2008;14(1):5–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Camelot Consulting. The Link King: record linkage and consolidation software. 2018; http://www.the-link-king.com/index.html. Accessed 13 May 2019.

  28. Karriker-Jaffe KJ. Areas of disadvantage: a systematic review of effects of area-level socioeconomic status on substance use outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2011;30(1):84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mennis J, Stahler GJ, Baron DA. Geographic barriers to community-based psychiatric treatment for drug-dependent patients. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2012;102(5):1093–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jacobson JO, Robinson P, Bluthenthal RN. A multilevel decomposition approach to estimate the role of program location and neighborhood disadvantage in racial disparities in alcohol treatment completion. Social Science & Medicine. 2007;64(2):462–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Karriker-Jaffe KJ. Neighborhood socioeconomic status and substance use by U.S. adults. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2013;133(1):212–221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaiser H. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1960;20(1):141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. The Cox model. In: Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2000.

  34. Beerman KA, Smith MM, Hall RL. Predictors of recidivism in DUIIs. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1988;49(5):443–449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schmidt LA, Ye Y, Greenfield TK, et al. Ethnic disparities in clinical severity and services for alcohol problems: results from the National Alcohol Survey. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2007;31(1):48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Guerrero EG, Kao D, Perron BE. Travel distance to outpatient substance use disorder treatment facilities for Spanish-speaking clients. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2013;24(1):38–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cummings JR, Wen H, Ko M, et al. Race/ethnicity and geographic access to Medicaid substance use disorder treatment facilities in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(2):190–196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lê Cook B, Doksum T, Chen C-N, et al. The role of provider supply and organization in reducing racial/ethnic disparities in mental health care in the US. Social Science & Medicine. 2013;84:102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Longshore D, Urada D, Evans E, et al. Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act: 2003 report. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs;2004.

  40. LaVeist TA, Wallace Jr JM. Health risk and inequitable distribution of liquor stores in African American neighborhood. Social Science & Medicine. 2000;51(4):613–617.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Moore H, Jones-Webb R, Toomey T, et al. Alcohol advertising on billboards, transit shelters, and bus benches in inner-city neighborhoods. Contemporary Drug Problems. 2008;35(2–3):509–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Campbell CA, Hahn RA, Elder R, et al. The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009;37(6):556–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Treno AJ, Johnson FW, Remer LG, et al. The impact of outlet densities on alcohol-related crashes: a spatial panel approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2007;39(5):894–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ingram JR. The effect of neighborhood characteristics on traffic citation practices of the police. Police Quarterly. 2007;10(4):371–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Harris DA. Driving while black: racial profiling on our nation’s highways. American Civil Liberties Union;1999.

  46. Pierson E, Simoiu C, Overgoor J, et al. A large-scale analysis of racial disparities in police stops across the United States. Stanford Open Policing Project; 2017.

  47. Fagan J, Geller A, Davies G, et al. Street stops and broken windows revisited: the demography and logic of proactive policing in a safe and changing city. In: Rice S, White M, eds. Race and ethnicity in policing. New York: NYU Press; 2010.

  48. Guerrero EG. Enhancing access and retention in substance abuse treatment: the role of Medicaid payment acceptance and cultural competence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2013;132(3):555–561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Miller WR, Sorensen JL, Selzer JA, et al. Disseminating evidence-based practices in substance abuse treatment: a review with suggestions. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2006;31(1):25–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mark TL, Levit KR, Vandivort-Warren R, et al. Changes In US spending on mental health and substance abuse treatment, 1986–2005, and implications for policy. Health Affairs. 2011;30(2):284–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mark TL, Levit KR, Yee T, et al. Spending on mental and substance use disorders projected to grow more slowly than all health spending through 2020. Health Affairs. 2014;33(8):1407–1415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism of the National Institutes of Health under award number R03AA023390. The content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or of the State of Washington.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Miles PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miles, J., Acevedo, A., Panas, L. et al. Race/Ethnicity, Community of Residence, and DUI Arrest After Beginning Treatment for an Alcohol Use Disorder. J Behav Health Serv Res 47, 201–215 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-019-09672-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-019-09672-6

Keywords

Navigation