Skip to main content
Log in

Strain-Rate-Dependent Yield Criteria for Progressive Failure Analysis of Composite Laminates Based on the Northwestern Failure Theory

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The strain-rate-dependent failure of a fiber-reinforced toughened-matrix composite (IM7/8552) was experimentally characterized over the range of quasi-static (10−4 s−1) to dynamic (103 s−1) strain rates by testing off-axis lamina and angle-ply laminate specimens. A progressive failure framework was proposed to describe the matrix-dominated transition from linear elastic to non-linear material behavior as determined from the experimentally measured stress-strain material response, and the Northwestern Failure Theory was adapted to provide a set of apparent yield criteria for predicting the matrix-dominated yielding of composites using the lamina-based transverse tension (F2ty), transverse compression (F2cy), and in-plane shear (F6y) yield strengths. The underlying theory was validated by determining the applicability of the new damage-mode-based yield criteria. Starting with the lamina, the proposed criteria accurately predicted the matrix-dominated yielding. Angle-ply laminates were then investigated to isolate the matrix-dominated laminate behavior based on fiber orientation, and the predictions were found to be in superior agreement with the experimental results compared to the classical failure theories. The results indicate the potential of using the Northwestern Yield and Failure Criteria to provide the predictive baseline for damage propagation from yield to ultimate lamina failure in composite laminates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASME. Guide for Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics. ASME V&V 10. 2006:1–36

  2. Hart-Smith LJ (1993) The role of biaxial stresses in discriminating between meaningful and illusory composite failure theories. Compos Struct 25:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Razi H, Schaefer JD, Wanthal S (2016) Rapid Integration of New Analysis Methods in Production, 31st ASC Technical Conference and ASTM D30 Meeting

  4. Arguelles A, Vina J, Canteli AF (2011) Influence of the matrix type on the mode I fracture of carbon-epoxy composites under dynamic delamination. Exp Mech 51(3):293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Costa ML, Botelho EC (2005) Paiva JMFd, Rezende MC. Characterization of cure of carbon/epoxy Prepreg used in aerospace field. Mater Res 8(3):317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eibl S (2008) Observing Inhomogeneity of Plastic Components in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Materials by ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy in the Micrometer Scale. J Compos Mater 42(12):1231–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee J, Soutis C (2007) A study on the compressive strength of thick carbon fibre–epoxy laminates. Compos Sci Technol 67(10):2015–2026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Marasco AI, Cartié DDR, Partridge IK, Rezai A (2006) Mechanical properties balance in novel Z-pinned sandwich panels: out-of-plane properties. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 37(2):295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murri GB (2013) Evaluation of delamination onset and growth characterization methods under mode I fatigue loading. NASA/TM-2013-217966

  10. Tsotsis TK, Keller S, Lee K, Bardis J, Bish J (2001) Aging of polymeric composite specimens for 5000 hours at elevated pressure and temperature. Compos Sci Technol 61(1):75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolfrum J, Eibl S, Lietch L (2009) Rapid evaluation of long-term thermal degradation of carbon fibre epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 69(3–4):523–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. NIAR, NCAMP. Hexcel 8552 IM7 Unidirectional Prepreg 190 gsm & 35% RC Qualification Material Property Data Report. 2011 April 22, 2011;CAM-RP-2009-015(Rev A)

  13. Daniel IM, Luo J-J, Schubel PM, Werner BT (2009) Interfiber/interlaminar failure of composites under multi-axial states of stress. Compos Sci Technol 69(6):764–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daniel IM, Cho J-M, Werner BT, Fenner JS (2011) Characterization and Constitutive Modeling of Composite Materials Under Static and Dynamic Loading. AIAA J 49(8):1658–1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Daniel IM, Werner BT, Fenner JS (2011) Strain-rate-dependent failure criteria for composites. Compos Sci Technol 71(3):357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Werner BT, Daniel IM (2012) Characterization and modeling of polymeric matrix under static and dynamic loading. SEM XII International Congress & Exposition on Experimental & Applied Mechanics 2012. Costa Mesa, CA

  17. Schaefer JD, Werner BT, Daniel IM (2014) Strain-Rate-Dependent Failure of a Toughened Matrix Composite. Exp Mech 54(6):11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karim MR, Fatt MSH (2006) Rate-dependent constitutive equations for carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy. Polym Compos 27(5):513–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Koerber H, Camanho PP (2011) High strain rate characterisation of unidirectional carbon–epoxy IM7-8552 in longitudinal compression. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 42(5):462–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thiruppukuzhi SV, Sun CT (2001) Models for the strain-rate-dependent behavior of polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 61(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Catalanotti G, Camanho PP, Marques AT (2013) Three-dimensional failure criteria for fiber-reinforced laminates. Compos Struct 95(0):63–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Werner BT, Daniel IM (2014) Characterization and modeling of polymeric matrix under multi-axial static and dynamic loading. Compos Sci Technol 102:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schaefer JD (2014) Matrix dominated failure of fiber-reinforced composite laminates under static and dynamic loading. Northwestern University, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  24. Daniel IM, Schaefer JD, Werner B (2015) Yield criteria for matrix and composite materials under static and dynamic loading, 20th international conference on composite materials, July 19-24

  25. Werner BT, Schaefer JD, Daniel IM (2013) Effect of Ply Dispersion on Failure Characteristics of Multidirectional Laminates. SEM 2013 Annual Conference & Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics; June 3–5; Lombard, IL2013

  26. Cuntze RG (2004) The predictive capability of failure mode concept-based strength criteria for multi-directional laminates—part B. Compos Sci Technol 64(3–4):487–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jadhav A, Woldesenbet E, Pang S-S (2003) High strain rate properties of balanced angle-ply graphite/epoxy composites. Compos Part B 34(4):339–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Daniel IM, Ishai O (2006) Engineering mechanics of composite materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper was sponsored by the Office of Naval Research (ONR). The authors are grateful to Dr. Y.D.S. Rajapakse of ONR for his encouragement and cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.D. Schaefer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schaefer, J., Daniel, I. Strain-Rate-Dependent Yield Criteria for Progressive Failure Analysis of Composite Laminates Based on the Northwestern Failure Theory. Exp Mech 58, 487–497 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-017-0366-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-017-0366-z

Keywords

Navigation