Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation Using Digital Image Correlation of Stress Intensity Factors in an Aerospace Panel

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fracture behavior of a crack propagating in a large (4.8 m × 1.4 m) aircraft panel was investigated quantitatively by experiment for the first time using digital image correlation. Mixed mode (I+II) stress intensity factors were evaluated using a methodology, which combined digital image correlation with the multi-point over-deterministic method to fit displacement field equations to the experimental data from around a crack tip. More than 800 images were taken during a 10-minute time period as the fracture of the panel occurred under monotonic loading. It was observed that the crack propagated through the skin of the panel at a relatively low speed, with an average crack tip velocity of 0.014 mm/s, and changed its propagation direction at particular points due to the reinforcement of the structure. In the later stages of the test, substantial shear lips were observed indicating a state of plane stress as would be expected in a thin, wide panel and the size of the plastic zone increased substantially. The value of the mode I stress intensity factor obtained from the measured displacement fields initially increased linearly to around 50 MPa√m (KIc = 37 MPa√m) and afterwards non-linearly reaching 300 to 400 MPa√m for crack extensions of the order of 100 mm. It is proposed that these high values of stress intensity factor do not represent an unrealistically high material fracture toughness but rather are indicative of the high resistance to crack growth of the structural assemblage of ribs, stringers and hole reinforcements in the panel which allow the skin to sustain a strain level that would otherwise cause unstable crack growth. Digital image correlation is demonstrated to be particularly powerful in elucidating this structural behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanford RJ (1989) Determining fracture parameters with full-field optical methods. Exptl Mech 29(3):241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Olden EJ, Patterson EA (2004) Optical analysis of crack tip stress fields: a comparative study. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 277:623–636

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dally JW, Riley WF (1991) Experimental Stress Analysis, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill Inc

  4. Chu TC, Ranson WF, Sutton MA, Peters WH (1985) Applications of digital-image correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Exp Mech 25(3):232–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu Z-H, Li X-D, Sutton MA, Li N (2008) Drift and spatial distortion elimination in atomic force microscopy images by digital image correlation technique. J Strain Anal 43(8):729–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jin H, Lu W-Y, Korellis J (2008) Microscale deformation measurement using the digital image correlation technique and scanning electron microscope imaging. J Strain Anal 43(8):719–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Backman D, Liao M, Crichlow L, Yanishevsky M, Patterson EA (2008) The use of digital image correlation in a parametric study of the effect of edge distance and thickness on residual strains after hole expansion. J Strain Anal 43(8):781–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reu PL, Miller TJ (2008) The application of high-speed digital image correlation. J Strain Anal 43(8):673–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopez-Crespo P, Shterenlikht A, Patterson EA, Withers PJ, Yates JR (2008) The stress intensity of mixed mode cracks determined by digital image correlation. J Strain Anal 43(8):769–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rethore J, Gravouil A, Morestin F, Combescure A (2005) Estimation of mixed-mode stress intensity factors using digital image correlation and an interaction integral I. J Fract 132:65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoneyama S, Morimoto Y, Takashi M (2006) Automatic evaluation of mixed-mode stress intensity factors utilizing digital image correlation. Strain 42:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Muskhelishvili NI (1953) Some basic problems of the mathematical theory of elasticity. P.Noordhoff, Groningen

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Q-400 introduction in 3-D correlation, DANTEC Dynamics

  14. Ewalds HL, Wanhill RJH (1985) Fracture mechanics. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kanninen MF, Popelar CH (1985) Advanced fracture mechanics. Oxford University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Nurse AD, Patterson EA (1993) Determination of predominantly mode II stress intensity factors from isochromatic data. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct 16(12):1339–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Qian J, Fatemi A (1996) Mixed mode fatigue crack growth: a literature survey. Engng Fract Mech 55(6):969–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lopez-Crespo P, Burguete RL, Patterson EA, Shterenlikht A, Withers PJ, Yates JR (2008) Study of a crack at a fasten hole by digital image correlation, Experimental Mechanics, doi:10.1007/s11340-008-9161-1

  19. Rosakis AJ, Ravi-Chandar K (1986) On crack tip stress state:an experimental evaluation of three-dimensional effects. Int J Solids Struct 22(2):121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials (1981) ASTM annual book of standards, Part 10, American Society for Testing of Materials. Philadelphia, E399-81, p588–618

  21. Swift T (1987) Damage tolerance in pressurized fuselages, ICAF, Vol. 1, edited by D.L. Simpson, Paper 1, Engineering Materials Advisory Services, Ltd., Cradley Heath, England, U.K., June 1987

  22. Feddersen CE (1971) Evaluation and prediction of the residual strength of center cracked tension panels, Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures, ASTM Special Technical Publication 486. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp 59–78

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang X, Li Y (2005) Damage tolerance and fail safety of welded aircraft wing panels. AIAA J 43(7):1613–1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nesterenko GI, Nesterenko BG (2009) Ensuring structural damage tolerance of Russian aircraft. Int J Fract 31:1054–1061

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Nesterenko BG (2002) Analytical-experimental study of damage tolerance of aircraft structures, International Council of Aeronautical Sciences, Paper 333.1, Aug. 2002

  26. Swift T (2003) Fail-safe design requirements and features, regulatory requirements, AIAA Paper 2003-2783, July 2003

  27. Wanhill RJH, Schra L, Hart WGJT (1992) Crack resistance, fracture toughness and instability in damage-tolerant aluminium alloys, in Cyclic deformation, fracture and nondestructive evaluation of advanced materials. Mitchell MR, Buck O (eds) ASTM, STP 1157, p.224–241

  28. Gu I (1992) An engineering approach for crack growth analysis of 2024-T351 aluminium alloy, fracture mechanics: Twenty-Second Symposium (Volume II), ASTM STP 1131, Atluri SN, Newman JC Jr, Raju IS, Epstein JS (eds.) American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadephia, p.246–256

  29. Sumpter JDG (1999) An alternative view of R curve testing. Engng Fract Mechs 64:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Collins RA, Cartwright DJ (1996) On the development of the strip yield model for the assessment of multiple site damage. Theor Appl Fract Mech 25:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aircraft Accident Report—Aloha Airlines, Flight 243, Boeing 737-200, N73711, near Maui, Hawaii, April, 1988/ Report no. NTSB/AA-89/03, National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, D.C., June 1989

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge a number of detailed technical discussions with Professor Neil James of the University of Plymouth. The authors are extremely grateful for his thoughtful and insightful comments which have helped to guide their interpretation to the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan State University, 2555 Engineering Building, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1226, USA

    Y. Du & E. A. Patterson (SEM member)

  2. Departamento de Ingenieria Mecanica y Minera, Universidad de Jaen, Jaen, Spain

    F. A. Díaz (SEM member)

  3. Airbus, New Filton House, Filton, Bristol, BS99 7AR, UK

    R. L. Burguete (SEM member)

Authors
  1. Y. Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. A. Díaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. L. Burguete
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. A. Patterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Du.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du, Y., Díaz, F.A., Burguete, R.L. et al. Evaluation Using Digital Image Correlation of Stress Intensity Factors in an Aerospace Panel. Exp Mech 51, 45–57 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-010-9335-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-010-9335-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation