Abstract
Forests provide 1.75 billion cubic meters of timber each year and a similar amount of fuel wood. Our understanding of forest ecosystems is far from complete. Biotechnology can provide means to speed up adaptation by forest species in response to pathogen introduction, climate change, or other perturbations. Consensus building on forest issues is always likely to be difficult, as diversity in the nature of forests and their cultural and historical significance must be recognized. The potential risks and possible benefits of deploying or choosing not to deploy forest biotechnology products must be considered on a case-by-case, product- rather than process-driven basis for rational, evidence-based decisions to be reached. Aspects of ecologically neutral field trials, ecological and social perceptions of risk, and steady state and dynamic paradigms of nature are discussed alongside challenges facing biotechnology in adequately avoiding or limiting risks to allow deployment in forests.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACRE (Advisory Committee on Release into the Environment) (2006) Managing the footprint of agriculture: towards a comparative assessment of risks and benefits for novel agricultural systems. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, UK
Burke M (2005) Farm scale evaluations: managing GM crops with herbicides. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, UK. ISBN: 0-85521-142-3
Dale PJ, Clarke B, Fontes MG (2002) Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat Biotechnol 20:567–574
Davis WM (1892) The convex profile of bad-land divides. Science 20:245
Flannery T (2001) The eternal frontier. Atlantic Monthly Press, New York, p 404
Gartland KMA, Kellison RC, Fenning TM (2003) Forest biotechnology and Europe’s forests of the future. In: McCord S, Gartland KMA (eds) Forest biotechnology in Europe. Institute of Forest Biotechnology, Raleigh, NC, pp 56–84
Kellison R, McCord S, Gartland KMA (eds) (2004) Forest biotechnology in Latin America. Institute of Forest Biotechnology, Raleigh, NC & Universidad de Concepcion, Chile. ISBN 0-9763838-0-2
Kershaw JA Jr, Oliver CD, Hinckley TM (1993) Effect of harvest of old growth Douglas-fir stands and subsequent management on carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. J Sustain For 1:61–77
Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Botkin DB (2000) Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conserv Biol 14:941–950
Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest stand dynamics. Update edition. Wiley, New York, p 521
Sandborn R, Oliver CD (2005) Wood as an environmental resource. Yale Forest Forum Review Vol. 8, No. 2. Global Institute of Sustainable Forestry, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA, p 36
Stevens WK (1990) New eye on nature: the real constant is eternal turmoil. New York Times. Science article. 31 July 1990 (Tuesday). B-5-B-6
Strauss SH, Campbell MM, Pryor SN, Coventry P, Burley J (2001) Plantation certification and genetic engineering: FSC’s ban on research is counterproductive. J For 99:4–7
Thompson Campbell FT (2000) Genetically engineered trees: questions without answers. American Lands Alliance, Washington, DC
Xiao-hua S, Bing-yu Z, Qin-Jun H, Lie-jian H, Xiang-hua Z (2003) Advances in tree genetic engineering in China. In: XII World Forestry Congress, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. http://www.fao.org/docrep/article/wfc/xii/0280-b2.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Ronald Sederoff
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gartland, K.M.A., Oliver, C.D. Growing trees: risks and rewards for society. Tree Genetics & Genomes 3, 169–172 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-006-0064-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-006-0064-y