Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Vegetation dynamics across a chronosequence of created wetland sites in Virginia, USA

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant species composition, dominance, richness, and diversity were measured across a 15-year chronosequence of created wetland sites in Virginia, USA. Using an age-class categorization (1–2 years, 3–5 years, 6–10 years, or 11–15 years), all classes had a predominance of herbaceous species with perennial life history strategy, and perennials contributed 68.6 % to the overall dominance measure (importance value; IV) averaged across all sites. There was no significant difference in species richness or diversity among age classes. Analysis of Similarity (ANOSIM) indicated that herbaceous species composition was similar between the youngest and oldest age classes, but not the intermediate classes. For woody shrubs and saplings, planted species were more prevalent in the youngest age classes, and volunteer species predominated in the oldest age classes. These results suggest that perennial herbaceous species are important in early plant development on created wetland sites, and may be influential in observed patterns of species composition over time. In the context of plant development in newly created wetlands, dominance shifts from planted to volunteer woody species suggest that planting early successional species, or species with reproductive strategies attuned to created wetland site management, may favor survivorship and recruitment of other species over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson RB, Cairns J Jr (2001) Plant decomposition and litter accumulation in depressional wetlands: functional performance of two wetland age classes that were created via excavation. Wetlands 21:354–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson RB, Perry JE, Smith E, Cairns J Jr (1993) Use of created wetland delineation and weighted averages as a component of assessment. Wetlands 13:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson RB, Perry JE, Cairns J Jr (2005) Vegetation communities of 20-year-old created depressional wetlands. Wetl Ecol Manage 13:469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey DE, Perry JE, Daniels WL (2007) Vegetation dynamics in response to organic matter loading rates in a created wetland in Southeastern Virginia. Wetlands 27:936–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA (1996) Plants in changing environments: linking physiological, population, and community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM (1993) A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Technical report WRP-DE-4. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DA, Cole CA, Brooks RP (2002) A comparison of created and natural wetlands in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetl Ecol Manage 10:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG (1941) The distribution of the largest of a set of estimated variances as a fraction of their total. Ann Eugen 11:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 111:1119–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk JK, Fennessey MS (2001) Wetland plants: biology and ecology. Lewis, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (2006) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1998–2004. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBerry DA (2006) Floristic Quality Index: ecological and management implications in created and natural wetlands. Dissertation, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg

  • DeBerry DA, Perry JE (2004) Primary succession in a created freshwater wetland. Castanea 63:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBerry DA, Perry JE (2007) Noteworthy collections: Virginia. Castanea 72:119–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deller AS, Baldassarre GA (1998) Effects of flooding on the forest community in a greentree reservoir 18 years after flood cessation. Wetlands 18:90–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egler FE (1954) Vegetation science concepts I. Initial floristic composition, a factor in old-field vegetation development. Vegetatio 4:412–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Laboratory (1987) Corps of engineers wetland delineation manual. Technical report Y-87-1. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP, Minchin PR, Belbin L (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernald ML (1950) Gray’s manual of botany, 8th edn. Dioscorides, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora of North America Association (2002) Flora of North America volume 23: Magnoliophyta: Commelinidae (in part): Cyperaceae. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frelich LE (2002) Forest dynamics and disturbance regimes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fried R (1976) Introduction to statistics. Gardner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glascock S, Ware S (1979) Forests of small stream bottoms in the Peninsula of Virginia. Va J Sci 30:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1991) Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. The New York Botanical Garden, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer DA (1996) Creating freshwater wetlands. Lewis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaven JB, Gross FE, Gannon AT (2003) Vegetation comparison of a natural and created emergent marsh wetland. Southeast Nat 2:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1999) Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson EW (2000) Forest sampling desk reference. CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keddy PA (2000) Wetland ecology: principles and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeland BD, Conner WH (1999) Natural regeneration and growth of Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich. in Lake Chicot, Louisiana after 44 years of flooding. Wetlands 19:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindt R, Coe R (2005) Tree diversity analysis: a manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software. Gleneden Beach, Ore

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 4.25. MjM software. Gleneden Beach, Ore

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod KW, Reed MR, Nelson EA (2001) Influence of a willow canopy on tree seedling establishment for wetland restoration. Wetlands 21:395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Wilson RF (1996) Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecol Appl 6:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Noon KF (1996) A model of created wetland primary succession. Landsc Urban Plan 34:97–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odland A (1997) Development of vegetation in created wetlands in western Norway. Aquat Bot 59:45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons SE, Ware SA (1982) Edaphic factors and vegetation in Virginia coastal plain swamps. Bull Torrey Bot Club 109:365–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry JE, Atkinson RB (1997) Plant diversity along a salinity gradient of four marshes on the York and Pamunkey Rivers in Virginia. Castanea 62:112–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1975) Ecological diversity. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford AE, Ahles HE, Bell CR (1968) Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed PB Jr (1988) National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Northeast (Region 1). Biological Report 88 (26.1). U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz JA, Warne EL (1993) Development of vegetation in small created wetlands in southeastern Wisconsin. Wetlands 13:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheskin DJ (1997) Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (1990) Ecology and field biology. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer DR, Perry JE, Silberhorn GM (2001) Early secondary succession in bottomland hardwood forests of Southeastern Virginia. Environ Manage 27:559–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spieles DJ (2005) Vegetation development in created, restored, and enhanced mitigation wetland banks of the United States. Wetlands 25:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer AL, Brooks RP (1997) Plant and soil responses to salvaged marsh surface and organic matter amendments at a created wetland in central Pennsylvania. Wetlands 17:90–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner RW (1999) Wetland indicators: a guide to wetland identification, delineation, classification, and mapping. Lewis, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (2002) Regulatory Guidance Letter RG-02 (December 24, 2002)

  • USDA, NRCS (2005) The PLANTS database, version 3.5 National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge (http://plants.usda.gov)

  • van der Valk AG (1981) Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62:688–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virginia Botanical Associates (2005) Digital atlas of the Virginia flora. Department of Biology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg (www.biol.vt.edu/digital_atlas/)

  • Wallace PM, Kent DM, Rich DR (1996) Responses of wetland tree species to hydrology and soils. Restor Ecol 4:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weakley AS (2002) Flora of the Carolinas and Virginia. Working draft. UNC Herbarium, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Wofford BE (1989) Guide to the vascular plants of the Blue Ridge. University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Donna M. E. Ware for help with verification of the collections, Mr. Steve Russell, Mr. Leo Snead, and the Virginia Department of Transportation for use of the sites and for filling informational gaps, and Dr. Gene M. Silberhorn for botanical assistance in the overall project. We would also like to thank Mr. Keith Goodwin, Dr. Johan F. Gottgens, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. This is VIMS contribution number 3,229.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Science and Policy Program, Biology Department, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, 23187, USA

    Douglas A. DeBerry

  2. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA, 23062, USA

    James E. Perry

Authors
  1. Douglas A. DeBerry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James E. Perry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas A. DeBerry.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeBerry, D.A., Perry, J.E. Vegetation dynamics across a chronosequence of created wetland sites in Virginia, USA. Wetlands Ecol Manage 20, 521–537 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-012-9273-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-012-9273-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation