Skip to main content
Log in

Urea in the Tributaries of the Chesapeake and Coastal Bays of Maryland

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concentrations of dissolved urea were monitored in several Chesapeake Bay tributaries from 1998 to 2002. Urea is a commonly used agricultural fertilizer and is also a breakdown product of poultry manure, which is used as an additional source of fertilizer throughout the watershed. Two trends were apparent. First, in several of the tributaries, seasonal peaks in ambient urea concentration coincided with the periods of the year (early spring and mid summer) when agricultural applications are most common. Second, highest annual mean concentrations (up to 2.6 μg atom N L−1), as well as highest individual measurements (up to 24 μg atom N L−1), were found for those tributaries with the most intensive agricultural and poultry operations. Peak urea concentrations were significantly higher than those which could be attained from in situ sources and regeneration. These elevated concentrations are of concern because this form of nitrogen has been shown to be a preferred form of nitrogenous nutrient for many phytoplankton, including some dinoflagellates which form harmful algal blooms. These results demonstrate that urea from land based sources can contribute to anthropogenic eutrophication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D. M., Glibert, P. M. and Burkholder, J. M.: 2002, ‘Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: Nutrient sources, composition, and consequences’ Estuaries 25, 704–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antia, N. J., Harrison, P. J. and Oliveira, L.: 1991, ‘Phycological reviews: The role of dissolved organic nitrogen in phytoplankton nutrition, cell biology, and ecology’ Phycologia 30, 1–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, G. M., Glibert, P. M., Lomas, M. W. and Burford, M.: 1997, ‘Organic nitrogen uptake and growth by the chrysophyte Aureococcus anophagefferens during a brown tide event’ Mar. Biol. 129, 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, T.: 1974, ‘Urea in the waters of Lake Kinneret (Sea of Galilee)’ Limnol. Oceanogr. 19, 977–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, T. and Bronk, D. A.: 2003, ‘Dissolved organic nitrogen: A dynamic participant in aquatic ecosystems’ Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 31, 279–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidigare, R. R.: 1983, ‘Nitrogen excretion by marine zooplankton’ in E. J. Carpenter (ed.), Nitrogen in the Marine Environment, Academic Press, NY, pp. 385–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F.: 2002, ‘Challenges and opportunities for science in reducing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal ecosystems’ Estuaries 25, 886–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F., Brinsfield, R. B. and Magnien, R. E.: 2000, ‘Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: Scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture’ J. Environ. Qual. 30, 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, W. R. and Kemp, W. M.: 2000, ‘Influence of river flow and nutrient loading on selected ecosystem processes and properties in Chesapeake Bay’ in J. Hobbie (ed.), Estuarine Science: A Synthetic Approach to Research and Practice, Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 269–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, W. R., Kemp, W. M. and Keefe, C. W.: 1982, ‘A comparative analysis of nutrients and other factors influencing estuarine phytoplankton production’ in V. S. Kennedy (ed.), Estuarine Comparisons, Academic Press, NY, pp. 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, W. R., Garber, J. H., Summers, R. and Kemp, W. M.: 1995, ‘Input, transformations, and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries’ Estuaries 18, 285–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, E. J., Remsen, C. C. and Schroeder, B. W.: 1972, ‘Comparison of laboratory and in situ measurements of urea decomposition by a marine diatom’ J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 8, 259–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, T. D. and Wright, P. A.: 1999, ‘Nitrogen excretion and expression of urea cycle enzymes in the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.): A comparison of early life stages with adults’ J. Exp. Biol. 19, 2653–2662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, B. C. and Azam, F.: 1995, ‘Urea decomposition by bacteria in the southern California bight and its implications for the mesopelagic nitrogen cycle’ Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.. 122, 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, B. C., Park, M. G., Shim, J. H. and Azam, F.: 1996, ‘Significance of bacteria in urea dynamics in coastal surface waters’ Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.. 142, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constant, K. M. and Sheldrick, W. F.: 1992, ‘World nitrogen survey’ World Bank Technical Paper 174, Washington, DC.

  • Cornell, S. E., Jickells, T. D. and Thornton, C. A.: 1998, ‘Urea in rainwater and atmospheric aerosol’ Atmos. Environ. 32, 1903–1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. D. S. and Newell, B. S.: 1967, ‘On the nutrition and metabolism of zooplankton. 4. The forms of nitrogen excreted by CalanusJ. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 47, 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. R., Harding L., Stanley, D. W. and Ward L. G.: 1988, ‘Phytoplankton, nutrients, and turbidity in the Chesapeake, Delaware, and Hudson estuaries’ Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 27, 61–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. R., Peele E. R., Ammerman J. W., Harding L. W., : 1992, ‘Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay’ Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.. 82, 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glibert, P. M., Alexander J., Trice T. M., Michael B.,Magnien R. E.,Lane L.,Oldach D., and Bowers, H.: in press, ‘Chronic urea nitrogen loading: A correlate of Pfiesteria spp. in the Chesapeake and coastal bays of Maryland, USA’ in K. A. Steidinger, J. H. Landsberg, C. R. Tomas, G. A. Vargo, (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Harmful Algae, 2002, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commision of UNESCO.

  • Glibert, P. M. and Terlizzi, D. E.: 1999, ‘Co-occurrence of elevated urea levels and dinoflagellate blooms in temperate estuarine aquaculture ponds’ Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 5594–5596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glibert, P. M.,Garside C.,Fuhrman J. A., Roman M. R.: 1991, ‘Time-dependent coupling of inorganic and organic nitrogen uptake and regeneration in the plume of the Chesapeake bay estuary and its regulation by large heterotrophs’ Limnol. Oceanogr. 36, 895–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glibert, P. M., Conley, D. J., Fisher, T. R., Harding, L. W., Jr. and Malone, T. C.: 1995, ‘Dynamics of the 1990 winter/spring bloom in Chesapeake bay’ Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.. 122, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glibert, P. M., Magnien, R., Lomas, M. W., Alexander, J., Fan, C., Haramoto, E., Trice, M. and Kana, T. M.: 2001, ‘Harmful algal blooms in the Chesapeake and Coastal Bays of Maryland, USA: Comparisons of 1997, 1998, and 1999 events’ Estuaries 24, 875–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, S.: 1983, ‘Urea as a nitrogen source for the phytoplankton in the Oslofjord’ Mar. Biol. 74, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewitus, A. J., Burkholder, J. M., Glasgow Jr., H. B., Glibert, P. M., Willis, B. M. and Hayes, K. C.: 1999, ‘Mixotrophy and nitrogen uptake by Pfiesteria piscicida (Dinophyceae)’ J. Phycol. 35, 1430–1437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, M. W., Trice, T. M., Glibert, P. M., Bronk, D. A. and McCarthy, J. J.: 2002, ‘Temporal and spatial dynamics of urea uptake and regeneration rates, and concentrations in Chesapeake Bay’ Estuaries 25, 469–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, M. W., Glibert, P. M., Clougherty, D. A., Huber, D. E., Jones, J., Alexander, J. and Haramoto, E.: 2001, ‘Elevated organic nutrient ratios associated with brown tide blooms of Aureococcus anophagefferens (Pelagophyceae)’ J. Plank. Res. 23, 1339–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomstein, B. A., Blackburn, T. H. and Henriksen, K.: 1989, ‘Aspects of nitrogen and carbon cycling in the northern Bering Shelf sediment. 1. The significance of urea turnover in the mineralization of NH4+Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.. 57, 237–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, B. A. and Blackburn, T. H.: 1989, ‘Urea turnover in a coastal marine sediment measured by a 14C-urea short-term incubation’ J. Microbiol. Methods 9, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayzaud, P.: 1973, ‘Respiration and nitrogen excretion of zooplankton. II. Studies of the metabolic characteristics of starved animals’ Mar. Biol. 21, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J.: 1970, ‘A urease method for urea in seawater’ Limnol. Oceanogr. 15, 309–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J. and Kamykowski, D.: 1972, ‘Urea and other nitrogenous nutrients in La Jolla bay during February, March, and April 1970’ Fish. Bull. 70, 1261–1273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. A. and Glibert, P. M.: 1998, ‘Nitrogen excretion by the calanoid copepod Acartia tonsa: Results of mesocosm experiments’ J. Plank. Res. 20, 1767–1780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitamura, O. and Saijo, Y.: 1980, ‘In situ measurement of the urea decomposition rate and its turnover rate in the Pacific Ocean’ Mar. Biol. 58, 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overdahl, C. J., Rehm, G. W. and Meredith, H. L.: 1991, Fertilizer Urea, University of Minnesota Extension Services.

  • Paerl, H. W.: 1988, ‘Nuisance phytoplankton blooms in coastal, estuarine, and inland waters’ Limnol. Oceanogr. 33, 823–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. R., Maita, Y. and Lalli, C. M.: 1984, A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater Analyses, Pergamon Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satoh, Y., Okino, T. and Aoyama, K.: 1980, ‘Correlation between urea and other chemical and biological parameters in waters of Lake Suwa, Japan’ Intern. Rev. der Hydrobiologie 65, 445–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savidge, G. and Hutley, H. T.: 1977, ‘Rates of remineralization and assimilation of urea by fractionated plankton populations in coastal waters’ J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 28, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoji, S., Delgado, J., Mosier, A. and Miura, Y.: 2001, ‘Use of controlled release fertilizers and nitrification inhibitors to increase nitrogen use efficiency and to conserve air and water quality’ Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 32, 1051–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V.: 2001, Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehouwer, R. C. and Johnson, J. W.: 1990, ‘Urea and anhydrous ammonia management for conventional tillage corn production’ J. Prod. Agri. 3, 507–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamminen, T. and Irmisch, A.: 1996, ‘Urea uptake kinetics of a midsummer planktonic community on the SW coast of Finland’ Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.. 130, 201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therkildsen, M. S. and Lomstein, B. A.: 1994, ‘Seasonal variation in sediment urea turnover in a shallow estuary’ Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.. 109, 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, M. H., Vigor-Brown, R. J., Kawashima, M. and Ishigami, M.: 1985, ‘Organic nitrogen compounds in atmospheric precipitation: Their chemistry and availability to phytoplankton’ Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.. 42, 1171–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turley, C. M.: 1986, ‘Urea uptake by phytoplankton at different fronts and associated stratified and mixed waters on the European shelf’ Br. Phycol. J. 21, 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Agriculture: 1997, ‘Manure nitrogen vulnerability leaching index’ Natural Resources Conservation Service, Resource Assessment and Strategic Planning Division Map ID: BWM 2126.

  • Walsh, P. J., Heitz, M. J., Campbell, C. E., Cooper, G. J., Medina, M., Wang, Y. S., Goss, G. G., Vincek, V., Wood, C. M. and Smith, C. P.: 2000, ‘Molecular characterization of a urea transporter in the gill of the gulf toadfish (Opsanus beta)’ J. Exp. Biol. 203, 2357–2364.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, K. L. and Haas, L. W.: 1976, ‘The significance of urea for phytoplankton nutrition in the York River, Virginia’ in M. Wiley (ed.), Estuarine Processes. Uses, Stresses, and Adaptations to the Estuary, Vol. 1., Academic Press, NY, pp. 90–102.

  • Wright, P. A., Felskie, A. and Anderson, P. M.: 1995, ‘Induction of ornithine-urea cycle enzymes and nitrogen metabolism and excretion in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) during early life stages’ J. Exp. Biol. 198, 127–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia M. Glibert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glibert, P.M., Trice, T.M., Michael, B. et al. Urea in the Tributaries of the Chesapeake and Coastal Bays of Maryland. Water Air Soil Pollut 160, 229–243 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-2546-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-2546-1

Keywords

Navigation