Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of soil properties on street tree attributes in Singapore

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil quality is thought to be a primary driver of street tree performance and thus a major concern for urban forest growth, health and longevity. This research was conducted to evaluate the influence of soil physical, chemical and biological properties on Singapore’s street trees. In total, 338 plots, 1014 trees and 32 species across Singapore’s five regions were sampled. Singapore’s street trees are skewed towards smaller diameters (<50 cm) and largely represented (61 %) by five species, four of which are non-native. Most soil properties in Singapore’s streetscapes are likely not limiting for trees: verge (5 to 7 m), bulk density (1.05 to 1.45 Mg m−3), P (1.52 to 2.87 mg kg−1), organic C (7.8 to 11.4 %), Ca (924 to 1772 mg kg−1), Mg (313 to 631 mg kg−1), Na (130 to 208 mg kg−1), Cr (143 to 212 mg kg−1), Pb (55 to 74 mg kg−1), Ni (15 to 30 mg kg−1) and microbial biomass C (265 to 457 mg kg−1). Soil pH (6.04 to 7.63) is not as acidic as the humid-tropical soil commonly found in Singapore. Soil K (23 to 130 mg kg−1) was found to be relatively low and potentially limiting. Individual soil properties and multi-factor models were poor predictors of urban tree attributes across Singapore, but models improved when examined at regional scales. Relatively high soil quality, uniformity of streetscape soils and fast growth rates of these trees are proposed as explanations for why soil properties appear to poorly predict street tree attributes in Singapore.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amacher MC, O'Neill KP, Perry CH (2007) Soil vital signs: a new soil quality index (SQI) for assessing forest soil health. USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Station, p. 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Cekstere G, Osvalde A (2013) A study of chemical characteristics of soil in relation to street trees status in Riga (Latvia). Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 12:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang SX, Robison DJ (2003) Nondestructive and rapid estimation of hardwood foliar nitrogen status using the SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter. For Ecol Manag 181:331–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craul PJ (1992) Urban soil in landscape design. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 396

    Google Scholar 

  • Craul PJ (1999) Urban soils: applications and practices. John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 366

    Google Scholar 

  • Craul, P., Patterson, J., 1989. The urban soil as a rooting environment, Proceedings from the Fourth National Urban Forestry Conference, pp. 97–102

  • CUGE Standards., 2013. Centre for urban Greenery and Ecology, National Parks Board, Singapore. Specifications for soil mixture for general landscaping use CS A03: 2013. Specifications on properties of planting media, pp. 12–16

  • Doran JW, Parkin TB (1994) Defining and assessing soil quality. Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. Soil Sci Soc Am Special Publication 49:1–21

  • Gałuszka A, Migaszewski ZM, Podlaski R, Dołęgowska S, Michalik A (2011) The influence of chloride deicers on mineral nutrition and the health status of roadside trees in the city of Kielce, Poland. Environ Monit Assess 176:451–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Yeo D, Wilson B, Ow LF (2012) Application of char products improves urban soil quality. Soil Use Manag 28:329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Ow LF, Wilson B (2015) Influence of biochar and compost on soil properties and tree growth in a tropical urban environment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:1303–1310

  • Grossman RB, Reinsch TG (2002) Bulk density and linear extensibility. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part IV. Physical Methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 201–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb P, Turner I, Burslem D (1994) Mineral nutrient status of coastal hill dipterocarp forest and adinandra belukar in Singapore: analysis of soil, leaves and litter. J Trop Ecol 10:559–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hootman RGK, Reid R, von der Heide-Spravka K (1994) Factors affecting accumulation of deicing salts in soils around trees. J Arboric 20:196–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Jim CY (1998) Physical and chemical properties of a Hong Kong roadside soil in relation to urban tree growth. Urban Ecosystems 2:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jim C, Liu H (2001) Species diversity of three major urban forest types in Guangzhou city, China. For Ecol Manag 146:99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlen DLM, Doran JW, Cline RG, Harris RF, Schuman GE (1997) Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society America Journal 61:4–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Land Transport Authority (LTA)., 2014. Soil aeration. Standard Details of Road Elements. Retrieved 27 June 2014 from http://www.lta.gov.sg/content/dam/ltaweb/corp/Industry/files/SDRE(2014)/SDRE14-12PNR1-2.pdf

  • Linde M, Bengtsson H, Öborn I (2001) Concentrations and pools of heavy metals in urban soils in Stockholm, Sweden. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 1:83–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madrid L, Díaz‐Barrientos E, Reinoso R, Madrid F (2004) Metals in urban soils of Sevilla: seasonal changes and relations with other soil components and plant contents. Eur J Soil Sci 55(2):209–217

  • McGill WB, Cole CV (1981) Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C, N, S and P through soil organic matter. Geoderma 26:267–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Parks Board (NParks) (2014). National Parks Annual Report. Grow with Us: Fifty years of greening Singapore. National Parks Publications. https://www.nparks.gov.sg/~/media/nparksreal-content/about-us/annual-report/nparks-ar2013-2014.pdf?la=en. Accessed 13 Jan 2016

  • Neely DW, Watson GW (1998) The landscape below ground II. Proceedings of a 2nd international workshop on tree root development in urban soils. International Society of Arboriculture, San Fransico, CA, p. 266

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng OH, Tan BC, Obbard JP (2006) Lichens as bioindicators of atmospheric heavy metal pollution in Singapore. Environ Monit Assess 123(1):63–74

  • Pitts J (1984) A review of geology and engineering geology in Singapore. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 17:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat RV, Russell-Anelli J, Neerchal NK (2007) Soil chemical and physical properties that differentiate urban land-use and cover types. Soil Science Society America Journal 71:1010–1019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice IC, Cramer W, Harrison SP, Leemans R, Monserud RA, Solomon AM (1992) Special paper: a global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. J Biogeogr 19:117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Public Works Department (1976) Geology of the Republic of Singapore Public Works Department, pp:79

  • Rahardjo H, Aung K, Leong EC, Rezaur R (2004) Characteristics of residual soils in Singapore as formed by weathering. Eng Geol 73:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharenbroch BC, Catania M (2012) Soil quality attributes as indicators of urban tree performance. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 38:214

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharenbroch BC, Lloyd JE, Johnson-Maynard JL (2005) Distinguishing urban soils with physical, chemical, and biological properties. Pedobiologia 49:283–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheyer J, Hipple K (2005) Urban soil primer. Washington, DC: United States department of agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service and Lincoln, NE, p. 77

    Google Scholar 

  • Short JRF, McIntosh MS, Foss JE, Patterson JC (1986) Soils of the mall in Washington, DC: I. statistical summary of properties. Soil Science Society America Journal 50:699–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim JWS, Tan HTW, Turner IM (1992) Adinandra belukar: an anthropogenic heath forest in Singapore. Vegetatio 102:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DL, Page A, Helmke P, Loeppert R, Soltanpour P, Tabatabai M, Johnston C, Sumner M (1996) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3-chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, WI, p. 1390

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudha P, Ravindranath N (2000) A study of Bangalore urban forest. Landsc Urban Plan 47:47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan PY, Wang J, Sia A (2013) Perspectives on five decades of the urban greening of Singapore. Cities 32:24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo M, Poorter L, Peña-Claros M, Alarcón A, Balcázar J, Leaño C, Licona JC, Llanque O, Vroomans V, Zuidema P (2011) Climate is a stronger driver of tree and forest growth rates than soil and disturbance. J Ecol 99:254–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Sanford R (1986) Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forest. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:137–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voroney RP, Paul EA (1984) Determination of kC and kN in situ for calibration of the chloroform fumigation-incubation method. Soil Biol Biochem 16:9–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waksman S, Fred E (1922) A tentative outline of the plate method for determining the number of micro-organisms in the soil. Soil Sci 14:27–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA (1992) A comparative assessment of factors which influence microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels in soil. Biol Rev 67:321–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe F, Olsen S (1965) Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 29:677–678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson GW, Neely D (1994) The landscape below ground: proceedings of an international workshop on tree root development in urban soils. International Society of Arboriculture, Lisle, IL, p. 222

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson GW, Costello L, Scharenbroch BC, Gilman E (2008) The landscape below ground III. Proceedings of a 3rd international workshop on tree root development in urban soils. International Society of Arboriculture, Lisle, IL, p. 403

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts IE (1955) Rainfall of Singapore island. J Trop Geogr 7:1–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde S, Corey RB, Iyer JG, Voigt GK (1979) Soil and plant analysis for tree culture. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, p. 223

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn K, Rahardjo H, Peng S (2001) Characterization of residual soils in Singapore. Geotech Eng 32:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, McBride J, Zhou J, Sun Z (2005) The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 3:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee ATK, Corlett RT, Liew SC, Tan HTW (2011) The vegetation of Singapore – an updated map. Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 32:205–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuen B (1996) Creating the garden city: the Singapore experience. Urban Stud 33:955–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by Centre for Urban Greenery and Ecology (CUGE) and National Parks Board, Singapore. We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Puay Yok Tan, National University Singapore and Dr. Paul Kristiansen, University of New England, Armidale, Australia for their input and helpful suggestions. We would also like to acknowledge help from Mr. Thomas Ong, Mr. Darren Yeo, Ms. Siti Nazurah Ahmad, Mr. Lokman Yusof and Mr. Muhammad Hafiz during the course of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Urban Greenery and Ecology, National Parks Board, Singapore, 259569, Singapore

    Subhadip Ghosh, Daniel Burcham & Lai Fern Ow

  2. School of Environmental and Rural Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia

    Subhadip Ghosh

  3. College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point, Stevens Point, WI, 54481, USA

    Bryant C. Scharenbroch

  4. The Morton Arboretum, 4100 Illinois Route 53, Lisle, IL, 60532, USA

    Bryant C. Scharenbroch

  5. Department of Environmental Sciences, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, India

    S. Shenbagavalli & S. Mahimairaja

Authors
  1. Subhadip Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bryant C. Scharenbroch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Burcham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lai Fern Ow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Shenbagavalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Mahimairaja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryant C. Scharenbroch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghosh, S., Scharenbroch, B.C., Burcham, D. et al. Influence of soil properties on street tree attributes in Singapore. Urban Ecosyst 19, 949–967 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0530-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0530-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation