Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The potential value of mosses for stormwater management in urban environments

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant-based stormwater management systems such as green roofs are typically composed exclusively of vascular plants. Yet, mosses have several desirable properties that could warrant their more widespread use in green roof applications. In natural systems mosses are important primary colonizers of bare ground, and their establishment improves water storage and provides numerous soil benefits including carbon and nitrogen sequestration. Additionally, mosses often facilitate the establishment and survival of vascular plants at otherwise environmentally harsh or stressful sites. Despite their potential value, few studies have investigated the functional performance of mosses on green roofs. In this study we evaluated the establishment success and potential stormwater performance of three candidate moss species. We also directly compared the runoff and thermal characteristics of replicate moss covered green roofs to vascular planted and bare roofs. Candidate mosses had high water holding capacities, storing 8–10 times their weight in water compared to only 1.3 times for typical green roof medium. Mock-up roof sections composed of mosses and medium had delayed and reduced runoff flows relative to medium only sections, although the magnitude of these effects varied with moss species. In field trials all three mosses survived a harsh rooftop environment with limited summer irrigation, although lateral growth after one year was minimal. Green roofs planted solely with Racomitrium canescens had between 12–24% higher stormwater retention than vascular or medium only roofs. Moss cover also ameliorated temperature fluctuations on green roofs. Hourly heating rates were buffered to a similar degree (less than half that of surface temperatures) 5 cm below the surface of both moss covered and medium only roofs. In contrast, cooling under the surface of the moss roof was nearly 6 times faster than under the medium only roof. These results demonstrate the potential for mosses to be valuable components of green roofs, either in combination with vascular plants or planted exclusively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams KJ, Preston CD (1992) Evidence for the effects of atmospheric pollution on bryophytes from national and local recording. In: Harding PT (ed) Biological recording of changes in British wildlife. HMSO, London, pp 31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarek O (2003) Niphotrichum canescens. Flora of North America 27:287

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson L (2005a) Hydrological function of a thin extensive green roof in southern Sweden. Nord Hydrol 36:259–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson L (2005b) Peak flows from a sedum-moss roof. Nord Hydrol 36:269–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaffredo M, Denayer FO (2004) Mosses, A necessary step for perennial plant dynamics. Proceedings Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, Portland Oregon, June 2–4 2004

  • Ducket JG, Burch J, Fletcher PW, Matcham HW, Read DJ, Russel AJ, Pressel S (2004) In vitro cultivation of bryophytes: a review of practicalities, problems, progress and promise. J Bryol 26:3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnet N, Kingsbury N (2008) Planting green roofs and living walls. Timber, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnet N, Nagase A, Booth R, Grime P (2008) Influence of vegetation composition on runoff in two simulated green roof experiments. Urban Ecosyst 11:385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans D, and Associates (2008) Cost benefit evaluation of ecoroofs. City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services: 1–22

  • Fahey T, Knapp A (2007) Principles and standards for measuring primary production. Oxford University Press US

  • Gilbert OL (1971) Urban bryophyte communities in north-east England. Trans Br Bryol Soc 6:306–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedge D, Kadas G (2004) Bugs, bees, and spiders: Green roof design for rare invertebrates. Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities. Proceedings Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, Portland, Oregon, June 2–4 2004

  • Getter K, Rowe D (2006) The role of extensive green roofs in sustainable development. HortScience 41:1276–1285

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson D, Abrams P, Retzlaff R, Liptan T (2003) Stormwater monitoring two ecoroofs in Portland, Oregon, USA. Proceedings Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, Chicago, Illinois 2003

  • Jukonienė I (2008) The impact of anthropogenic habitats on rare bryophyte species in Lithuania. Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc 44:55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer R (2003) Gathering moss. Oregon State University, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo FE, Sullivan WC (2001) Aggression and violence in the inner city: effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environ Behav 33:543–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc F, Rao D (1973) Evaluation of the pollution and drought hypotheses in relation to lichens and bryophytes in urban environments. The Bryologist 76:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg (1869) Dicranoweisia cirrata. Flora of North America 27:396

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough S (2006) Moss propagation in Glacier National Park’s native plant nursery. Nativ Plants J 7:27–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentens J, Raes D, Hermy M (2006) Green roofs as a tool for solving the rainwater runoff problem in the urbanized 21st century? Landsc Urban Plan 77:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monterusso MA, Rowe DB, Rugh CL, Russel DK (2004) Runoff water quantity and quality from green roof systems. Acta Hort (ISHS) 639:369–376

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moran A, Hunt B, Jennings G (2003) A North Carolina field study to evaluate greenroof runoff quality, runoff quantity, and plant growth. ASAE Paper 032303. Am Soc of Agric Eng, St. Joseph, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagase A, Thuring C (2006) Plant response to drought on extensive green roofs: the effect of temperature substrate type and substrate depth. Proceedings Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, May 11-12, 2006

  • Newberry CC (2008) Antitrichia californica. Bryophyte Flora of North America Provisional Publication http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/BFNA/bfnamenu.htm

  • Oberndorfer E, Lundholm J, Bass B, Coffman R, Doshi H, Dunnett N, Gaffin S, Kohler M, Liu K, Rowe B (2007) Green roofs as urban ecosystems: ecological structures, functions and services. Bioscience 57:823–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck J (2006) Towards sustainable commercial moss harvest in the Pacific Northwest of North America. Biol Conserv 128:289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck J, Muir P (2001) Harvestable epiphytic bryophytes and their accumulation in central western Oregon. The Bryologist 104:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck J, Studlar S (2009) Extensive green roofs and mosses: reflections from a pilot study in Terra Alta, West Virginia. Evanisa 26:52–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Pypker T, Unsworth M, Bond B (2006) The role of epiphytes in rainfall interception by forests in the Pacific Northwest. Can J For Res 36:819–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort L, Quinty F, Campeau S, Johnson K, Malterer T (2003) North American approach to the restoration of Sphagnum dominated peatlands. Wetlands Ecol Manage 11:3–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider M, Voth PD, Troxler R (1967) Methods of propagating bryophyte tissues and propagules. Bot Gaz 128:169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield WB (1973) Mosses on rooftops. Davidsonia 4:27–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroll E (2009) Plant selection, irrigation requirements and stormwater management of Pacific Northwest extensive green roofs. MS thesis, Oregon State University

  • Smaw SG, Petersen RL (2005) Effects of simulated rain and cement amendments on protonematal growth of the urban moss, Bryum capillare, in culture. The Bryologist 108:236–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonne J (2006) Evaluating green roof energy performance. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers Journal 48:59–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Spirin AW (1984) Granite garden. Urban Nature and Human Design. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolek G (2008) Performance monitoring of three ecoroofs in Portland Oregon. Urban Ecosyst 11:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson CR, Hill MO (2008) urban myths exploded: results of a bryological survey of King’s Lynn (Norfolk, UK). J Bryol 30:12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan PY, Wong NH, Chen Y, Ong CL, Sia A (2003) Thermal benefits of rooftop gardens in Singapore. Proceedings Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, Chicago, Illinois, 2003

  • VanWoert ND, Rowe DB, Andresen JA, Rugh CL, Fernandez RT, Xiao L (2005) Green roof stormwater retention: effects of roof surface, slope and media depth. J Environ Qual 34:1036–1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitt D, Marsh J, Bovey R (1988) Mosses lichens & ferns of Northwest North America. Lone Pine, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood A (2007) The nature and distribution of vegetative desiccation-tolerance in hornworts, liverworts and mosses. The Bryologist 110:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Pat Muir for assistance with study design and editing, Bruce McCune for help with study design, and Mike Russell for help with data analyses and interpretation. Funding was provided in part by the E.R. Jackman Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malcolm Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, M., Lambrinos, J. & Schroll, E. The potential value of mosses for stormwater management in urban environments. Urban Ecosyst 13, 319–332 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-010-0121-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-010-0121-z

Keywords

Navigation