Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Personal self and collective self: when academic choices depend on the context of social comparison

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examines the impact of same-sex versus opposite-sex social comparisons on the perception of one’s own abilities at school and subsequent reported marks and academic choices. During their final year, male and female high school students were asked to describe themselves either in comparison with boys in their class, in comparison with girls in their class or without any explicit social comparison (control group). The interaction effects of gender and comparison context on academic selfconcept, school marks and academic choices indicated that gender differences depend on the comparison context. Particularly, as predicted, gender differences disappeared in the same-sex social comparison condition, and even became inverted for the intended academic choices. Here, boys intended to choose more than girls Preparatory Courses for Higher Education (PCHE) in the opposite-sex social comparison condition, while girls more often chose a prestigious PCHE than boys in the same-sex social comparison condition. The theoretical, methodological and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biernat M., Manis M. (1994) Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66: 5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatard A., Guimond S., Selimbegovic L. (2007) “How good are you in math?” The effect of gender stereotypes on students’ recollections of their school marks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43: 1017–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazal S., Guimond S. (2003) La théorie de la dominance sociale et les choix d’orientation scolaire et de rôles sociaux des filles et des garçons [Social dominance theory and the choices of academic orientations and social roles among girls and boys]. L’Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle 32: 595–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherney, I. D., & Campbell, K. L. (2011). A League of their own: do single-sex schools increase girls’ participation in the physical sciences? Sex roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0013-6.

  • Désert, M., & Leyens, J. P. (2006). Social comparison across cultures I: Gender stereotypes in high and low power distances cultures. In D. S. Guimond (Ed.), Social comparison and social psychology: Understanding cognition, intergroup relations, and culture (pp. 303–317). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

  • Duru-Bellat M. (1990) L’école des filles Quelle formation pour quels rôles sociaux? The girls’ school Which formation for which social roles?. L’Harmattan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Duru-Bellat, M. (2002). Les inégalités sociales à l’école. Genèse et mythes (Social inequalities in school. Genesis and myths). Education et Formation. Presses Universitaires de France.

  • Else-Quest N. M., Hyde J. S., Linn M. C. (2010) Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics and gender equity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 136: 103–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L. (1954) A theory of social comparaison. Human Relations 7: 117–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M., Ajzen I. (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research reading. Addison-Wesley, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • French Ministry of Education. (2009). Filles et garçons sur le chemin de l’égalité, de l’école à l’enseignement supérieur (Girls and boys on the way of equality, from school to university). DEPP.

  • Guimond S. (2006) Social comparison and social psychology: Understanding cognition, intergroup relations, and culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimond S. (2010) Psychologie sociale: Perspective multiculturelle. Social psychology: Multicultural perspective. De Wavre, Mardaga

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimond S., Branscombe N. R., Brunot S., Buunk A. P., Chatard A., Désert M., Garcia D. M., Haque S., Martinot D., Yzerbyt V. (2007) Culture, gender and the self: Variations and impact of social comparison processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92: 1118–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimond S., Chatard A., Kang P. (2010) Personality, social comparison and self-categorization. European Journal of Personality 24: 483–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimond S., Chatard A., Martinot D., Crisp R. J., Redersdorff S. (2006) Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90: 221–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimond S., Roussel L. (2001) Bragging about one’s school grades: Gender stereotyping and student’s perception of their abilities in science, mathematics, and language. Social Psychology of Education 4: 275–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimond, S., & Roussel, L. (2002). L’activation des stéréotypes de genre, l’évaluation de soi et l’orientation scolaire. In D. J.-M. Monteil (Ed.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales. Cognitive perspectives and social behaviors (Vol. 8, pp. 163–179). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

  • Hamamura, T. (2011). Power distance predicts gender differences in math performance across societies. Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi:10.1177/1948550611429191.

  • Heine S. J., Lehman D. R., Peng K., Greenholtz J. (2002) What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective likert scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82: 903–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huguet P., Régner N. (2007) Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances. Journal of Educational Psychology 99: 545–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht M., Ben-Zeev T. (2003) Do high achieving female students underperforme in private? The implications of threatening environments on intellectual processing. Journal of Educational Psychology 95: 796–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapan R. T., Shaughnessy P., Boggs K. (1996) Efficacy expectations and vocational interests as mediators between sex and choice of math/science college majors: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior 49: 277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavigne G. L., Vallerand R. J., Miquelon P. (2007) A motivational model of persistence in science education: A self-determination theory approach. European Journal of Psychology of Education 22: 351–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent R. W., Lopez A. M. Jr., Lopez F. G., Sheu H. B. (2008) Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. Journal of Vocational Behavior 73: 52–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg S. M., Hyde J. S., Petersen J. L., Linn M. C. (2010) New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 136: 1123–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus H. (1977) Self-schemas and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35: 63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus H., Wurf E. (1987) The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 38: 299–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marro C., Vouillot F. (1991) Représentation de soi, représentation du scientifique-type et choix d’une orientation scientifique chez les filles et les garçons [Self-presentation, representation of the scientist-prototype, and choice of a scientific career among girls and boys in junior high school]. L’Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle 20: 303–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh H. W., Byrne B. M., Shavelson R. J. (1988) A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 366–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinot D., Monteil J. M. (1995) The academic self-schema: an experimental illustration. Learning and Instruction 5: 63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy M. C., Steele C. M., Gross J. J. (2007) Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science 18: 879–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K. M., Fassinger R. E. (1993) A causal model of the career orientation and career choice of adolescent women. Journal of Counseling Psychology 40: 456–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey L. R., Sekaquaptewa D. (2011) Changing stereotypes, changing grades: A longitudinal study of stereotyping during a college math course. Social Psychology of Education 14: 377–387. doi:10.1007/s11218-010-9150-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross M. (1989) Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review 96: 341–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheeran P. (2002) Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology 12: 1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer S. J., Steele C. M., Quinn D. M. (1999) Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35: 4–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann W. B. Jr., Chang-Schneider C., McClarty K. L. (2007) Do people’s self-views matter?. American Psychologist 62: 84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H.,& Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

  • Taylor D. M., McKirnan D. J. (1984) A five-stage model for intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology 23: 291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 42–67). Oxford, England: Blackwell.

  • Turner J. C., Oakes P. J., Haslam S. A., McGarty C. (1994) Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20: 454–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt M., De Cremer D., Janssen D. P. (2007) Gender differences in cooperation and competition. The male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science 18: 19–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt M., Spisak B. R. (2008) Sex differences in the emergence of leadership during competitions within and between groups. Psychological Science 19: 854–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sébastien Chazal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chazal, S., Guimond, S. & Darnon, C. Personal self and collective self: when academic choices depend on the context of social comparison. Soc Psychol Educ 15, 449–463 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9199-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9199-x

Keywords

Navigation