Abstract
The present research explores college students’ explanations of their success and failure in challenging activities and how it relates to students’ efficacy, value, and engagement. The results suggest most students hold one primary reason for success during the challenging activity, including grade/extrinsic, mastery/intrinsic, amotivation/working, social, and performance. These task reasons for success, if assumed to be goals, were more numerous than those suggested by goal theory. Task reason for success was important for engagement, intrinsic value, difficulty compared to others, and effort. As expected, engagement and intrinsic value were highest for those with mastery reasons but lowest for those in amotivation or those who succeeded because they made the grade. Unexpectedly, success was more important for motivation and experience of the activity. These results suggest that it is important to examine not only student goals, but also whether or not students reach their goals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman, New York
Brophy J. (2004) Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Brophy J. (2005) Goal theorists should move on from performance goals. Educational Psychologist 40(3): 167–176. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4003_3
Credé M., Kuncel N. R. (2008) Study habits, skills, and attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3(6): 425–453. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x
Csikszentmihalyi M. (1997) Intrinsic motivation and effective teaching: A flow analysis. In: Bess J. L. (eds) Teaching well and liking it: Motivating faculty to teach effectively. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, pp 72–89
Csikszentmihalyi M. (2000) Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Jossey-Bass, Francisco, CA
Csikszentmihalyi M., Abuhamdeh S., Nakamura J. (2005) Flow. In: Elliott A. J., Dweck C. S. (eds) Handbook of competence and motivation. Guilford, New York, pp 598–608
Csikszentmihalyi M., Larson R. (1987) Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 175(9): 526–536. doi:10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004
Csikszentmihalyi M., Larson R. (1992) Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. In: deVries M. W. (eds) The experience of psychopathology: Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 43–57
Csikszentmihalyi M., Nakamura J. (1989) The dynamics of intrinsic motivation. In: Ames R., Ames C. (eds) Handbook of motivation theory and research (Vol. 3). Academic Press, New York, NY, pp 45–71
Csikszentmihalyi M., Rathunde K. R., Whalen S. (1993) Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
Daniels L. M., Haynes T. L., Stupnisky R. H., Perry R. P., Newall N. E., Pekrun R. (2008) Individual differences in achievement goals: A longitudinal study of cognitive, emotional, and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33(4): 584–608. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.002
Dweck C. S., Leggett E. L. (1988) A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review 95(2): 256–273
Eccles J. S., Wigfield A. (1995) In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(3): 215–225. doi:10.1177/0146167295213003
Elliott E. S., Dweck C. S. (1988) Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(1): 5–12. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5
Greene B. A., Miller R. B. (1996) Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 21(2): 181–192. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0015
Griffin K. A. (2006) Striving for success: A qualitative exploration of competing theories of high-achieving black college students’ academic motivation. Journal of College Student Development 47(4): 384–400
Harackiewicz J. M., Barron K. E., Pintrich P. R., Elliot A. J., Thrash T. M. (2002) Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology 94(3): 638–645. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.638
Harackiewicz J. M., Barron K. E., Tauer J. M., Elliot A. J. (2002) Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology 94(3): 562–575. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562
Hatcher L. (1994) A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
Hormuth S. E. (1986) The sampling of experiences in situ. Journal of Personality 54(1): 262–293. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00395.x
Hoyert M., O’Dell C. (2008) Goal orientation and the aftermath of an academic failure. International Journal of Learning 15(3): 245–252
Kaufman J. C., Agars M. D., Lopez-Wagner M. C. (2008) The role of personality and motivation in predicting early college academic success in non-traditional students at a Hispanic-serving institution. Learning and Individual Differences 18(4): 492–496. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.004
Larson R., Csikszentmihalyi M. (1983) The experience sampling method. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science 15: 41–56
Lemos M.S. (1996) Students’ and teachers’ goals in the classroom. Learning and Instruction 6(2): 151–171. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(95)00031-3
Maehr M. (2001) Goal theory is not dead—Not yet, anyway: A reflection on the special issue. Educational Psychology Review 13(2): 177–185
Meyer D. K., Turner J. C., Spencer C. A. (1997) Challenge in a mathematics classroom: Students’ motivation and strategies in project-based learning. The Elementary School Journal 97(5): 501–521. doi:10.1086/461878
Meyers L. S., Gamst G., Guarino A. J. (2006) Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., & Freeman, K. E., et al. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. Retrieved October 10, 2008, from http://www.umich.edu/~pals/manuals.html.
Navarro C., Escribe C., Dupeyrat C. (2006) Achievement goals and engagement in individual and collective learning activities. Psychological Reports 98(2): 556–562. doi:10.2466/PR0.98.2.556-562
Preacher K. J., MacCallum R. C. (2003) Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics 2(1): 13–43
Roebken H. (2007) The influence of goal orientation on student satisfaction, academic engagement and achievement. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 5(3): 679–704
Schweinle, A., & Hanson, A. (2011). Motivational distinctions of challenging and difficult academic activities among 10–11 year olds. (submitted).
Schweinle A., Reisetter M., Stokes V. (2009a) Elements of engagement for successful learning. The Qualitative Report 14(4): 774–806
Schweinle A., Turner J. C., Meyer D. K. (2006) Striking the right balance: Students’ motivation and affect in elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Research 99(5): 271– 293. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.5.271-294
Schweinle A., Turner J. C., Meyer D. K. (2009b) Understanding young adolescents’ optimal experiences in academic settings. Journal of Experimental Education 77(2): 125–146
Steinmayr R., Spinath B. (2009) The importance of motivation as a predictor of school achievement. Learning and Individual Differences 19(1): 80–90. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.004
Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. (2001) Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon, Boston MA
Urdan T. (2001) Contextual influences on motivation and performance: An examination of achievement goal structures. In: Salili F., Chiu C., Hong Y. (eds) Student motivation: The culture and context of learning. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 171–201
Vygotsky L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Wheeler L., Reis H. T. (1991) Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. Journal of Personality, Personality and Daily Experience 59(3): 339–354. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00252.x
Wigfield A., Eccles J. S. (2000) Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, Motivation and the Educational Process 25(1): 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Wigfield A., Eccles J. S., Schiefele U., Roeser R. W., Davis-Kean P. (2006) Development of achievement motivation. In: Eisenberg N., Damon W., Lerner R. M. (eds) Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3, social, emotional, and personality development (4th ed.). Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 933–1002
Wolters C. A. (2004) Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 96(2): 236–250. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schweinle, A., Helming, L.M. Success and motivation among college students. Soc Psychol Educ 14, 529–546 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9157-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9157-z