Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Constructing a Quality of Life Scale for Older Chinese People in Hong Kong (HKQoLOCP)

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports a multi-stagestudy carried out between 1999 and 2001 whichaimed to develop an instrument to address theneed for a culturally relevant measure ofquality of life for Chinese older persons inHong Kong and similar communities. The firststage of the research involved a focus groupstudy conducted in August 1999 which it washoped would reflect how ‘quality of life’ maybe interpreted by older persons themselves. Thenext stage, a content analysis of the focusgroups, enabled the construction of aquestionnaire containing over 100 items onvarious aspects of quality of life (QoL). Thequestionnaire was reviewed by a panel ofexperts and the items were refined and reducedto 86 to which were added a further 25 itemsfor socio-demographic background. This formedthe initial instrument. The final stage was avalidation study based on a representativecommunity survey, with a sample of 3,000respondents drawn for the research team by theCensus and Statistics Department of the HongKong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR)Government. The survey yielded 1,616 successfulinterviews with older persons aged 60 or above.The careful stratification of the sampleenabled us to say that subjects in all thestages of the survey had broadly similarcharacteristics to the general Hong Kongelderly population in sex and age distribution.After a rigorous process of validation, theresearch team recommended the adoption of bothan index and six domains for measuring HongKong older persons’ QoL. The new scale containsa total of 21 items which can be grouped intovarious domains: subjective well-being, with 4items; health with 5 items; interpersonalrelationships with 6 items; achievement-recognition with 4 items, finance and livingconditions (1 item each). The overall QoL scalehas a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.72 with its domainsranging from 0.65 to 0.77 which indicates ahigh degree of statistical reliabilities. Thename recommended for the scale was ‘Hong KongQuality of Life for Older Persons Scale’-abbreviated as ‘HKQoLOCP’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aaronson, N.K.: 1989, ‘Quality if life assessment in clinical trials: Methodology issues’, Controlled Clinical Trials 10, p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A.: 1988, Psychological Testing, 6th ed. (Macmillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F.M.: 1976, ‘Subjective Social Indicators, Objective Social Indicators, and Social Accounting Systems’, in Juster and Kenneth (eds.), Social Accounting Systems: Essays on the State of the Art, pp. 377–419.

  • Bauer, R.A.: 1966, Social Indicators (MIT Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A.: 1997, Research Methods in Health (Open University Press, Buckingham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N.: 1961, The Structure of Psychological Well-being (Alding, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver and Scheier: 1990, ‘Originals and functions of positive and negative affects: A control process view’, Psychological Review 97(1), pp. 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C.S. and F.S. Michael: 1990, ‘Principles of Self-Regulation: Action and Emotion’, in E.T. Higgins and R.M. Sorrentino (eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior 2, pp. 3–52.

  • Chan, C.M.: 1996, ‘Clinical validation of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Chinese version’, Journal of Aging and Health 8(2), pp. 238–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng: 1988, ‘Subjective quality of life in the planning and evaluation of programs’, Evaluation and Program Planning 11, pp. 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C.K.: 1997, ‘Toward a theoretically based measurement model of the good life’, Journal of Genetic Psychology 158(2), pp. 200–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C.K.: 1997, ‘World understanding and well-being in a marital context’, Journal of Genetic Psychology 158, pp. 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons, D. and N.L. Mace: 1996, Quality of Life in Long-term Care (Haworth Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubos, R.: 1976, ‘The role of health and the quality of life’, The Western Journal of Medical Ethics 125, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayos, J.V. and F. Beland: 1981, ‘An inquiry on the quality of life after curative treatment’, Head and Neck Oncology: Controversies in Cancer Treatment (Hall HG, Boston), pp. 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrel, B.R., K.H. Dow and M. Grant: 1995, ‘Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors’, Quality of Life Research 4, pp. 523–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, R., C. Yu and J.S.T. Sham: 2000, The Fact-G (Chinese): A Validated Measure of Quality of Life during Cancer Treatment (Department of Community Medicine, The University of Hong Kong).

  • Grayson, L. and K. Young: 1995, Quality of Life in Cities: An Overview and Guide to the Literature (British Library, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grib, A.: 1985, ‘Quality of life: A response to KC. Calman’, Journal of Medical Ethics 11, pp. 142–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grogon, A.W. and D.J. Woodgate: 1971, ‘Index for Measuring Health’, The Lancet 2, pp. 1024–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R.D., R. Anderson and D. Revicki: 1993, ‘Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures’, Quality of Life Research 2, pp. 441–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, B. and A. Wearing: 1989, ‘Personality: Life-events and subjective well-being: Towards a dynamic equilibrium model’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, pp. 731–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, B. and A. Wearing: 1992, Understanding Happiness: A Theory of Subjective Well-being (Longman, Sydney).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, O.W.: 1960, The Professor at the Breakfast Table (Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, L.K., B. Gandek, X.S. Ren and M.S. Chan: 1998, ‘Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36’, Health Survey 51, pp. 1139–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, L.K: 1999, The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)-the Chinese (HK) Version (The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, L.K.: 2000, The Application of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Measures (The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, L.K., D.Y.T. Fong, I.J. Lauder and T.P.D. Lam: 2000, ‘The effect of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) on health service utilization of a Chinese population’, Social Science and Medicine 55, pp. 1635–1646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Anna, I. Chi and K. McKenna: 1998, ‘Self-perceived quality of life of Chinese elderly people in Hong Kong’, Occupational Therapy International 5(2), pp. 118–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, E.M.F.: 2000, ‘Long-term care issues in the Asia-Pacific region’, in D.R. Phillips (eds.), Ageing in the Asia-Pacific Region (Routledge, London), pp. 82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, E.M.F. and M.B.N. Lo: 1997, ‘Social and health status of elderly people in Hong Kong’, in S.K. Lam (eds.), The Health of the Elderly in Hong Kong (Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong), pp. 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K.F., M. Tay, S.S.W. Cheng and F. Lin: 1997, Hong Kong Chinese version World Health Organization Quality of Life: Abbreviated Version WHOQOL-BREF (HK) (Hong Kong Hospital Authority, Hong Kong).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, L. and L. Anderson: 1975, Psychological Stress: Population, Environment, and Quality of Life (Spectrum Publications, Halsted Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, S.: 1996, ‘Research and Reflection on the Quality of Life in Recent Years’, New Frontiers of Social Indicators Research in Chinese Societies (Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong), pp. 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F.: 1987, ‘Implications of measures of quality of life for policy development’, Journal of Chronic Diseases 40(6), pp. 645–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najam, J.M. and S. Levine: 1981, ‘Evaluating the impact of medical care and technologies on the quality of life’, Social Science and Medicine 15, pp. 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcross, J.C.: 1990, ‘Quality of Life of Older Adults: A Qualitative Study’, Doctoral Dissertation. Athens (University of Georgia, GE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogburn, W.F.: 1929, ‘Social change in the 1928’, American Journal of Sociology 34(5), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.R.: 1999, ‘Ageing in the Asia-Pacific region: The impact of the ageing and development report’, Hong Kong Journal of Gerontology 13, pp. 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salek, S.: 1998, Compendium of Quality of Life Instruments (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schippae, H. and Levitt, M: 1985, ‘Measuring quality of life: Risk and benefits’, Cancer Treatment Reports 69(10), p. 1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed and Kayer: 1994, Handbook for Assessing and Managing Care in the Community (Jessica Kingsley, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, M.K.: 1996, ‘Chang in the objective quality of life in Taiwan’, New Frontiers of Social Indicators Research in Chinese Societies (Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong), pp. 157–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R.: 1991, ‘Questions on happiness: Classical topics, modern answers, blind spots’, Subjective Well-Being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (Pergamon Press, Oxford), pp. 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, P.S.: 1992, ‘Subjective quality of life’, Indicators of Social Development: Hong Kong 1990 (Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, Hong Kong), pp. 173–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group: 1994, ‘The development of the WHOQOL: Rationale and current status’, International Journal of Mental Health 23(3), pp. 24–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Politics and Sociology, Lingnan University, Hong Kong

    Alfred C.M. Chan & David R. Phillips

  2. Department of Applied Social Studies, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Sheung-Tak Cheng

  3. Department of Social Work and Social Administration, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Iris Chi

  4. Department of Community Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Suzanne S.Y. Ho

Authors
  1. Alfred C.M. Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David R. Phillips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sheung-Tak Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Iris Chi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Suzanne S.Y. Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, A.C., Phillips, D.R., Cheng, ST. et al. Constructing a Quality of Life Scale for Older Chinese People in Hong Kong (HKQoLOCP). Soc Indic Res 69, 279–301 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-4516-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-4516-1

Search

Navigation