Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Evolution of Stalking

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose that stalking tactics have been shaped by evolutionary processes to help solve mating problems. These include: (1) acquiring new mates, (2) guarding existing mates to prevent defection, (3) fending off mate poachers, (4) poaching someone else’s mate, (5) interfering with intrasexual competitors, (6) reacquiring ex-mates, (7) sexual exploitation and predation, and (8) guarding kin from sexual exploitation. We hypothesize several, gender-differentiated design features of psychological adaptations, including sensitivity to adaptive problems for which stalking was an ancestral solution and cognitive biases that function to motivate and perpetuate stalking behaviors. Although often abhorrent, cost-inflicting, and illegal, stalking sometimes enables successful adaptive solutions to problems of mating and within-gender competition faced by both men and women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 249–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist, G., & Rowe, L. (2005). Sexual conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, A. (1942). Parental roles in courtship. Social Forces, 20, 483–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, K., Catalano, S., Rand, M., & Rose, K. (2009). Stalking victimization in the United States (NCJ 224527). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, J., & Sheridan, L. (2002). Stalking and psychosexual obsession: Psychological perspectives for prevention, policing, and treatment. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüne, M. (2001). DeClerambault’s syndrome (erotomania) in an evolutionary perspective. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 409–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, T., & Mattinson, J. (2000). The extent and nature of stalking: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey. Home Office Research Study No. 210. London: Home Office.

  • Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Conflict between the sexes: Strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 735–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2002). Human mate guarding. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23, 23–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2003a). The evolution of desire. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2003b). Sexual conflict. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society. Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska.

  • Buss, D. M. (2005). The murderer next door. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2008). Adaptations for exploitation. Group Dynamics, 12, 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Haselton, M. G. (2005). The evolution of jealousy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 506–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997a). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997b). Human aggression in evolutionary psychological perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 605–619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A., & Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. The American Psychologist, 53, 533–548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caryl, P. G. (1979). Communication by agonistic displays: What can games theory contributed to ethology?. Behaviour, 67, 136–169.

  • Chagnon, N. (1983). Yanomamo: The fierce people (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavanne, T. J., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (1998). Variation in risk taking behavior among female college students as a function of the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist.

  • Cupach, W. R., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1998). Obsessive relational intrusion and stalking. In B. H. Spitzberg & W. R. Cupach (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships (pp. 233–263). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupach, W. R., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2004). The dark side of relational pursuit: From attraction to obsession and stalking. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Davis, K. E., Ace, A., & Andra, M. (2000). Stalking perpetrators: Gender, attachment insecurity, need for control, and relationship context as correlates. Violence and Victims, 15, 407–426.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. E., Frieze, I. H., & Maiuro, R. D. (2002). Stalking: Perspectives on victims and perpetrators. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. (1978). Animal signals: Information or manipulation. In J. Krebs & N. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 282–309). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennison, S. M. (2007). Interpersonal relationships and stalking: Identifying when to intervene. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 353–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dressing, H., Gass, P., & Juehner, C. (2007). What can we learn from the first community-based epidemiological study on stalking in Germany? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 10–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dressing, H., Kuehner, C., & Gass, P. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and impact of stalking in a European population: Epidemiological data from a middle-sized German city. British Journal of Psychiatry, 187, 168–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental interference and romantic love: The Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duntley, J. D. (2005). Adaptations to dangers from other humans. In D. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 224–249). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duntley, J. D., & Buss, D. M. (2002). Stalking as a strategy of human mating. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.

  • Dutton, M. A., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 52, 743–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, L. B., & Winstead, B. A. (2006a). Predicting unwanted pursuit: Attachment, relationship satisfaction, relationship alternatives, and break-up distress. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 565–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, L. B., & Winstead, B. A. (2006b). Predicting unwanted pursuit: Attachment, relationship satisfaction, relationship alternatives, and break-up distress. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 565–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edlund, J., & Sagarin, B. (2009). Sex differences in jealousy: Misinterpretation of nonsignificant results as refuting the theory. Personal Relationships, 16, 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R., Ferris, K., & Gardner, C. (1998). On being stalked. Social Problems, 45, 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadagkar, R. (2003). Is the peacock merely beautiful or also honest? Current Science, 85, 1012–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiglieri, M. (2000). The dark side of man. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiling, H., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Women’s Sexual Strategies: The hidden dimension of extra pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. M. (1997). Outside looking in: stalkers and their victims. PhD dissertation, Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, CA.

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. D., & Goldsmith, T. H. (2005). Law and behavioral biology. Columbia Law Review, 105, 405–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kan, M. L., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (2008). Parental involvement in adolescent romantic relationships: Patterns and correlates. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 168–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, L. H. (1997). War before civilization: The myth of the peaceful savage. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienlen, K. K. (1998). Developmental and social antecedents of stalking. In J. R. Meloy (Ed.), The psychology of stalking: Clinical and forensic perspectives (pp. 51–67). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinkade, B., Burns, R., & Fuentes, A. I. (2005). Criminalizing attractions: Perceptions of stalking and the stalker. Crime & Delinquency, 51, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J. R., & Dawkins, R. (1984). Animal signals: Mind-reading and manipulation. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (2nd ed., pp. 380–402). Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, D. J. (2008). Young adults attempt exchanges in reproductively relevant currencies. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 204–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, D. J., & Nesse, R. M. (2004). Sexual selection and the male: female mortality ratio. Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalumiére, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (2005). The causes of rape. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

  • Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2006). An examination of sheltered battered women’s perpetration of stalking and other unwanted pursuit behaviors. Violence and Victims, 21, 579–595.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Palarea, R. E., Cohen, J., & Rohling, M. L. (2000). Breaking up is hard to do: Unwanted pursuit behaviors following the dissolution of a romantic relationship. Violence and Victims, 15, 73–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. F., Fremouw, W. J., Del Ben, K., & Farr, C. (2001). An investigation of the psychological characteristics of stalkers: Empathy, problem-solving, attachment and borderline personality features. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46, 80–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, I. (1987). Fears, phobias, and rituals: Panic, anxiety, and their disorders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1994). Must reliable signals always be costly? Animal Behaviour, 47, 1115–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meloy, J. R. (1992). Violent attachments. Northvale: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloy, J. R. (1998). The psychology of stalking: Clinical and forensic perspectives. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloy, J. R. (2001). Communicated threats and violence toward public and private targets: Discerning differences among those who stalk and attack. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46, 1211–1213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meloy, J. R., & Fisher, H. (2005). Some thoughts on the neurobiology of stalking. Journal of Forensic Science, 50, 1472–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2009). Why women have sex: Understanding sexual motivations from adventure to revenge (and everything in between). New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, P. E., Pathé, M., Purcell, R., & Stuart, G. W. (1999). Study of stalkers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1244–1249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, P. E., Pathé, M., & Purcell, R. (2000). Stalkers and their victims. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palarea, R. E. (2004). An empirical analysis of stalking as a risk factor in domestic violence (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=01-03-2015&FMT=7&DID=795961791&RQT=309&attempt=1&cfc=1

  • Palarea, R. E., Zona, M. A., Lane, J. C., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1999). The dangerous nature of intimate relationship stalking: Threats, violence, and associated risk factors. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 17, 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathé, M. (2002). Surviving stalking. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. E. (1997). The impact of stalkers on their victims. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 12–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2008). Breaking up romantic relationships: Costs experienced and coping strategies deployed. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 164–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perilloux, C., Fleischman, D. S., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The Daughter-Guarding Hypothesis: Parental influence on children’s mating behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, B., Brown, G. P., & Shine, R. (2004). Assessing the potential for an evolutionary response to rapid environmental change: Invasive toads and an Australian snake. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 6, 799–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravensburg, V., & Miller, C. (2003). Stalking among young adults: A review of the preliminary research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 455–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, P. J. (2007). Stalking risk assessment. In D. A. Pinals (Ed.), Stalking: Psychiatric perspectives and practical approaches (pp. 61–84). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894–917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., Duntley, J. D., Tooke, W., & Buss, D. M. (2001). The desire for sexual variety as a tool for understanding basic human mating strategies. Personal Relationships, 8, 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., Angleiter, A., Ault, L., Austers, I., et al. (2004). Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: The effects of sex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person’s partner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 560–584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, L. P., & Grant, T. (2007). Is cyberstalking different? Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 627–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, L., Davies, G. M., & Boon, J. C. W. (2001). Stalking: Perceptions and prevalence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, L., Gillett, R., Davies, G. M., Blaauw, E., & Patel, D. (2003). There’s no smoke without fire: Are male ex-partners perceived as more entitled to stalk than acquaintance or stranger stalkers? British Journal of Psychology, 94, 87–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, H. C., & Frieze, I. H. (2005). When courtship persistence becomes intrusive pursuit: A comparison of rejecter and pursuer perspectives of unrequited attraction. Sex Roles, 52, 839–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B. (1992). Men’s aggression against women. Human Nature, 6, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. H. (2002). The tactical topography of stalking victimization and management. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 3, 261–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2003). What mad pursuit? Obsessive relational intrusion and stalking related phenomena. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 345–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2007). The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 64–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1981). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, NCJ 169592.U.S.

  • Tonin, E. (2004). The attachment styles of stalkers. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 15, 584–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1988). The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations. Institute for Evolutionary Studies Technical Report #88-1.

  • Tooby, J., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), The evolution of human behavior (pp. 183–238). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Updegraff, K. A., McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., & Kupanoff, K. (2004). Parents’ involvement in adolescents’ peer relationships: A comparison of mothers’ and fathers’ roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 655–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Hoek, C., Mann, D. G., & Jahns, H. M. (1995). Algae: An introduction to phycology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Dennen, J. M. G. (1995). The origin of war: The evolution of a male-coalitional reproductive strategy. Groningen, Netherlands: Origin Press.

  • Wakefield, J. C. (2005). Biological function and dysfunction. In D. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 878–902). New York: Oxford Press.

  • Williams, S., Frieze, I. H., & Sinclair, H. C. (2006). Stalking and intimate violence. In J. Hamel & T. Nicholls (Eds.), Family therapy for domestic violence: A practitioner’s guide to gender-inclusive research and treatment (pp. 109–123). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner-Wilson, R. J. (1998). Gender differences in adolescent sexual attitudes: The influence of individual and family factors. Adolescence, 33, 519–531.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, J., Kowalski, R. M., Lyndon, A., & Valentine, S. (2000). Integrative contextual developmental model of male stalking. Violence and Victims, 15, 373–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. L., & Frieze, I. H. (2005). Courtship behaviors, relationship violence, and breakup persistence in college men and women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 248–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., & Mesnick, S. L. (1997). An empirical test of the bodyguard hypothesis. In P. A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology (pp. 505–512). New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Buss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duntley, J.D., Buss, D.M. The Evolution of Stalking. Sex Roles 66, 311–327 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9832-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9832-0

Keywords

Navigation