Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

High School Student Participation in Scientific Research Apprenticeships: Variation in and Relationships Among Student Experiences and Outcomes

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research apprenticeships for secondary students provide authentic contexts for learning science in which students engage in scientific investigations with practicing scientists in working laboratory groups. Student experiences in these research apprenticeships vary depending on the individual nature of the laboratory in which students have been placed. This study explores potential relationships among student experiences in apprenticeship contexts and desired student outcomes (e.g. science content knowledge, understandings of nature of science, and aspirations for science oriented career plans). The following two research questions guided the study: How do participant experiences in and outcomes resulting from an authentic research program for high school students vary? How does variation in participant experiences in an authentic research program relate to participant outcomes? Primary data sources were student and mentor interviews in addition to student generated concept maps. Results indicated that the greatest variance in student experiences existed in the categories of collaboration, epistemic involvement, and understandings of the significance of research results. The greatest variation in desired student outcomes was observed in student understandings of nature of science and in students’ future science plans. Results suggested that collaboration and interest in the project were experience aspects most likely to be related to desired outcomes. Implications for the design of research apprenticeships for secondary students are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naamon, R., Hofstein, A., et al. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, L. M. (2002). What do high school science students gain from field-based research apprenticeship programs? The Clearing House., 75, 229–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issue related to the Science Apprenticeship Camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 70–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleicher, R. E. (1996). High school students learning science in university research laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1115–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charney, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Sofer, W., Neigeborn, L., Coletta, S., & Nemeroff, M. (2007). Cognitive apprenticeship in science through immersion in laboratory practices. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, W. W., & Bassett, R. D. (1961). Evaluation and follow-up study of a summer science and mathematics program for talented secondary school students. Science Education, 45, 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research 3e: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. D. (1999). April). The research apprenticeship program: Promoting careers in biomedical sciences and the health professions for minority populations. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Monreal, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (1995). The place of investigations in practical work in the UK national curriculum for science. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, A., Divoll, K., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2009). Research education of new scientists: implications for science teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 442–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • France, B., & Bay, J. L. (2010). Questions students ask: Bridging the gap between scientists and students in a research institute classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 173–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1996). Practical work: Its role in the understanding of evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 791–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grindstaff, K., & Richmond, G. (2008). Learners’ perceptions of the role of peers in a research experience: Implications for the apprenticeship process, scientific inquiry, and collaborative work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, M., France, B., & Forret, M. (2005). Is ‘doing science’ in New Zealand classrooms an expression of scientific inquiry? International Journal of Science Education, 27, 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, K. E., & Barab, S. A. (2001). Constructivism in practice: A comparison and contrast of apprenticeship and constructionist learning environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 281–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 791–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal and professional development. Science Education, 91, 36–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D., Bellocchi, A., & Ritchie, S. M. (2008). Making connections: Learning and teaching chemistry in context. Research in Science Education, 38, 365–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). View of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. R., Kotur, M. S., Butt, O., Kulcarni, S., Riley, A. A., Ferrell, N., et al. (2002). Biotechnology apprenticeship for secondary-level students: Teaching advanced cell culture techniques for research. Cell Biology Education, 1, 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3, 270–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Krull, J. A. (1998). Can we be scientists too? Secondary students’ perceptions of scientific research from a project-based classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neber, H., & Anton, M. (2008). Promoting pre-experimental activities in high-school chemistry: Focusing on the role of students’ epistemic questions. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1801–1821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2007). Theoretical Origins of Concept Maps, How to Construct Them, and Uses in Education. Reflecting Education, 3, 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, D. C., Ryan, J. M., & Samson, S. M. (1998). Using concept maps to assess student learning in the science classroom: must different methods compete? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1103–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, G., & Kurth, L. (1999). Moving from outside to inside: High school students’ use of apprenticeships as vehicles for entering the culture and practice of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 677–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (1996). Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 799–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S.H. (2006). Evaluation of NSF support for undergraduate research opportunities: Draft synthesis report.

  • Ryder, J., & Leach, J. (1999). University science students’ experiences of investigative project work and their images of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 945–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. S., Burgin, S., McKinney, L. L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning Science through Research Apprenticeships: A Critical Review of the Literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 235–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Deantoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three year study. Science Education, 88, 493–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E., & Mares, K. R. (2001). Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: Predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1065–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. E., & Mares, K. R. (2005). Evaluating the impact of science-enrichment programs on adolescents’ science motivation and confidence: The splashdown effect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Y., Vanides, J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C. C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2005). Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: implications for scoring, interpretation, and use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 166–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Stephen R. Burgin & Troy D. Sadler

  2. College of Medicine & Center for Precollegiate Education & Training, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-2010, USA

    Mary Jo Koroly

  3. School of Teaching and Learning, College of Education, University of Florida, P.O. Box 117048, Room 2403 Norman Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611-7048, USA

    Stephen R. Burgin

Authors
  1. Stephen R. Burgin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Troy D. Sadler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mary Jo Koroly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen R. Burgin.

Additional information

This research was supported in part by a grant from the Francis C. & William P. Smallwood Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burgin, S.R., Sadler, T.D. & Koroly, M.J. High School Student Participation in Scientific Research Apprenticeships: Variation in and Relationships Among Student Experiences and Outcomes. Res Sci Educ 42, 439–467 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9205-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9205-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation