Abstract
This study examines the dynamics of cognitive processes during writing. Participants were 5th, 7th and 9th graders ranging in age from 10 to 15 years. They were shown a short silent video composed of clips illustrating conflictual situations between people in school, and were invited to produce a narrative text. Three chronometric measures of word n were analyzed using a Linear Mixed-Effects Model regression procedure: pause duration before word n, pause duration within word n, and writing rate of word n. The predictors were sublexical and lexical properties of word n, i.e., immediacy effects, word n − 1, i.e., delayed effects, and of word n + 1, i.e., anticipatory effects. The writing-rate and the intra-word-pause measures show both immediacy and anticipatory effects. However, the between-word-pause durations show only delayed effects, which has not been reported in previous studies. As far as we know, our study is the first investigation which reveals the occurrence of parallel and serial effects in written text production: preprocessing of word n + 1 occurs when word n is being written, and properties of word n − 1 still exert their influences while the pen has already moved to the next word.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Alamargot, D., Chesnet, D., Dansac, C., & Ros, C. (2006). Eye and Pen: A new device to study reading during writing. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 287–299.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Baayen, R. H., Feldman, L. B., & Schreuder, R. (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 290–313.
Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In E. Butterfield (Ed.), Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 57–81). Greenwich, CT: J.A.I. Press.
Bonin, P., Fayol, M., & Gombert, J. E. (1997). The role of phonological and orthographic codes in picture naming and writing. CPC/Current Psychology of Cognition, 16, 299–324.
Bonin, P., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2001). Do phonological codes constraint the selection of orthographic codes in written picture naming? Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 688–720.
Chanquoy, L., Foulin, J.-N., & Fayol, M. (1990). The temporal management of short text writing by children and adults. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 513–540.
Chesnet, D., & Alamargot, D. (2005). Analyse en temps réel des activités oculaires graphomotrices du scripteur. Intérêt du dispositif Eye and pen. L’Année Psychologique, 105, 477–520.
Delattre, M., Bonin, P., & Barry, C. (2006). Written spelling to dictation: Sound-to-spelling regularity affects both writing latencies and durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1330–1340.
Ellis, A. W. (1982). Spelling and writing (and reading and speaking). In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 113–143). New-York, NY: Academic Press.
Fayol, M. (1991). From sentence production to text production: Investigating fundamental processes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 6, 101–119.
Fayol, M. (1999). From on-line management problems to strategies in written composition. In M. Torrance & G. Jeffery (Eds.), The cognitive demands of writing: Processing capacity and working memory effects (pp. 13–23). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamic of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ford, M., & Holmes, V. M. (1978). Planning units and syntax in sentence production. Cognition, 6, 35–53.
Foulin, J.-N. (1998). To what extent does pause location predict pause duration in adults’ and children’s writing ? Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 17, 601–620.
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Herrmann, T., & Grabowski, J. (1995). Pre-terminal levels of process in oral and written language production. In U. M. Quasthoff (Ed.), Aspects of oral communication (pp. 67–87). Berlin, G: Walter de Gruyter.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
Kandel, S., Alvarez, C., & Vallée, N. (2006). Syllables as processing units in handwriting production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 18–31.
Kandel, S., Herault, L., Grosjacques, G., Lambert, E., & Fayol, M. (2009). Orthographic vs. phonologic syllables in handwriting production. Cognition, 110, 440–444.
Klapp, S. T., Boches, C. A., Trabert, M. L., & Logan, G. D. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: II. Are there practice effects after automaticity is achieved? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 196–209.
Kliegl, R. (2007). Toward a perceptual-span theory of distributed processing in reading: A reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, & Reichle (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 530–537.
Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12–35.
Kolers, P. A. (1976). Buswell’s discoveries. In R. A. Monty & J. W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kuperman, V., Dambacher, M., Nuthmann, A., & Kliegl, R. (2010). The effect of word position on eye-movements in sentence and paragraph reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1838–1857.
Lambert, E., Kandel, S., Fayol, M., & Esperet, E. (2007). The effect of the number of syllables when writing poly-syllabic words. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 859–883.
Lété, B. (2003). Building the mental lexicon by exposure to print: A corpus-based analysis of French reading books. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon. “Some words to talk about words” (pp. 187–214). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publisher.
Lété, B., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2008). Phoneme-to-grapheme consistency and word-frequency effects on spelling among first-to-fifth-grade French children: A regression-based study. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 952–977.
Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). Manulex: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary-school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 156–166.
Logan, G. D., & Klapp, S. T. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 179–195.
Matsuhashi, A. (1982). Explorations in the real-time production of written discourse. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 269–290). New York, NY: Academic Press.
McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 299–325.
McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35, 13–23.
Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1997). Orthographic and phonological neighborhoods in naming: Not all neighbors are equally influential in orthographic space. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 382–421.
Peereman, R., Lété, B., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2007). Manulex-infra: Distributional characteristics of grapheme-phoneme mappings, infra-lexical and lexical units in child-directed written material. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 593–603.
Roux, S., & Bonin, P. (2009). Neighborhood effects in spelling in adults. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 369–373.
Schilperoord, J. (1996). It’s about time: Temporal aspects of cognitive Processes in text production. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.
Schilperoord, J. (2002). On the cognitive status of pauses in discourse production. In T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing (pp. 61–90). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Van der Plaats, R. E., & Van Galen, G. E. (1990). Effects of spatial and motor demands in handwriting. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22(3), 361–385.
Van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10, 165–191.
Van Hell, J. G., Verhoeven, L., & Van Beijsterveldt, L. M. (2008). Pause time patterns in writing narrative and expository texts by children and adults. Discourse Processes, 45, 406–427.
Verhoeven, L., & Van Hell, J. G. (2008). From knowledge representation to writing text: A developmental perspective. Discourse Processes, 45, 387–405.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by a grant from the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR05 BLAN 0313) Harriet Jisa, PI.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maggio, S., Lété, B., Chenu, F. et al. Tracking the mind during writing: immediacy, delayed, and anticipatory effects on pauses and writing rate. Read Writ 25, 2131–2151 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9348-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9348-1