Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating cognition in individuals with Huntington disease: Neuro-QoL cognitive functioning measures

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cognitive functioning impacts health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for individuals with Huntington disease (HD). The Neuro-QoL includes two patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of cognition—Executive Function (EF) and General Concerns (GC). These measures have not previously been validated for use in HD. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Neuro-QoL Cognitive Function measures for use in HD.

Methods

Five hundred ten individuals with prodromal or manifest HD completed the Neuro-QoL Cognition measures, two other PRO measures of HRQOL (WHODAS 2.0 and EQ5D), and a depression measure (PROMIS Depression). Measures of functioning The Total Functional Capacity and behavior (Problem Behaviors Assessment) were completed by clinician interview. Objective measures of cognition were obtained using clinician-administered Symbol Digit Modalities Test and the Stroop Test (Word, Color, and Interference). Self-rated, clinician-rated, and objective composite scores were developed. We examined the Neuro-QoL measures for reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and known-groups validity.

Results

Excellent reliabilities (Cronbach’s alphas ≥ 0.94) were found. Convergent validity was supported, with strong relationships between self-reported measures of cognition. Discriminant validity was supported by less robust correlations between self-reported cognition and other constructs. Prodromal participants reported fewer cognitive problems than manifest groups, and early-stage HD participants reported fewer problems than late-stage HD participants.

Conclusions

The Neuro-QoL Cognition measures provide reliable and valid assessments of self-reported cognitive functioning for individuals with HD. Findings support the utility of these measures for assessing self-reported cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacDonald, M. E., Ambrose, C. M., Duyao, M. P., Myers, R. H., Lin, C., Srinidhi, L., Barnes, G., Taylor, S. A., James, M., & Groot, N. & Huntington’s Disease Collaborative Research Group. (1993). A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell, 72(6), 971–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Squitieri, F., Griguoli, A., Capelli, G., Porcellini, A., & D’Alessio, B. (2016). Epidemiology of Huntington disease: First post-HTT gene analysis of prevalence in Italy. Clinical Genetics, 89(3), 367–370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ross, C. A., Aylward, E. H., Wild, E. J., Langbehn, D. R., Long, J. D., Warner, J. H., Scahill, R. I., Leavitt, B. R., Stout, J. C., & Paulsen, J. S. (2014). Huntington disease: Natural history, biomarkers and prospects for therapeutics. Nature Reviews Neurology, 10, 204–216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Evans, S. J. W., Douglas, I., Rawlins, M. D., Wexler, N. S., Tabrizi, S. J., & Smeeth, L. (2013). Prevalence of adult Huntington’s disease in the UK based on diagnoses recorded in general practice records. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 84(10), 1156–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rawlins, M. D., Wexler, N. S., Wexler, A. R., Tabrizi, S. J., Douglas, I., Evans, S. J., & Smeeth, L. (2016). The prevalence of huntington’s disease. Neuroepidemiology, 46(2), 144–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paulsen, J. S. (2010). Early detection of Huntington’s disease. Future Neurology, 5(1), 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carlozzi, N. E., & Tulsky, D. S. (2013). Identification of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) issues relevant to individuals with Huntington disease. Journal of Health Psychology, 18(2), 212–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy people 2010: Understanding and improving health (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mickes, L., Jacobson, M., Peavy, G., Wixted, J. T., Lessig, S., Goldstein, J. L., & Corey-Bloom, J. (2010). A comparison of two brief screening measures of cognitive impairment in Huntington’s disease. Movement Disorders, 25(13), 2229–2233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stout, J. C., Glikmann-Johnston, Y., & Andrews, S. C. (2016). Cognitive assessment strategies in Huntington’s disease research. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 265, 19–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kremer, H. P. H. & Hungtington Study Group. (1996). Unified Huntington’s disease rating scale: Reliability and consistency. Movement Disorders, 11, 136–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stout, J. C., Paulsen, J. S., Queller, S., Solomon, A. C., Whitlock, K. B., Campbell, J. C., Carlozzi, N., Duff, K., Beglinger, L. J., Langbehn, D. R., Johnson, S. A., Biglan, K. M., & Aylward, E. H. (2011). Neurocognitive signs in prodromal Huntington disease. Neuropsychology, 25(1), 1–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, A. (1995). Symbol digit modalities test: Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stroop, J. R. (1992). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions (Reprinted from Journal Experimental-Psychology, vol. 18, pp. 643–662, 1935). Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 121(1), 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Benton, A. L., Sivan, A. B., Hamsher, K. D., Varney, N. R., & Spreen, O. (1994). Contributions to neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Conway, M. A. (1991). In defense of everyday memory. American Psychologist, 46(1), 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Loftus, E. F. (1991). The glitter of everyday memory … and the gold. American Psychologist, 46(1), 16–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chaytor, N., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2003). The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychology Review, 13(4), 181–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Silver, C. H. (2000). Ecological validity of neuropsychological assessment in childhood traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15(4), 973–988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hutchinson, A. D., Hosking, J. R., Kichenadasse, G., Mattiske, J. K., & Wilson, C. (2012). Objective and subjective cognitive impairment following chemotherapy for cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 38(7), 926–934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cella, D., Lai, J. S., Nowinski, C., Victorson, D., Peterman, A., Miller, D., Bethoux, F., Heinemann, A., Rubin, S., Cavasos, J., Reder, A., Sufit, R., Simuni, T., Holmes, G., Siderowf, A., Wojna, V., Bode, R., McKinney, N., Podrabsky, T., Wortman, K., Choi, S., Gershon, R., Rothrock, N., & Moy, C. (2012). Neuro-QOL: Brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology. Neurology, 78, 1860–1867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Cella, D., Nowinski, C., Peterman, A., Victorson, D., Miller, D., Lai, J.-S., & Moy, C. (2011). The neurology quality of life measurement (Neuro-QOL) initiative. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(Suppl 1), S28-S36.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1985). Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Perez, L., Huang, J., Jansky, L., Nowinski, C., Victorson, D., Peterman, A., & Cella, D. (2007). Using focus groups to inform the Neuro-QOL measurement tool: exploring patient-centered, health-related quality of life concepts across neurological conditions. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 39(6), 342–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gershon, R., Lai, J., Bode, R., Choi, S., Moy, C., Bleck, T., Miller, D., Peterman, A., & Cella, D. (2012). Neuro-QOL: Quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: Item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 475–486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rock, P., Roiser, J., Riedel, W., & Blackwell, A. (2014). Cognitive impairment in depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 44(10), 2029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carlozzi, N. E., Schilling, S. G., Lai, J. S., Paulsen, J. S., Hahn, E. A., Perlmutter, J. S., Ross, C. A., Downing, N. R., Kratz, A. L., McCormack, M. K., Nance, M. A., Quaid, K. A., Stout, J. C., Gershon, R. C., Ready, R. E., Miner, J. A., Barton, S. K., Perlman, S. L., Rao, S. M., Frank, S., Shoulson, I., Marin, H., Geschwind, M. D., Dayalu, P., Goodnight, S. M., & Cella, D. (2016). HDQLIFE: Development and assessment of health-related quality of life in Huntington disease (HD). Quality of Life Research, 25(10), 2441–2455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shoulson, I., & Fahn, S. (1979). Huntington disease clinical care and evaluation. Neurology, 29(1), 1–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Marder, K., Zhao, H., Myers, R. H., Cudkowicz, M., Kayson, E., Kieburtz, K., Orme, C., Paulsen, J., Penney, J. B. Jr., Siemers, E., Shoulson, I., & Huntington Study Group. (2000). Rate of functional decline in Huntington’s disease. Neurology, 54(2), 452–458.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Paulsen, J. S., Wang, C., Duff, K., Barker, R., Nance, M., Beglinger, L., Moser, D., Williams, J. K., Simpson, S., Langbehn, D., & van Kammen, D. P. (2010). Challenges assessing clinical endpoints in early Huntington disease. Movement Disorders, 25(15), 2595–2603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hanauer, D. A., Mei, Q., Law, J., Khanna, R., & Zheng, K. (2015). Supporting information retrieval from electronic health records: A report of University of Michigan’s nine-year experience in developing and using the Electronic Medical Record Search Engine (EMERSE). Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 55, 290–300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Paulsen, J. S., Hayden, M., Stout, J. C., Langbehn, D. R., Aylward, E., Ross, C. A., Guttman, M., Nance, M., Kieburtz, K., Oakes, D., Shoulson, I., Kayson, E., Johnson, S., Penziner, E., & Investigators, P.-H. (2006). Preparing for preventive clinical trials—The Predict-HD study. Archives of Neurology, 63(6), 883–890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Amtmann, D., Kim, J., Chung, H., Bamer, A. M., Askew, R. L., Wu, S., Cook, K. F., & Johnson, K. L. (2014). Comparing CESD-10, PHQ-9, and PROMIS depression instruments in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 59(2), 220–229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 18(3), 263–283.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., Cook, K., Devellis, R., Dewalt, D., Fries, J. F., Gershon, R., Hahn, E. A., Pilkonis, P., Revicki, D., Rose, M., Weinfurt, K., Hays, R., & Lai, J. S. & PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Ader, D., Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Rose, M. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Callaghan, J., Stopford, C., Arran, N., Boisse, M.-F., Coleman, A., Santos, R. D., Dumas, E. M., Hart, E. P., Justo, D., & Owen, G. (2015). Reliability and factor structure of the short problem behaviors assessment for Huntington’s disease (PBA-s) in the TRACK-HD and REGISTRY studies. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 27(1), 59–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Üstün, T. B., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., Rehm, J., Kennedy, C., Epping-Jordan, J., Saxena, S., Korff, M. v., & Pull, C. (2010). Developing the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88(11), 815–823.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Carlozzi, N. E., Kratz, A. L., Downing, N. R., Goodnight, S., Miner, J. A., Migliore, N., & Paulsen, J. S. (2015). Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD). Quality of Life Research, 24(8), 1963–1971

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Stroop, J. R. (1992). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions (Reprinted from Journal Experimental-Psychology, vol. 18, pp. 643–662, 1935). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(1), 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Beglinger, L. J., O’Rourke, J. J., Wang, C., Langbehn, D. R., Duff, K., & Paulsen, J. S. (2010). Earliest functional declines in Huntington disease. Psychiatry Research, 178(2), 414–418.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. DeVellis, R. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th edn.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cramer, D., & Howitt, D. L. (2004). The Sage dictionary of statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Andresen, E. M. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 81(12 Suppl 2), S15–S20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (2001). Applying regression and correlation: A guide for students and researchers. London: Sage Publications, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Youngstrom, E. A. (2014). A primer on receiver operating characteristic analysis and diagnostic efficiency statistics for pediatric psychology: We are ready to ROC. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(2), 204–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Heaton, R. K., Miller, S. W., Taylor, J. T., & Grant, I. (2004). Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Grimes, D. A., & Schulz, K. F. (2005). Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios. The Lancet, 365(9469), 1500–1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Duff, K., Paulsen, J. S., Beglinger, L. J., Langbehn, D. R., Wang, C., Stout, J. C., Ross, C. A., Aylward, E., Carlozzi, N. E., & Queller, S. (2010). “Frontal” behaviors before the diagnosis of Huntington’s disease and their relationship to markers of disease progression: Evidence of early lack of awareness. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 22(2), 196–207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Lai, J.-S., Zelko, F., Krull, K., Cella, D., Nowinski, C., Manley, P., & Goldman, S. (2014). Parent-reported cognition of children with cancer and its potential clinical usefulness. Quality of Life Research, 23(4), 1049–1058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Choi, S., Reise, S., Pilkonis, P., Hays, R., & Cella, D. (2010). Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms. Quality of Life Research, 19(1), 125–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lai, J. S., Zelko, F., Butt, Z., Cella, D., Kieran, M. W., Krull, K. R., Magasi, S., & Goldman, S. (2011). Parent-perceived child cognitive function: Results from a sample drawn from the US general population. Child’s Nervous System, 27(2), 285–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work on this manuscript was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS077946), and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR000433). In addition, a portion of this study sample was collected in conjunction with the Predict-HD study. The Predict-HD study was supported by the NIH, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS040068), the NIH Center for Inherited Disease Research (provided supported for sample phenotyping), and the CHDI Foundation (award to the University of Iowa). Dr. Kratz was supported during manuscript preparation by a grant from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (1K01AR064275; PI: Kratz). We thank the University of Iowa, the Investigators and Coordinators of this study, the study participants, the National Research Roster for Huntington Disease Patients and Families, the Huntington Study Group, and the Huntington’s Disease Society of America. We acknowledge the assistance of Jeffrey D. Long, Hans J. Johnson, Jeremy H. Bockholt, and Roland Zschiegner. We also acknowledge Roger Albin, Kelvin Chou, and Henry Paulsen for the assistance with participant recruitment. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. HDQLIFE Site Investigators and Coordinators: Noelle Carlozzi, Praveen Dayalu, Anna L. Kratz, Stephen Schilling, Amy Austin, Matthew Canter, Siera Goodnight, Jennifer Miner, Nicholas Migliore (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI); Jane S. Paulsen, Nancy Downing, Isabella DeSoriano, Courtney Hobart, Amanda Miller (University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA); Kimberly Quaid, Melissa Wesson (Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN); Christopher Ross, Gregory Churchill, Mary Jane Ong (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD); Susan Perlman, Brian Clemente, Aaron Fisher, Gloria Obialisi, Michael Rosco (University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA); Michael McCormack, Humberto Marin, Allison Dicke (Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ); Joel Perlmutter, Stacey Barton, Shineeka Smith (Washington University, St. Louis, MO); Martha Nance, Pat Ede (Struthers Parkinson’s Center); Stephen Rao, Anwar Ahmed, Michael Lengen, Lyla Mourany, Christine Reece, (Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH); Michael Geschwind, Joseph Winer (University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA), David Cella, Richard Gershon, Elizabeth Hahn, Jin-Shei Lai (Northwestern University, Chicago, IL).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Shei Lai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors report no disclosures and no conflicts of interest relevant to the manuscript.

Ethical approval

This project was approved by the Institutional Research Board of all participating institutions. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 42 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 35 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lai, JS., Goodnight, S., Downing, N.R. et al. Evaluating cognition in individuals with Huntington disease: Neuro-QoL cognitive functioning measures. Qual Life Res 27, 811–822 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1755-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1755-6

Keywords

Navigation