Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Gut Microbiome and Treatment-Resistance in Schizophrenia

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of antipsychotic medication is poor in 30–40% of patients with schizophrenia; treatment resistance is usually met with shifts to new drugs or drug augmentation strategies or a trial of clozapine. The purpose of this review was to examine the potential role of intestinal bacteria in the bioavailability of antipsychotic medication and the possibility that parenterally administered antipsychotics might be able to overcome treatment resistance. Databases were searched with appropriate terms to locate relevant papers dealing with the effect of antipsychotic drugs on the gut microbiome and the effect of bacterial metabolizing enzymes on antipsychotic drugs. Also searched were papers addressing the various current parenteral formulations of antipsychotic drugs. Sixty-five recent pertinent papers were reviewed and the results are suggestive of the premise that there is a drug refractory form of psychosis for which the composition of gut bacteria is responsible, and that parenteral drug administration could overcome the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kane JM. Addressing non-response in schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73:e07.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, et al. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1209–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beck K, McCutcheon R, Stephenson L, Schilderman M, Patel N, Ramsey R, et al. Prevalence of treatment-resistant psychoses in the community: a naturalistic study. J Psychopharmacol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881119855995.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Diaz-Caneja CM, Pina-Camacho L, Rodriguez-Quiroga A, Fraguas D, Parellada M, Arango C. Predictors of outcome in early onset psychosis: a systematic review. NPJ Schizophrenia. 2015;1. Article # 14005. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjschz.2014.5.

  5. Mouchlianitis E, McCutcheon R, Howes OD. Brain imaging studies of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:451–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Murru A, Carpiniello B. Duration of untreated illness as a key to early intervention in schizophrenia: a review. Neurosci Lett. 2018;669:59–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Samaha AN, Seeman P, Stewart J, Rajabi H, Kapur S. “Breakthrough” dopamine supersensitivity during ongoing antipsychotic treatment leads to treatment failure over time. J Neurosci. 2007;27:2979–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hassan AN, De Luca V. The effect of lifetime adversities on resistance to antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Res. 2015;161:496–500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lambert TJR, Velakoulis D, Pantelis C. Medical comorbidity in schizophrenia. Med J Aust. 2003;178:S67–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wimberley T, Støvring H, Sørensen HJ, Horsdal HT, MacCabe JH, Gasse C. Predictors of treatment resistance in patients with schizophrenia: a population-based cohort study. 2016;3:358–66.

  11. Butler R, Berry K, Varese F, Bucci S. Are family warmth and positive remarks related to outcomes in psychosis? A systematic Review. 2019;49:1250–65.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arranz MJ, Munro J. Toward understanding genetic risk for differential antipsychotic response in individuals with schizophrenia. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2011;4:389–405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Puangpetch A, Vanwong N, Nuntamool N, Hongkaew Y, Chamnanphon M, Sukasem C. CYP2D6 polymorphisms and their influence on risperidone treatment. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2016;9:131–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Vandenberghe F, Guidi M, Choong E, von Gunten A, Conus P, Csajka C, et al. Genetics-based population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of risperidone in a psychiatric cohort. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54:1259–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Amato D, Vernon AC, Papaleo F. Dopamine, the antipsychotic molecule: a perspectve on mechanisms underlying antipsychotic response variability. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;85:146–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reynolds GP. The pharmacogenetics of symptom response to antipsychotic drugs. Psychiatry Investig. 2012;9:1–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang JP, Lencz T, Malhotra AK. D2 receptor genetic variation and clinical response to antipsychotic drug treatment: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:763–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464:59–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhernakova A, Kurilshikov A, Bonder MJ, Tigchelaar EF, Schirmer M, Vatanen T, et al. LifeLines cohort study. Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Science. 2016;352:565–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Li J, Jia H, Cai X, Zhong H, Feng Q, Sunagawa S, et al. An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:834–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Clarke G, Sandhu KV, Griffin BT, Dinan TG, Cryan JF, Hyland NP. Gut reactions: breaking down xenobiotic–microbiome interactions. Psychol Rev. 2019;71:198–224.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmermann M, Zimmermann-Kogadeeva M, Wegmann R, Goodman AL. Separating host and microbiome contributions to drug pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Science. 2019;363:eaat9931.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kurilshikov A, Wijmenga C, Fu J, Zhernakova A. Host genetics and gut microbiome: challenges and perspectives. Trends Immunol. 2017;38:633–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Claesson MJ, Cusack S, O'Sullivan O, Greene-Diniz R, de Weerd H, Flannery E, et al. Composition, variability, and temporal stability of the intestinal microbiota of the elderly. PNAS. 2011;108:S4586–91.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jeffery IB, Lynch DB, O’Toole PW. Composition and temporal stability of the gut microbiota in older persons. ISME J. 2016;10:170–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505:559–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Portune KJ, Benítez-Páez A, Del Pulgar EM, Cerrudo V, Sanz Y. Gut microbiota, diet, and obesity-related disorders: the good, the bad, and the future challenges. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sandhu KV, Sherwin E, Schellekens H, Stanton C, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Feeding the microbiota-gut-brain axis: diet, microbiome, and neuropsychiatry. Transl Res. 2017;179:223–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shanahan F, van Sinderen D, O’Toole PW, Stanton C. Feeding the microbiota: transducer of nutrient signals for the host. Gut. 2017;66:1709–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu Y, Xie Z, Wang H, Shen Z, Guo Y, Gao Y, et al. Bacterial diversity of intestinal microbiota in patients with substance use disorders revealed by16S rRNA gene deep sequencing. Sci Rep. 2017;7:3628.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Cussotto S, Clarke G, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Psychotropics and the microbiome: a chamber of secrets. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019;236:1411–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Flowers SA, Evans SJ, Ward KM, McInnis MG, Ellingrod VL. Interaction between atypical antipsychotics and the gut microbiome in a bipolar disease cohort. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37:261–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ticinesi A, Milani C, Lauretani F, Nouvenne A, Mancabelli L, Lugli GA, et al. Gut microbiota composition is associated with polypharmacy in elderly hospitalized patients. Sci Rep. 2017;7:11102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Skonieczna-Zydecka K, Loniewski I, Misera A, Stachowska E, Maciejewska D, Marlicz W, et al. Second-generation antipsychotics and metabolism alterations: a systematic review of the role of the gut microbiome. Psychopharmacology. 2019;236:1491–512.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Barton W, Penney NC, Cronin O, Garcia-Perez I, Molloy MG, Holmes E, et al. The microbiome of professional athletes differs from that of more sedentary subjects in composition and particularly at the functional metabolic level. Gut. 2018;67:625–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Campbell SC, Wisniewski PJ II. Exercise is a novel promoter of intestinal health and microbial diversity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2017;45:41–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dikongué E, Ségurel L. Latitude as a co-driver of human gut microbial diversity? BioEssays. 2017;39:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Johnson CH, Zhao C, Xu Y, Mori T. Timing the day: what makes bacterial clocks tick? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15:232–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Voigt RM, Forsyth CB, Green SJ, Engen PA, Keshavarzian A. Circadian rhythm and the gut microbiome. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2016;131:193–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moloney RD, Desbonnet L, Clarke G, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. The microbiome: stress, health and disease. Mamm Genome. 2014;25:49–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schwarz E, Maukonen J, Hyytiäinen T, Kieseppä T, Orešič M, Sabunciyan S, et al. Analysis of microbiota in first episode psychosis identifies preliminary associations with symptom severity and treatment response. Schizophr Res. 2018;192:398–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Koppel N, Maini Rekdal V, Balskus EP. Chemical transformation of xenobiotics by the human gut microbiota. Science. 2017;356:eaag2770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilson ID, Nicholson JK. Gut microbiome interactions with drug metabolism, efficacy, and toxicity. Transl Res. 2017;179:S204–22.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Maier L, Pruteanu M, Kuhn M, Zeller G, Telzerow A, Anderson EE, et al. Extensive impact of non-antibiotic drugs on human gut bacteria. Nature. 2018;555:623.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Walsh J, Griffin BT, Clarke G, Hyland NP. Drug–gut microbiota interactions: implications for neuropharmacology. Br J Pharmacol. 2018;175:4415–29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Al-Hilal TA, Alam F, Byun Y. Oral drug delivery systems using chemical conjugates or physical complexes. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:845–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zimmerman M, Zimmerman-Kogadeeva M, Wegmann R, Goodman AL. Mapping human microbiome drug metabolism by gut bacteria and their genes. Nature. 2019;570:462–7.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kaminsky BM, Bostwick JR, Guthrie SK. Alternate routes of administration of antidepressant and antipsychotic medications. Ann Pharmacother. 2015;49:808–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Oliveira P, Fortuna A, Alves G, Amílcar F. Drug-metabolizing enzymes and efflux transporters in nasal epithelium: influence on the bioavailability of intranasally administered drugs. Current Drug Metabol. 2016;17:628–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Quintana DS, Guastella AJ, Westlye LT, Andreassen OA. The promise and pitfalls of intranasally administering psychopharmacological agents for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:29–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Katare YK, Piazza JE, Bhandari J, Daya RP, Akilan K, Simpson MJ, et al. Intranasal delivery of antipsychotic drugs. Schizophr Res. 2017;184:2–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wong YC, Zuo Z. Brain disposition and catalepsy after intranasal delivery of loxapine: role of metabolism in PK/PD of intranasal CNS drugs. Pharm Res. 2013;30:2368–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Taylor DM, Velaga S, Werneke U. Reducing the stigma of long acting injectable antipsychotics: current concepts and future developments. Nord J Psychiatry. 2018;72:S36–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Seeman MV. Drawbacks of long-acting intramuscular antipsychotic injections. J Clin Practical Nurs. 2017;1:12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ita K. Percutaneous transport of psychotropic agents. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 2017:247–59.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Zun LS. Evidence-based review of pharmacotherapy for acute agitation. Part 1: onset of efficacy. J Emerg Med. 2018;54:364–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Citrome L. Inhaled loxapine for agitation. Curr Psychiatr Ther. 2013;12:31–6.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Currier G, Walsh P. Safety and efficacy review of inhaled loxapine for treatment of agitation. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2013;7:25–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Citrome L. Asenapine for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a review of the efficacy and safety profile for this newly approved sublingually absorbed second-generation antipsychotic. Int J Clin Practice. 2009;63:1762–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Kinon BJ, Hill AL, Liu H, Kollack-Walker S. Olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets in the treatment of acutely ill non-compliant patients with schizophrenia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2003;6:97–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Pratts M, Citrome L, Grant W, Leso L, Opler LA. A single-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sublingual asenapine for acute agitation. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014;130:61–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Thulluru A, Mahammed N, Madhavi C, Nandini K, Sirisha S, Spandana D. Sublingual tablets – an updated review. Asian J Pharm Res. 2019;9:97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Abdelbary A, Bendas ER, Ramadan AA, Mostafa DA. Pharmaceutical and pharmacokinetic evaluation of a novel fast dissolving film formulation of flupentixol dihydrochloride. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014;15:1603–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Nagar M, Nagar M, Chopra V. Formulation and evaluation of mouth dissolving film of antipsychotic drug aripiprazole. Pharm Lett. 2012;4:1221–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Bartlett JA, van der Voort Maarschalk K. Understanding the oral mucosal absorption and resulting clinical pharmacokinetics of asenapine. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2012;13:1110–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Solanki A, Gupta N, Jain S. Formulation, development and evaluation of fast dissolving oral film of antipsychotic drug. J Drug Delivery Therapeut. 2019;9:181–5.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Fakhar-Ud-Din KGM. Development and characterisation of levosulpiride-loaded suppositories with improved bioavailability in vivo. Pharm Dev Technol. 2019;24:63–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Matsumoto K, Kimura S, Takahashi K, Yokoyama Y, Miyazawa M, Kushibiki S, et al. Pharmaceutical studies on and clinical application of olanzapine suppositories prepared as a hospital preparation. J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2016;2:20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Isaac M, Holvey C. Transdermal patches: the emerging mode of drug delivery system in psychiatry. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2012;2:255–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Kayhart B, Lapid MI, Nelson S, Cunningham JL, Thompson VH, Leung JG. A lack of systemic absorption following the repeated application of topical quetiapine in healthy adults. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018;35:1076–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Manikkath J, Shenoy GG, Pandey S, Mutalik S. Response surface methodology for optimization of ultrasound-assisted transdermal delivery and skin retention of asenapine maleate. J Pharm Innov. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-019-09386-4.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lopez A, Rey J. Role of paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly in the management of schizophrenia: insights from clinical practice. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019;15:449–56.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Haddad PM, Kishimoto T, Correll CU, Kane JM. Ambiguous findings concerning potential advantages of depot antipsychotics: in search of clinical relevance. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015;28:216–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Ostuzzi G, Bighelli I, So R, Furukawa TA, Barbui C. Does formulation matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis of oral versus long-acting antipsychotic studies. Schizophr Res. 2017;183:10–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Correll CU, Citrome L, Haddad PM, Lauriello J, Olfson M, Calloway SM, et al. The use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in schizophrenia: evaluating the evidence. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77:S1–S24.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Kishimoto T, Robenzadeh A, Leucht C, Leucht S, Watanabe K, Mimura M, et al. Long-acting injectable vs oral antipsychotics for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40:192–213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Miyamoto S, Fleischhacker W. The use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Curr Treat Options Psych. 2017;4:117–26.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Tiihonen J, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Majak M, Mehtälä J, Hoti F, Jedenius E, et al. Real-world effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments in a nationwide cohort of 29 823 patients with schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiat. 2017;74:686–93.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Lin CH, Chen FC, Chan HY, Hsu CC. Time to rehospitalization in patients with schizophrenia receiving long-acting injectable antipsychotics or oral antipsychotics. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019:7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyz035.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Olagunju AT, Clark SR, Baune BT. Long-acting atypical antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analyses of effects on functional outcome. Austr NZ J Psychiatry. 2019;53:509–27.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Park S-C, Young Choi MY, Choi J, Park E, Tchoe HJ, Suh JK, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of long-acting injectable and oral second-generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2018;16:361–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Misawa F, Kishimoto T, Hagi K, Kane JM, Correll CU. Safety and tolerability of long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies comparing the same oral and depot AP. Schizophr Res. 2016;176:220–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Pietrini F, Albert U, Ballerini A, Calò P, Maina G, Pinna F, et al. The modern perspective for long-acting injectables antipsychotics in the patient-centered care of schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019;15:1045–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Tveito M, Smith RL, Molden E, Haslemo T, Refsum H, Hartberg C, et al. Age impacts olanzapine exposure differently during use of oral versus long-acting injectable formulations: an observational study including 8,288 patients. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018;38:570–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 260 Heath St. West Suite #605, Toronto, Ontario, M5P 3L6, Canada

    Mary V. Seeman

Authors
  1. Mary V. Seeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary V. Seeman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest. The author has nothing to disclose.

Ethical Approval

This is a review paper. No ethical approval was sought.

Informed Consent

This is a review paper. There was no need for consent.

Humans or Animals Participants

There was no research involving humans or animals.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seeman, M.V. The Gut Microbiome and Treatment-Resistance in Schizophrenia. Psychiatr Q 91, 127–136 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-019-09695-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-019-09695-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation