Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Design of a survey to assess prospects for consumer electric mobility in Canada: a retrospective appraisal

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the process that led to the development of a national survey instrument used to gather over 20,000 observations across Canada. This survey captured aspects of household preferences and behavioural intentions towards electric vehicles through a choice experiment and a comprehensive suite of attitudinal questions. Background information on demographics, residential location and context, vehicle ownership and purchase plans, and travel patterns among other aspects were also collected. Important survey design decisions are examined that include: the choice and implications of using a survey panel, screening criteria for the sample, conceptualization of the observational unit for the sample, critical aspects relating to the choice experiment, and tactics employed to manage and measure survey cognitive burden. Novel aspects associated with the survey design are discussed in this paper and these have enabled new research works on the implications of vehicle body type on choice of powertrain and insights into spatial variation in electric vehicle preferences. Results and insights discussed are seen as relevant for a range of survey practitioners including those with a focus on the consumer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abotalebi, E., Mahmoud, M., Ferguson, M.R., Kanaroglou, P.S.:Utilizing stated preference in electric vehicle research; evidence from the literature. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Canadian Transport Research Forum Conference, Montreal, pp. 1–19 (2015)

  • Achtnicht, M.: German car buyers’ willingness to pay to reduce CO2 emissions. Clim. Change 113, 679–697 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behaviour. Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179–211 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Axsen, J., Bailey, J., Castro, M.A.: Preference and lifestyle heterogeneity among potential plug-in electric vehicle buyers. Energy Econ. 50, 190–201 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M.J., Rose, J.M., Hensher, D.: Environmental attitudes and emissions charging: an example of policy implications for vehicle choice. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 50, 171–182 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasius, J., Brandt, M.: Representativeness in online surveys through stratified samples. Bulletin de me´thodologie sociologique 107, 5–21 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliemer, M.C.J., Rose, J.M.: Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: an empirical study in air travel choice. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 45, 63–79 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, D.S., Bradley, M., Golob, T.F., Kitamura, R., Occhiuzzo, G.P.: Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: a discrete-choice stated preference pilot project. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 27, 237–253 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A.R., Ryley, T., Thring, R.: Identifying the early adopters of alternative fuel vehicles: a case study of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 46, 1318–1327 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, F.: Design of stated preference surveys: is there more to learn from behavioral economics. Environ. Resour. Econ. 46, 167–177 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, F., Martinsson, P.: Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. Health Econ. 12, 281–294 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D.: Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. Wiley, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Egbue, O., Long, S.: Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: an analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy 48, 717–729 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, G.O., Sarigöllü, E.: Car fuel-type choice under travel demand management and economic incentives. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 3, 429–444 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, M., Mohamed, M., Higgins, C.D., Abotalebi, E., Kanaroglou, P.: How open are Canadian households to electric vehicles? A national latent class choice analysis with willingness-to-pay and metropolitan characterization. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 58, 208–224 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackbarth, A., Madlener, R.: Consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles: a discrete choice analysis. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 25, 5–17 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Helveston, J.P., Liu, Y., Feit, E.M., Fuchs, E., Klampfl, E., Michalek, J.J.: Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the US and China. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 73, 96–112 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D., Rose, J., William, W.: Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D.A., Beck, M.J., Rose, J.M.: Accounting for preference and scale heterogeneity in establishing whether it matters who is interviewed to reveal household automobile purchase preferences. Environ. Resour. Econ. 49, 1–22 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidrue, M.K., Parsons, G.R., Kempton, W., Gardner, M.P.: Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resour. Energy Econ. 33, 686–705 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, C.D., Mohamed, M., Ferguson, M.R.: Size matters: how vehicle body type affects consumer preferences for electric vehicles. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 100, 182–201 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoen, A., Koetse, M.J.: A choice experiment on alternative fuel vehicle preferences of private car owners in the Netherlands. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 61, 199–215 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, M., Jaccard, M., Tiedemann, K.: Improving behavioral realism in hybrid energy-economy models using discrete choice studies of personal transportation decisions. Energy Econ. 27, 59–77 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J., Zwerina, K.: The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. J. Mark. Res. XXXIII, 307–317 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A.F., Cherchi, E., Mabit, S.L.: On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 25, 24–32 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, R.M., Sanya, R.C., Lane, B.W., Graham, J.D.: Perception and reality: public knowledge of plug-in electric vehicles in 21 U.S. cities. Energy Policy 63, 433–440 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, B., Potter, S.: The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: exploring the consumer attitude-action gap. J. Clean. Prod. 15, 1085–1092 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, F., Molin, E., van Wee, B.: Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review. Transp. Rev. 37, 252–275 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J., Hensher, D., Joffre Swait, J.: Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabit, S.L., Fosgerau, M.: Demand for alternative-fuel vehicles when registration taxes are high. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 16, 225–231 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Massiani, J.: Stated preference surveys for electric and alternative fuel vehicles: are we doing the right thing? Transp. Lett. 6, 152–160 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, A.W., Craig, S.B.: Identifying careless responses in survey data. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago (2011)

  • Mohamed, M., Higgins, C., Ferguson, M., Kanaroglou, P.: Identifying and characterizing potential electric vehicle adopters in Canada: a two-stage modelling approach. Transp. Policy 52, 100–112 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, M., Higgins, C.D., Ferguson, M., Réquia, W.J.: The influence of vehicle body type in shaping behavioural intention to acquire electric vehicles: a multi-group structural equation approach. Transp. Res. Part A 116, 54–72 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moons, I., de Pelsmacker, P.: Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention. J. Mark. Manag. 28, 195–237 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrik, O., De Abreu e Silva, J., Moura, F.: Stated preference surveys in transport demand modeling: disengagement of respondents. Transp. Lett. Int. J. Transp. Res. 8, 13–25 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Potoglou, D., Kanaroglou, P.S.: An internet-based stated choices household survey for alternative fuelled vehicles. Can. J. Transp. 1, 36–55 (2007a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Potoglou, D., Kanaroglou, P.S.: Household demand and willingness to pay for clean vehicles. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 12, 264–274 (2007b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J.M., Bliemer, M.C.J.: Stated preference experimental design strategies. In: Hensher, D.A., Button, K.J. (eds.) Handbook of Transport Modelling, 2nd edn, pp. 151–180. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopher, R.P.: A review of separate and joint strategies for the use of data on revealed and stated choices. Transp. J. 25, 187–205 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, D.J., Burgess, L., Louviere, J.J.: Quick and easy choice sets: constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. Int. J. Res. Mark. 22, 459–470 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Szolnoki, G., Hoffmann, D.: Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research. Wine Econ. Policy 2, 57–66 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, M., Ida, T., Murakami, K., Friedman, L.: Consumers’ willingness to pay for alternative fuel vehicles: a comparative discrete choice analysis between the US and Japan. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 70, 194–209 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, A.: Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: a discrete choice analysis for Germany. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 46, 1372–1385 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the editor (Dr. Patricia Mokhtarian) and three anonymous reviewers for providing insightful comments to improve our paper. This work was supported financially by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant No: 886-2013-0001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Elnaz Abotalebi

  2. McMaster Institute for Transportation and Logistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Mark R. Ferguson

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Moataz Mohamed

  4. TransLAB (Transportation Research Lab), School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Darren M. Scott

Authors
  1. Elnaz Abotalebi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark R. Ferguson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Moataz Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Darren M. Scott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darren M. Scott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abotalebi, E., Ferguson, M.R., Mohamed, M. et al. Design of a survey to assess prospects for consumer electric mobility in Canada: a retrospective appraisal. Transportation 47, 1223–1250 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9952-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9952-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation