Skip to main content
Log in

Fractional-order flight control of quadrotor UAS on vision-based precision hovering with larger sampling period

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fractional-order flight control has a history of nearly 10 years. Fractional-order controllers (FOCs) have been proved to be better in rising time, overshoot and robustness against plant variation. However, there are still not many real applications of FOC in industry. More case studies need to be carried out to accelerate the maturation of FOC. Quadrotor vision-based control often has a large and time-varying sampling period due to drone’s resource limitation. Therefore, our research has been focused on a specific case for drone vision-based control to investigate the benefits of FOC. In this paper, FOC has been first discovered to be able to tolerate larger sampling period than integer-order controllers. This fact has been proved both theoretically and numerically. First of all, the speed model was identified from real flight tests. Then an integral-order proportional, integral and derivative (IOPID) controller and a fractional-order proportional–derivative (FOPD) controller were designed. After that, a stability criteria, optimization method, graphic method and parallel computing techniques were employed to theoretically prove that the largest sampling period of the designed FOC (0.933 s) is much larger than that of the designed integral-order controller (0.546 s). Later, Simulink simulation with identified linear model proved that the FOC can tolerate larger sampling period. Finally, flight tests showed that the designed FOC has a nearly 20% better precision on drone vision-based hovering than the IOC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luo, Y., Chao, H., Di, L., Chen, Y.Q.: Lateral directional fractional order \(PI^\alpha \) control of a small fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles: controller designs and flight tests. IET Control Theory Appl. 5(18), 2156–2167 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Shang, B., Liu, J., Zhao, T., Chen, Y.Q.: Fractional order robust visual servoing control of a quadrotor UAV with larger sampling period. In: 2016 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), pp. 1228–1234. IEEE (2016)

  3. Shang, B., Wu, C., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y.Q.: Analysis of maximum possible sampling period for a real-time vision-based control system. In: ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 1–7. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2017)

  4. Shang, B., Wu, C., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y.Q.: Code for “Analysis of maximum possible sampling period for a real-time vision-based control system”. http://bit.ly/max-sampling-period. Accessed 06 Nov 2018

  5. Podlubny: Fractional Differential Equations: An Introduction to Fractional Derivatives, Fractional Differential Equations, to Methods of Their Solution and some of Their Applications, vol. 198. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, K.S.: Derivatives of noninteger order. Math. Mag. 68(3), 183–192 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Caputo, M.: Linear models of dissipation whose Q is almost frequency independent. Ann. Geophys. 19(4), 383–393 (1966)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo, Y., Chen, Y.Q.: Fractional order [proportional derivative] controller for a class of fractional order systems. Automatica 45(10), 2446–2450 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, H.S., Luo, Y., Chen, Y.Q.: A fractional order proportional and derivative (FOPD) motion controller: tuning rule and experiments. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 18(2), 516–520 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kao, C.-Y., Lincoln, B.: Simple stability criteria for systems with time-varying delays. Automatica 40(8), 1429–1434 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Shang, B., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Wu, C., Chen, Y.Q.: Drone code for visual hovering. https://github.com/cnpcshangbo/vision-hovering. Accessed 03 Aug 2018

  12. Mackay, R.: Red balloon finder. https://github.com/rmackay9/ardupilot-balloon-finder. Accessed 30 July 2018

  13. Fliess, M., Join, C.: Model-free control and intelligent pid controllers: towards a possible trivialization of nonlinear control? IFAC Proc. Vol. 42(10), 1531–1550. 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification (2009)

  14. Zhang, X., Wang, H., Tian, Y., Peyrodie, L., Wang, X.: Model-free based neural network control with time-delay estimation for lower extremity exoskeleton. Neurocomputing 272, 178–188 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmed, S., Wang, H., Tian, Y.: Model-free control using time delay estimation and fractional-order nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode for uncertain lower-limb exoskeleton. J. Vib. Control 24(22), 5273–5290 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Mathworks. Pid tuning algorithm for linear plant model. https://www.mathworks.com/help/control/ref/pidtune.html. Accessed 13 Mar 2019

  17. Åström, K.J., Hägglund, T.: Advanced PID control. ISA-The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society; Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 (2006)

  18. Dorf, R., Bishop, R.: Modern Control Systems, 8th edn. Books by Marquette University Faculty (1998)

  19. Simulink library Performance index. http://bit.ly/performance-index. Accessed 06 Nov 2018

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank Bo Shang’s wife Juyao Dong’s support on taking care of their little daughter. Thank Bo Shang’s parents’ financial support to keep this research going on.

Funding

This work was supported in part by Xihua University, China Scholarship Council (CSC), Shenyang City Foundation #17-87-0-00, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant nos. 61701101, U1713216, 61803077, the National Key Robot Project under Grant nos. 2017YFB1300900, 2017YFB1301103, and the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities of China N172603001, N181602014, N172604004, N172604003, and N172604002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chengdong Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was supported in part by the research project granted by Xihua University and China Scholarship Council (CSC), National Key R&D Program of China, No. 2017YFB1300900 and Shenyang City Foundation #17-87-0-00.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shang, B., Liu, J., Zhang, Y. et al. Fractional-order flight control of quadrotor UAS on vision-based precision hovering with larger sampling period. Nonlinear Dyn 97, 1735–1746 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05103-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-019-05103-5

Keywords

Navigation