Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Study of iron oxide nanoparticles in soil for remediation of arsenic

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the use of nanoparticles for environmental applications due to their unique physical and chemical properties. One possible application is the removal of contaminants from water. In this study, the use of iron oxide nanoparticles (19.3 nm magnetite and 37.0 nm hematite) were examined to remove arsenate and arsenite through column studies. The columns contained 1.5 or 15 wt% iron oxide nanoparticles and soil. Arsenic experiments were conducted with 1.5 wt% iron oxides at 1.5 and 6 mL/h with initial arsenate and arsenite concentrations of 100 μg/L. Arsenic release occurred after 400 PV, and 100% release was reached. A long-term study was conducted with 15 wt% magnetite nanoparticles in soil at 0.3 mL/h with an initial arsenate concentration of 100 μg/L. A negligible arsenate concentration occurred for 3559.6 pore volumes (PVs) (132.1 d). Eventually, the arsenate concentration reached about 20% after 9884.1 PV (207.9 d). A retardation factor of about 6742 was calculated indicating strong adsorption of arsenic to the magnetite nanoparticles in the column. Also, increased adsorption was observed after flow interruption. Other experiments showed that arsenic and 12 other metals (V, Cr, Co, Mn, Se, Mo, Cd, Pb, Sb, Tl, Th, U) could be simultaneously removed by the iron oxide nanoparticles in soil. Effluent concentrations were less than 10% for six out of the 12 metals. Desorption experiment showed partial irreversible sorption of arsenic to the iron oxide nanoparticle surface. Strong adsorption, large retardation factor, and resistant desorption suggest that magnetite and hematite nanoparticles have the potential to be used to remove arsenic in sandy soil possibly through in situ techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth CC, Pilou JL, Gassman PL, Van der Sluys WG (1994) Cobalt, cadmium and lead sorption on hydrous iron oxide: residence time effect. Soil Sci Soc Am 58:1615–1623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Appelo CA, Van Der Weiden MJJ, Tournassat C, Charlet L (2002) Surface complexation of ferrous iron and carbonate on ferrihydrite and the mobilization of arsenic. Environ Sci Technol 36:3096–3103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brusseau ML, Rao PSC, Jessup RE, Davidson JM (1989) Flow interruption: a method for investigating sorption non-equilibrium. J Contam Hydrol 4:223–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerovi L, Lefèvre G, Jaubertie A, Fédoroff M, Milonji S (2009) Deposition of hematite particles on polypropylene walls in dynamic conditions. J Colloid Interf Sci 330:284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark GL (1990) Flow rate effects on the sorption of methylated benzenes in saturated aquifer materials. Rice University, Houston, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell RM, Schwertmann U (1996) The iron oxides: structure, properties, reactions, occurrence and use. Weinheim, New York, p 573

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarco MJ, SenGupta AK, Greenleaf JE (2003) Arsenic removal using a polymeric/inorganic hybrid sorbent. Water Res 37:164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit S, Hering JG (2003) Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic (III) sorption onton iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility. Environ Sci Technol 37:4182–4189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Domenico PA, Schwartz FW (1998) Physical and chemical hydrogeology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Kan AT, Tomson MB (2003) Critical evaluation of desorption phenomena of heavy metals from natural sediments. Environ Sci Technol 37:5566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Genc-Fuhrman H, Tjell JC, McConchie D (2004) Adsorption of arsenic from water using activated neutralized red mud. Environ Sci Technol 38:2428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez J, Martınez M, Pablo Jd, Rovira M, Duroc L (2007) Arsenic sorption onto natural hematite, magnetite, and goethite. J Hazard Mater 141:575–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kan AT, Fu G, Hunter M, Chen W, Ward CH, Tomson MB (1998) Irreversible sorption of neutral hydrocarbons to sediments: experimental observations and model predictions. Environ Sci Technol 32:892–902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanel SR, Manning B, Charlet L, Choi H (2005) Removal of Arsenic(III) from groundwater by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environ Sci Technol 39:1291–1298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanel S, Greneche J, Choi H (2006) Arsenic (V) removal from groundwater using nano scale zero-valent iron as a colloidal reactive barrier material. Environ Sci Technol 40:2045–2050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kookana RS, Naidu R, Tiller KG (1994) Sorption non-equilibrium during cadmium transport through soils. Aust J Soil Res 32:635–651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W-T (2006) Nanoparticles and their biological and environmental applications. J Biosci Bioeng 102:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry G, Johnson K (2004) Congener-specific dechlorination of dissolved PCBs by microscale and nanoscale zerovalent iron in a water/methanol solution. Environ Sci Technol 38:5208–5216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manning BA, Hunt M, Amrhein C, Yarmoff JA (2002) Arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) reactions with zerovalent iron corrosion products. Environ Sci Technol 36:5455–5461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murali V, Aylmore LAG (1980) No-flow equilibrium and adsorption dynamics during ionic transport in soils. Nature 283:467–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagayama M, Cohen M (1962) The anodic of oxidation of iron in neutral solution. J Electrochem Soc 109:781–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponder SM, Darab JG, Mallouk TE (2000) Remediation of Cr(VI) and Pb(II) aqueous solutions using supported, nanoscale zero-valent iron. Environ Sci Technol 34:2564–2569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley HJ, Yean S, Kan AT, Tomson MB (2009) Effect of solid concentration, pH, IS, and Temperature on arsenic adsorption. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:509–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smedley PL, Kinniburgh DG (2002) A review of the source, behavior, and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl Geochem 17:517–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic chemistry, 3rd edn, vol 60. Wiley, New York, 1200pp

  • Tran YT, Bajracharya K, Barry DA (1998) Anomalous cadmium adsorption in flow interruption experiments. Geoderma 84:169–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tratnyek PG, Johnson RL (2006) Nanotechnologies for environmental cleanup. Nano Today 1:44–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Violante A, Pigna M (2002) Competitive sorption of arsenate and phosphate on different clay minerals and soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1788–1796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waychunas GA, Rea BA, Fuller CC, Davis JA (1993) Surface chemistry of ferrihydrite: Part 1. EXAFS studies of the geometry of coprecipitated and adsorbed arsenate. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 57:2251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JT, Enfield CG, Dunlap WJ, Cosby RL, Foster DA, Baskin LB (1981) Transport and fate of selected organic pollutants in a sandy soil. J Environ Qual 10:501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin S, Le XC (2001) Speciation of arsenic using solid phase extraction cartridges. J Environ Monit 3:81–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz CT, Mayo JT, Yu WW, Prakash A, Falkner J, Yean S, Cong L, Shipley HJ, Kan AT, Tomson MB, Natelson D, Colvin VL (2006) Low-field magnetic separation of monodisperse Fe3O4 nanocrystals. Science 314:964–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yean S, Cong L, Yavuz CT, Mayo JT, Yu WW, Kan AT, Colvin VL, Tomson MB (2005) Effect of magnetic particle size on adsorption and desorption of arsenite and arsenate. J Mater Res 20:3255–3264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan C, Lien H-L (2006) Removal of arsenate from aqueous solution using nanoscale iron particles. Water Qual Res J Canada 41:210–215

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W (2003) Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: An overview. J Nanopart Res 5:323–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported from the National Science Foundation through the Broadening Participation Research Initiation Grants in Engineering [EEC-0823685] and the University of Texas-San Antonio Tenure Track Research Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78249, USA

    Heather J. Shipley, Karen E. Engates & Allison M. Guettner

Authors
  1. Heather J. Shipley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karen E. Engates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Allison M. Guettner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather J. Shipley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shipley, H.J., Engates, K.E. & Guettner, A.M. Study of iron oxide nanoparticles in soil for remediation of arsenic. J Nanopart Res 13, 2387–2397 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-9999-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-9999-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation