Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of competition and performance goals on decoding complex emotions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research examines the processes through which competitive contexts influence performance in an understudied domain: social perception. In two experiments (one preregistered), we test how competition (relative to control) influences performance on a measure of emotion decoding: The Reading-the-mind-in-the-Eyes (RME) task. Specifically, we examine whether performance-approach (PAP) and performance-avoidance (PAV) goals (as well as mastery-approach [MAP] and mastery-avoidance [MAV] goals) affect the competition-performance relation in this domain. The results indicate no direct effect of competition on RME performance, but that competition promotes the pursuit of both PAP and PAV goals. Moreover, we find that both PAP and PAV goals are positively related to RME performance in a competitive, but not control, context. Mediational analyses indicate that PAP goals, in particular, are the process through which competition indirectly influences RME performance. These findings integrate several different heretofore separate literatures, and lay the foundation for exciting new work in this overlooked area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the pre-registration, we mistakenly stated that the Baron-Cohen et al. measure has 32 items – this mistake has been corrected herein.

References

  • Adams, R. B., Albohn, D. N., & Kveraga, K. (2017). Social vision: Applying a social-functional approach to face and expression perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. V., & Morales, J. R. (2013). Social cognition and perception. In H. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 225–246). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1992). Another look at new look. American Psychologist, 47, 780–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, A. J., Lawrence, A. D., Keane, J., Scott, S. K., Owen, A. M., Christoffels, I., et al. (2002). Reading the mind from eye gaze. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1129–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodell-Feder, D., Ressler, K., & Germine, L. T. (2020). Social cognition or social class and culture? On the interpretation of differences in social cognitive performance. Psychological Medicine, 50, 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of co-operation and competition. Human relations, 2, 129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Hulleman, C. S. (2017). Achievement goals. In A. Elliot, C. Dweck, & D. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation, second edition: Theory and application (pp. 43–60). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., Jury, M., & Murayama, K. (2017). Trait and perceived environmental competitiveness in achievement situations. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hangen, E. J., Elliot, A. J., & Jamieson, J. (2016). The opposing processes model of competition: Effects of competition on cardiovascular responses and risk-taking. Motivation Science, 2, 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoorens, V., & Damme, C. V. (2012). What do people infer from social comparisons? Bridges between social comparison and person perception. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 607–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J. M., Harris, P. B., Howansky, K., & Houston, S. M. (2015). Winning at work: Trait competitiveness, personality types, and occupational interests. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 49–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. (2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 48–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, E. E., Barasch, A., Rand, D., Berman, J. Z., & Small, D. A. (2018). Signaling emotion and reason in cooperation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 702–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochbaum, M., & Gottardy, J. (2015). A meta-analytic review of the approach-avoidance achievement goals and performance relationships in the sport psychology literature. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4, 164–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P. H., Wuehrmann, E. V., & Josephs, R. A. (2009). When are low testosterone levels advantageous? The moderating role of individual vs. group competition. Hormones and Behavior, 56, 158–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). The competition–performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1035–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olderbak, S., Wilhelm, O., Olaru, G., Geiger, M., Brenneman, M. W., & Roberts, R. D. (2015). A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortvliet, P. M., & Darnon, C. (2010). Towards a more social understanding of achievement goals: The interpersonal effects of mastery and performance goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 324–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruscher, J. B., & Fiske, S. T. (1990). Interpersonal competition can cause individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 832–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, D. F., & Hugenberg, K. (2008). Cooperative and competitive motives enhance perceptual sensitivity to angry and happy facial expressions. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 382–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultheiss, O. C., & Hale, J. A. (2007). Implicit motives modulate attentional orienting to facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommet, N., Elliot, A. J., Jamieson, J., & Butera, F. (2019). Income inequality, perceived competitiveness, and approach-avoidance motivation. Journal of Personality, 87, 767–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. T., Soto, J. A., & Adams, R. B., Jr. (2012). More than meets the eye: The role of self-identity in decoding complex emotional states. Emotion, 12, 882–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Velden, F. S., Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. (2009). Goal expectations meet regulatory focus: How appetitive and aversive competition influence negotiation. Social Cognition, 27, 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1992). Adversarial problem solving: Modeling an opponent using explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science, 16, 123–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.). (2015). American Psychological Association dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welling, L. L. M., Persola, L., Wheatley, J. R., Cárdenas, R. A., & Puts, D. A. (2013). Competition and men’s face preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 414–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worchel, S., Shebilske, W. L., Jordan, J. A., & Prison, R. (1997). Competition and performance on a computer-based complex perceptual-motor task. Human Factors, 39, 410–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. G., Hugenberg, K., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F. (2012). Perception and motivation in face recognition: A critical review of theories of the cross-race effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 116–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. G., & Wilson, J. P. (2018). A minimal ingroup advantage in emotion identification confidence. Cognition and Emotion, 32, 192–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven G. Young.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix

The complete list of items used for each goal measure in the current research is provided below.

Performance-approach (PAP)

My aim is to perform well relative to other workers in this experiment.

I am striving to do well compared to other workers in this experiment.

My goal is to perform better than the other workers in this experiment.

Performance-avoidance (PAV)

My aim is to avoid doing worse than other workers in this experiment.

I am striving to avoid performing worse than other workers in this experiment.

My goal is to avoid performing poorly compared to other workers in this experiment.

Mastery-approach (MAP)

My aim is to completely master the task in this experiment.

I am striving to understand this experiment as thoroughly as possible.

My goal is to do as well as possible in this experiment.

Mastery-avoidance (MAV)

My aim is to avoid doing worse than I possibly could in this experiment.

I am striving to avoid an incomplete understanding of the experiment.

My goal is to avoid learning less than it is possible to learn in this experiment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Young, S.G., Elliot, A.J. The influence of competition and performance goals on decoding complex emotions. Motiv Emot 44, 911–920 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09845-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09845-3

Keywords

Navigation