Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An integrative model of emotion regulation and associations with positive and negative affectivity across four Arabic speaking countries and the USA

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The associations between emotion regulation (ER) and positive and negative affectivity have been well investigated. However, previous studies have examined these associations using a variety of individual ER scales with little integration across measurement approaches. The current study thus aimed to explore a joint ER structural model across three widely-used ER scales (the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire) using 1852 participants from four Middle Eastern Arabic speaking countries (Egypt, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Qatar) and a Western country (USA). The results showed cross-culture differences with regard to mean-level differences and patterns of correlations among positive and negative affectivity and the individual subscales of the three ER scales. In addition, a two-factor integrative model that was robust across all five countries emerged across scales which included a more adaptive strategies factor and a less adaptive strategies factor. Further, the more adaptive strategies factor, but not the less adaptive strategies factor, yielded highly consistent associations with positive and negative affectivity across all countries. Accordingly, culture may play a more important role in shaping the less adaptive ER strategies and their associations with negative and positive affectivity, but less so for more positive strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdi, S., Taban, S., & Ghaemian, A. (2012). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: Validity and reliability of the Persian translation of the CERQ (36-item). Procedia-Social & Behavioral Sciences, 32, 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abler, B., & Kessler, H. (2009). Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: A German version of the ERQ by Gross and John. Diagnostica, 55, 144–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldao, A., Jazaieri, H., Goldin, P. R., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies: Interactive effects during CBT for social anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorder, 28, 382–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 217–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arens, E. A., Balkir, N., & Barnow, S. (2012). Ethic variation in emotion regulation: Do cultural differences end where psychopathology begins? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balzarotti, S., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2010). An Italian adaptation of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabello, R., Salguero, J., Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Gross, J. J. (2013). A Spanish adaptation of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., & Gerbino, M. (2001). Affective perceived self-efficacy: The capacity to regulate negative affect and to express positive affect. In G. V. Caprara (Ed.), Self-efficacy assessment (pp. 35–50). Trento: Edizioni Erickson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Giunta, L. D., Gerbino, M., Pastorelli, C., Tramontano, C., & Eisenberg, N. (2008). Assessing regulatory emotional self-efficacy in three countries. Psychological Assessment, 20, 227–237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cerutti, R., Presaghi, F., Gratz, K. L., & Manca, M. (2012). Deliberate self-harm behavior among Italian young adults: Correlations with clinical and nonclinical dimensions of personality. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82, 298–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, L. R., Cassiello-Robbins, C., Brake, C. A., Sauer-Zavala, S., Farchione, T. J., Ciraulo, D. A., & Barlow, D. H. (2015). Relationships among adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies and psychopathology during the treatment of comorbid anxiety and alcohol use disorders. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 73, 124–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez-Sánchez, F. J., Lasa-Aristu, A., Amor, P. J., & Holgado-Tello, F. P. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Assessment, 20, 253–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, A. C., Matos, A. P., & Marques, C. (2015). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: Gender’s moderating effect. Procedia-Social & Behavioral Sciences, 165, 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehring, T., Fischer, S., Schnülle, J., Bösterling, A., & Tuschen-Caffier, B. (2008). Characteristics of emotion regulation in recovered depressed versus never depressed individuals. Personality & Individual Differences, 44, 1574–1584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, B. Q., & Mauss, I. B. (2015). Culture and emotion regulation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 3, 1–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2007). The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Psychometric features and prospective relationships with depression and anxiety in adults. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality & Individual Differences, 30, 1311–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (2001). Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 214–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85, 348–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jermann, F., Van der Linden, M., d’Acremont, M., & Zermatten, A. (2006). Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ): Confirmatory factor analyses and psychometric properties of the French translation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 126–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loch, N., Hiller, W., & Witthöft, M. (2011). The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ): Psychometric evaluation of a German adaptation. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 40, 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. C., & Dahlen, E. R. (2005). Cognitive emotion regulation in the prediction of depression, anxiety, stress, and anger. Personality & Individual Differences, 39, 1249–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D. (2006). Are cultural differences in emotion regulation mediated by personality traits? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 421–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., Nakagawa, S., et al (2008). Culture, emotion regulation, and adjustment. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 94, 925–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, I. B., Bunge, S. A., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Culture and automatic emotion regulation. In M. Vanderkerckhove, C. von Scheve, S. Ismer, S. Jung & S. Kronast (Eds.), Regulating emotions: Culture, social necessity, and biological inheritance (pp. 39–60). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Megreya, A. M., Latzman, R. D., Al-Attiyah, A. A., & Alrashidi, M. (2016). The robustness of the nine-factor structure of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire across four Arabic speaking middle eastern countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 875–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2013). Mplus user’s guide (7th edn.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Otterpohl, N., Schwinger, M., & Wild, E. (2016). Exploring the interplay of adaptive and maladaptive strategies: Prevalence and functionality of anger regulation profiles in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 1042–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perţe, A., & Miclea, M. (2011). The standardization of the Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionaire (CERQ) on Romanian population. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 111–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riediger, M., & Klipker, K. (2014). Emotion Regulation in Adolescence. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd edn., pp. 187–202). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala, M. N., Molina, P., Abler, B., Kessler, H., Vanbrabant, L., & van de Schoot, R. (2012). Measurement invariance of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ): A cross-national validity study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 751–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto, J. A., Perez, C. R., Kim, Y. H., Lee, E. A., & Minnick, M. R. (2011). Is expressive suppression always associated with poorer psychological functioning? A cross-cultural comparison between European Americans and Hong Kong Chinese. Emotion, 11, 1450–1455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Su, J. C., Wei, M., & Tsai, H. T. (2014). Running away from unwanted feelings: Culture matters. Cognition & Emotion, 28, 1313–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totan, T. (2014). The regulatory emotional self-efficacy scale: Issues of reliability and validity within a Turkish sample group. Psychological Thought, 7, 144–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuna, E., & Bozo, Ö (2012). The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Turkish version. Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment, 34, 564–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd edn., pp. 257–300). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, M., Su, J. C., Carrera, S., Lin, S. P., & Yi, F. (2013). Suppression and interpersonal harmony: A cross-cultural comparison between Chinese and European Americans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 625–633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., Auerbach, R. P., Yao, S., Abela, J. R. Z., Xiao, J., & Tong, X. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Chinese version. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Sciences, College of Education, Qatar University, P.O. 2713, Doha, Qatar

    Ahmed M. Megreya, Ahmed A. Al-Emadi & Asma A. Al-Attiyah

  2. Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Robert D. Latzman

Authors
  1. Ahmed M. Megreya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert D. Latzman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmed A. Al-Emadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Asma A. Al-Attiyah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed M. Megreya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Megreya, A.M., Latzman, R.D., Al-Emadi, A.A. et al. An integrative model of emotion regulation and associations with positive and negative affectivity across four Arabic speaking countries and the USA. Motiv Emot 42, 566–575 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9682-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9682-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation