Skip to main content
Log in

Siding with the underdog: is your customer voting effort a sweet deal for your competitors?

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, we explore the negative consequences of engaging customer participation through voting mechanisms. Specifically, we draw attention to the double risk of customer voting, first by identifying the adverse effects of losing, and then by revealing the potential of turning an already engaged set of customers over to underdog competitors. We first establish that the losing effect is distinct from that of a voting (empowerment) effect (Pilot Study). We then replicate the losing effect and show that losing (as opposed to winning) voters tend to experience stronger levels of disempowerment and identify more with the underdog (Study 1). Finally, we demonstrate that losing voters are more likely to choose a competitor brand over the incumbent brand, particularly when the competitor is perceived to be an underdog (Study 2). Our findings caution brand managers to reconsider their customer engagement strategy when it involves customer voting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. J., & Mendes, S. M. (2006). Learning to lose: election outcomes, democratic experience and political protest potential. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 91–111. doi:10.1017/s0007123406000056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendapudi, N., & Leone, R. P. (2003). Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production. Journal of Marketing, 67, 14–28. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.1.14.18592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, P. C., Dabbs, J. M., Jr., Fielden, J. A., & Lutter, C. D. (1998). Testosterone changes during vicarious experiences of winning and losing among fans at sporting events. Physiology & Behavior, 65, 59–62. doi:10.1016/S0031-9384(98)00147-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., & Gelineau, F. (2007). Winning, losing and satisfaction with democracy. Political Studies, 55, 425–441. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00659.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641–657. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. W., Yim, C. K., & Lam, S. S. (2010). Is customer participation in value creation a double-edged sword? Evidence from professional financial services across cultures. Journal of Marketing, 74, 48–64. doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.3.48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., & Richardson, K. D. (1980). Two indirect tactics of image management: basking and blasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 406–415. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNN Money. (2002). M&M lovers pick purple. http://money.cnn.com/2002/06/20/news/companies/mandms/. Accessed 1 June 2014.

  • Craig, S. C., Martinez, M. D., Gainous, J., & Kane, J. G. (2006). Winners, losers, and election context: voter responses to the 2000 presidential election. Polit Res Q, 59, 579–592. doi:10.1177/106591290605900407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durisin, M. (2013). Lay’s reveals its newest potato chip flavor. Business Insider. http://www.businessinsider.com/winner-of-lays-new-flavor-contest-is-2013-5. Accessed 5 June 2014.

  • Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 378–389. doi:10.1086/497549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 343–373. doi:10.1086/209515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E., & Schreier, M. (2010). The psychological effects of empowerment: strategies on consumers’ product demand. Journal of Marketing, 74, 65–79. doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.1.65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E., Schreier, M., & Dahl, D. W. (2013). All that is users might not be gold: how labeling products as user designed backfires in the context of luxury fashion brands. Journal of Marketing, 77, 75–91. doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.1.65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirt, E. R., Zillmann, D., Erickson, G. A., & Kennedy, C. (1992). Costs and benefits of allegiance: changes in fans’ self-ascribed competencies after team victory versus defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 724–738. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, A.-T., Yen, C.-H., & Chin, K.-C. (2004). Participative customers as partial employees and service provider workload. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15, 187–199. doi:10.1108/09564230410532501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, J. H., Wilson, G. V., Nakamura, I., & Sudo, Y. (2005). Emotional dynamics of soccer fans at winning and losing games. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1855–1866. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, T., Gouveia, M., & Oliveira, R. (2009). Testosterone responsiveness to winning and losing experiences in female soccer players. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 1056–1064. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.02.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paharia, N., Keinan, A., Avery, J., & Schor, J. B. (2011). The underdog effect: the marketing of disadvantage and determination through brand biography. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 775–790. doi:10.1086/656219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roggeveen, A. L., Tsiros, M., & Grewal, D. (2012). Understanding the co-creation effect: when does collaborating with customers provide a lift to service recovery? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 771–790. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0274-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreier, M., Fuchs, C., & Dahl, D. W. (2012). The innovation effect of user design: exploring consumers’ innovation perceptions of firms selling products designed by users. Journal of Marketing, 76, 18–32. doi:10.1509/jm.10.0462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Lassegard, M., & Ford, C. E. (1986). Distancing after group success and failure: basking in reflected glory and cutting off reflected failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 382–388. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Pensgaard, A. M. (2005). The effect of competitive outcome and task-involving, ego-involving, and cooperative structures on the psychological well-being of individuals engaged in a co-ordination task: a self-determination approach. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 41–68. doi:10.1007/s11031-005-4415-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsarenko, Y., & Tojib, D. R. (2011). A transactional model of forgiveness in the service failure context: a customer-driven approach. Journal of Services Marketing, 25, 381–392. doi:10.1108/08876041111149739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandello, J. A., Goldschmied, N. P., & Richards, D. A. (2007). The appeal of the underdog. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1603–1616. doi:10.1177/0146167207307488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wathieu, L., et al. (2002). Consumer control and empowerment: a primer. Marketing Letters, 13, 297–305. doi:10.1023/A:1020311914022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 345–411). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. V., & Kerr, J. H. (1999). Affective responses to success and failure: a study of winning and losing in competitive rugby. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 85–99. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00226-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., et al. (2000). Focalism: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 821–836. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, C. Y., Bagozzi, R. P., & Troye, S. V. (2008). Trying to prosume: toward a theory of consumers as co-creators of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 109–122. doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0060-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zourrig, H., Chebat, J.-C., & Toffoli, R. (2009). Exploring cultural differences in customer forgiveness behavior. Journal of Service Management, 20, 404–419. doi:10.1108/09564230910978502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angeline G. A. Nariswari.

Additional information

Both authors contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nariswari, A., Chen, Q. Siding with the underdog: is your customer voting effort a sweet deal for your competitors?. Mark Lett 27, 701–713 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9372-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9372-z

Keywords

Navigation