Abstract
We show in this paper that some expressions indicating source of evidence are part of propositional content and are best analyzed as special kind of epistemic modal. Our evidence comes from the Japanese evidential system. We consider six evidentials in Japanese, showing that they can be embedded in conditionals and under modals and that their properties with respect to modal subordination are similar to those of ordinary modals. We show that these facts are difficult for existing theories of evidentials, which assign evidentials necessarily widest scope, to explain. We then provide an analysis using a logical system designed to account for evidential reasoning; this logic is the first developed system of probabilistic dynamic predicate logic. This analysis is shown to account for the data we provide that is problematic for other theories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikhenvald, A. (2003). Evidentiality in typological perspective. In A. Aikhenvald & R.Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (pp. 1–31). Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins.
Aikhenvald, A. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald A.Y., Dixon R.M.W. (2003). Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company
Anand, P., & Nevins, A. (2004). Shifty operators in changing contexts. In Proceedings of SALT XIV.
Aoki, H. (1986). Evidentials in Japanese. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols, (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Ablex.
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge University Press.
Beaver, D. (2002). Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics. No. 16 in Studies in Logic, Language and Information. Stanford, CA: CSLI/FoLLI.
Billingsley P. (1986). Probability and measure (2nd ed). New York: Wiley
Chafe, W., & Nichols, J. (1986a). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. No. 20 in Advances in Discourse Processes. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Chafe, W., & Nichols, J. (1986b). Introduction. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols, (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. vii–xi). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Co.
Chung, K.-S. (2005). Space in tense: The interaction of tense, aspect, evidentiality and speech act in Korean. PhD. thesis, Simon Fraser University.
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford University Press.
de Haan F. (1999). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, 83–101
Faller, M. (2002). Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Faller, M. (to appear). Evidentiality above and below speech acts. Special issue of Functions of Language on Evidentiality.
Frank, A. (1997). Context dependence in modal constructions. PhD thesis, University of Stuttgart.
Gärdenfors, P. (1988). Knowledge in flux: Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Garrett, E. (2001). Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. PhD thesis, UCLA.
Geurts B. (1999). Presupposition and pronouns. Oxford, Elsevier
Groenendijk J., Stokhof M. (1991). Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 39–100
Gunlogson C. (2003). True to form: Rising and falling declaratives as questions in English. Outstanding dissertations in linguistics. New York, Routledge
Halmos P.R. (1950). Measure theory. Berlin, Springer-Verlag
Halpern J.Y. (2003). Reasoning about uncertainty. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Heim I. (1992). Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics, 9, 183–221
Higginbotham, J. (2005). Evidentials: Some preliminary distinctions. Ms., University of Southern California.
Horn, L. (1989). A natural history of negation. University of Chicago Press.
Izvorski, R. (1997). The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In A. Lawson & E. Cho (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT 7. CLC Publications.
Jeffrey, R. (1983). The logic of decision. University of Chicago Press.
Kamp H., Reyle U. (1993). From discourse to logic. Dordrecht, Reidel, Kluwer
Kekidze T. (2000). ‘-Shi-soo-da’ no imi bunseki [Classification of the meanings of ‘-shi-soo-da’]. Nihongo Kyooiku, 107, 7–15
Kooi B.P. (2003). Probabilistic dynamic epistemic logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 12, 381–408
Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of Modality. In H.-J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (Eds.), Words, worlds, and contexts: New approaches in word semantics (pp. 38–74). No. 6 in Research in text theory, Berlin: de Gruyter.
Krifka, M. (1992). Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and event domains. In I. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical matters (pp. 29–53). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Masuoka T., Takubo Y. (1989). Kisoo Nihongo Bunpoo [Essential Japanese Grammar]. Tokyo, Kuroshio Shuppan
Matthewson, L., Davis, H., & Rullmann, H. (2006). Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St’át’imcets. Manuscript, University of British Columbia.
McCready, E. (2005). The dynamics of particles. PhD thesis, UTexas-Austin.
McCready E. (2006). Semantic classification of evidentials. Manuscript, Aoyama Gakuin University
McCready, E., & Asher, N. (2006). Modal subordination in Japanese: Dynamics and evidentiality. In A. Eilam, T. Scheffler, & J. Tauberer (Eds.), Penn working papers in linguistics 12.1 (pp. 237–249).
McCready, E., & Ogata, N. (to appear). Adjectives, comparison and stereotypicality. Natural Language Semantics.
Merin, A. (1997). If all our arguments had to be conclusive, there would be few of them. Arbeitspapiere SFB 340 101, Universität Stuttgart.
Mithun, M. (1986). Evidential diachrony in Northern Iroquoian. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 89–112). New Jersey: Ablex.
Moriyama T., Nitta Y., Kudo H. (2000). Modariti [Modality]. Tokyo, Iwanami Shoten
Morrill G. (1994). Type-logical grammar. Dordrecht, Kluwer
Nitta, Y. (1989). Gendai nihongo-bun no modariti no taikei to koozoo (the system and structure of modalities in the modern Japanese sentences). In Modality in Japanese (pp. 1–56). Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.
Ogata, N. (2005a). A dynamic semantics of modal subordination. In Proceedings of the International Workshop of Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics 2005. Tokyo: The Japanese Society of Artificial Intelligence.
Ogata, N. (2005b). A multimodal dynamic predicate logic of Japanese evidentials. Paper presented at language under uncertainty workshop, Kyoto University.
Palmer F.R. (2001). Mood and modality: Second edition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Potts, C. (2003). Expressive content as conventional implicature. In Proceedings of NELS 33.
Potts, C. (2005). The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford University Press. Revised version of 2003 UCSC dissertation.
Quine W.V.O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, The MIT Press
Roberts, C. (1987). Modal subordination, anaphora and distributivity. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts–Amherst.
Roberts C. (1989). Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 683–721
Schlenker P. (2003). A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 29–120
Takubo, Y. (2005). Two types of modal auxiliaries in Japanese: Two directionalities in inference. Paper presented at Japanese/Korean Linguistics 15.
Teramura, H. (1984). Nihongo no Syntax to Imi (Syntax and Meaning of Japanese), Vol. II. Tokyo: Kuroshio. Evidentiality, modality and probability
van der Sandt R. (1992). Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics, 9, 333–377
Vanderveken, D. (1990). Meaning and speech acts. Cambridge University Press. In 2 volumes.
Veltman F. (1996). Defaults in update semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25, 221–261
von Fintel K., Iatridou S. (2003). Epistemic containment. Linguistic Inquiry, 34(2): 173–198
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCready, E., Ogata, N. Evidentiality, modality and probability. Linguist and Philos 30, 147–206 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-007-9017-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-007-9017-7