Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive modeling of spatial patterns of soil nutrients related to fertility islands

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In arid shrublands, soil resources are patchily distributed around shrub canopies, forming well-studied “islands of fertility.” While soil nutrient patterns have previously been characterized quantitatively, we develop a predictive model that explicitly considers the distance from shrubs of varying canopy sizes. In 1-ha macroplots in both the Sonoran and Mojave Deserts, we used Plant Root Simulator™ probes to measure nutrient availability along transects extending north and south from creosote bushes (Larrea tridentata). We modeled the decline of nutrients with distance from focal shrubs using hierarchical mixed models that included the effects of transect direction and shrub canopy size. Of the nutrients considered, nitrogen and potassium had the strongest response to distance from focal shrubs. In the Sonora, both depended on canopy size and had different patterns to the north versus the south. In the Mojave, potassium depended on size and direction, but nitrogen only on canopy size. We used the fitted model equations and the location and canopy size of all Larrea shrubs within the macroplots to estimate nutrient concentrations at a 20 cm resolution. This produced maps showing nutrient “hotspots” centered on Larrea. Our models predicted up to 60 % of the variation in nutrient availability the following growing season. Our models efficiently used a moderate number of sample locations to predict nutrient concentrations over a large area, given easily measured values of shrub size and location. Our method can be applied to many systems with patchily distributed resources focused around major structural landscape features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abella SR, Craig DJ, Chiquoine LP, Prengaman KA, Schmid SM, Embrey TM (2011) Relationships of native desert plants with Red Brome (Bromus rubens): toward identifying invasion-reducing species. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4(1):115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amoroso L, Miller DM (2006) NTC_Soils. Surficial geologic map of arid Southwest USA. U. S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC

  • Austin AT, Yahdjian L, Stark JM, Belnap J, Porporato A, Norton U, Ravetta DA, Schaeffer SM (2004) Water pulses and biogeochemical cycles in arid and semiarid ecosystems. Oecologia 141(2):221–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley A, Turner R (2005) Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J Stat Softw 12(6):1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger U, Hildenbrandt H (2000) A new approach to spatially explicit modelling of forest dynamics: spacing, ageing and neighbourhood competition of mangrove trees. Ecol Model 132(3):287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness MD, Callaway R (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9(5):191–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks ML (1998) Ecology of a biological invasion: alien annual plants in the Mojave Desert. University of California Riverside

  • Brooks ML (2003) Effects of increased soil nitrogen on the dominance of alien annual plants in the Mojave Desert. J Appl Ecol 40(2):344–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks ML, Matchett JR (2006) Spatial and temporal patterns of wildfires in the Mojave Desert, 1980–2004. J Arid Environ 67:148–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference—understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33(2):261–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield BJ, Briggs JM (2009) Patch dynamics of soil biotic feedbacks in the Sonoran Desert. J Arid Environ 73(1):96–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charley JL, West NE (1975) Plant-induced soil chemical patterns in some shrub-dominated semi-desert ecosystems of Utah. J Ecol 63(3):945–963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charley JL, West NE (1977) Micro-patterns of nitrogen mineralization activity in soils of some shrub-dominated semi-desert ecosystems of Utah. Soil Biol Biochem 9(5):357–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins SL, Sinsabaugh RL, Crenshaw C, Green LE, Porras-Alfaro A, Stursova M, Zeglin LH (2008) Pulse dynamics and microbial processes in aridland ecosystems. J Ecol 96(3):413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSoyza AG, Whitford WG, MartinezMeza E, VanZee JW (1997) Variation in creosotebush (Larrea tridentata) canopy morphology in relation to habitat, soil fertility and associated annual plant communities. Am Midl Nat 137(1):13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drohan PJ, Merkler DJ, Buck BJ (2005) Suitability of the plant root simulator probe for use in the Mojave Desert. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69(5):1482–1491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esque TC, Kaye JP, Eckert SE, DeFalco LA, Tracy CR (2010) Short-term soil inorganic N pulse after experimental fire alters invasive and native annual plant production in a Mojave Desert shrubland. Oecologia 164(1):253–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing SA, Southard RJ, Macalady JL, Hartshorn AS, Johnson MJ (2007) Soil microbial fingerprints, carbon, and nitrogen in a Mojave Desert creosote-bush ecosystem. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71(2):469–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forseth IN, Wait DA, Casper BB (2001) Shading by shrubs in a desert system reduces the physiological and demographic performance of an associated herbaceous perennial. J Ecol 89(4):670–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Moya E, McKell CM (1970) Contribution of shrubs to nitrogen economy of a desert-wash plant community. Ecology 51(1):81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez JL, Jones CG (2006) Physical ecosystem engineers as agents of biogeochemical heterogeneity. Bioscience 56(3):227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel C, Mahall BE (1999) Bidirectional facilitation and interference between shrubs and annuals in the Mojave Desert. Ecology 80(5):1747–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Caldwell MM (1993) Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plants. J Ecol 81(4):683–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69(3):373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CJ, Li Y, Ma JA (2011) Spatial heterogeneity of soil chemical properties at fine scales induced by Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae) plants in a sandy desert. Ecol Res 26(2):385–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marion GM, Verburg PSJ, Stevenson B, Arnone JA (2008) Soluble element distributions in a Mojave desert soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72(6):1815–1823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe JR, Hamerlynck EP, Eppes MC (2007) Landscape dynamics fostering the development and persistence of long-lived Creosotebush (Larrea tridentata) clones in the Mojave Desert. J Arid Environ 69(1):96–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudrak E (2013) Using high resolution aerial imagery to determine shrub location & size in creosote flats of the Sonoran & Mojave Deserts. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.783022

  • Muller CH (1953) The association of desert annuals with shrubs. Am J Bot 40(2):53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (2005) Soil survey staff, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Luke Air Force Range, Arizona, Parts of Maricopa, Pima and Yuma Counties. http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov. Accessed 29 Nov 2010

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Development Core Team (2011) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-102

  • Qi YC, Dong YS, Jin Z, Peng Q, Xiao SS, He YT (2010) Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients and respiration in the desertified grasslands of Inner Mongolia, China. Pedosphere 20(5):655–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qian P, Schoenau JJ, Huang WZ (1992) Use of ion-exchange membranes in routine soil testing. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 23(15–16):1791–1804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro PJ, Diggle PJ (2001) geoR: a package for geostatistical analysis. R-NEWS 1(2): 15–18

  • Rietkerk M, Dekker SC, de Ruiter PC, van de Koppel J (2004) Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Science 305(5692):1926–1929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz C, Streibig JC (2008) Nonlinear Regression with R. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade JD, Hobbie SE (2005) Spatial and temporal variation in islands of fertility in the Sonoran Desert. Biogeochemistry 73(3):541–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer JL, Mudrak EL, Haines CE, Parag HA, Moloney KA, Holzapfel C (2012) The association of native and non-native annual plants with Larrea tridentata (creosote bush) in the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts. J Arid Environ 87:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk HJ, Mahall BE (2002) Positive and negative plant interactions contribute to a north–south-patterned association between two desert shrub species. Oecologia 132(3):402–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Raikes JA, Hartley AE, Cross AE (1996) On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems. Ecology 77(2):364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org

  • Western Regional Climate Center (2012) Cooperative climatological data summaries. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/climatedata/climsum/. Accessed 22 Aug 2012

  • Whitford WG, Martinez-Meza E, de Soyza A (1996) Morphological variation in Creosotebush, Larrea tridentata: effects on ecosystem properties. In: Barrow JR, Durant E, Sosebee RE, Tausch RJ (eds) Proceedings of symposium on shrubland ecosystem dynamics in a changing climate, May 23–25, 1995, Las Cruces, NM. General Technical Report INT-GTR 338. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT

  • Whitford WG, Anderson J, Rice PM (1997) Stemflow contribution to the ‘fertile island’ effect in creosotebush, Larrea tridentata. J Arid Environ 35(3):451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson TB, Thompson TL (2005) Soil nutrient distributions of mesquite-dominated desert grasslands: changes in time and space. Geoderma 126(3–4):301–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JP, Jones CG (2006) The concept of organisms as ecosystem engineers ten years on: progress, limitations, and challenges. Bioscience 56(3):203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Department of Defense’s Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) Project RC-1721, Holzapfel & Moloney. Carolyn Haines, Marjolein Schat, Hadas Parag, David Housman, Alex Misiura, Ruth Sparks, Teresa Walker, and Richard Whittle provided logistical support and help in the field. Dennis Lock of the Iowa State University Statistics Consulting Services provided guidance on fitting the non-linear models. AFR is supported by Becas Chile-CONICYT, Ministry of Education, Chile.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erika L. Mudrak.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 129 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mudrak, E.L., Schafer, J.L., Fuentes-Ramirez, A. et al. Predictive modeling of spatial patterns of soil nutrients related to fertility islands. Landscape Ecol 29, 491–505 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9979-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9979-5

Keywords

Navigation