Abstract
Neutron activation analysis is a useful analytical technique for the determination of many nuclides. However, the resulting gamma-ray spectra frequently have overlapping photopeaks, necessitating complicated peak de-convolution techniques to perform an accurate measurement. This work investigates the viability of gamma–gamma coincidence measurements of neutron activation analysis samples for the determination of 76As, 160Tb, and 169Yb to improve peak de-convolution and significantly lower the background. It is shown that these nuclides can be better determined using gamma–gamma coincidence measurements as opposed to single detector measurements. Comparisons are shown between the single channel and coincidence-gated spectra to demonstrate the de-convolution improvements achieved with coincidence gating. Additionally, a quality assurance protocol has been developed using 226Ra and 152Eu to ascertain that the coincidence electronics are set up properly. This protocol quantitatively demonstrates the capability of this system to discriminate between true coincidence and noncoincident events.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Greenberg RR, Bode P, De Nadai Fernandes S EA (2011) Neutron activation analysis: a primary method of measurement. Spectrochim Acta Part B. 66:193–241
Khang PD, Hai NX, Tan VH, Dien NN (2011) Gamma-gamma coincidence spectrometer setup for neutron activation analysis and nuclear structure studies. Nucl Instrum Meth Phys Res A 634:47–51
Kim JI, Speecke A, Hoste J (1965) Neutron activation analysis of copper in bismuth by gamma gamma-coincidence measurement. Anal Chim Acta 33:123–130
Bramlitt ET (1966) Gamma–gamma coincidence counting applied to chlorine analysis by neutron activation. Anal Chem 38:1669–1674
Ehmann WD, McKown DM (1969) Instrumental activation analysis of meteorites using gamma–gamma coincidence spectrometry. Anal Lett 2:49–60
Wangen LE, Gladney ES, Hensley WK (1980) Determination of environmental standard reference materials by gamma-gamma coincidence method using Ge(Li) detectors. Anal Chem 52:765–767
Yoho M, Landsberger S (2016) Determination of selenium in coal fly ash via γ–γ coincidence neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:733–737
Jakůbek J, Nuitenb P, Pluhařc J, Pospíšila S, Šiňora M, Štekla I, Timorackýc S, Vobeckýd M (1998) Coincidence gamma–gamma spectroscopy system for instrumental neutron activation analysis. Nucl Instrum Meth Phys Res A 414:261–264
Tomlin BE, Zeisler R, Lindstrom RM (2008) γγ Coincidence spectrometer for neutron activation analysis. Coincidence spectrometer for neutron activation analysis. Nucl Instrum Meth Phys Res A. 589:243–249
Zeisler R, Cho H, Ribeiro IS, Shetty MG, Turkoglu D (2017) On neutron activation analysis with γγ coincidence spectrometry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 314:513–519
Horne S, Landsberger S (2012) Selenium and mercury determination in biological samples using gamma–gamma coincidence and Compton suppression. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 291:49–53
http://www4vip.inl.gov/gammaray/catalogs/pdf/gecat.pdf. Accessed April 2018
Drescher A et al (2017) Gamma-gamma coincidence performance of LaBr 3: Ce scintillation detectors vs HPGe detectors in high count-rate scenarios. App Radiat Isotop 122:116–120
XIA LLC “Pixie-4 User’s Manual” http://www.xia.com/Manuals/Pixie4_UserManual.pdf. Accessed April 2018
Funding
Funding for the Ph.D. student A. Drescher is supported by the National Nuclear Security Administration’s Consortium for Nonproliferation Enabling Capabilities through North Carolina State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drescher, A., Yoho, M. & Landsberger, S. Gamma–gamma coincidence in neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 318, 527–532 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6033-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6033-8