Abstract
While access to computers, other technologies, and cyber-enabled resources that could be leveraged for enhancing student learning in science is increasing, generally it has been found that teachers use technology more for administrative purposes or to support traditional instruction. This use of technology, especially to support traditional instruction, sits in opposition to most recent standards documents in science education that call for student involvement in evidence-based sense-making activities. Many see technology as a potentially powerful resource that is reshaping society and has the potential to do the same in science classrooms. To consider the promise of technology in science classrooms, this research investigated the impact of a professional development project focused on enhancing teacher and student learning by using information and communication technologies (ICTs) for engaging students in reformed-based instruction. More specifically, these findings revealed positive teacher outcomes with respect to reformed-based and technology-supported instruction and increased ICT and new literacies skills. When considering students, the findings revealed positive outcomes with respect to ICT and new literacies skills and student achievement in science.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achieve Inc (2013) Next generation science standards. www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
Ackerson VL, Cullen TA, Hanson DL (2009) Fostering a community of practice through a professional development program to improve elementary teachers’ views of nature of science and teaching practice. J Res Sci Teach 46(10):1090–1113
Akerson V, Hanuscin DL (2007) Teaching nature of science through inquiry: results of a 3-year professional development program. J Res Sci Teach 44:653–680
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989) Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press, New York
Anastopoulou S, Sharples M, Ainsworth S, Crook C, O’Malley C, Wright M (2012) Creating personal meaning through technology-supported science inquiry learning across formal and informal settings. Int J Sci Educ 34(2):251–273
Baylor A, Ritchie D (2002) What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology using classrooms? Comput Educ 39(4):395–414
Bell RL, Maeng JL, Binns IC (2013) Learning in context. Technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory. J Res Sci Teach 50(3):348–379
Birman B, Desimore L, Porter A, Garet M (2000) Designing professional development that works. Educ Leadersh 57(8):28–33
Bull G, Bell L (2009) TPACK: a framework for the CITE journal. Contemp Issues Technol Teach Educ 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/editorial/article1.cfm
Campbell T, Abd-Hamid N (2013) Technology use in the science Instruction (TUSI): technology and science education reform. J Sci Educ Technol 22(4):572–588
Campbell T, Neilson D (2009) Student ideas and inquiries: investigating friction in the physics classroom. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas 46(1):13–16
Campbell T, Longhurst M, Duffy AM, Wolf PG, Shelton BE (2013) Science teaching orientations and technology-enhanced tools for student learning in science. Res Sci Educ 43(50):2035–2057
Campbell T, Wang S, Hsu H, Duffy A, Wolf P (2010) Learning with web tools, simulations, and other technologies in science classrooms. J Sci Educ Technol 19(5):505–511
Campbell T, ZuWallack BA, Longhurst M, Shelton BE, Wolf PG (2014) An examination of the changes in science teaching orientations and technology-enhanced tools for student learning in the context of professional development. Int J Sci Educ 36(11):1815–1848
Carlone H, Webb S (2006) On (not) overcoming our history of Hierarchy: complexities of university/school collaboration. Sci Educ 90(3):544–568
Clark DB, Sampson V (2008) Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. J Res Sci Teach 45(3):293–321
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Crippen KJ (2012) Argument as professional development: impacting teacher knowledge and beliefs about science. J Sci Teach Educ 23:847–866. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9282-3
Davis EA, Krajcik JS (2005) Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educ Res 34(3):3–14
Duschl RA (1990) Restructuring science education. Teachers College Press, New York
Ebenezer J, Osman NK, Devairakkam L (2011) Engaging students in environmental research projects: perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and levels of scientific inquiry abilities. J Res Sci Teach 48(1):98–116
Garet MS, Porter AC, Desimone L, Birman BF, Yoon KS (2001) What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. Am Educ Res J 38(4):915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
Gerard LF, Varma K, Corliss SB, Linn MC (2011) Professional development for technology-enhanced inquiry science. Rev Educ Res 81(3):408–448
Goedhart H, Hoogstraten J (1992) The retrospective pretest and the role of pretest information in evaluation studies. Psychol Rep 70:699–704
Hawley WD, Valli L (1999) The essentials of effective professional development: a new consensus. In: Sykes G, Darling-Hammond L (eds) Teaching as the learning profession: handbook of policy and practice. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, pp 127–150
Hey T, Tansley S, Tolle K (eds) (2009) The fourth paradigm: data intensive scientific discovery. Microsoft Research, Redmond
Higgins TE, Spitulnik MW (2008) Supporting teachers’ use of technology in science instruction through professional development: a literature review. J Sci Educ Technol 17:511–521
Howard GS, Ralph KM, Gulanick NA, Maxwell SE, Nace D, Gerber SL (1979) Internal invalidity in pre-test–posttest self report evaluations and the re-evaluation of retrospective pretests. Appl Psychol Meas 3(1):1–23
Hsu H-Y, Wang S-K (2013) Human impact on water quality: conducting inquiry activities with cyberdatabases and ICTs. Sci Scope 37(3):37–43
Hsu H-Y, Wang S-K, Runco L (2013) Middle school science teachers’ confidence and pedagogical practice of new literacies. J Sci Educ Technol 22(3):314–324
Ito M, et al (2008) Living and learning with new media: summary of findings from the digital youth project. Retrieved from http://digitalyouth.ischool.berkeley.edu/files/report/digitalyouth-WhitePaper.pdf
Johnson CC, Kahle JB, Fargo JD (2006) A study of the effect of sustained, whole-school professional development on student achievement. J Res Sci Teach 44:775–786
Klatt J, Taylor-Powell E (2005) Synthesis of literature relative to the retrospective pretest design. Paper read at the American Evaluation Association at Toronto, Ontario
Koehler M, Mishra P (2005) What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. J Educ Comput Resour 32(2):131–152
Lamb T (2005) The retrospective pretest: an imperfect but useful tool. Eval Exch XI(2). Retrieved from http://www.hfrp.org/var/hfrp/storage/original/application/d6517d4c8da2c9f1fb3dffe3e8b68ce4.pdf
Lawless KA, Pellegrino JW (2007) Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Rev Educ Res 77:575–614
Lederman NG (1992) Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. J Res Sci Teach 29:331–359
Lee VR, Thomas JM (2011) Integrating physical activity data technologies into elementary school classrooms. Educ Tech Res Dev 59(6):865–884
Lemke JL (2001) Articulating communities: sociocultural perspectives on science education. J Res Sci Teach 38(3):296–316
Leu DJ, Kinzer CK, Coiro J, Cammack D (2004) Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the internet and other information and communication technologies. In: Ruddell RB, Unrau N (eds) Theoretical models and processes of reading, 5th edn. International Reading Association, Newark, pp 1568–1611
Lim CP, Chai CS (2008) Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. Br J Educ Technol 39(5):807–828
Linn MC, Clark D, Slotta JD (2003) WISE design for knowledge integration. Sci Educ 87(4):517–538
Lowenstein R (2011) New York City public school indicators: demographics, resources, outcomes, annual report 2011. http://www.ibo.nyc.ny.us/iboreports/2011edindicatorsreport.pdf
Lussier C, Gomez S, Hurst R, Hendrick S (2007) Improving science classroom instruction by means of constructivism and technology. In: Montgomerie C, Seale J (eds) Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2007. AACE, Chesapeake, pp 2282–2284
Lynch S, Kuipers J, Pyke C, Szesze M (2005) Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: results from a planning grant. J Res Sci Teach 42(8):921–946
Markauskaite L (2007) Exploring the structure of trainee teachers’ ICT literacy: the main components of, and relationships between, general cognitive and technical capabilities. Educ Tech Res Dev 55:547–572
Mumtaz S (2000) ‘Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature. Technol Pedagogy Educ 9(3):319–342
National Research Council (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a conceptual framework for new K-12 science education standards. Board on science education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
National Research Council (NRC) (1996) National science education standards. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Niess ML (2005) Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teach Teach Educ 21(5):509–523
Pamuk S (2012) Understanding preservice teachers’ technology use through TPACK framework. J Comput Assist Learn 28:425–439
Park Rogers MA, Abell SK, Marra RM, Arbaugh F, Hutchins KL, Cole JS (2010) Orientations to science teacher professional development: an exploratory study. J Sci Teach Educ 21:309–328
Park H, Khan S, Petrina S (2009) ICT in science education: a quasiexperimental study of achievement, attitudes toward science, and career aspirations of Korean middle school students. Int J Sci Educ 31(8):993–1012
Pew Internet & American Life report (2002) Use of the internet at major life moments. http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=58. Retrieved 9 Dec 2008
Piburn M, Sawada D, Turley J, Falconer K, Benford R, Bloom I, Judson E (2000) Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP): reference manual (ACEPT technical report no. INOO-3). Arizona collaborative for excellence in the preparation of teachers, Tempe, AZ (Eric Document Reproduction Service, ED 447 205)
Pratt CC, McGuigan WM, Katzev AR (2000) Measuring program outcomes: using retrospective pretest methodology. Am J Eval 21(3):341–349
Quintana C, Reiser BJ, Davis EA, Krajcik J, Fretz E, Duncan RG et al (2004) A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. J Learn Sci 13(3):337–386
Richardson V (2003) The dilemmas of professional development. Phi Delta Kappan 84(5):401–406
Roth KJ, Garnier HE, Chen C, Lemmens M, Schwille K, Wickler N (2011) Videobased lesson analysis: effective science PD for teacher and student learning. J Res Sci Teach 48(2):117–148
Rushton GJ, Lotter C, Singer J (2011) Chemistry teachers’ emerging expertise in inquiry teaching: the effect of a professional development model on beliefs and practice. J Sci Teach Educ 22(1):23–52
Sabelli NH (2006) Complexity, technology, science, and education. J Learn Sci 15(1):5–9
Sadler PM, Sonnert G, Coyle HP, Cook-Smith N, Miller JL (2013) The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. Am Educ Res J 50(5):1020–1049
Shulman LS (1986) Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res 15(2):4–14
Singer J, Marx RW, Krajcik JS, Clay-Chambers J (2000) Constructing extended inquiry projects: curriculum materials for science education reform. Educ Psychol 35(3):165–178. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3503_3
Slater SJ, Slater TF, Shaner A (2008) Impact of backwards faded scaffolding in an astronomy course for pre-service elementary teachers based on inquiry. J Geosci Educ 56:408–416
Soong B, Mercer N (2011) Improving students’ revision of physics concepts through ICT-based co-construction and prescriptive tutoring. Int J Sci Educ 33(8):1055–1078
Squire K (2006) From content to context: videogames as designed experience. Educ Res 35(8):19–29
Stein M, Smith M, Silver E (1999) The development of professional developers: learning to assist teachers in new settings in new ways. Harvard Educ Rev 69(3):237–269
U.S. Census Bureau (2010) Diversity. Retrieved Jan 2015, from http://www.census.gov/2010census/popmap/ipmtext.php?fl=49
Utah State Office of Education (USOE) (2007) Utah performance assessment system for students. Retrieved 14 Dec 2007, from Utah Performance Assessment System for Students. http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:rzO5weK-SUoJ:www.schools.utah.gov/eval/DOCUMENTS/Science_ItemWritingAnnouncementiRegister.pdf+Utah+CRT&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us&client=firefox-a
Varma K, Husic F, Linn MC (2008) Targeted support for using technology-enhanced science inquiry models. J Sci Educ Technol 17:341–356. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9104-8
Williams M, Linn MC, Ammon P, Gearhart M (2004) Learning to teach inquiry science in a technology-based environment: a case study. J Sci Educ Technol 13(2):189–206. doi:10.1023/B:JOST.0000031258.17257.48
Wilson CD, Taylor JA, Kowalski SM, Carlson J (2010) The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. J Res Sci Teach 47(3):276–301
Wu H (2010) Modelling a complex system: using novice-expert analysis for developing an effective technology-enhanced learning environment. Int J Sci Educ 32(2):195–219
Zhao Y, Cziko GA (2001) Teacher adoption of technology: a perceptual control theory perspective. J Technol Teach Educ 9(1):5–30
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, T., Longhurst, M.L., Wang, SK. et al. Technologies and Reformed-Based Science Instruction: The Examination of a Professional Development Model Focused on Supporting Science Teaching and Learning with Technologies. J Sci Educ Technol 24, 562–579 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9548-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9548-6