Skip to main content
Log in

The Use of Video Cases in a Multimedia Learning Environment for Facilitating High School Students’ Inquiry into a Problem from Varying Perspectives

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the connection between the use of video cases within a multimedia learning environment and students’ inquiry into a socio-scientific problem. The software program was designed based on principles from the Cognitive Flexibility Theory (CFT) and incorporated video cases of experts with differing perspectives. Seventy-nine 10th-grade students in an urban high school participated in this study. After watching the expert videos, students generated investigative questions and reflected on how their ideas changed over time. This study found a significant correlation between the time students spent watching the expert videos and their ability to consider the problem’s perspectives as well as their ability to integrate these perspectives within their questions. Moreover, problem-solving ability and time watching the videos were detected as possible influential predictors of students’ consideration of the problem’s perspectives within their questions. Although students watched all video cases in equivalent ways, one of the video cases, which incorporated multiple perspectives as opposed to just presenting one perspective, appeared most influential in helping students integrate the various perspectives into their own thinking. A qualitative analysis of students’ reflections indicated that many students appreciated the complexity, authenticity, and ethical dimensions of the problem. It also revealed that while the majority of students thought critically about the problem, some students still had naïve or simplistic ways of thinking. This study provided some preliminary evidence that offering students the opportunity to watch videos of different perspectives may influence them to think in alternative ways about a complex problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Minor spelling errors were corrected to enhance the readability of the quotes from the students. Other mistakes in students’ quotes were not corrected.

References

  • Barab S, Dede C (2007) Games and immersive participatory simulations for science education: an emerging type of curricula. J Sci Educ Technol 16:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab SA, Sadler TD, Heiselt C, Hickey D, Zuiker S (2007) Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: supporting consequential play. J Sci Educ Technol 16:59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom RB, French JW, Harman HH (with Derman D) (1992) Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests 1976 (Office of Naval Research Contract N00014-71-0117). Educational Testing Services, Princeton, NJ

  • Fitzgerald GE, Wilson B, Semrau L (1997) An interactive multimedia program to enhance teacher problem-solving skills based on cognitive flexibility theory: design and outcomes. J Educ Multimed Hypermed 6:47–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmer AJ, Cates WM (2007) Designing for learner engagement in middle school science: technology, inquiry, and the hierarchies of engagement. Comput Schools 24:105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton JT, Filho LGM, Callender BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K (1996) Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson MJ, Archodidou A (2000) The design of hypermedia tools for learning: fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. J Learn Sci 9:145–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketelhut D, Nelson BC, Clarke J, Dede C (2010) A multi-user virtual environment for building and assessing higher order inquiry skills in science. Br J Educ Technol 41:56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King A (1994) Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. Am Educ Res J 31:338–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler MJ (2002) Designing case-based hypermedia for developing understanding of children’s mathematical reasoning. Cogn Instr 20:151–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus LA, Reed WM, Fitzgerald GE (2001) The effects of learning style and hypermedia prior experience on behavioral disorders knowledge and time on task: a case-based hypermedia environment. Comput Human Behav 17:125–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtman M (2006) Qualitative research in education: a user’s guide. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Marbach-Ad G, Sokolove P (2000) Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions? J Res Sci Teach 37:854–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam SB (2001) Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Wiley, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake N, Norman DA (1979) To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not known. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 18:357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2000) Inquiry and the national science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson BC (2007) Exploring the use of individualized, reflective guidance in an educational multi-user virtual environment. J Sci Educ Technol 16:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed WM, Palumbo DB (1992) The effect of BASIC instruction on problem solving skills over an extended period of time. J Educ Comput Res 8:311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum E, Klopfer E, Perry J (2007) On location learning: authentic applied science with networked augmented realities. J Sci Educ Technol 16:31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco MA, Nemiro J (1994) Problem finding, creativity, and giftedness. Roeper Rev 16:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler TD, Ziedler DL (2005) The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Sci Educ 89:71–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro RJ, Coulson RL, Feltovich PJ, Anderson DK (1988) Cognitive flexibility theory: advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains (Tech. Rep. No. 441). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro RJ, Collins BP, Thota JJ, Feltovich PJ (2003) Cognitive flexibility theory: hypermedia for complex learning, adaptive knowledge application, and experience acceleration. Educ Technol 45(5):5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer-Azaroff B, Mayer GR (1977) Applying behavior-analysis procedures with children and youth. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Needham, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziedler DL, Sadler TD, Simmons ML, Howes EV (2005) Beyond STS: a research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Sci Educ 89:357–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zydney JM (2005) Eighth-grade students defining complex problems: the effectiveness of scaffolding in a multimedia program. J Educ Multimed Hypermed 14:61–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Zydney JM (2008) Cognitive tools for scaffolding an ill-structured problem. J Educ Comput Res 38:353–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Zydney JM (2010) The effect of multiple scaffolding tools on students’ understanding, considerations of different perspectives, and misconceptions of a complex problem. Comput Educ 54:360–370

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet Mannheimer Zydney.

Appendix

Appendix

This Appendix contains a rubric (see Table 5) used to evaluate question perspectives.

Table 5 Rubric used to evaluate question perspectives

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zydney, J.M., Grincewicz, A. The Use of Video Cases in a Multimedia Learning Environment for Facilitating High School Students’ Inquiry into a Problem from Varying Perspectives. J Sci Educ Technol 20, 715–728 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9264-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9264-1

Keywords

Navigation