Abstract
The influence of phonological similarity on bilingual language processing was examined within and across languages in three experiments. Phonological similarity was manipulated within a language by varying neighborhood density, and across languages by varying extent of cross-linguistic overlap between native and non-native languages. In Experiment 1, speed and accuracy of bilinguals’ picture naming were susceptible to phonological neighborhood density in both the first and the second language. In Experiment 2, eye-movement patterns indicated that the time-course of language activation varied across phonological neighborhood densities and across native/non-native language status. In Experiment 3, speed and accuracy of bilingual performance in an auditory lexical decision task were influenced by degree of cross-linguistic phonological overlap. Together, the three experiments confirm that bilinguals are sensitive to phonological similarity within and across languages and suggest that this sensitivity is asymmetrical across native and non-native languages and varies along the timecourse of word processing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allopenna P.D., Magnuson J.S. and Tanenhaus M.K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38: 419–439
Arnold H., Conture E. and Ohde R. (2005). Phonological neighborhood density in the picture naming of young children who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 30: 125–148
Baayen H., Piepenbrock R. and Van Rijn H. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). University of Pennsylvania Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia
Best C.T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In: Strange, W. (eds) Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language speech research., pp 171–204. York Press, Timonium
Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2005). Covert bilingual language activation through cognate word processing: An eye-tracking study. In Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 286–291). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bradlow A.R. and Bent T. (2002). The clear-speech effect for non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 112: 272–284
Bradlow A.R. and Pisoni D.B. (1999). Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener- and item-related factors. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 106: 2074–2085
Brody N. (1992). Intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 168–214). Academic Press, San Diego
Brysbaert M., Van Dyck G. and Van de Poel M. (1999). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence from masked phonological priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25: 137–148
Ceci S.J. (1996). On Intelligence: A bioecological treatise on intellectual development (Expanded ed., pp. 69–90). Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Costa A., Caramazza A. and Sebastian-Galles N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26: 1283–1296
Costa A. and Sebastian-Galles N. (1998). Abstract phonological structure in language production: Evidence from Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24: 886–903
Dahan D. and Tanenhaus M.K. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12: 453–459
Dijkstra T., Grainger J. and van Heuven W.J.B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41: 496–518
Dickushina O.J. (1965). English phonetics. Prosvesh’enie, Moscow
Doctor E.A. and Klein D. (1992). Phonological processing in bilingual word recognition. In: Harris, R.J. (eds) Cognitive processing in bilinguals, pp 237–252. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Dunn, L. M. & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (PPVT). American Guidance Service, Circle Pines.
Ferrand L. and Grainger J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 47A: 365–382
Garlock V.M., Walley A.C. and Metsala J.L. (2001). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density in spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 45: 468–492
Gordon J.K. (2002). Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: Spontaneous and structural contexts. Brain and Language, 82: 113–145
Gordon J.K. and Dell G.S. (2001). Phonological neighborhood effects: Evidence from aphasia and connectionist modeling. Brain and Language, 79: 21–23
Grainger J., Muneaux M., Farioli F. and Ziegler J.C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A: 981–998
Grosjean F. (1997). Processing mixed languages: Issues, findings and models. In: de Groot A.M.B., Kroll, J.F. (eds) Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives., pp 225–254. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum
Harley T.A. (1984). A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-plan-internal speech errors. Cognitive Science, 8: 191–219
Harley T.A. and Bown H.E. (1998). What causes a tip-of-the-tongue state? Evidence for lexical neighborhood effects in speech production. British Journal of Psychology, 89: 151–174
Imai S., Walley A.C. and Flege J.E. (2005). Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 117: 896–907
International Phonetic Association. (1999). Handbook of the international phonetic association: A guide to the use of the international phonetic alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
James L.E. and Burke D.M. (2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26: 1378–1392
Jared D. and Kroll J.F. (2001). Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words?. Journal of Memory and Language, 44: 2–31
Ju M. and Luce P.A. (2004). Falling on sensitive ears. Psychological Science, 15(5): 314–318
Jusczyk P.W., Luce P.A. and Charles-Luce J. (1994). Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33: 630–645
Kaushanskaya M., Marian, V. (2006). Learning foreign words under dual-task conditions. In Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual meeting of the cognitive science society. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum
Kroll J.F. and Stewart E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33: 149–174
Kucera H. and Francis W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Brown University Press, Providence
Lam A.S.L., Perfetti C.A. and Bell L. (1991). Automatic phonetic transfer in bidialectal reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12: 299–311
Luce P.A. and Pisoni D.B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19: 1–36
Marian V. (2007). Bilingual research methods. In: Altarriba, J. and Heredia, R.R. (eds) An introduction to bilingualism: Principles and processses. Erlbaum, Mahwah
Marian V. and Spivey M. (2003). Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24: 173–193
Marian V. and Spivey M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6: 97–115
Marslen-Wilson W.D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25: 71–102
McClelland J.L. and Elman J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18: 1–86
Meyer A.S. and Bock J. K. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation? Memory & Cognition, 20: 715–726
Metsala J.L. (1997). An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25: 47–56
Nas G. (1983). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence for a cooperation between visual and sound based codes during access to a common lexical store. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22: 526–534
Neisser U., Boodoo G., Bouchard T.J., Boykin A.W., Brody N., Ceci S.J., Halpern D.F., Loehlin J.C., Perloff R., Sternberg R.J. and Urbina S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51: 77–101
Newman R.S. and German D.J. (2002). Effects of lexical factors on lexical access among typical language-learning children and children with word-finding difficulties. Language and Speech, 45: 285–317
Perfetti C.A. and Bell L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 30: 473–485
Roberts P. and Deslauriers L. (1999). Picture naming of cognate and noncognate nouns in bilingual aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32: 1–23
Schulpen B., Dijkstra T., Schriefers H.J. and Hasper M. (2003). Recognition of interlingual homophones in bilingual auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26: 1155–1178
Sharoff, S. (2003). The frequency dictionary for Russian. [Computer software]. Retrieved November 16, 2003, from http://bokrcorpora.narod.ru/frqlist/frqlist-en.html.
Silverberg S. and Samuel A.G. (2004). The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 51: 381–398
Slowiaczek L.M. and Hamburger M. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18: 1239–1250
Slowiaczek L.M., McQueen J.M., Soltano E.G. and Lynch M. (2000). Phonological representations in prelexical speech processing: Evidence from form-based priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 43: 530–560
Slowiaczek L.M., Soltano E.G., Wieting S.J. and Bishop K.L. (2003). An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A: 233–262
Spinelli E., Segui J. and Radeau M. (2001). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition with bisyllabic targets. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16: 367–392
Spivey M. and Marian V. (1999). Cross-talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10: 281–284
Takayanagi S., Dirks D.D and Moshfegh A. (2002). Lexical talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 45: 585–597
Tanenhaus M., Magnuson J., Dahan D. and Chambers C. (2000). Eye movements and lexical access in spoken language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29: 557–580
Tanenhaus M.K., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Eberhard K.M. and Sedivy J.C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268: 1632–1634
Van Hell J.G. and Dijkstra T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9: 780–789
Van Orden G.C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15: 181–198
Van Orden G.C., Johnston J.C. and Hale B.L.(1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14: 371–386
Van Wijnendaele I. and Brysbaert M. (2002). Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Phonological priming from the second to the first language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28: 616–627
Vitevitch M.S. (1997). The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Language and Speech, 40: 211–228
Vitevitch M.S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. JEP: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28: 735–747
Vitevitch M.S. and Luce P.A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9: 325–328
Vitevitch M.S. and Sommers M.S. (2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory and Cognition, 31: 491–504
Weber A. and Cutler A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken- word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50: 1–25
Weber A., Paris G. (2004). The origin of the linguistic gender effect in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from non-native listening. In Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 1446–1451). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Yates M., Locker L. and Simpson G.B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11: 452–457
Ziegler J.C., Muneaux M. and Grainger J. (2003). Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48: 779–793
Zevin J.D. and Seidenberg M.S. (2002). Age of acquisition effect in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47: 1–29
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H.K. & Boukrina, O.V. Sensitivity to Phonological Similarity Within and Across Languages. J Psycholinguist Res 37, 141–170 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-007-9064-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-007-9064-9