Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the Economic Attractiveness of Coronary Artery Revascularization in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. We compared the economic attractiveness of CAD revascularization procedures in patients with and without CKD. Our population included 6218 patients with significant CAD undergoing cardiac catheterization at Duke University between 1996 and 2001, with follow-up through 2002. We investigated the influence of CKD (creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min) upon 3-year survival and medical costs in our CAD population. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery was an economically attractive alternative vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or medical therapy for all patients with left main disease, three-vessel CAD patients without CKD, and two-vessel CAD patients with CKD. Medical therapy was an economically attractive strategy vs. CABG surgery or PCI for three-vessel CAD patients with CKD, two-vessel CAD patients without CKD, and all single-vessel CAD patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eagle, K. A., Guyton, R. A., Davidoff, R., et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary and recommendations: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery). Circulation. 100(13):1464–1480, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hannan, E. L., Racz, M. J., McCallister, B. D., et al. A comparison of three-year survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 33(1):63–72, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, S. C. Jr., Dove, J. T., Jacobs, A. K., et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 103(24):3019–3041, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Szczech, L. A., Reddan, D. N., Owen, W. F., et al. Differential survival after coronary revascularization procedures among patients with renal insufficiency. Kidney International. 60(1):292–299, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Szczech, L. A., Best, P. J., Crowley, E., et al. Outcomes of patients with chronic renal insufficiency in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation. Circulation. 105(19):2253–2258, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reddan, D. N., Szczech, L. A., Tuttle, R. H., et al. Chronic kidney disease, mortality, and treatment strategies among patients with clinically significant coronary artery disease. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 14(9):2373–2380, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. National Kidney Foundation, K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 39(2 Suppl 1):S1–S266, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosati, R. A., McNeer, J. F., Starmer, C. F., Mittler, B. S., Morris, J. J. Jr., and Wallace, A. G., A new information system for medical practice. Archives of Internal Medicine. 135(8):1017–1024, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fortin, D. F., Califf, R. M., Pryor, D. B., and Mark, D. B., The way of the future redux. American Journal of Cardiology. 76(16):1177–1182, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris, P. J., Harrell, F. E. Jr., Lee, K. L., Behar, V. S., and Rosati, R. A., Survival in medically treated coronary artery disease. Circulation. 60(6):1259–1269, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Califf, R. M., Harrell, F. E. Jr., Lee, K. L., et al. The evolution of medical and surgical therapy for coronary artery disease. A 15-year perspective. JAMA. 261(14):2077–2086, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mark, D. B., Nelson, C. L., Califf, R. M., et al. Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 89(5):2015–2025, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eisenstein, E. L., and Mark, D. B., Cost effectiveness of new diagnostic tools and therapies for acute coronary syndromes. In: TopolE. J. (Ed.), Acute coronary syndromesMarcel Dekker, New York, pp. 811–844, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anstrom, K. J., and Tsiatis, A. A., Utilizing propensity scores to estimate causal treatment effects with censored time-lagged data. Biometrics. 57(4):1207–1218, 2001.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Eisenstein, E. L., Shaw, L. K., Anstrom, K. J., et al. Assessing the clinical and economic burden of coronary artery disease: 1986–1998. Medical Care. 39(8):824–835, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bucher, H. C., Hengstler, P., Schindler, C., and Guyatt, G. H., Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical treatment for non-acute coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 321(7253):73–77, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mark, D. B., and Hlatky, M. A., Medical economics and the assessment of value in cardiovascular medicine: Part II. Circulation. 106(5):626–630, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yusuf, S., Zucker, D., Peduzzi, P., et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet. 344(8922):563–570, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, L. R., Milano, C. A., Molter, B. S., Elbeery, J. R., Sabiston, D. C. Jr., and Smith, P. K., Preoperative determinants of postoperative costs associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 90(5 Pt 2):II124–II128, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weintraub, W. S., Mauldin, P. D., Becker, E., Kosinski, A. S., and King, S. B. III., A comparison of the costs of and quality of life after coronary angioplasty or coronary surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease. Results from the Emory Angioplasty Versus Surgery Trial (EAST). Circulation. 92(10):2831–2840, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hlatky, M. A., Rogers, W. J., Johnstone, I., et al. Medical care costs and quality of life after randomization to coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery. Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. New England Journal of Medicine. 336(2):92–99, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rihal, C. S., Raco, D. L., Gersh, B. J., and Yusuf, S., Indications for coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic stable angina: review of the evidence and methodological considerations. Circulation. 108(20):2439–2445, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. The BARI Investigators., Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. New England Journal of Medicine. 335(4):217–225, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kong, D. F., Eisenstein, E. L., Sketch, M. H. Jr., et al. Economic impact of drug-eluting stents on hospital systems: a disease-state model. American Heart Journal. 147(3):449–456, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Morice, M. C., Serruys, P. W., Sousa, J. E., et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. New England Journal of Medicine. 346(23):1773–1780, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brener, S. J., Lytle, B. W., Casserly, I. P., Schneider, J. P., Topol, E. J., and Lauer, M. S., Propensity analysis of long-term survival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and high-risk features. Circulation. 109(19):2290–2295, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jones, R. H., Kesler, K., Phillips, H. R. III., et al. Long-term survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 111(5):1013–1025, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grant RO1-DK058188. The authors acknowledge the editorial and technical support of Maqui Ortiz.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric L. Eisenstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eisenstein, E.L., Sun, J.L., Anstrom, K.J. et al. Assessing the Economic Attractiveness of Coronary Artery Revascularization in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients. J Med Syst 33, 287–297 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9190-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9190-4

Keywords

Navigation