Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Biomechanical Approaches for Studying Integration of Tissue Structure and Function in Mammary Epithelia

  • Published:
Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The structure and function of each individual mammary epithelial cell (MEC) is largely controlled by a bidirectional interchange of chemical and mechanical signals with the microenvironment. Most of these signals are tissue-specific, since they arise from the three-dimensional (3D) tissue organization and are modulated during mammary gland development, maturation, pregnancy, lactation, and involution. Although the important role played by structural and mechanical signals in mammary cell and tissue function is being increasingly recognized, quantitative biomechanical approaches are still scarce. Here we review currently available biomechanical tools that allow quantitative examination of individual cells, groups of cells or full monolayers in two-dimensional cultures, and cells in 3D cultures. Current technological limitations and challenges are discussed, with special emphasis on their potential applications in MEC biology. We argue that the combination of biomechanical tools with current efforts in mathematical modeling and in cell and molecular biology applied to 3D cultures provides a powerful approach to unravel the complexity of tissue-specific structure-function relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hagios C, Lochter A, Bissell MJ. Tissue architecture: The ultimate regulator of epithelial function? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1998;353:857–70.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Neville MC, McFadden TB, Forsyth I. Hormonal regulation of mammary differentiation and milk secretion. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2002;7:49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bissell MJ, Hall HG, Parry G. How does the extracellular matrix direct gene expression? J Theor Biol 1982;99:31–68.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schmeichel KL, Bissell MJ. Modeling tissue-specific signaling and organ function in three dimensions. J. Cell Sci. 2003;116:2377–88.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knight CH, Peaker M, Wilde CJ. Local control of mammary development and function. Rev Reprod 1998;3:104–12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bissell MJ, Bilder D. Polarity determination in breast tissue: Desmosomal adhesion, myoepithelial cells, and laminin 1. Breast Cancer Res 2003;5:117–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bissell MJ, Weaver VM, Lelievre SA, Wang F, Petersen OW, Schmeichel KL. Tissue structure, nuclear organization, and gene expression in normal and malignant breast. Cancer Res 1999;59:1757s–63s; discussion 63s–64s.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roskelley CD, Srebrow A, Bissell MJ. A hierarchy of ECM-mediated signalling regulates tissue-specific gene expression. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1995;7:736–47.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roskelley CD, Desprez PY, Bissell MJ. Extracellular matrix-dependent tissue-specific gene expression in mammary epithelial cells requires both physical and biochemical signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:12378–82.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bissell MJ, Rizki A, Mian IS. Tissue architecture: The ultimate regulator of breast epithelial function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2003;15:753–62.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Emerman JT, Pitelka DR. Maintenance and induction of morphological differentiation in dissociated mammary epithelium on floating collagen membranes. In Vitro 1977;13:316–28.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee EY, Lee WH, Kaetzel CS, Parry G, Bissell MJ. Interaction of mouse mammary epithelial cells with collagen substrata: Regulation of casein gene expression and secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985;82:1419–23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wozniak MA, Desai R, Solski PA, Der CJ, Keely PJ. ROCK-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix. J Cell Biol 2003;163:583–95.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pitelka DR, Taggart BN. Mechanical tension induces lateral movement of intramembrane components of the tight junction: Studies on mouse mammary cells in culture. J Cell Biol 1983;96:606–12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Furuya K, Enomoto K, Yamagishi S. Spontaneous calcium oscillations and mechanically and chemically induced calcium responses in mammary epithelial cells. Pflugers Arch 1993;422:295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang F, Weaver VM, Petersen OW, Larabell CA, Dedhar S, Briand P, et al. Reciprocal interactions between beta1-integrin and epidermal growth factor receptor in three-dimensional basement membrane breast cultures: A different perspective in epithelial biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:14821–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weaver VM, Lelievre S, Lakins JN, Chrenek MA, Jones JC, Giancotti F, et al. beta4 Integrin-dependent formation of polarized three-dimensional architecture confers resistance to apoptosis in normal and malignant mammary epithelium. Cancer Cell 2002;2:205–16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marti A, Feng Z, Altermatt HJ, Jaggi R. Milk accumulation triggers apoptosis of mammary epithelial cells. Eur J Cell Biol 1997;73:158–65.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Van Vliet K, Bao G, Suresh S. The biomechanics toolbox: Experimental approaches for living cells and biomolecules. Acta Materialia 2003;51:5881–905.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fung YC. Mechanical properties of living tissues. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Heidemann SR, Kaech S, Buxbaum RE, Matus A. Direct observations of the mechanical behaviors of the cytoskeleton in living fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 1999;145:109–22.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wakatsuki T, Wysolmerski RB, Elson EL. Mechanics of cell spreading: Role of myosin II. J Cell Sci 2003;116:1617–25.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thoumine O, Ott A, Cardoso O, Meister JJ. Microplates: A new tool for manipulation and mechanical perturbation of individual cells. J Biochem Biophys Methods 1999;39:47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alcaraz J, Buscemi L, Grabulosa M, Trepat X, Fabry B, Farre R, et al. Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 2003;84:2071–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. You HX, Yu L. Atomic force microscopy imaging of living cells: Progress, problems and prospects. Methods Cell Sci 1999;21:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Baumgartner W, Hinterdorfer P, Ness W, Raab A, Vestweber D, Schindler H, et al. Cadherin interaction probed by atomic force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:4005–10.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tan JL, Tien J, Pirone DM, Gray DS, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:1484–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Galbraith CG, Sheetz MP. A micromachined device provides a new bend on fibroblast traction forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:9114–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bausch AR, Moller W, Sackmann E. Measurement of local viscoelasticity and forces in living cells by magnetic tweezers. Biophys J 1999;76:573–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang N, Butler JP, Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 1993;260:1124–7.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fabry B, Maksym GN, Butler JP, Glogauer M, Navajas D, Fredberg JJ. Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys Rev Lett 2001;87:148102.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Trepat X, Grabulosa M, Puig F, Maksym GN, Navajas D, Farre R. Viscoelasticity of human alveolar epithelial cells subjected to stretch. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2004;287:L1025–34.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Grier DG. A revolution in optical manipulation. Nature 2003;424:810–6.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Choquet D, Felsenfeld DP, Sheetz MP. Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin-cytoskeleton linkages. Cell 1997;88:39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Galbraith CG, Yamada KM, Sheetz MP. The relationship between force and focal complex development. J Cell Biol 2002;159:695–705.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Raucher D, Sheetz MP. Characteristics of a membrane reservoir buffering membrane tension. Biophys J 1999;77:1992–2002.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yamada S, Wirtz D, Kuo SC. Mechanics of living cells measured by laser tracking microrheology. Biophys J 2000;78:1736–47.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lau AW, Hoffman BD, Davies A, Crocker JC, Lubensky TC. Microrheology, stress fluctuations, and active behavior of living cells. Phys Rev Lett 2003;91:198101.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tseng Y, Lee JS, Kole TP, Jiang I, Wirtz D. Micro-organization and visco-elasticity of the interphase nucleus revealed by particle nanotracking. J Cell Sci 2004;117:2159–67.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Heidemann SR, Wirtz D. Towards a regional approach to cell mechanics. Trends Cell Biol 2004;14:160–6.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Harris AK, Wild P, Stopak D. Silicone rubber substrata: A new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. Science 1980;208:177–9.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Beningo KA, Wang YL. Flexible substrata for the detection of cellular traction forces. Trends Cell Biol 2002;12:79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dembo M, Oliver T, Ishihara A, Jacobson K. Imaging the traction stresses exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method. Biophys J 1996;70:2008–22.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rabinovitz I, Gipson IK, Mercurio AM. Traction forces mediated by alpha6beta4 integrin: Implications for basement membrane organization and tumor invasion. Mol Biol Cell 2001;12:4030–43.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Brown TD. Techniques for mechanical stimulation of cells in vitro: A review. J Biomech 2000;33:3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tschumperlin DJ, Dai G, Maly IV, Kikuchi T, Laiho LH, McVittie AK, et al. Mechanotransduction through growth-factor shedding into the extracellular space. Nature 2004;429:83–6.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jacobs CR, Yellowley CE, Davis BR, Zhou Z, Cimbala JM, Donahue HJ. Differential effect of steady versus oscillating flow on bone cells. J Biomech 1998;31:969–76.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Frangos JA, McIntire LV, Eskin SG. Shear stress induced stimulation of mammalian cell metabolism. Biotech Bioeng 1988;32:1053–60.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Takahashi M, Ishida T, Traub O, Corson MA, Berk BC. Mechanotransduction in endothelial cells: Temporal signaling events in response to shear stress. J Vasc Res 1997;34:212–9.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Moy AB, Winter M, Kamath A, Blackwell K, Reyes G, Giaever I, et al. Histamine alters endothelial barrier function at cell–cell and cell-matrix sites. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000;278:L888–98.

    Google Scholar 

  51. D’Addario M, Arora PD, Ellen RP, McCulloch CA. Interaction of p38 and Sp1 in a mechanical force-induced, beta 1 integrin-mediated transcriptional circuit that regulates the actin-binding protein filamin-A. J Biol Chem 2002;277:47541–50.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bissell MJ, Farson D, Tung AS. Cell shape and hexose transport in normal and virus-transformed cells in culture. J Supramol Struct 1977;6:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Folkman J, Moscona A. Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature 1978;273:345–9.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Thomas CH, Collier JH, Sfeir CS, Healy KE. Engineering gene expression and protein synthesis by modulation of nuclear shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:1972–7.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ingber DE. Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction. Ann Med 2003;35:564–77.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Folch A, Toner M. Microengineering of cellular interactions. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2000;2:227–56.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Abbot A. Cell culture: Biology’s new dimension. Nature 2003;424:870–2.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Grinnell F. Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Trends Cell Biol 2003;13:264–9.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Garvin J, Qi J, Maloney M, Banes AJ. Novel system for engineering bioartificial tendons and application of mechanical load. Tissue Eng 2003;9:967–79.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhu C, Bao G, Wang N. Cell mechanics: Mechanical response, cell adhesion, and molecular deformation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2000;2:189–226.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Talhouk RS, Bissell MJ, Werb Z. Coordinated expression of extracellular matrix-degrading proteinases and their inhibitors regulates mammary epithelial function during involution. J Cell Biol 1992;118:1271–82.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kheradmand F, Werner E, Tremble P, Symons M, Werb Z. Role of Rac1 and oxygen radicals in collagenase-1 expression induced by cell shape change. Science 1998;280:898–902.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Yamada KM. Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2002;14:633–9.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Apodaca G. Modulation of membrane traffic by mechanical stimuli. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2002;282:F179–90.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Chicurel ME, Singer RH, Meyer CJ, Ingber DE. Integrin binding and mechanical tension induce movement of mRNA and ribosomes to focal adhesions. Nature 1998;392:730–3.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Voldman J. BioMEMS: Building with cells. Nat Mater 2003;2:433–4.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Maniotis AJ, Chen CS, Ingber DE. Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:849–54.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Maxwell CA, Hendzel MJ. The integration of tissue structure and nuclear function. Biochem Cell Biol 2001;79:267–74.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Janmey PA, Weitz DA. Dealing with mechanics: Mechanisms of force transduction in cells. Trends Biochem Sci 2004;29:364–70.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Liu H, Radisky DC, Wang F, Bissell MJ. Polarity and proliferation are controlled by distinct signaling pathways downstream of PI3-kinase in breast epithelial tumor cells. J Cell Biol 2004;164:603–12.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Zoubiane GS, Valentijn A, Lowe ET, Akhtar N, Bagley S, Gilmore AP, et al. A role for the cytoskeleton in prolactin-dependent mammary epithelial cell differentiation. J Cell Sci 2004;117:271–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California

    Jordi Alcaraz, Celeste M. Nelson & Mina J. Bissell

  2. Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, MS 83-101, Berkeley, California, 94720

    Jordi Alcaraz & Mina J. Bissell

Authors
  1. Jordi Alcaraz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Celeste M. Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mina J. Bissell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mina J. Bissell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alcaraz, J., Nelson, C.M. & Bissell, M.J. Biomechanical Approaches for Studying Integration of Tissue Structure and Function in Mammary Epithelia. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 9, 361–374 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-004-1406-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-004-1406-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation