Abstract
Smokefree policies (SFPs) have diffused throughout the US and worldwide. However, the development of SFPs in the difficult policy environment of tobacco-producing states and economies worldwide has not been well-explored. In 2007, Tennessee, the third largest tobacco producer in the US, enacted the Non-Smoker Protection Act (NSPA). This study utilizes the multiple streams model to provide understanding of why and how this policy was developed by triangulating interviews with key stakeholders and legislative debates with archival documents. In June 2006, the Governor unexpectedly announced support for SFP, which created a window of opportunity for policy change. The Campaign for Healthy and Responsible Tennessee, a health coalition, seized this opportunity and worked with the administration and the Tennessee Restaurant Association to negotiate a comprehensive SFP, however, a weaker bill was used by the legislative leadership to develop the NSPA. Although the Governor and the Tennessee Restaurant Association’s support generated an environment for 100 % SFP, health groups did not fully capitalize on this environmental change and settled for a weak policy with several exemptions. This study suggests the importance for proponents of policy change to understand changes in their environment and be willing and able to capitalize on these changes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schoenborn, C. A., & Adams, P. F. (2010). Health behaviors of adults: United States, 2005–2007. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics 10(245). 2010.
Mamudu, H. M., Dadkar, S., Veeranki, S. P., & He, Y. (2011). Available at tobacco control in Tennessee: Stakeholder analysis of the development of the Non-Smoker Protection Act, 2007. http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8z38c04x.
Mamudu, H. M., & Veeranki, S. P. (2013). Tennessee’s smokefree policy: It’s time for local control. Tennessee Medicine, 106(9), 37–41.
Sargent, R. P., Shepard, R. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2004). Reduced incidence of admissions for myocardial infarction associated with public smoking ban: Before and after study. British Medical Journal, 328(7446), 977–980.
Dove, M. S., Dockery, D. W., & Connolly, G. N. (2011). Smoke-free air laws and asthma prevalence, symptoms, and severity among nonsmoking youth. Pediatrics, 127(1), 102–109.
USDHHS. (2010). The biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
Farkas, A. J., & Gilpin, E. A., White, M. M, (2000). Association between household and workplace smoking restrictions and adolescent smoking. Journal of American Medical Association, 284(6), 717–722.
Wakefield, M. A., Chaloupka, F. J., & Kaufman, N. J. (2000). Effect of restriction on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: Cross-sectional study. British Medical Journal, 321(7257), 333–337.
Pyles, M. K., Mullineaux, D. J., Okoli, C. T., & Hahn, E. J. (2007). Economic effect of a smoke-free law in a tobacco-growing community. Tobacco Control, 16(1), 66–68.
Scollo, M., Lal, A., Hyland, A., & Glantz, S. (2003). Review of the quality of studies on economic effects of smoke-free policies on hospitality industry. Tobacco Control, 12(1), 13–20.
Hahn, E. J. (2010). Smokefree legislation: A review of health and economic outcomes research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39(6 Suppl 1), S66–S76.
Boles, M., Dilley, J., Maher, J. E., Boysun, M. J., & Reid, T. (2010). Smoke-free law associated with higher-than-expected taxable retail sales for bars and taverns in Washington State. Prevention of Chronic Disease, 7(4), A79.
Mandel, L. L., Alamar, B. C., & Glantz, S. A. (2005). Smoke-free law did not affect revenue from gaming in Delaware. Tobacco Control, 14(1), 10–12.
Bartosch, W. J., Pope, G. C. (1999). The economic effects of smoke-free restaurant policies on restaurant business in Massachusetts. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, 553–562.
Biener, L., Garrett, C. A., Skeer, M., Siegel, M., & Connolly, G. (2007). The effects on smokers of Boston’s smoke-free bar ordinance: A longitudinal analysis of changes in compliance, patronage, policy support, and smoking at home. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, 13(6), 630–636.
Reiter, P. L., Wewers, M. E., Paskett, E. D., Klein, E. G., & Katz, M. L. (2012). Ohio Appalachian residents’ views on smoke-free laws and cigarette warning labels. Rural and Remote Health, 12, 1945.
Pacheco, J. (2011). The polls—trends: Public opinion of smoking and anti-smoking policies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 576–592.
Givel, M. (2005). Oklahoma tobacco policy-making. Journal of Oklahoma State Medical Association, 98(3), 89–94.
Studlar, D. T. (2006). Tobacco control in west Virginia: “You’ve come a long way, maybe”. West Virginia Public Affairs Reporter, 23(3), 2–7.
Washington, M. D., Barnes, R. L., & Glantz, S. A. (2011). Chipping away at tobacco tradition in tobacco country: Tobacco industry political influence and tobacco policy making in North Carolina 1969–2011. San Francisco: University of California.
Sullivan, S., & Glantz, S. A. (2010). Local smoke-free ordinances are passing in tobacco-growing states. American Journal of Public Health, 100(11), 2013–2014.
Givel, M. S., & Glantz, S. A. (2001). Tobacco lobby political influence on U.S. state legislatures in the 1990s. Tobacco Control, 10, 124–134.
Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Thurber, J. A. (1996). Agenda for excellence: Administering the states (pp. 76–104). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies, 48, 4–21.
Daugbjerg, C., & Marsh, D. (1998). Comparing policy networks (pp. 52–71). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Givel, M., & Glantz, S. (2000). Failure to defend a successful state tobacco control program: Policy lessons from Florida. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 762–767.
Givel, M., & Glantz, S. A. (2004). Political insiders without grassroots advocacy in the administration of a Missouri tobacco control youth-access program. Public Integrity, 7(1), 5–19.
Cairney, P. A., Studlar, D. T., & Mamudu, H. M. (2011). Global tobacco control: Power, policy, governance and transfer. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2006). Bottom-up federalism: The diffusion of antismoking policies from U.S. Cities to States. American Journal or Political Science, 50(4), 825–843.
Rogers, E. M., & Peterson, J. C. (2008). Diffusion of clean indoor air ordinances in the southwestern United States. Health Education and Behavior, 35(5), 683–697.
Pacheco, J. (2012). The social contagion model: Exploring the role of public opinion in the diffusion of anti-smoking legislation across the American States. The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 187–202.
Wolfson, M. (2001). The fight against big tobacco. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Nathanson, C. A. (1999). Social movements as catalysts for policy change: The case of smoking and guns. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 24, 421–488.
Greathouse, L. W., Hahn, E. J., Okoli, C. T. C., Warnick, T. A., & Riker, C. A. (2005). Passing a smoke-free law in a pro-tobacco culture: A multiple streams approach. Policy Politics Nursing Practice, 6(3), 211–220.
Blackman, V. S. (2005). Putting policy theory to work: Tobacco control in California. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 6(2), 148–155.
Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Pearson Education Inc.
Soroka, S. (1999). Policy agenda-setting theory revisited: A critique of Howlett on Downs, Baumgartner and Jones, and Kingdon. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 32(4), 763–772.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 738–770.
Rose, R. (1993). Lesson drawing in public policy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Hilgartner, J., & Bosk, C. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78.
Birkland, T. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), 53–74.
RITC, IDRC. (2005). Manual for researchers and development practitioners: Qualitative research for tobacco control. Ottawa, Canada: RITC/IDRC.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Russell, C. K., & Gregory, D. M. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research studies. Evidence Based Nursing, 6(2), 36–40.
Malone, R. E., & Balbach, E. D. (2000). Tobacco industry documents: Treasure trove or quagmire? Tobacco Control, 9, 334–338.
Anderson, S. J., McCandless, P. M., Klausner, K., Taketa, R., & Yerger, V. B. (2011). Tobacco documents research methodology. Tobacco Control, 20, ii8–ii11.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Williams, B. (2007). Toppling tobacco in Tennessee: TMA works to help loosen tobacco’s deadly grip on the volunteer state. Tennessee Medicine, 100(5), 23–26.
Tobacco Institute. Available at State of the States. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/edv41e00.
Sepe, E., Ling, P. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2002). Smooth moves: Bar and nightclub tobacco promotions that target young adults. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 414–419.
Gilpin, E. A., White, V. M., & Pierce, J. P. (2005). How effective are tobacco industry bar and club marketing efforts in reaching young adults? Tobacco Control, 14(3), 186–192.
Kierstein, A., Barnes, R. L., & Stanton, S. A. (1977–2009). Available at the High cost of compromise: Tobacco industry political influence and tobacco control policy in Virginia. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3gm9794g?query=virginia.
Otanez, M., Mamudu, H., & Glantz, S. (2007). Global leaf companies control the tobacco market in Malawi. Tobacco Control, 16, 261–269.
Druckman, J. N., Jacobson, L. R., & Ostermeier, (2004). Candidates strategies to prime issues and image. Journal of Politics, 66, 1180–1202.
Browder A and Tobacco Institute. Available at remarks before the council of the city of Memphis. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/udh44b00.
Glantz, S. A., & Balbach, D. (Eds.). (2000). Tobacco war: Inside the California Battles. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
U.S. Court of Appeal. Available at USA vs. Philip Morris, British American tobacco, the council for tobacco research et al. http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/content/what_we_do/industry_watch/doj/cadcopinion.pdf.
Eriksen, M. P., & Cerak, R. L. (2008). The diffusion and impact of clean indoor air laws. Annual Review of Public Health, 97, 171–185.
Lopipero, P., & Bero, L. A. (2006). Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions. Tobacco Control, 15(4), 323–332.
Apollonio, D. E., & Bero, L. A. (2007). The creation of industry front groups: The tobacco industry and “get government off our back”. American Journal of Public Health, 97(3), 419–427.
Dearlove, J. V., Bialous, S. A., & Glantz, S. A. (2002). Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places. Tobacco Control, 11, 94–104.
Howlett, M. (1998). Predictable and unpredictable policy windows: Institutional and exogenous correlates of Canadian Federal Agenda-setting. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 31(3), 495–524.
Hansen, W. L., & Mitchell, N. J. (2000). Disaggregating and explaining corporate political activity: Domestic and foreign corporation in national politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 891–903.
Mitchell, N. J., Hansen, W. L., & Jepsen, E. (1997). The determinants of domestic and foreign corporate political activity. Journal of Politics, 59, 1072–1096.
Gray, V., & Lowery, D. (1998). State lobbying regulations and their enforcement: Implications for the diversity of state interest communities. State and Local Government Review, 30, 78–91.
Hojnacki, M. (1997). Interest groups’ decisions to join alliances or work alone. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 61–87.
Holyoke, T. T. (2003). Choosing battlegrounds: Interest group lobbying across multiple venues. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 325–336.
Gray, V., Lowery, D., Fellows, M., & Anderson, J. (2004). Living in the moment: Lags, leads, and the link between legislative agendas and interest advocacy. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 463–477.
Lowery, D., & Gray, V. (1995). The population ecology of Gucci Gulch, or the natural regulation of interest group numbers in the American States. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 1–29.
Americans Nonsmokers’ Right. (2011). Summary of 100% Smokefree State Laws and Population Protected by 100% U.S. Smokefree Laws, April 1, 2011. Berkeley, CA: ANR.
Emmons, K. M., Kawachi, I., & Barclay, G. (1997). Tobacco control: A brief review of its history and prospects for the future. Hematology/oncology Clinics of North America, 11(2), 177–195.
Morley, C. P., Cummings, K. M., Hyland, A., Giovino, G. A., & Horan, J. K. (2002). Tobacco institute lobbying at the state and local levels of government in the 1990s. Tobacco Control, 11, i102–i109.
Bialous, S. A., Fox, B. J., & Glantz, S. A. (2001). Industry allegations of “illegal lobbying” and state tobacco control. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 62–77.
Sullivan, S., & Glantz, S. (2010). The changing role of agriculture in tobacco control policymaking: A South Carolina case study. Social Science and Medicine, 71(8), 1527–1534.
King, B., Dube, S., & Kaufmann, R. (2011). Vital signs: Current Cigarette smoking among adults aged ≥18 years—United States, 2005–2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 60(35), 1207–1212.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2010). Vital signs: Nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand smoke—United States, 1999–2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 59(35), 1141–1146.
Schroeder, S. A. (2004). The tobacco buyout and the FDA. New England Journal of Medicine, 351(14), 1377–1380.
Hart, J. F. (2011). The initial impact of the tobacco buyout program. Geographical Review, 101(3), 447–457.
American lung Association. (2008). State of tobacco control 2007. New York, NY: ALA.
Hahn, E. J., York, N. L., & Rayens, M. K. (2010). Smoke-free legislation in Appalachian counties. American Journal of Public Health, 100(11), 2012–2013.
Department of Health, Division of Health Planning. (2011). State of Tennessee: 2010 Tennessee State Health Plan. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Department of Health.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the ETSU Foundation for providing the funds for this research and the Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, and the Division of Health Affairs, ETSU, for logistical support. Additionally, we would like to thank all the people who volunteered to participate in this study. The research was supported by a grant from the ETSU Foundation (c0610.10 sd) and the National Cancer Institute grant CA-61021. The funding agencies have no involvement in the conduct of the research and the writing of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mamudu, H.M., Dadkar, S., Veeranki, S.P. et al. Multiple Streams Approach to Tobacco Control Policymaking in a Tobacco-Growing State. J Community Health 39, 633–645 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9814-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9814-6