Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiple Streams Approach to Tobacco Control Policymaking in a Tobacco-Growing State

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Smokefree policies (SFPs) have diffused throughout the US and worldwide. However, the development of SFPs in the difficult policy environment of tobacco-producing states and economies worldwide has not been well-explored. In 2007, Tennessee, the third largest tobacco producer in the US, enacted the Non-Smoker Protection Act (NSPA). This study utilizes the multiple streams model to provide understanding of why and how this policy was developed by triangulating interviews with key stakeholders and legislative debates with archival documents. In June 2006, the Governor unexpectedly announced support for SFP, which created a window of opportunity for policy change. The Campaign for Healthy and Responsible Tennessee, a health coalition, seized this opportunity and worked with the administration and the Tennessee Restaurant Association to negotiate a comprehensive SFP, however, a weaker bill was used by the legislative leadership to develop the NSPA. Although the Governor and the Tennessee Restaurant Association’s support generated an environment for 100 % SFP, health groups did not fully capitalize on this environmental change and settled for a weak policy with several exemptions. This study suggests the importance for proponents of policy change to understand changes in their environment and be willing and able to capitalize on these changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schoenborn, C. A., & Adams, P. F. (2010). Health behaviors of adults: United States, 2005–2007. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics 10(245). 2010.

  2. Mamudu, H. M., Dadkar, S., Veeranki, S. P., & He, Y. (2011). Available at tobacco control in Tennessee: Stakeholder analysis of the development of the Non-Smoker Protection Act, 2007. http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8z38c04x.

  3. Mamudu, H. M., & Veeranki, S. P. (2013). Tennessee’s smokefree policy: It’s time for local control. Tennessee Medicine, 106(9), 37–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sargent, R. P., Shepard, R. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2004). Reduced incidence of admissions for myocardial infarction associated with public smoking ban: Before and after study. British Medical Journal, 328(7446), 977–980.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dove, M. S., Dockery, D. W., & Connolly, G. N. (2011). Smoke-free air laws and asthma prevalence, symptoms, and severity among nonsmoking youth. Pediatrics, 127(1), 102–109.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. USDHHS. (2010). The biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.

  7. Farkas, A. J., & Gilpin, E. A., White, M. M, (2000). Association between household and workplace smoking restrictions and adolescent smoking. Journal of American Medical Association, 284(6), 717–722.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wakefield, M. A., Chaloupka, F. J., & Kaufman, N. J. (2000). Effect of restriction on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: Cross-sectional study. British Medical Journal, 321(7257), 333–337.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pyles, M. K., Mullineaux, D. J., Okoli, C. T., & Hahn, E. J. (2007). Economic effect of a smoke-free law in a tobacco-growing community. Tobacco Control, 16(1), 66–68.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scollo, M., Lal, A., Hyland, A., & Glantz, S. (2003). Review of the quality of studies on economic effects of smoke-free policies on hospitality industry. Tobacco Control, 12(1), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hahn, E. J. (2010). Smokefree legislation: A review of health and economic outcomes research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39(6 Suppl 1), S66–S76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boles, M., Dilley, J., Maher, J. E., Boysun, M. J., & Reid, T. (2010). Smoke-free law associated with higher-than-expected taxable retail sales for bars and taverns in Washington State. Prevention of Chronic Disease, 7(4), A79.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mandel, L. L., Alamar, B. C., & Glantz, S. A. (2005). Smoke-free law did not affect revenue from gaming in Delaware. Tobacco Control, 14(1), 10–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bartosch, W. J., Pope, G. C. (1999). The economic effects of smoke-free restaurant policies on restaurant business in Massachusetts. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, 553–562.

  15. Biener, L., Garrett, C. A., Skeer, M., Siegel, M., & Connolly, G. (2007). The effects on smokers of Boston’s smoke-free bar ordinance: A longitudinal analysis of changes in compliance, patronage, policy support, and smoking at home. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, 13(6), 630–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reiter, P. L., Wewers, M. E., Paskett, E. D., Klein, E. G., & Katz, M. L. (2012). Ohio Appalachian residents’ views on smoke-free laws and cigarette warning labels. Rural and Remote Health, 12, 1945.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pacheco, J. (2011). The polls—trends: Public opinion of smoking and anti-smoking policies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 576–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Givel, M. (2005). Oklahoma tobacco policy-making. Journal of Oklahoma State Medical Association, 98(3), 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Studlar, D. T. (2006). Tobacco control in west Virginia: “You’ve come a long way, maybe”. West Virginia Public Affairs Reporter, 23(3), 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Washington, M. D., Barnes, R. L., & Glantz, S. A. (2011). Chipping away at tobacco tradition in tobacco country: Tobacco industry political influence and tobacco policy making in North Carolina 1969–2011. San Francisco: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sullivan, S., & Glantz, S. A. (2010). Local smoke-free ordinances are passing in tobacco-growing states. American Journal of Public Health, 100(11), 2013–2014.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Givel, M. S., & Glantz, S. A. (2001). Tobacco lobby political influence on U.S. state legislatures in the 1990s. Tobacco Control, 10, 124–134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thurber, J. A. (1996). Agenda for excellence: Administering the states (pp. 76–104). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies, 48, 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Daugbjerg, C., & Marsh, D. (1998). Comparing policy networks (pp. 52–71). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Givel, M., & Glantz, S. (2000). Failure to defend a successful state tobacco control program: Policy lessons from Florida. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 762–767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Givel, M., & Glantz, S. A. (2004). Political insiders without grassroots advocacy in the administration of a Missouri tobacco control youth-access program. Public Integrity, 7(1), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cairney, P. A., Studlar, D. T., & Mamudu, H. M. (2011). Global tobacco control: Power, policy, governance and transfer. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2006). Bottom-up federalism: The diffusion of antismoking policies from U.S. Cities to States. American Journal or Political Science, 50(4), 825–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rogers, E. M., & Peterson, J. C. (2008). Diffusion of clean indoor air ordinances in the southwestern United States. Health Education and Behavior, 35(5), 683–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pacheco, J. (2012). The social contagion model: Exploring the role of public opinion in the diffusion of anti-smoking legislation across the American States. The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wolfson, M. (2001). The fight against big tobacco. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nathanson, C. A. (1999). Social movements as catalysts for policy change: The case of smoking and guns. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 24, 421–488.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Greathouse, L. W., Hahn, E. J., Okoli, C. T. C., Warnick, T. A., & Riker, C. A. (2005). Passing a smoke-free law in a pro-tobacco culture: A multiple streams approach. Policy Politics Nursing Practice, 6(3), 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Blackman, V. S. (2005). Putting policy theory to work: Tobacco control in California. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 6(2), 148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Soroka, S. (1999). Policy agenda-setting theory revisited: A critique of Howlett on Downs, Baumgartner and Jones, and Kingdon. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 32(4), 763–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 738–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rose, R. (1993). Lesson drawing in public policy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hilgartner, J., & Bosk, C. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Birkland, T. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. RITC, IDRC. (2005). Manual for researchers and development practitioners: Qualitative research for tobacco control. Ottawa, Canada: RITC/IDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Russell, C. K., & Gregory, D. M. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research studies. Evidence Based Nursing, 6(2), 36–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Malone, R. E., & Balbach, E. D. (2000). Tobacco industry documents: Treasure trove or quagmire? Tobacco Control, 9, 334–338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Anderson, S. J., McCandless, P. M., Klausner, K., Taketa, R., & Yerger, V. B. (2011). Tobacco documents research methodology. Tobacco Control, 20, ii8–ii11.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Williams, B. (2007). Toppling tobacco in Tennessee: TMA works to help loosen tobacco’s deadly grip on the volunteer state. Tennessee Medicine, 100(5), 23–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tobacco Institute. Available at State of the States. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/edv41e00.

  52. Sepe, E., Ling, P. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2002). Smooth moves: Bar and nightclub tobacco promotions that target young adults. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 414–419.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gilpin, E. A., White, V. M., & Pierce, J. P. (2005). How effective are tobacco industry bar and club marketing efforts in reaching young adults? Tobacco Control, 14(3), 186–192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kierstein, A., Barnes, R. L., & Stanton, S. A. (1977–2009). Available at the High cost of compromise: Tobacco industry political influence and tobacco control policy in Virginia. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3gm9794g?query=virginia.

  55. Otanez, M., Mamudu, H., & Glantz, S. (2007). Global leaf companies control the tobacco market in Malawi. Tobacco Control, 16, 261–269.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Druckman, J. N., Jacobson, L. R., & Ostermeier, (2004). Candidates strategies to prime issues and image. Journal of Politics, 66, 1180–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Browder A and Tobacco Institute. Available at remarks before the council of the city of Memphis. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/udh44b00.

  58. Glantz, S. A., & Balbach, D. (Eds.). (2000). Tobacco war: Inside the California Battles. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. U.S. Court of Appeal. Available at USA vs. Philip Morris, British American tobacco, the council for tobacco research et al. http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/content/what_we_do/industry_watch/doj/cadcopinion.pdf.

  60. Eriksen, M. P., & Cerak, R. L. (2008). The diffusion and impact of clean indoor air laws. Annual Review of Public Health, 97, 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lopipero, P., & Bero, L. A. (2006). Tobacco interests or the public interest: 20 years of industry strategies to undermine airline smoking restrictions. Tobacco Control, 15(4), 323–332.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Apollonio, D. E., & Bero, L. A. (2007). The creation of industry front groups: The tobacco industry and “get government off our back”. American Journal of Public Health, 97(3), 419–427.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Dearlove, J. V., Bialous, S. A., & Glantz, S. A. (2002). Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places. Tobacco Control, 11, 94–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Howlett, M. (1998). Predictable and unpredictable policy windows: Institutional and exogenous correlates of Canadian Federal Agenda-setting. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 31(3), 495–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hansen, W. L., & Mitchell, N. J. (2000). Disaggregating and explaining corporate political activity: Domestic and foreign corporation in national politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 891–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mitchell, N. J., Hansen, W. L., & Jepsen, E. (1997). The determinants of domestic and foreign corporate political activity. Journal of Politics, 59, 1072–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Gray, V., & Lowery, D. (1998). State lobbying regulations and their enforcement: Implications for the diversity of state interest communities. State and Local Government Review, 30, 78–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hojnacki, M. (1997). Interest groups’ decisions to join alliances or work alone. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Holyoke, T. T. (2003). Choosing battlegrounds: Interest group lobbying across multiple venues. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Gray, V., Lowery, D., Fellows, M., & Anderson, J. (2004). Living in the moment: Lags, leads, and the link between legislative agendas and interest advocacy. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 463–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Lowery, D., & Gray, V. (1995). The population ecology of Gucci Gulch, or the natural regulation of interest group numbers in the American States. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Americans Nonsmokers’ Right. (2011). Summary of 100% Smokefree State Laws and Population Protected by 100% U.S. Smokefree Laws, April 1, 2011. Berkeley, CA: ANR.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Emmons, K. M., Kawachi, I., & Barclay, G. (1997). Tobacco control: A brief review of its history and prospects for the future. Hematology/oncology Clinics of North America, 11(2), 177–195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Morley, C. P., Cummings, K. M., Hyland, A., Giovino, G. A., & Horan, J. K. (2002). Tobacco institute lobbying at the state and local levels of government in the 1990s. Tobacco Control, 11, i102–i109.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Bialous, S. A., Fox, B. J., & Glantz, S. A. (2001). Industry allegations of “illegal lobbying” and state tobacco control. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 62–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Sullivan, S., & Glantz, S. (2010). The changing role of agriculture in tobacco control policymaking: A South Carolina case study. Social Science and Medicine, 71(8), 1527–1534.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. King, B., Dube, S., & Kaufmann, R. (2011). Vital signs: Current Cigarette smoking among adults aged ≥18 years—United States, 2005–2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 60(35), 1207–1212.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2010). Vital signs: Nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand smoke—United States, 1999–2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 59(35), 1141–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Schroeder, S. A. (2004). The tobacco buyout and the FDA. New England Journal of Medicine, 351(14), 1377–1380.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Hart, J. F. (2011). The initial impact of the tobacco buyout program. Geographical Review, 101(3), 447–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. American lung Association. (2008). State of tobacco control 2007. New York, NY: ALA.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Hahn, E. J., York, N. L., & Rayens, M. K. (2010). Smoke-free legislation in Appalachian counties. American Journal of Public Health, 100(11), 2012–2013.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Department of Health, Division of Health Planning. (2011). State of Tennessee: 2010 Tennessee State Health Plan. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the ETSU Foundation for providing the funds for this research and the Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, and the Division of Health Affairs, ETSU, for logistical support. Additionally, we would like to thank all the people who volunteered to participate in this study. The research was supported by a grant from the ETSU Foundation (c0610.10 sd) and the National Cancer Institute grant CA-61021. The funding agencies have no involvement in the conduct of the research and the writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadii M. Mamudu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mamudu, H.M., Dadkar, S., Veeranki, S.P. et al. Multiple Streams Approach to Tobacco Control Policymaking in a Tobacco-Growing State. J Community Health 39, 633–645 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9814-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9814-6

Keywords

Navigation