Abstract
Despite the increasing amount of empirical research on gambling helplines (e.g., characteristics, effectiveness), little is known about gender differences on treatment outcomes following contact. The present research addresses this gap in the literature via secondary analysis of an uncontrolled outcome study of New Zealand’s gambling helpline (N = 150). To this end, the present research had three aims; (a) explore gender differences (e.g., demographics, co-morbidities, gambling variables) among helpline callers using psychometrically robust measures, (b) assess whether gender predicts treatment utilization following contact and (c) assess whether systematic gender differences exist on gambling and psychosocial outcomes at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-ups. The results revealed that at baseline, women compared to men, described greater problem severity and shorter problem duration, and were more likely to report electronic gaming machines as their most problematic form of gambling. Women also reported greater distress and lower quality of life. Men, despite less problem severity and distress, were more likely to access treatment following helpline contact. Importantly, both men and women reported significant and equivalent improvements in both gambling and psychosocial outcomes following helpline contact. The improved outcomes remained significant after controlling for treatment attendance. Although different approaches for women may be required by helplines if the goal is to refer callers to treatment, the results suggest that after calling the helpline, women reduced their problematic gambling and improved psychosocial functioning without further treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2014). New Zealand 2012 national gambling study: Gambling harm and problem gambling, report number 2. Prepared for Ministry of Health. http://www.aut.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/508588/Report-final-National-Gambling-Study-Report-No.-2.pdf.
Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A., Hodgins, D., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., et al. (2012). Effectiveness of problem gambling brief telephone interventions: A randomised controlled trial. Auckland University of Technology, Gambling and Addictions Research Centre: Prepared for Ministry of Health. http://www.aut.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/377988/Report-Effectiveness-Study-Final-13-December-2012.pdf.
Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (2006). The measurement of adult problem and pathological gambling. International Gambling Studies, 6, 175–200.
Blaszczynski, A. (2012). Influencing international foundations for legalization, policy and commercial gambling: A tribute to William Eadington’s International Conference on gambling and risk taking. UNLV Gaming Research and Review Journal, 16, 27–32.
Chiu, W. T., Huang, S. J., Hwang, H. F., Tsauo, J. Y., Chen, C. F., Tsai, S. H., et al. (2006). Use of the WHOQOL-BREF for evaluating persons with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 23(11), 1609–1620.
Clifford, G. (2008). The evolution of problem gambling helplines. In M. Zangeneh, A. Blaszczynski, & N. Turner (Eds.), In the pursuit of winning (pp. 291–312). New York, NY: Springer.
Cocco, K. M., & Carey, K. B. (1998). Psychometric properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test in psychiatric outpatients. Psychological Assessment, 10, 408–414.
Cohen, B. B., & Vinson, D. C. (1995). Retrospective self-report of alcohol consumption: Test–retest reliability by telephone. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 19(5), 1156–1161.
Colasante, E., Gori, M., Bastiani, L., Siciliano, V., Giordani, P., Grassi, M., et al. (2013). An assessment of the psychometric properties of Italian version of CPGI. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(4), 765–774.
Crisp, B. R., Thomas, S. A., Jackson, A. C., Thomason, N., Smith, S., Borrell, J., et al. (2000). Sex differences in the treatment needs and outcomes of problem gamblers. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(2), 229–242.
Cuadrado, M. (1999). A comparison of Hispanic and Anglo calls to a gambling help hotline. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 71–81.
de Meneses-Gaya, C., Zuardi, A. W., Loureiro, S. R., & Crippa, J. A. S. (2009). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): An updated systematic review of psychometric properties. Psychology and Neuroscience, 2(1), 83.
Fassaert, T., De Wit, M. A. S., Tuinebreijer, W. C., Wouters, H., Verhoeff, A. P., Beekman, A. T. F., et al. (2009). Psychometric properties of an interviewer-administered version of the Kessler Psychological Distress scale (K10) among Dutch, Moroccan and Turkish respondents. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 18(3), 159–168.
Ferentzy, P., & Skinner, W. (2003). Gamblers Anonymous: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Gambling Issues, 9, 1–29.
Ferland, F., Ladouceur, R., Giroux, I., Savard, C., Ruel, S., Leclerc, M. F., et al. (2013). Evaluation of the quality of services provided by a gambling helpline: An empirical study. Journal of Gambling Issues, 28, 1–11.
Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
González-Ortega, I., Echeburúa, E., de Corral, P., & Polo-López, R. (2015). Pathological gambling: Clinical gender differences. In M. Sáenz-Herrero (Ed.), Psychopathology in women (pp. 713–726). Switzerland: Springer.
Grant, J. E., Odlaug, B. L., & Mooney, M. E. (2012). Telescoping phenomenon in pathological gambling: Association with gender and comorbidities. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200(11), 996–998.
Griffiths, M., Scarfe, A., & Bellringer, P. (1999). The UK national telephone gambling helpline-results on the first year of operation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 83–90.
Hanley, J. A., Negassa, A., Edwardes, M. de. B., & Forrester, J. E. (2003). Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation. American Journal of Epidemiology, 157(4), 364–375.
Heater, J., & Patton, D. (2006). Gender differences in problem gambling behaviour from helpline callers. Journal of Gambling Issues, 16.
Hides, L., Lubman, D. I., Devlin, H., Cotton, S., Aitken, C., Gibbie, T., et al. (2007). Reliability and validity of the Kessler 10 and Patient Health Questionnaire among injecting drug users. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 41(2), 166–168.
Hodgins, D. C. (2013). Reliability and validity of the Sheehan disability scale modified for pathological gambling. BMC Psychiatry, 13(1), 177.
Hodgins, D. C., Stea, J. N., & Grant, J. E. (2011). Gambling disorders. The Lancet, 378(9806), 1874–1884.
Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S. L. T., et al. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 95–976.
Kobak, K. A., Taylor, L. H., Dottl, S. L., Greist, J. H., Jefferson, J. W., Burroughs, D., et al. (1997). A computer- administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 905–910.
Ledgerwood, D. M., Arfken, C. L., Wiedemann, A., Bates, K. E., Holmes, D., & Jones, L. (2013). Who goes to treatment? Predictors of treatment initiation among Gambling helpline callers. The American Journal on Addictions, 22, 33–38.
Ledgerwood, D. M., Wiedemann, A. A., Moore, J., & Arfken, C. L. (2012). Clinical characteristics and treatment readiness of male and female problem gamblers calling a state gambling helpline. Addiction Research and Theory, 20, 162–171.
Loo, J. M., Oei, T. P., & Raylu, N. (2011). Psychometric evaluation of the Problem Gambling Severity Index-Chinese version (PGSI-C). Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(3), 453–466.
Ministry of Health. (2006). Problem gambling in New Zealand: Analysis of the 2002/03 New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health. http://www.health.govt.nz/publication/problem-gambling-new-zealand-analysis-2002-03-new-zealand-health-survey.
Ministry of Health. (2009). A focus on problem gambling: Results of the 2006/07 New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health. http://www.health.govt.nz/publication/focus-problem-gambling-results-2006-07-new-zealand-health-survey.
Potenza, M. N., Steinberg, M. A., McLaughlin, S. D., Wu, R., Rounsaville, B. J., & O’Malley, S. S. (2001). Gender-related differences in the characteristics of problem gamblers using a gambling helpline. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1500–1505.
Potenza, M. N., Steinberg, M. A., & Wu, R. (2005). Characteristics of gambling helpline callers with self-reported gambling and alcohol use problems. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21, 233–254.
Reinert, D. F., & Allen, J. P. (2002). The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): A review of recent research. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 26, 272–279.
Rodda, S. N., Hing, N., & Lubman, D. I. (2014). Improved outcomes following contact with a gambling helpline: The impact of gender on barriers and facilitators. International Gambling Studies, 14, 318–329.
Rohde, P., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Seeley, J. R. (1997). Comparability of telephone and face-to-face interviews in assessing axis I and II disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(11), 1589–1592.
Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., De La Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption—II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.
Schmidt, S., Muhlan, H., & Power, M. (2005). The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: Psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. European Journal of Public Health, 16, 420–428.
Shandley, K., & Moore, S. (2008). Evaluation of gambler’s helpline: A consumer perspective. International Gambling Studies, 8, 315–330.
Sinclair, H., Pretorius, A., & Stein, D. J. (2014). A counselling line for problem and pathological gambling in South Africa: Preliminary data analysis. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3, 199–202.
Skinner, H. A. (1982). The Drug Abuse Screening Test. Addictive Behaviors, 7, 363–371.
Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Gibbon, M., & First, M. B. (1992). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID), I: History, rationale, and description. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 624–629.
Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Kroenke, K., Linzer, M., deGruy III, F. V, Hahn, S. R., et al. (1994). Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care: The PRIME-MD 1000 study. Journal of American Medical Association, 272, 1749–1756.
Swan, J. L., & Hodgins, D. C. (in press). Brief interventions for disordered gambling. Canadian Journal of Addiction.
Tavares, H., Zilberman, M. L., Beites, F. J., & Gentil, V. (2001). Gender differences in gambling progression. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 151–159.
Valdivia-Salas, S., Blanchard, K. S., Lombas, A. S., & Wulfert, E. (2014). Treatment-seeking precipitators in problem gambling: Analysis of data from a gambling helpline. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28, 300–306.
Weinstock, J., Burton, S., Rash, C. J., Moran, S., Biller, W., Krudelbach, N., et al. (2011). Predictors of engaging in problem gambling treatment: Data from the West Virginia problem gamblers help network. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25, 372–379.
Winters, K. C., Bengston, P. L., & Stinchfield, R. D. (1996). Findings from a follow-up study of callers to the Minnesota problem gambling hotline. Minneapolis: Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota.
Yudko, E., Lozhkina, O., & Fouts, A. (2007). A comprehensive review of the psychometric properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32(2), 189–198.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Health. We would like to thank Dr. Tak Fung (University of Calgary) for assistance with the statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, H.S., Hodgins, D.C., Bellringer, M. et al. Gender Differences Among Helpline Callers: Prospective Study of Gambling and Psychosocial Outcomes. J Gambl Stud 32, 605–623 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9572-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9572-8