Abstract
Domestic violence is a serious social issue that affects one in every four relationships. Interventions for victims and abusers are contingent upon reporting of the violence, but many cases are never reported. The theory of reasoned action may offer a model for understanding reporting behavior in adolescents and young adults. In a sample of 891 adolescents and young adults, social norms and attitudes were predictive of reporting intentions and subsequently, reporting behavior. For the purposes of this study, reporting behavior was defined as reporting the domestic violence to any individual not directly involved, which could include law enforcement personnel or other individuals who may provide assistance. Understanding how attitudes and social norms affect reporting behavior could be helpful for agencies serving individuals affected by domestic violence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acock, A. (2005). Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1012–1028.
Adams, C. M. (2006). The consequences of witnessing family violence on children and the implications for family counselors. The Family Journal, 14, 334–341.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Anderson, D. K., & Sanders, D. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner: An empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma Violence and Abuse, 4, 163–191.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.
Babcock, J. C., Green, E. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053.
Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2008). Measuring effect sizes: The effect of measurement error (CALDER Working Paper No. 19). Washington: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
Clark, A. H., & Foy, D. W. (2000). Trauma exposure and alcohol use in battered women. Violence Against Women, 6, 37–48.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
Crime Research Center, University of Western Australia, & Donovan Research. (2001). Young People’s Survey on Violence. Barton: Attorney-General’s Department.
Cummings, E. M. (1998). Children exposed to marital conflict and violence: Conceptual and theoretical directions. In G. W. Holden, R. Geffner, & E. N. Jouriles (Eds.), Children exposed to marital violence: Theory, research, and applied issues (pp. 55–93). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1992). Women, violence, and social change. New York: Routledge.
Durose, M. R., Harlow, C. W., Langan, P. A., Motivans, M., Rantala, R. R., Smith, E. L., & Constantin, E. (2005). Family violence statistics including statistics on strangers and acquaintences. NCJ 207846. Washington: United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2010). Attitude structure. In R. F. Baumeister & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 177–216). New York: Oxford University Press.
Felson, R. B., & Paré, P. (2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 597–610.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Feury, R. E., Sullivan, C. M., Bybee, D. I., & Davidson, W. S., II. (1998). “Why don’t they just call the cops?”: Reasons for differential police contact among women with abusive partners. Violence and Victims, 13, 333–346.
Gillmore, M. R., Archibald, M. E., Morrison, D. M., Wilsdon, A., Wells, E. A., Hoppe, M. J., & Murowchick, E. (2002). Teen sexual behavior: Applicability of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 885–897.
Goelman, D. M. (2004). Shelter from the storm: using jurisdictional statutes to protect victims of domestic violence after the Violence Against Women Act of 2000. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 13, 101–168.
Gomez, A. M. (2010). Testing the cycle of violence hypothesis: Child abuse and adolescent dating violence as predictors of intimate partner violence in young adulthood. Youth & Society (in press).
Graham-Bermann, S. A., & Levendosky, A. A. (1998). Traumatic stress symptoms in children of battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 111–128.
Holt, S., Buckley, H., & Whelan, S. (2008). The impact of exposure to domestic violence on children and young people: A review of the literature. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 797–810.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Mears, D. P. (2003). Research and interventions to reduce domestic violence revictimization. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4, 127–147.
Moe, A. M. (2007). Silenced voices and structured survival: Battered women’s help seeking. Violence Against Women, 13, 676–699.
Murrell, A. R., Christoff, K. A., & Henning, K. R. (2007). Characteristics of domestic violence offenders: Associations with childhood exposure to violence. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 523–532.
Neighbors, C., Walker, D. D., Mbilinyi, L. F., O’Rourke, A., Edleson, J. L., Zegree, J., & Roffman, R. A. (2010). Normative misperceptions of abuse among perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 16, 370–386.
O’Keefe, M. (1997). The differential effects of family violence on adolescent adjustment. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 13, 51–68.
Paradine, K., & Wilson, J. (2004). Protection and accountability: The reporting, investigating, and prosecuting of domestic violence cases. National Centre for Policing Excellence. London: Home Office.
Tailor, K., & Letourneau, N. (2012). Infants exposed to intimate partner violence: A look at issues of gender and sex. Journal of Family Violence, 27, 477–488.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000a). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000b). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington: National Institute of Justice.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, The Administration for Children and Families, National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect Information. (1993). The second national incidence study of child abuse and neglect. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2005). Family violence statistics: Including statistics on strangers and acquaintances. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2013). Crime victimization, 2012 (NCJ 243389). Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Vallerand, R. J., Deshaies, P., Cuerrier, J. P., Pelletier, L. G., & Mongeau, C. (1992). Ajzen and Fisbein’s theory of reasoned action as applied to moral behavior: A confirmatory analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 98–109.
Walby, S., & Allen, J. (2004). Domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey (Home Office Research Study 276). London: Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
Whitaker, D. J., Tadesse, H., Swahn, M., & Saltzman, I. S. (2007). Difference in frequency of violence and reported injury between relationships with reciprocal and nonreciprocal intimate partner violence. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 941–947.
Zahn-Waxler, C. (1993). Warriors and worries: Gender and psychopathy. Development and Psychopathy, 5, 79–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sulak, T.N., Saxon, T.F. & Fearon, D. Applying the Theory of Reasoned Action to Domestic Violence Reporting Behavior: The Role of Sex and Victimization. J Fam Viol 29, 165–173 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9569-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9569-y