Abstract
Many different studies have been conducted to determine the prevalence rates of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in the United States. The methodologies of these studies have varied, resulting in a multitude of publications with differing prevalence rates. Because there is such a wide range in the results of prevalence studies, it may be difficult for individual states to determine their rates. Accurate prevalence rates are important to obtain for many different reasons including increasing advocacy and awareness, increasing funding, and proper allocation of services for individuals with ASD and their families. Additionally, prevalence studies can be used to assess which groups are more at risk for ASD based off location and environmental factors. This paper describes different methodologies that can be utilized to determine ASD prevalence rates, the strengths and weaknesses of each method, and the challenges to determining accurate rates. This paper also includes the results from a study conducted in Nebraska to determine prevalence rates of ASD in the state. Implications for future prevalence studies are addressed and recommendations are provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Autism Society (2015). Autism diagnoses. Retrieved from: http://www.autism-society.org/what-is/diagnosis/.
Baron-Cohen, S., Scott, F. J., Allison, C., Williams, J., Bolton, P., Matthews, F. E., & Brayne, C. (2009). Prevalence of autism-spectrum conditions: UK school-based population studies. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 194, 500–509. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059345.
Blumberg, S.B, Bramlett, M.D., Kogan, M.D., Schieve, L.A., Jones, J.R.., & Lu, M.C. (2013). Changes in prevalence of parent-reported autism spectrum disorder in school-aged U.S. children: 2007 to 2001–2012. National Health Statistics Report, 65.
Boswell, K., Zablotsky, B., & Smith, C. (2014). Predictors of autism enrollment in public school systems. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 96–106. doi:10.1177/0014402914532230.
Brock, S.E. (2006). An examination of the changing rates of autism in special education. The California School Psychologist, II, 31–39. Retrieved from http://education.ucsb.edu/school-psychology/CSP-Joumal/index.html.
Bureau of Autism Services (2009). Pennsylvania autism census project: final report. Retrieved from: http://www.med.upenn.edu/autism/PA%20Autism%20Census%20Project.pdf. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare.
Bureau of Autism Services (2009). A valuable resource for the autism community. (n.d).
California Department of Developmental Services (2003). Autism spectrum disorders: changes in the California caseload. Retrieved from: http://www.dds.ca.gov/Autism/pdf/AutismReport2003.pdf.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2012). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, United States, 2008. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 61(3), 1–19.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2014). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, United States, 2010. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 63(2), 1–21.
Council for Affordable Health Insurance (2009). The growing trend toward mandating autism coverage. Solutions for Today’s Health Policy Challenges, 152. Retrieved from: http://www.cahi.org/cahi_contents/resources/pdf/n152AutismTrend.pdf
Department of Health and Human Services (2003). Protecting personal information in research: understanding the HIPAA privacy rule. Retrieved from: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/.
European Commission (2005). Some elements about the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in the European union. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_information/dissemination/diseases/autism_1.pdf.
Fombonne, E. (2003). Epidemiology of pervasive developmental disorders. Trends in Evidence-Based Neuropsychiatry, 5, 29–36.
Fombonne, E., Quirke, S., & Hagen, A. (2009). Prevalence and interpretation of recent trends in rates of pervasive developmental disorders. McGill Journal of Medicine: MJM, 12(2), 99–107.
Harvard School of Public Health (2006). Autism has high costs to U.S. society. Retrieved from: http://archive.sph.harvard.edu/press-releases/2006-releases/press04252006.html
Hawkins, S.C. (2009). Medical diagnosis vs. educational determination a distinction that makes a difference. Autism E-News. 7(3) 3 January 2009, Training and Technical Assistance Centers, Virginia.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (2004). Retrieved from: http://idea.ed.gov/explore/home.
Kielinen, M., Linna, S. L., & Moilanen, I. (2000). Autism in Northern Finalnd. European Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 162–167.
Mandell, D., & Lecavalier, L. (2014). Should we believe the centers for disease control and Prevention’s autism spectrum disorder prevalence estimates? Autism, 18, 482–484. doi:10.1177/1362361314538131.
National Conference of State Legislatures (2012). Insurance coverage for autism. Retrieved from: http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/autism-and-insurance-coverage-state-laws.aspx.
Newschaffer, C. J., Falb, M. D., & Gurney, J. G. (2005). National autism prevalence trends from United States special education data. Pediatrics, 115, e277–e282. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1958.
Nonkin Avchen, R., Wiggins, L.D., Devine, O., Van Naarden Braun, K., Rice, C., Hobson, N.C., & … Yeargin-Allsopp, M. (2011). Evaluation of a records-review surveillance system used to determine the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders. Journal Of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 41(2), 227–236. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1050-7.
Pinborough-Zimmerman, J., Bilder, D., Satterfield, R., Hossain, S., & McMahon, W. (2010). The impact of surveillance method and record source on autism prevalence: collaboration with Utah maternal and child health programs. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14, 392–400. doi:10.1007/s10995-009-0472-3.
Posserud, M., Lundervold, A. J., Lie, S. A., & Gillberg, C. (2010). The prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: impact of diagnostic instrument and non-response bias. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45, 319–327. doi:10.1007/s00127-009-0087-4.
Rice, C. E., Rosanoff, M., Dawson, G., Durkin, M. S., Croen, L. A., Singer, A., & Yeargin-Allsopp, M. (2012). Evaluating changes in the prevalence of the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Public Health Reviews (2107–6952), 34(2), 1–22.
Saracino, J., Noseworthy, J., Steiman, M., Reisinger, L., & Fombonne, E. (2010). Diagnostic and assessment issues in autism surveillance and prevalence. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22, 317–330. doi:10.1007/s10882-010-9205-1.
Shattuck, P. (2006). The contribution of diagnostic substitution to the growing administrative prevalence of autism in US special education. Pediatrics, 117, 1028–1037. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-I516.
U.S. Department of Education (2015). Family educational rights and privacy act. Retrieved from: http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html?src=ft.
Wong, V. V., & Hui, S. H. (2008). Epidemiological study of autism spectrum disorder in china. Journal of Child Neurology, 23, 67–72. doi:10.1177/0883073807308702.
Zablotsky, B., Black, L. I., Maenner, M. J., Schieve, L. A., & Blumberg, S. J. (2015). Estimated prevalence of autism and other developmental disabilities following questionnaire changes in the 2014 National Health Interview Survey. National Health Statistics Reports, 87, 1–20.
Zaroff, C. M., & Uhm, S. Y. (2011). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders and influence of country of measurement and ethnicity. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47, 395–398.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study was funded by Autism Action Partnership and the Weitz Family Foundation.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no additional conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramsey, E., Kelly-Vance, L., Allen, J.A. et al. Autism Spectrum Disorder Prevalence Rates in the United States: Methodologies, Challenges, and Implications for Individual States. J Dev Phys Disabil 28, 803–820 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9510-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9510-4