Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of forgiveness and apology on cardiovascular reactivity and recovery in response to mental stress

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the relation between forgiveness and apology as they relate to cardiovascular reactivity and recovery, 29 men and 50 women were exposed to an interpersonal transgression (i.e., verbal harassment) while performing a serial subtraction task. Participants were categorized into high and low forgiveness groups based on scores on the forgiving personality scale. Following the task, approximately half of the participants received an apology from the experimenter for his/her comments during the task. Although no group differences in cardiovascular reactivity were observed during the serial subtraction task, persons high in forgiveness displayed more rapid diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure recovery than persons low in forgiveness. In response to the apology, participants displayed greater high frequency heart rate variability recovery compared to those who did not receive an apology. A significant apology × sex interaction was observed for diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure. Women who received an apology exhibited faster recovery from the transgression than women who did not receive an apology. In contrast, men who received an apology exhibited delayed recovery from the transgression compared to men who did not receive an apology. These results indicate that there are potentially healthful benefits to forgiveness and apology, but the relation is influenced by situation and by sex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To determine whether the findings on forgiveness could be attributed to the often reported inverse relation between forgiveness and hostility, analyses for each cardiovascular parameter were repeated replacing forgiveness level with hostility level as measured by a median split on the cook medley hostility questionnaire from the screening packet. No main effects for hostility level were significant, nor were any interaction effects during any period of the experimental session (all Ps > .05). Most notably, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure recovery did not differ between high and low hostility groups.

References

  • Allen, M. T., Stoney, C. M., Owens, J. F., & Matthews, K. A. (1993). Hemodynamic adjustment to laboratory stress: The influence of gender and personality. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 505–517.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., Linden, W., & Habra, M. E. (2006). Influence of apologies and trait hostility on recovery from anger. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29(4), 347–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, G. F., & Guerrero, K. L. (2006). Forgiveness, apology, and communicative responses to hurtful events. Communication Reports, 19(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berntson, G., Bigger, J., Eckberg, D., Grossman, P., Kaufmann, P., Malik, M., et al. (1997). Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology, 34(6), 623–648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W., & Worthington, E. L. Jr. (2001). Forgiveness, relationship quality, stress while imagining relationship events, and physical and mental health. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 447–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of well-being. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, B. W., & Schlenker, B. R. (1982). Children’s reactions to apologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 742–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., Sollers I. ii, J., Edelstein, E., & Thayer, J. (2008). Data transforms for spectral analyses of heart rate variability. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, 44392-397.

  • Enright, R. D., Santos, M. J. D., & Al-Mabuk, R. (1989). The adolescent as forgiver. Journal of Adolescence, 12, 95–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, J., Suchday, S., & Shelov, D. (2007). The impact of forgiveness on cardiovascular reactivity and recovery. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65(2), 87–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, D. H., Larkin, K. T., & Whited, M. C. (2009). Cardiovascular response to interpersonal provocation and mental arithmetic among high and low hostile young adult males. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 34, 27–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamat, V., Jones, W., & Row, K. (2006). Assessing forgiveness as a dimension of personality. Individual Differences Research, 4(5), 322–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, K. A., Younger, J. W., Piferi, R. L., Billington, E., Jobe, R., Edmondson, K., et al. (2003). A change of heart: Cardiovascular correlates of forgiveness in response to interpersonal conflict. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 26(5), 373–393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, K. A., Younger, J. W., Piferi, R. L., Jobe, R. L., Edmondson, K. A., & Jones, W. J. (2005). The unique effects of forgiveness on health: An exploration of pathways. Journal of Behavior Medicine, 28(2), 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler-Row, K., Karremans, J., Scott, C., Edlis-Matityahou, M., & Edwards, L. (2008). Forgiveness, physiological reactivity and health: The role of anger. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of The International Organization of Psychophysiology, 68(1), 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubin, B., Van Whitlock, R., Reddy, D., & Petren, S. (2001). A comparison of the short and long forms of the multiple affect adjective checklist—revised. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 411–416.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marler, M. R., Jacob, R. G., Lehoszky, J. P., & Shapiro, A. P. (1988). The statistical analysis of treatment effects in 24-h ambulatory blood pressure recordings. Statistics in Medicine, 7, 697–716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 1586–1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., & Witvliet, C. V. (2002). The psychology of forgiveness. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 446–458). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 321–336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, B. S., & Stellar, E. (1993). Stress and the individual: Mechanisms leading to disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 153, 2093–2101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. Q., Smith, T. W., Turner, C. W., Guijarro, M. L., & Hallet, A. J. (1996). Meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 322–348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A., Worthington, E., & McDaniel, M. (2008). Gender and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review and research agenda. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 27(8), 843–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, S., Waldstein, S., Sellers, J., Thayer, J., & Sorkin, J. (2004). Hostility and distraction have differential influences on cardiovascular recovery from anger recall in women. Health Psychology, 23(6), 631–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, J., Tarvainen, M., Ranta-aho, P., & Karjalainen, P. (2004). Software for advanced HRV analysis. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 76(1), 73–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seybold, K. S., Hill, P. C., Neumann, J. K., & Chi, D. S. (2001). Physiological and psychological correlates of forgiveness. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 20(3), 250–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W. (1992). Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychology, 11(3), 139–150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., Glazer, K., Ruiz, J. M., & Gallo, L. C. (2004). Hostility, anger, aggressiveness, and coronary heart disease: An interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1217–1270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1995). Revised state-trait personality inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takaku, S. (2001). The effects of apology and perspective taking on interpersonal forgiveness: A dissonance-attribution model of interpersonal forgiveness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 494–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thoresen, C. E., Harris, A. H., & Luskin, F. (2000). Forgiveness and health: An unanswered question. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 254–280). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandervort, D. J. (2006). Hostility and health: Mediating effects of belief systems and coping styles. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 25(1), 50–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, N. G., & Worthington, E. L. (2005). In search of a common core: A content analysis of interventions to promote forgiveness. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42(2), 160–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltman, M., Russell, D., Coyle, C., Enright, R., Holter, A., & Swoboda, M. C. (2009). The effects of a forgiveness intervention on patients with coronary artery disease. Psychology & Health, 24(1), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., Smith, N., & Holmes, P. (2007). The role of effort in influencing the effect of anxiety on performance: Testing the conflicting predictions of processing efficiency theory and the conscious processing hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 98(3), 411–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witvliet, C. O., Ludwig, T. E., & Bauer, D. J. (2002). Please forgive me: Transgressors’ emotions and physiology during imagery of seeking forgiveness and victim responses. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 21(3), 219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witvliet, C. V., Ludwig, T. E., & Vander Laan, K. L. (2001). Granting forgiveness or harboring grudges: Implications for emotion, physiology, and health. Psychological Science, 12(2), 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister, J. S., Garcia, S., Romero, C., & Vas, S. N. (2004). Don’t apologize unless you mean it: A laboratory investigation of forgiveness and retaliation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(4), 532–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Lubin, B. (1985). Manual for the multiple affect adjective checklist. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support for this study was provided by West Virginia University’s Eberly College of Arts and Sciences (Doctoral Research Program) and Department of Psychology (Alumni Fund). We thank Jennifer Friedberg for her assistance in conducting some of the statistical analyses herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew C. Whited.

Additional information

This manuscript is based, in part, on a doctoral dissertation (Matthew C. Whited).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whited, M.C., Wheat, A.L. & Larkin, K.T. The influence of forgiveness and apology on cardiovascular reactivity and recovery in response to mental stress. J Behav Med 33, 293–304 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-010-9259-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-010-9259-7

Keywords

Navigation