Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Performance Feedback and Video Self-Monitoring Within a BST Package to Train Pre-service Behavior Analysts to Conduct Preference Assessments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavior skills training (BST) has been shown to be an effective strategy for teaching new skills. Given the evidence suggesting its efficacy for use as a training package, BST should be considered as an option for training future behavior analysts to implement behavior change strategies. Further, training future practitioners to engage in self-monitoring skills may enhance training and promote generalized skills across time. Video self-monitoring is one strategy that can increase efficiency of using this strategy. The current study compares two BST packages, one with instructor feedback and one with video self-monitoring, in a multielement design embedded within a multiple baseline across participants design to train master’s level graduate students to conduct preference assessments. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of performance feedback and video self-monitoring on performance fidelity outcomes of pre-service behavior analysts conducting preference assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavosius, M. P., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1990). Acquisition and maintenance of health-care routines as a function of feedback density. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1990.23-151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore, P. J., Fritts, K. M., & Herman, B. C. (2008). The role of procedural integrity: Using self-monitoring to enhance discrete trial instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 23, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357607311445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M. (1989). Assessment of performance fidelity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review, 18, 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, K. D. (2018). Teachers’ use of video self-monitoring to improve delivery of effective teaching practices. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50, 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918765749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranak, M. P., Shapiro, M. N., Sawyer, M. R., Deochand, N. & Neef, N. A. (2018). Using behavioral skills training to improve graduate students’ graphing skills. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miltenberger, R. G. (2008). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures. Belmont, MA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrier, M. J., Hess, K. L., & Heflin, L. J. (2011). Teacher training for implementation of teaching strategies for students with autism spectrum disorder. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortenson, B. P., & Witt, J. C. (1998). The use of weekly performance feedback to increase teacher implementation of a prereferral academic intervention. School Psychology Review, 27, 613–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouzakitis, A., Codding, R. S., & Tryon, G. (2015). The effects of self-monitoring and performance feedback on the performance fidelity of behavior intervention plan implementation and generalization. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Slider, N. J., & Connell, J. E. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34, 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. B., Rollyson, J. H., & Reid, D. H. (2012). Evidence-based staff training: A guide for practitioners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, K., McNamara, B., Braga-Kenyon, P., & Ahearn, W. H. (2010). Effect of video self-monitoring on procedural integrity. Behavioral Interventions, 25, 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rispoli, M., Zaini, S., Mason, R., Brodhead, M., Burke, M. D., & Gregori, E. (2017). A systematic review of teacher self-monitoring on implementation of behavioral practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 58–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T., Parker, T., Taubman, M., & Lovaas, O. I. (1992). Transfer of staff training from workshops to group homes: A failure to generalize across settings. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward-Horner, J., & Sturmey, P. (2012). Component analysis of behavior skills training in functional analysis. Behavioral Interventions, 27, 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Regan Weston.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weston, R., Davis, T.N., Radhakrishnan, S. et al. Comparing Performance Feedback and Video Self-Monitoring Within a BST Package to Train Pre-service Behavior Analysts to Conduct Preference Assessments. J Behav Educ 29, 571–583 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-019-09333-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-019-09333-w

Keywords

Navigation