Skip to main content
Log in

Low-temperature treatment for preservation and separation of graphene dispersions

  • Chemical routes to materials
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Graphene nanosheets prepared by liquid-phase exfoliation tend to aggregate easily and irreversibly in most solvents due to van der Waals forces and high surface energy. This article presents a facile, low-cost and novel approach for the preservation and separation of graphene dispersions by adjusting the temperature and solvent. Using IPA-water mixtures can realize green production of graphene nanosheets, and different physicochemical parameters are achievable by changing the proportion of components. Two valid methods for improving stability were discussed in depth: low-temperature storage as a liquid and as a solid. When graphene dispersions are stored in a liquid phase, agglomeration of nanosheets in mixed solvents can be effectively retarded by strong viscous resistance induced by low temperatures. Frozen powder prepared by liquid nitrogen maintains the nanosheets in a dispersed state and is suitable for long-term preservation in the solid phase in ordinary freezers. Furthermore, rapid separation of graphene nanosheets is a challenging problem that retards industrial production. Flocculation induced by slow freezing can accelerate solid–liquid separation, offering a novel approach to obtain easily dispersed powders. Various patterns could be printed on paper and poly(ethylene terephthalate) by a simple and low-cost screen printing technique using the graphene powder, providing a new platform for scalable, low-cost printing of electronics. Consequently, this scalable and simple strategy can be satisfactorily applied to the preservation and separation of graphene and is expected to extend to other nanomaterials, including MoS2 and h-BN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen MJ, Tung VC, Kaner RB (2009) Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene. Chem Rev 110:132–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Geim AK, Novoselov KS (2007) The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 6:183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards RS, Coleman KS (2013) Graphene synthesis: relationship to applications. Nanoscale 5:38–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brownson DAC, Varey SA, Hussain F et al (2014) Electrochemical properties of CVD grown pristine graphene: monolayer- vs. quasi-graphene. Nanoscale 6:1607–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Antonova IV, Basyleva EV, Kotin IA (2017) High carrier mobility in quasi-suspended few-layer graphene on printed graphene oxide layers. J Mater Sci 52:10230–10236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1186-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jia X, Campos-Delgado J, Terrones M et al (2011) Graphene edges: a review of their fabrication and characterization. Nanoscale 3:86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdelkader AM, Cooper AJ, Dryfe RAW et al (2015) How to get between the sheets: a review of recent works on the electrochemical exfoliation of graphene materials from bulk graphite. Nanoscale 7:6944–6956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang W, Hsu AL, Song Y et al (2015) A review of large-area bilayer graphene synthesis by chemical vapor deposition. Nanoscale 7:20335–20351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu W, Zhang C, Hou S (2017) Electrochemical exfoliation of graphene and graphene-analogous 2D nanosheets. J Mater Sci 52:10649–10660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1289-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hernandez Y, Nicolosi V, Lotya M et al (2008) High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nat Nanotechnol 3:563–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu L, Shen Z, Yi M et al (2014) A green, rapid and size-controlled production of high-quality graphene sheets by hydrodynamic forces. RSC Adv 4:36464–36470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi W, Lahiri I, Seelaboyina R et al (2010) Synthesis of graphene and its applications: a review. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 35:52–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wei D, Kivioja J (2013) Graphene for energy solutions and its industrialization. Nanoscale 5:10108–10126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu L, Shen Z, Liang S et al (2014) Graphene for reducing bubble defects and enhancing mechanical properties of graphene/cellulose acetate composite films. J Mater Sci 49:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7708-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ciesielski A, Samori P (2014) Graphene via sonication assisted liquid-phase exfoliation. Chem Soc Rev 43:381–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Si Y, Samulski ET (2008) Synthesis of water soluble graphene. Nano Lett 8:1679–1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu Z, Liu J, Li Y et al (2015) Self-assembly of nanoclusters into Mono-Few-, and multilayered sheets via dipole-induced asymmetric van der waals attraction. ACS Nano 9:6315–6323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee YJ, Huang L, Wang H et al (2015) Structural rearrangement and dispersion of functionalized graphene sheets in aqueous solutions. Colloids Interface Sci Commun 8:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Su Y, Yang G, Lu K et al (2017) Colloidal properties and stability of aqueous suspensions of few-layer graphene: importance of graphene concentration. Environ Pollut 220:469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Texter J (2014) Graphene dispersions. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 19:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu J, Tang J, Gooding JJ (2012) Strategies for chemical modification of graphene and applications of chemically modified graphene. J Mater Chem 22:12435–12452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin Y, Jin J, Song M (2011) Preparation and characterisation of covalent polymer functionalized graphene oxide. J Mater Chem 21:3455–3461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shen Z, Li J, Yi M et al (2011) Preparation of graphene by jet cavitation. Nanotechnology 22:365306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hernandez Y, Lotya M, Rickard D et al (2010) Measurement of multicomponent solubility parameters for graphene facilitates solvent discovery. Langmuir 26:3208–3213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hernandez Y, Nicolosi V, Lotya M et al (2008) High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nat Nanotechnol 3:563–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou KG, Mao NN, Wang HX et al (2011) A mixed-solvent strategy for efficient exfoliation of inorganic graphene analogues. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:10839–10842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yi M, Shen Z, Ma S et al (2012) A mixed-solvent strategy for facile and green preparation of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. J Nanopart Res 14:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shen ZG, Li JZ, Yi M et al (2011) Preparation of graphene by jet cavitation. Nanotechnology 22:365306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ibrahem MA, T-w Lan, Huang JK et al (2013) High quantity and quality few-layers transition metal disulfide nanosheets from wet-milling exfoliation. RSC Adv 3:13193–13202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kudin KN, Ozbas B, Schniepp HC et al (2008) Raman spectra of graphite oxide and functionalized graphene sheets. Nano Lett 8:36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Neill A, Khan U, Nirmalraj PN et al (2011) Graphene dispersion and exfoliation in low boiling point solvents. J Phys Chem C 115:5422–5428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hansen CM (2012) Hansen solubility parameters: a user’s handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hong J-Y, Jang J (2012) Highly stable, concentrated dispersions of graphene oxide sheets and their electro-responsive characteristics. Soft Matter 8:7348–7350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Walter J, Nacken TJ, Damm C et al (2015) Graphene oxide: determination of the lateral dimension of graphene oxide nanosheets using analytical ultracentrifugation (small 7/2015). Small 11:814–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Silvera Batista CA, Zheng M, Khripin CY et al (2014) Rod hydrodynamics and length distributions of single-wall carbon nanotubes using analytical ultracentrifugation. Langmuir 30:4895–4904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tirado MM, Martínez CL, Torre JG (1984) Comparison of theories for the translational and rotational diffusion coefficients of rod-like macromolecules. Application to short DNA fragments. J Chem Phys 81:2047–2052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Steinberger R (1999) Chemical properties handbook. World Pub. Co., Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  38. Seeton CJ (2006) Viscosity–temperature correlation for liquids. Tribol Lett 22:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Aladko L, Manakov AY, Ogienko A et al (2009) New data on phase diagram and clathrate formation in the system water–isopropyl alcohol. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem 63:151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen Z, Ren W, Gao L et al (2011) Three-dimensional flexible and conductive interconnected graphene networks grown by chemical vapour deposition. Nat Mater 10:424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hong J-Y, Yun S, Wie JJ et al (2016) Cartilage-inspired superelastic ultradurable graphene aerogels prepared by the selective gluing of intersheet joints. Nanoscale 8:12900–12909

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (Grant Number 20131102110016) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant Number 157212).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhigang Shen.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2775 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, L., Shen, Z., Zhang, X. et al. Low-temperature treatment for preservation and separation of graphene dispersions. J Mater Sci 53, 13875–13885 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2572-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2572-1

Keywords

Navigation