Skip to main content
Log in

Classifier syntax in Vietnamese

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vietnamese is a language with a three-way split in the appearance of numeral classifiers when nouns are counted: some nouns always require classifiers (obligatory-classifier nouns), others occur only optionally with classifiers (optional-classifier nouns), and a third group never combines with a classifier (non-classified nouns). This distribution provides potentially important information on the much debated question of whether classifiers functionally combine with numerals (Bale and Coon in Linguist Inq 45:695–707, 2014) or with nouns (Li in Linguist Inq 29(4):693–702, 1998; Cheng and Sybesma in Linguist Inq 30:509–542, 1999). It also appears to challenge Chierchia’s (Nat Lang Semant 6(4):339–405, 1998) characterization of the basic semantic type of nouns found in different languages, which assumes a uniform pattern of classifier occurrence in numeral classifier languages. Having described the broad distribution of classifiers in Vietnamese and the questions this raises, the article probes the syntactic properties of classifiers with the three types of noun in the language, considering double classifier patterns, fragment answers, passive constructions, and the use of classifiers with certain compound nouns. Evidence from such phenomena is shown to support the hypothesis that a uniform syntactic structure is actually projected with nouns of all types in Vietnamese, but sometimes masked by the use of nouns to overtly lexicalize both the N and CL positions in nominal projections through N-to-Cl movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive Cyclicity, Anti-locality, and Adposition Stranding. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

  • Bale, Alan, and Jessica Coon. 2014. Classifiers are for Numerals, Not for Nouns: Consequences for the Mass/Count Distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 695–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit. 1988. On the Parallelism Between Compounds and Constructs. Yearbook of Morphology 1: 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring Sense: Volume 1: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2014. Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1): 27–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, and Rint Sybesma. 1999. Bare and Not-so-Bare Nouns and the Structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, and Rint Sybesma. 2005. Classifiers in Four Varieties of Chinese. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, ed. Guglielmo Cinque and Richard Kayne, 259–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to Kinds Across Language. Natural Language Semantics 6(4): 339–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro. 2015. How Universal is the Mass/Count Distinction? In Chinese Syntax in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, ed. Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson, and Dylan Tsai, 147–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist Inquiries. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daley, Karen. 1998. Vietnamese Classifiers in Narrative Texts. Arlington: University of Texas, Summer Institute of Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grohmann, Kleanthes. 2003. Prolific Domains: On the Anti-locality of Movement Dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Her, One-Soon, and Hui-Chin Tsai. 2014. Color isn’t Silent, Shallow isn’t Deep: Two Case Studies of Evaluating Silent Elements. Language and Linguistics 15: 775–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, Anders. 2000. Scandinavian Stylistic-Fronting: How Any Category Can Become an Expletive. Linguistic Inquiry 31(3): 445–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-T.James. 1983. Phrase Structure, Lexical Integrity, and Chinese Compounds. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 19: 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-T.James, Yen-Hui Audrey Li, and Yafei Li. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 2005. Movement and Silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 2012. A Note on Grand and Its Silent Entourage. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 33(2): 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred. 1995. Common Nouns: A Contrastive Analysis of English and Chinese. In The Generic Book, ed. Gregory Carlson and Francis Pelletier, 398–411. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe, Steven. 1980. A Theory of Grammatical Agreement. PhD dissertation, Amherst, University of Massachusetts.

  • Li, Xu Ping. 2013. Numeral Classifiers in Chinese. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1998. Argument Determiner Phrases and Number Phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29(4): 693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, Rochelle, and Sergio Scalise. 2007. The Lexical Integrity Hypothesis in a new theoretical universe. In On-line Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, ed. Geert Booij, Luca Ducceschi, Bernard Fradin, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli, and Sergio Scalise, 1–24.http://mmm.lingue.unibo.it/.

  • Löbel, Elisabeth. 2000. Classifiers Versus Genders and Noun Classes: A Case Study in Vietnamese. In Gender in Grammar and Cognition: I: Approaches to Gender. II: Manifestations of Gender, ed. Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen, and Mirja Saari, 259–313. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manetta, Emily. 2011. Peripheries in Kashmiri and Hindi-Urdu. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, Binh. 2012. Vietnamese Classifiers: (Non-)specificity. MA thesis, Northeastern Illinois University.

  • Nguyen, D.H. 1957. Classifiers in Vietnamese. Word - Journal of the International Linguistic Association 13(1): 124–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, Tưởng Hùng. 2004. The Structure of the Vietnamese Noun Phrase. PhD dissertation, Boston University.

  • Radford, Andrew. 2004. Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1982. The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Andrew. 2008. Classifiers and DP Structure in Southeast Asia. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, ed. Guglielmo Cinque and Richard Kayne, 806–838. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Andrew. 2012. The Silence of the Bucks: A Note on Kayne’s ‘Grand and Its Silent Entourage’. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 33(2): 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Andrew. 2017. Bare Classifier/Noun Alternations in the Jinyun (Wu) Variety of Chinese and the Encoding of Definiteness. Linguistics 55(2): 305–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Andrew, and Priyanka Biswas. 2016. Bare Nominals, Classifiers, and the Representation of Definiteness in Bangla. Linguistic Analysis 40(3–4): 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Andrew, and Tam Ho. 2013. Vietnamese and the Typology of Passive Constructions. In Linguistics of Vietnamese, ed. Daniel Hole and Elisabeth Löbel, 155–185. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Andrew, Hooi Ling Soh, and Hiroki Nomoto. 2011. Bare Classifiers and Definiteness: A Cross-Linguistic Investigation. Studies in Language 35: 168–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Andrew, and Saurov Syed. 2016. Blocking Effects of Higher Numerals in Bangla: A Phase-Based Analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 47: 754–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syed, Saurov, and Andrew Simpson. 2017. On the DP/NP Status of Nominal Projections in Bangla: Consequences for the Theory of Phases. Glossa 2(68): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takano, Yuji. 2000. Illicit Remnant Movement: An Argument for Feature-Driven Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trương, Văn Chình. 1970. Structure de la Langue Vietnamienne. Paris: Imprimerie nationale P. Geuthner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu, Sonny. 1999. Splitting Compounds. Talk Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America, Los Angeles.

  • Zhang, Hong. 2007. Numeral Classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16: 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Niina Ning. 2013. Classifier Structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Simpson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simpson, A., Ngo, B. Classifier syntax in Vietnamese. J East Asian Linguist 27, 211–246 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-018-9181-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-018-9181-5

Keywords

Navigation