Skip to main content
Log in

Parental Contributions to the Delay of Gratification in Preschool-aged Children

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Delay of gratification in young children has been linked to long-term behavioral and academic outcomes. This study explored parent behavior during a laboratory paradigm as possible associates of delay ability. The sample consisted of 50 two- and three-year-old children and their primary caregivers. A newly created laboratory task, the gift delay task, was conducted to assess delay of gratification. Additionally, parents completed a child temperament (EASI-III) questionnaire. Based on the award-oriented behavior in the gift delay task, children were classified into three groups: delay (20 %), touch and go (i.e., approached the gift, but demonstrated some delay ability; 46 %), and non delay (34 %). Likewise, parents were classified into three groups: non-directive (parents did not initiate any interactions, but may have participated in child-led activity), active (parents initiated interaction with the child no more than 3 times), and very active (parents initiated 4 or more interactions with the child). Significant differences in emotionality and impulsivity were found between the 3 groups of children; additionally, significant differences in delay ability were found based on parent classifications suggesting that there is an optimal level of involvement on part of the parent that helps the child to wait, but beyond this point, involvement may be detrimental to a successful delay outcome. Implications for behavioral interventions focused on parental support and scaffolding are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A., & Mischel, W. (1965). Modification of self-imposed delay of reward through exposure to live and symbolic models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 698–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bronson, M. (2000). Self-regulation in early childhood. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H., & Plomin, R. (1975). A temperamental theory of personality development. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cournoyer, M., & Trudel, M. (1991). Behavioral correlates of self-control at 33 months. Infant Behavior, 14, 497–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshel, Y., & Kohavi, R. (2003). Perceived classroom control, self-regulated learning strategies, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 23, 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabes, R. A., Eisenberg, N., Jones, S., Smith, M., Guthrie, I., Poulin, R., et al. (1999). Regulation, emotionality, and preschoolers’ socially competent peer interactions. Child Development, 70, 432–442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R., & Klein, P. S. (2003). Toddlers’ self regulated compliance to mothers, caregivers, and fathers: Implications for theories of socialization. Developmental Psychology, 39, 680–692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D.C., Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1983). Delay of gratification: Some longitudinal personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1198–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauvain, M., Fagot, B., Leve, C., & Kavanagh, K. (2002). Instruction by mothers and fathers during problem solving with their young children. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 81–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, W. S., Bridges, L. J., & Connell, J. P. (1996). Emotion regulation in two-year-olds: Strategies and emotional expression in four contexts. Child Development, 67, 928–941.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, R. D., & Mcdevitt, T. M. (1984). Some cognitive consequences of maternal intervention techniques: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 55, 2017–2030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, T. (1998). Delay behavior at age six: Links to maternal expressed emotion. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159, 117–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, T., Huss, M., Fendrich, M., Kruesi, M. J. P., & Ziegenhain, U. (1997). Children’s ability to delay gratification: Longitudinal relations to mother-child attachment. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 158, 411–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kochanska, G., Murray, K., & Coy, K. C. (1997). Inhibitory control as a contributor to conscience in childhood: From toddler to early school age. Child Development, 68, 263–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, C. B. (1982). Antecedents of self-regulation: A developmental perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagattuta, K. H. (2005). When you shouldn’t do what you want to do: Young children’s understanding of desires, rules, and emotions. Child Development, 76, 713–733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D., & Endler, N. S. (1977). Interactional psychology: Present status and future prospects. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1974). Processes in delay of gratification. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7). NewYork: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1983). Delay of gratification as process and as person variable in development. In D. Magnusson & V. Allen (Eds.), Human Development—An Interactional Perspective (pp. 149–165). NewYork: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1990). Personality dispositions revisited and revised: A view after three decades. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality (pp. 111–134). NewYork: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Ebbessen, E. (1970). Attention in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Moore, B. (1973). Effects of attention to symbolically presented rewards on self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 172–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1992). Delay of gratification in children. In G. Lowenstein., & J. Elster (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 147–164). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  • Mittal, R., Russell, B. S., Britner, P. A., & Peake, P. K. (2012). Delay of gratification in two- and three-year-olds: Associations with attachment, personality, and temperament. Journal of Child and Family Studies. doi:10.1007/s10826-012-9600-6.

  • Moore, B., Mischel, W., & Zeiss, A. (1976). Comparative effects of the reward stimulus and its cognitive representation in voluntary delay. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 419–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisan, M. (1974). Exposure to rewards and the delay of gratification. Developmental Psychology, 10, 376–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peake, P. K., Hebl, M., & Mischel, W. (2002). Strategic attention deployment for delay of gratification in working and waiting situations. Developmental Psychology, 38, 313–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raikes, H. A., Robinson, J. L., Bradley, R. H., Raikes, H. H., & Ayoub, C. C. (2007). Developmental trends in self-regulation among low-income toddlers. Social Development, 16, 128–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schack, M. L., & Massari, D. J. (1973). Effects of temporal aids and frustration on delay of gratification. Developmental Psychology, 8, 168–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, A., Mischel, W., Aber, L., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. (2000). The role of strategic attention deployment in development of self-regulation: Predicting preschoolers’ delay of gratification from mother-toddler interactions. Developmental Psychology, 36, 767–777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, I. W., & Ippolito, M. F. (1995). Maternal antecedents of delay ability in young children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 16, 569–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, I. W., & Ragusa, D. M. (1990). Child and maternal correlates of impulse control in 24-month-old children. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 116, 435–453.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, B. E., Kopp, C. B., & Krakow, J. B. (1984). The emergence and consolidation of self-control from eighteen to thirty months of age: Normative trends and individual differences. Child Development, 55, 990–1004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, B. E., Kopp, C. B., Krakow, J. B., Johnson, K., & Schwartz, S. (1986). Process analyses of the behavior of the very young children in delay task. Developmental Psychology, 22, 752–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, G. (1974). Influence of televised modeling and verbalization on children’s delay of gratification. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank our hard-working undergraduate research assistants and the parents, teachers, and children who generously participated in the study. Funding for this research came from University of Connecticut Research Foundation grant to the third author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beth S. Russell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, B.S., Londhe, R. & Britner, P.A. Parental Contributions to the Delay of Gratification in Preschool-aged Children. J Child Fam Stud 22, 471–478 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9599-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9599-8

Keywords

Navigation