Skip to main content
Log in

Viewing Social Scenes: A Visual Scan-Path Study Comparing Fragile X Syndrome and Williams Syndrome

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) and Williams syndrome (WS) are both genetic disorders which present with similar cognitive-behavioral problems, but distinct social phenotypes. Despite these social differences both syndromes display poor social relations which may result from abnormal social processing. This study aimed to manipulate the location of socially salient information within scenes to investigate the visual attentional mechanisms of: capture, disengagement, and/or general engagement. Findings revealed that individuals with FXS avoid social information presented centrally, at least initially. The WS findings, on the other hand, provided some evidence that difficulties with attentional disengagement, rather than attentional capture, may play a role in the WS social phenotype. These findings are discussed in relation to the distinct social phenotypes of these two disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Separate CA- and MA-matched control groups were initially recruited for the FXS and WS groups due to sporadic recruitment of clinical participants. Fourteen controls were individually matched to FXS participants on sex and CA (M = 23.81 years, SD = 12.44, p = 0.856), and 14 matched on sex and MA (M = 9.51 years, SD = 3.64, p = 0.564). Likewise, 14 controls were individually matched to WS participants on sex and CA (M = 22.53 years, SD = 8.66, p = 0.916), 14 on sex and MA (M = 7.84 years, SD = 1.66, p = 0.924). Ultimately, the FXS and WS groups were well matched on both CA and MA, so separate control groups were not required. As such, controls were combined to increase power and to allow for a direct comparison across the four groups.

  2. Images used in the current study included: central: 2396, 2398, 2480, 2560, 2593, 2745, 2749, 5875, 9913; non-central: 2272, 2299, 2393, 2575, 2579, 2590, 2594, 2598, 7550.

  3. To ensure that the imbalanced gender ratio was not affecting the results, a univariate ANCOVA was conducted with gender as a covariate. While the significance value was reduced, the analysis remained significant [F(3, 79) = 2.73, p = 0.049, η2 = 0.094].

  4. Again, to investigate the effect of gender on the results, the analysis was re-run with gender as a covariate. The pattern of results remained the same, and in particular the Group by Stimulus Set interaction [F (3, 79) = 5.37, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.17].

References

  • Baumgardner, T. L., Reiss, A. L., Freund, L. S., & Abrams, M. T. (1995). Specification of the neurobehavioral phenotype in males with fragile X syndrome. Pediatrics, 95(5), 744–752.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellugi, U., Lichtenberger, L., Mills, D., Galaburda, A., & Korenberg, J. R. (1999). Bridging cognition, the brain and molecular genetics: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Trends in Neurosciences, 22(5), 197–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2008). Social attention and real-world scenes: The roles of action, competition and social content. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(7), 986–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogels, S. M., & Mansell, W. (2004). Attention processes in the maintenance and treatment of social phobia: Hypervigilance, avoidance and self-focused attention. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(7), 827–856. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2004.06.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. H., Johnson, M. H., Paterson, S. J., Gilmore, R., Longhi, E., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2003). Spatial representation and attention in toddlers with Williams syndrome and Down syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 41(8), 1037–1046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I. L., Fisch, G. S., Sudhalter, V., Wolf-Schein, G., Hanson, D., Hagerman, R., et al. (1988). Social gaze, social avoidance, and repetitive behavior in fragile X males: A controlled study. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 92(5), 436–446.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I. L., Vietze, P. M., Sudhalter, V., Jenkins, E. C., & Brown, T. W. (1991). Effects of age and communication level on eye contact in fragile X males and non-fragile X autistic males. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 38, 498–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, K. M., Munir, F., & Cross, G. (2001). Differential impact of the FMR-1 full mutation on memory and attention functioning: A neuropsychological perspective. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(1), 144–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, K. M., Scerif, G., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2007). Tracing syndrome-specific trajectories of attention across the lifespan. Cortex, 43(6), 672–685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, K. M., Turk, J., Wilding, J., Sudhalter, V., Munir, F., Kooy, F., et al. (2004). Annotation: Deconstructing the attention deficit in fragile X syndrome: A developmental neuropsychological approach. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1042–1053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. A. (1995). Review of the Woodcock–Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1113–1116). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, K. M., Holsen, L., Abbeduto, L., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Brain function and gaze fixation during facial-emotion processing in fragile X and autism. Autism Research, 1(4), 231–239. doi:10.1002/aur.32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Nuovo, S., & Buono, S. (2011). Behavioral phenotypes of genetic syndromes with intellectual disability: Comparison of adaptive profiles. Psychiatry Research, 189, 440–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, H. F., Schniering, C. A., & Porter, M. A. (2009). Beyond behaviour: Is social anxiety low in Williams syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1673–1681. doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0806-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duchowski, A. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykens, E. (2000). Annotation: Psychopathology in children with intellectual disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 407–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dykens, E. (2003). Anxiety, fears, and phobia in persons with Williams syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23, 291–316.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Einfeld, S. L., Tonge, B. J., & Florio, T. (1997). Behavioral and emotional disturbance in individuals with Williams syndrome. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 102(1), 45–53. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(1997)102<0045:BAEDII>2.0.CO;2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elison, S., Stinton, C., & Howlin, P. (2010). Health and social outcomes in adults with Williams syndrome: Findings from cross-sectional and longitudinal cohorts. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(2), 587–599. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2009.12.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farzin, F., Rivera, S. M., & Hessl, D. (2009). Brief report: Visual processing of faces in individuals with fragile X syndrome: An eye tracking study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 946–952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farzin, F., Scaggs, F., Hervey, C., Berry-Kravis, E., & Hessl, D. (2011). Reliability of eye tracking and pupillometry measures in individuals with fragile X syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1515–1522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisch, G., Carpenter, N., Howard-Peebles, P. N., Holden, J., Tarleton, J., Simensen, R., et al. (2007). Studies of age-related features of cognitive-behavioral development in children and adolescents with genetic disorders. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 143, 2478–2489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E. A. (2005). The role of visual processes in modulating social interactions. Visual Cognition, 12(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, P., Leboyer, M., Gansicke, M., Weiffenbach, O., Biancalana, V., Cornillet-Lefebre, P., et al. (1998). Genotype-phenotype relationship in female carriers of the premutation and full mutation of FMR-1. Psychiatry Research, 80, 113–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, L., & Reiss, A. L. (1991). Cognitive profile associated with Fra(X) syndrome in males and females. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 38, 542–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fryssira, H., Palmer, R., Hallidie-Smith, K. A., Taylor, J., Donnai, D., & Reardon, W. (1997). Fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) for hemizygous deletion at the elastin locus in patients with isolated supravalvular aortic stenosis. Journal of Medical Genetics, 34(4), 306–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, B. W., Mills, D., Yam, A., Hoeft, F., Bellugi, U., & Reiss, A. (2009). Genetic influences on sociability: Heightened amygdala reactivity and event-related responses to positive social stimuli in Williams syndrome. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 29(4), 1132–1139. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5324-08.2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman, R. (2002). The physical and behavioral phenotype. In R. Hagerman & P. Hagerman (Eds.), Fragile X syndrome: Diagnosis, treatment and research (3rd ed., pp. 3–109). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, D. D., Sideris, J., Skinner, M., Mankowski, J., Bailey, D. B., Roberts, J., et al. (2006). Autistic behavior in children with fragile X syndrome: Prevalence, stability, and the impact of FMRP. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 140A(17), 1804–1813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, A. K. (2001). Review of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. In B. S. Plake & J. C. Impara (Eds.), The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1329–1331). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessl, D., Dyer-Friedman, J., Glaser, B., Wisbeck, J., Barajas, R. G., Taylor, A., et al. (2001). The influence of environmental and genetic factors on behavior problems and autistic symptoms in boys and girls with fragile X syndrome. Pediatrics, 108(5), e88. doi:10/1542/peds.108.5.e88.

  • Holsen, L. M., Dalton, K. M., Johnstone, T., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Prefrontal social cognition network dysfunction underlying face encoding and social anxiety in fragile X syndrome. Neuroimage, 43(3), 592–604. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W., Bellugi, U., Lai, Z., Chiles, M., Reilly, J., Lincoln, A., et al. (2000). II. Hypersociability in Williams syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(Suppl 1), 30–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, W. E., Cortell, R., Kau, C. S. M., Bukelis, I., Tierney, E., Gray, R. M., et al. (2004). Autism spectrum disorder in fragile X syndrome: Communication, social interaction, and specific behaviors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 129A(3), 225–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002). Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 809–816.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lachiewicz, A. M., & Dawson, D. V. (1994). Behavior problems of young girls with fragile X syndrome: Factor scores on the Conners’ Parent’s Questionnaire. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 51(4), 364–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. Gainesville: University of Florida, Centre for Research in Psychophysiology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lense, M. D., Key, A. P., & Dykens, E. M. (2011). Attentional disengagement in adults with Williams syndrome. Brain and Cognition, 77(2), 201–207. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leyfer, O. T., Woodruff-Borden, J., Klein-Tasman, B. P., Fricke, J. S., & Mervis, C. B. (2006). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in 4 to 16-year-olds with Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 141B(6), 615–622. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.30344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, A., Lai, Z., & Jones, W. (2002). Shifting attention and joint attention dissociation in Williams syndrome: Implications for the cerebellum and the social deficits in autism. Neurocase, 8, 226–232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mervis, C. B., Morris, C. A., Klein-Tasman, B. P., Bertrand, J., Kwitny, S., Appelbaum, L. G., et al. (2003). Attentional characteristics of infants and toddlers with Williams syndrome during triadic interactions. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23(1–2), 243–268. doi:10.1080/87565641.2003.9651894.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mervis, C. B., Robinson, B. F., Bertrand, J., Morris, C. A., Klein-Tasman, B. P., & Armstrong, S. C. (2000). The Williams syndrome cognitive profile. Brain and Cognition, 44(3), 604–628. doi:10.1006/brcg.2000.1232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Hariri, A. R., Munoz, K. E., Mervis, C. B., Mattay, V. S., Morris, C. A., et al. (2005). Neural correlates of genetically abnormal social cognition in Williams syndrome. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 991–993. doi:10.1038/nn1494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikels, J. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Larkin, G. R., Lindberg, C. M., Maglio, S. J., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2005). Emotional category data on images from the international affective picture system. Behavioral Research Methods, 37(4), 626–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobbs, D., Garrett, A. S., Menon, V., Rose, F. E., Bellugi, U., & Reiss, A. (2004). Anomalous brain activation during face and gaze processing in Williams syndrome. Neurology, 62(11), 2070–2076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., de Bono, J., & Painter, M. (1997). Time course of attentional bias for threat information in non-clinical anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(4), 297–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munir, F., Cornish, K. M., & Wilding, J. (2000). A neuropsychological profile of attention deficits in young males with fragile X syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 38(9), 1261–1270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noton, D., & Stark, L. (1971). Eye movements and visual perception. Scientific American, 224(6), 35–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F., & Bennetto, L. (1998). A neuropsychology of mental retardation. In J. A. Burack, R. M. Hodapp, & E. Zigler (Eds.), Handbook of mental retardation and development (pp. 80–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. A., Dodd, H., & Cairns, D. (2009). Psychopathological and behavior impairments in Williams–Beuren syndrome: The influence of gender, chronological age, and cognition. Child Neuropsychology: A Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence, 15(4), 359–374. doi:10.1080/09297040802577881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. A., Shaw, T. A., & Marsh, P. J. (2010). An unusual attraction to the eyes in Williams–Beuren syndrome: A manipulation of facial affect while measuring face scanpaths. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 15(6), 505–530. doi:10.1080/13546801003644486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Psychological Corporation. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (WASI) manual. San Antonio, TX: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riby, D. M., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Bruce, V. (2009). The eyes or the mouth? Feature salience and unfamiliar face processing in Williams syndrome and autism. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(1), 189–203. doi:10.1080/17470210701855629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riby, D. M., & Hancock, P. J. (2008). Viewing it differently: Social scene perception in Williams syndrome and autism. Neuropsychologia, 46(11), 2855–2860. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riby, D. M., & Hancock, P. J. (2009a). Do faces capture the attention of individuals with Williams syndrome or autism? Evidence from tracking eye movements. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(3), 421–431. doi:10.1007/s10803-008-0641-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riby, D. M., & Hancock, P. J. (2009b). Looking at movies and cartoons: Eye-tracking evidence from Williams syndrome and autism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(2), 169–181. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01142.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riby, D. M., Jones, N., Brown, P. H., Robinson, L. J., Langton, S. R., Bruce, V., et al. (2011). Attention to faces in Williams syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(9), 1228–1239. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1141-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. J., Wehner, E. A., & Hagerman, R. (2001). The behavioral phenotype in fragile X: Symptoms of autism in very young children with fragile X syndrome, idiopathic autism, and other developmental disorders. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 22(6), 409–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, K. J. (1990). No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology, 1(1), 43–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scerif, G., Cornish, K. M., Wilding, J., Driver, J., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2004). Visual search in typically developing toddlers and toddlers with fragile X or Williams syndrome. Developmental Science, 7(1), 116–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scerif, G., Cornish, K. M., Wilding, J., Driver, J., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2007). Delineation of early attentional control difficulties in fragile X syndrome: Focus on neurocomputational changes. Neuropsychologia, 45(8), 1889–1898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scerif, G., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Campos, R., Elsabbagh, M., Driver, J., & Cornish, K. (2005). To look or not to look? Typical and atypical development of oculomotor control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(4), 591–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schrank, F. A., Miller, D. C., Wendling, B. J., & Woodcock, R. W. (2010). Essentials of WJ III cognitive abilities assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T. A., & Porter, M. A. (In Press). Emotion Recognition and Visual-Scan Paths in Fragile X Syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1654-1.

  • Smilek, D., Birmingham, E., Cameron, D., Bischof, W., & Kingstone, A. (2006). Cognitive ethology and exploring attention in real-world scenes. Brain Research, 1080(1), 101–119. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.090.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, K., Hatton, D., Hammer, J., Sideris, J., Hooper, S., Ornstein, P., et al. (2006). ADHD symptoms in children with FXS. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 140A(21), 2275–2288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H., Plesa-Skwerer, D., Schofield, C., Verbalis, A., & Simons, D. J. (2007). Change detection as a tool for assessing attentional deployment in atypical populations: The case of Williams syndrome. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 11(3), 491–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsiouris, J. A., & Brown, W. T. (2004). Neuropsychiatric symptoms of fragile X syndrome: Pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy. CNS Drugs, 18, 687–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turk, J. (1998). Fragile X syndrome and attentional deficits. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 11, 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilding, J., Cornish, K. M., & Munir, F. (2002). Further delineation of the executive deficit in males with fragile-X syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., & Mather, N. (Eds.). (1989). WJ-R tests of cognitive abilitystandard and supplementary batteries: Examiner’s manual (Woodcock–Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised). IL: Riverside Publishing.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our thanks go to all the participants and their families for their time and enthusiasm. We would also like to thank the Fragile X Association of Australia and Hunter Genetics at Hunter New England Health for their support, as well as Samantha Baggott and Alan Taylor for their helpful suggestions with regards to content and statistics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracey A. Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, T.A., Porter, M.A. & Langdon, R. Viewing Social Scenes: A Visual Scan-Path Study Comparing Fragile X Syndrome and Williams Syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord 43, 1880–1894 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1737-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1737-z

Keywords

Navigation