Skip to main content
Log in

Are generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape an improvement on existing models for estimating skewed and heteroskedastic cost data?

  • Published:
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS) are a class of semi-parametric models with potential applicability to health care cost data. We compared the bias, accuracy, and coverage of GAMLSS estimators with two distributions [gamma and generalized inverse gaussian (GIG)] using a log link to the generalized linear model (GLM) with log link and gamma family and the log-transformed OLS. The evaluation using simulated gamma data showed that the GAMLSS and GLM gamma model had similar bias, accuracy, and coverage and outperformed the GAMLSS GIG. When applied to simulated GIG data, the GLM gamma was similar or improved in bias, accuracy, and coverage compared to the GAMLSS GIG and gamma; furthermore, the GAMLSS estimators produced wildly inaccurate or overly-precise results in certain circumstances. Applying all models to empirical data on health care costs after a fall-related injury, all estimators produced similar coefficient estimates, but GAMLSS estimators produced spuriously smaller standard errors. Although no single alternative was best for all simulations, the GLM gamma was the most consistent, so we recommend against using GAMLSS estimators using GIG or gamma to test for differences in mean health care costs. Since GAMLSS offers many other flexible distributions, future work should evaluate whether GAMLSS is useful when predicting health care costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basu, A., Arondekar, B.V., Rathouz, P.J.: Scale of interest versus scale of estimation: comparing alternative estimators for the incremental costs of a comorbidity. Health Econ. 15(10), 1091–1107 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A.: Extended generalized linear models: simultaneous estimation of flexible link and variance functions. Stata. J. 5(4), 501–516 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A., Rathouz, P.J.: Estimating marginal and incremental effects on health outcomes using flexible link and variance function models. Biostatistics 6(1), 93–109 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A., Manning, W.G.: Issues for the next generation of health care cost analyses. Med. Care 47(7 Suppl 1), S109–S114 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blough, D.K., Madden, C.W., Hornbrook, M.C.: Modeling risk using generalized linear models. J. Health Econ. 18(2), 153–171 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bohl, A.A., Fishman, P.A., Ciol, M.A., Williams, B., Logerfo, J., Phelan, E.A.: A longitudinal analysis of total 3-year healthcare costs for older adults who experience a fall requiring medical care. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 58(5), 853–860 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, A., Altman, D.G., Royston, P., Holder, R.L.: The design of simulation studies in medical statistics. Stat. Med. 25(24), 4279–4292 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C., Huang, W.: On characterizations of the gamma and generalized inverse gaussian distributions. Stat. Prob. Lett. 69, 381–388 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, N., Manning, W.G., et al.: A comparison of alternative models for the demand for medical care. J. Busi. Econ. Stat. 1, 115–126 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, P.A., Goodman, M.J., Hornbrook, M.C., Meenan, R.T., Bachman, D.J., O’Keeffe Rosetti, M.C.: Risk adjustment using automated ambulatory pharmacy data: the RxRisk model. Med. Care 41(1), 84–99 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S.C., Miller, G.E.: Health expenditure estimation and functional form: applications of the generalized gamma and extended estimating equations models. Health Econ. 19(5), 608–627 (2010)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W.G.: The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem. J. Health Econ. 17(3), 283–295 (1998)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W.G., Basu, A., Mullahy, J.: Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. J. Health Econ. 24(3), 465–488 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W.G., Mullahy, J.: Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform. J. Health Econ. 20(4), 461–494 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mihaylova, B., Briggs, A., O’Hagan, A., Thompson, S.G.: Review of statistical methods for analyzing healthcare resources and costs. Health Econ. 20(8), 897–916 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, R., Stasinopoulos, D.: A flexible regression approach using GAMLSS in R. London Metropolitan University, London (2009)

  • Roudsari, B.S., Ebel, B.E., Corso, P.S., Molinari, N.A., Koepsell, T.D.: The acute medical care costs of fall-related injuries among the U.S. older adults. Injury 36(11), 1316–1322 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stasinopoulos, D., Rigby, R.: Generalized additive models for location scale and shape. J. Stat. Softw. 23(7), 1–46 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Buuren, S., Fredriks, M.: Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modelling growth reference curves. Stat. Med. 20(8), 1259–1277 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Cooperative Agreement U48-DP-000050 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Prevention Research Centers Program. The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention nor the Prevention Research Centers Program. A special thanks to Dr. Sara L. Tamers, Ph.D. and Judith Yarrow for their critical edits.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex A. Bohl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bohl, A.A., Blough, D.K., Fishman, P.A. et al. Are generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape an improvement on existing models for estimating skewed and heteroskedastic cost data?. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 13, 18–38 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-012-0086-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-012-0086-x

Keywords

Navigation