As in the response to modeling and notation of DEA with strong and weak disposable outputs by Gary D. Ferrier, Michael D. Rosko, and Vivian G. Valdmanis, we, too, acknowledge that there were the same errors in our notation in the paper “is more better? An analysis of hospital outcomes and efficiency with a DEA model of output congestion” More specifically, the “μ” should be on both the weak and strong disposability constraints on outputs [1, 3]. And, as in the case of Ferrier et al., the findings we reported were correct as we used the OnFront software. We thank the authors, L. Kuntz and S. Sülz [2], for identifying the errors in our paper.