Abstract
The compact and, with \({\sim }4.3\pm 0.3\times 10^6\) M\(_{\odot }\), very massive object located at the center of the Milky Way is currently the very best candidate for a supermassive black hole (SMBH) in our immediate vicinity. The strongest evidence for this is provided by measurements of stellar orbits, variable X-ray emission, and strongly variable polarized near-infrared emission from the location of the radio source Sagittarius A* (SgrA*) in the middle of the central stellar cluster. Simultaneous near-infrared and X-ray observations of SgrA* have revealed insights into the emission mechanisms responsible for the powerful near-infrared and X-ray flares from within a few tens to one hundred Schwarzschild radii of such a putative SMBH. If SgrA* is indeed a SMBH it will, in projection onto the sky, have the largest event horizon and will certainly be the first and most important target for very long baseline interferometry observations currently being prepared by the event horizon telescope (EHT). These observations in combination with the infrared interferometry experiment GRAVITY at the very large telescope interferometer and other experiments across the electromagnetic spectrum might yield proof for the presence of a black hole at the center of the Milky Way. The large body of evidence continues to discriminate the identification of SgrA* as a SMBH from alternative possibilities. It is, however, unclear when the ever mounting evidence for SgrA* being associated with a SMBH will suffice as a convincing proof. Additional compelling evidence may come from future gravitational wave observatories. This manuscript reviews the observational facts, theoretical grounds and conceptual aspects for the case of SgrA* being a black hole. We treat theory and observations in the framework of the philosophical discussions about “(anti)realism and underdetermination”, as this line of arguments allows us to describe the situation in observational astrophysics with respect to supermassive black holes. Questions concerning the existence of supermassive black holes and in particular SgrA* are discussed using causation as an indispensable element. We show that the results of our investigation are convincingly mapped out by this combination of concepts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the context of the Galactic Center, the black hole mass is given in millions of solar masses (M\(_{\odot }\) \(\,= 1.98\times 10^{30}\) kg).
e.g. the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope on Paranal in Chile or the W.M. Keck Observatory’s Keck telescopes on Mauna Kea in Hawai’i, USA.
The EHT is a Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) array working at millimeter wavelengths, and dedicated for observing the event horizons (but see section 2.2) of the largest SMBHs in the sky; http://www.eventhorizontelescope.org/.
For a detailed account for the history of black holes, see [153].
“When the long eye of Herschel Burrowed the heavens Near the belt of Orion He trembled in awe At the black hole of Chaos”.
For black holes the spin can be characterized by the angular momentum parameter \(a=J/Mc\), where J is the angular momentum, M the mass of the black hole, and c is the speed of light.
LISA and eLISA are proposed Laser Interferometer Space Antennae; see https://www.elisascience.org/.
The same mathematical formalism allows us to include the magnetic charge (a monopole) as the “fourth hair”. However, this possibility is usually rejected on simple physical grounds—there are no magnetic monopoles found in nature so far.
Because GR is time-symmetric, there is also a past event horizon. It is the boundary of a so-called “white-hole region”, that is, a spacetime region into which nothing can enter and which thus will never become part of an external observer’s future. White holes are usually excluded for thermodynamic reasons, analogously to the exclusion of advanced potentials in electrodynamics, cf. [328] for a careful and detailed discussion of these issues.
Hawking has recently claimed that only apparent horizons exist [143].
For the observers of the black hole’s “shadow”, it is perhaps the photon sphere that is the most important quantity.
Provided the so-called “null energy condition” holds.
Angular scales in this context are mostly given in fractions of arcseconds, i.e., milliarcseconds (mas) or microarcseconds (\(\upmu \)as). While the physical distance to the Galactic Center is given in kilo-parsecs (kpc; one parallactic second or 1 pc = 3.09\(\times 10^{16}\) m) the physical scales at the Center are given in light years (ly = 9.46\(\times \)10\(^{15}\) m) or parsecs (parallactic seconds or 1 pc = 3.3 ly) or fractions thereof, i.e., milli-parsecs (mpc) or micro-parsecs (\(\upmu \)pc). On even smaller scales, the sizes are given in astronomical units (AU = 149,597,871 km) or in Schwarzschild radii \(R_s\) that are linked to the black hole mass M via \(R_s\) = \(\frac{2GM}{c^2}\), where G is the gravitational constant and c is the speed of light.
A Plummer 3-dimensional density profile with the Plummer radius \(r_0\) is given by \(\rho =\rho _0 (1+\frac{r}{r_0})^{-\alpha }\). Functions of this form are often used as models to describe the density profile of dense stellar clusters.
For black holes the spin can be characterized via the angular momentum parameter \(a=J/Mc\), where J is the angular momentum and M the mass of the black hole. It has the dimension of a length and lies in the interval between zero and \(a^2 \le (GM/c^2)^2\). This results into the dimensionless parameter \(a^*=ac^2/GM\), which now lies between 0 and 1. Non-rotation black holes have \(a^*=0\) and maximally rotation black holes have \(a^*=1\). The spin is usually determined from modeling spin dependent quantities, like light curves of orbiting hot spots or observing jets (in Sect. 4.8) or searching for a black hole shadow (in Sect. 4.10).
The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) will be the worlds largest radio telescope, with a collecting area of more than one square kilometre (one million square metres); https://www.skatelescope.org/.
In the context of the SMBH candidate SgrA* at the Galactic Center and the large number of achievable and potential observables, the conceptual strategy laid out in Sect. 3 and depicted in Fig. 3 is not trivial. If several combinations of necessary conditions may lead to a convincing statement concerning the existence of an SMBH at the center of the Milky Way, then a conceptual or philosophical challenge arises through the fact that some are more convincing than others. A mere measurement of a relativistic jet might be less valued than the detection of an pulsar extremely close to the black hole. In this case, we would have to refrain from Boolean logic, in which only true and false (1 or 0) are allowed as values of the necessary and sufficient conditions N and S and the resulting value K (see Sect. 3.3). A many-valued logic in which the values of these conditions can be any real number between 0 and 1 is then a possible way and Eqs. (5)–(10) must be modified accordingly.
Using the notation from Sects. 3.3 Eq. (8) would then for the sufficient condition \(\lambda '\) translate into:
$$\begin{aligned} K_{\lambda '}=\Pi _{i=1}^{\mu (\lambda ')}~~~N_{\kappa _{i,\mu (\lambda ')}} \end{aligned}$$(18)The value of K will be high in case that a combination of necessary conditions have been met well. Then the favorite sufficient condition would have a value of:
$$\begin{aligned} K=max\left[ K_{\lambda } | \lambda = 1 , \nu \right] =max\left[ \Pi _{i=1}^{\mu (\lambda )}~~~N_{\kappa _{i,\mu (\lambda )}} | \lambda = 1 , \nu \right] . \end{aligned}$$(19)The case of pulsars and the case of the identification of sources in which gamma-ray bursts originate may be a further example in which establishing existence claims is or has been important in the the recent history of physics.
References
Aasi, J., Abadie, J., Abbott, B.P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T., Abernathy, M.R., Accadia, T., Acernese, F., Adams, C., Adams, T., et al.: Directed search for continuous gravitational waves from the Galactic center. Phys. Rev. D 88(10), 102002 (2013). arXiv:1309.6221
Aasi, J., Abbott, B.P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T., Abernathy, M.R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., et al.: Search for gravitational wave ringdowns from perturbed intermediate mass black holes in LIGO-Virgo data from 2005–2010. Phys. Rev. D 89(10), 102006 (2014). arXiv:1403.5306
Abbott, B.P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T.D., Abernathy, M.R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K.: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
Abdolrahimi, S., Mann, R.B., Tzounis, C.: Distorted local shadows. Phys. Rev. D 91(8), 084052 (2015)
Abramowicz, M.A., Kluźniak, W., Lasota, J.P.: No observational proof of the black-hole event-horizon. A&A 396, L31–L34 (2002). arXiv:astro-ph/0207270
Amaro-Seoane, P., Gair, J.R., Freitag, M., Miller, M.C., Mandel, I., Cutler, C.J., Babak, S.: Topical review: intermediate and extreme mass-ratio inspirals astrophysics, science applications and detection using LISA. Class. Quantum Gravity 24, R113–R169 (2007)
Amaro-Seoane, P., Aoudia, S., Babak, S., et al.: Low-frequency gravitational-wave science with ELISA/NGO. Class. Quantum Gravity 29(12), 124016 (2012)
Anderl, S.: Astronomy and astrophysics in the philosophy of science. (2015). arXiv:1510.03284
Anderl, S.: Astronomy and Astrophysics. In: Humphreys, P. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199368815.013.45
Arca-Sedda, M.: On the formation of compact, massive subsystems in stellar clusters and its relation with intermediate-mass black holes. MNRAS 455, 35–50 (2016). arXiv:1502.01242
Armstrong, D. (ed.): A World of States of Affairs, p. 41. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001). ISBN-13:9780521580649, ISBN-10:0521580641
Baganoff, F.K., Bautz, M.W., Brandt, W.N., Chartas, G., Feigelson, E.D., Garmire, G.P., Maeda, Y., Morris, M., Ricker, G.R., Townsley, L.K., Walter, F.: Rapid X-ray flaring from the direction of the supermassive black hole at the Galactic centre. Nature 413, 45–48 (2001)
Baganoff, F.K., Maeda, Y., Morris, M., Bautz, M.W., Brandt, W.N., Cui, W., Doty, J.P., Feigelson, E.D., Garmire, G.P., Pravdo, S.H., Ricker, G.R., Townsley, L.K.: Chandra X-ray spectroscopic imaging of Sagittarius A* and the central parsec of the galaxy. ApJ 591, 891–915 (2003)
Bahcall, J.N., Wolf, R.A.: Star distribution around a massive black hole in a globular cluster. ApJ 209, 214–232 (1976)
Balick, B., Brown, R.L.: Intense sub-arcsecond structure in the galactic center. ApJ 194, 265–270 (1974)
Barbour, J.B., Pfister, H. (eds.): Mach’s Principle: From Newton’s Bucket to Quantum Gravity. Birkhäuser, Boston (1995). ISBN 978-0-8176-3823-8
Bardeen, J.M.: Rapidly rotating stars, disks, and black holes. In: DeWitt, C., DeWitt, B.S. (eds.) Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus), pp. 241–289 (1973)
Bardeen, J.M., Wagoner, R.V.: Relativistic disks. I. Uniform rotation. ApJ 167, 359 (1971)
Barrau, A., Rovelli, C., Vidotto, F.: Fast radio bursts and white hole signals. Phys. Rev. D 90(12), 127503 (2014)
Barrau, A., Bolliet, B., Schutten, M., Vidotto, F.: Bouncing black holes in quantum gravity and the Fermi gamma-ray excess. (2016). arXiv:1606.08031
Barrière, N.M., Tomsick, J.A., Baganoff, F.K., Boggs, S.E., Christensen, F.E., Craig, W.W., Dexter, J., Grefenstette, B., Hailey, C.J., Harrison, F.A., Madsen, K.K., Mori, K., Stern, D., Zhang, W.W., Zhang, S., Zoglauer, A.: NuSTAR detection of high-energy X-ray emission and rapid variability from Sagittarius A* flares. ApJ 786, 46 (2014). arXiv:1403.0900
Bartusiak, M.: Black Hole. Yale University Press, New Haven (2015). ISBN 9780300210859
Berti, E., Barausse, E., Cardoso, V., Gualtieri, L., Pani, P., Sperhake, U., Stein, L.C., Wex, N., Yagi, K., Baker, T., Burgess, C.P., Coelho, F.S., Doneva, D., De Felice, A., Ferreira, P.G., Freire, P.C.C., Healy, J., Herdeiro, C., Horbatsch, M., Kleihaus, B., Klein, A., Kokkotas, K., Kunz, J., Laguna, P., Lang, R.N., Li, T.G.F., Littenberg, T., Matas, A., Mirshekari, S., Okawa, H., Radu, E., O’Shaughnessy, R., Sathyaprakash, B.S., Van Den Broeck, C., Winther, H.A., Witek, H., Emad Aghili, M., Alsing, J., Bolen, B., Bombelli, L., Caudill, S., Chen, L., Degollado, J.C., Fujita, R., Gao, C., Gerosa, D., Kamali, S., Silva, H.O., Rosa, J.G., Sadeghian, L., Sampaio, M., Sotani, H., Zilhao, M.: Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations. Class. Quantum Gravity 32(24), 243001 (2015)
Berti, E., Sesana, A., Barausse, E., Cardoso, V., Belczynski, K.: Spectroscopy of Kerr Black Holes with Earth- and Space-based interferometers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(10), 101102 (2016)
Bethge, K., Gruber, G., Stöhlker, T. (eds.): Physik der Atome und Moleküle: Eine Einfhrung, p. 4445. Wiley, New York (2012). ISBN 978-3-527-66255-5
Bilic, N., Tupper, G.B., Viollier, R.D.: Supermassive fermion balls and constraints from stellar dynamics near Sgr A*. Astrophysics (2003). arXiv:astro-ph/0310172
Bird, S., Cholis, I., Muñoz, J.B., Ali-Haïmoud, Y., Kamionkowski, M., Kovetz, E.D., Raccanelli, A., Riess, A.G.: Did LIGO detect dark matter? Phys. Rev. Lett. (2016). arXiv:1603.00464
Blais, D., Kiefer, C., Polarski, D.: Can primordial black holes be a significant part of dark matter? Phys. Lett. B 535, 11–16 (2002). arXiv:astro-ph/0203520
Blandford, R.D., Begelman, M.C.: On the fate of gas accreting at a low rate on to a black hole. MNRAS 303, L1–L5 (1999). arXiv:astro-ph/9809083
Boehle, A., Ghez, A.M., Schödel, R., Meyer, L., Yelda, S., Albers, S., Martinez, G.D., Becklin, E.E., Do, T., Lu, J.R., Matthews, K., Morris, M.R., Sitarski, B., Witzel, G.: An improved distance and mass estimate for Sgr A* from a multistar orbit analysis. ApJ 830, 17 (2016). arXiv:1607.05726
Bogdanović, T.: Supermassive Black Hole Binaries: The Search Continues. In: Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, vol. 40, p. 103 (2015). arXiv:1406.5193
Branham, R.L.: The distance to the Galactic center determined by OB stars. Ap&SS 353, 179–190 (2014)
Britzen, S., Eckart, A., Lämmerzahl, C., et al.: Jet signatures of black holes: from Sgr A* to active galactic nuclei. Astronomische Nachrichten 5(2015), 471–476 (2015)
Broderick, A.E., Loeb, A.: Imaging bright-spots in the accretion flow near the black hole horizon of Sgr A*. MNRAS 363, 353–362 (2005). arXiv:astro-ph/0506433
Broderick, A.E., Loeb, A.: Imaging optically-thin hotspots near the black hole horizon of Sgr A* at radio and near-infrared wavelengths. MNRAS 367, 905–916 (2006). arXiv:astro-ph/0509237
Broderick, A.E., Narayan, R.: Where are all the gravastars? Limits upon the gravastar model from accreting black holes. Class. Quantum Gravity 24, 659–666 (2007). arXiv:gr-qc/0701154
Broderick, A.E., Johannsen, T., Loeb, A., Psaltis, D.: Testing the no-hair theorem with event horizon telescope observations of Sagittarius A*. ApJ 784, 7 (2014)
Broderick, A.E., Narayan, R., Kormendy, J., Perlman, E.S., Rieke, M.J., Doeleman, S.S.: The event horizon of M87. ApJ 805, 179 (2015)
Brown, E.: Ann E. Ewing, 89, Washington Post, Sunday, August 1, 2010, p. 39, (2010). http://www.washingtonpost.com/ wp-dyn/content/article/
Buchholz, R.M., Schödel, R., Eckart, A.: Composition of the galactic center star cluster. Population analysis from adaptive optics narrow band spectral energy distributions. A&A 499, 483–501 (2009). arXiv:0903.2135
Bursa, M., Abramowicz, M.A., Karas, V., Kluźniak, W., Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A.: The timescale of encircling light. In: Hledík, S., Stuchlík, Z. (eds.) Proceedings of RAGtime 8/9: Workshops on Black Holes and Neutron Stars, pp. 21–25 (2007)
Calmet, X.: Quantum Aspects of Black Holes. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). ISBN 978-3-319-10852-0
Cardoso, V., Crispino, L.C.B., Macedo, C.F.B., Okawa, H., Pani, P.: Light rings as observational evidence for event horizons: long-lived modes, ergoregions and nonlinear instabilities of ultracompact objects. Phys. Rev. D 90(4), 044069 (2014)
Cardoso, V., Franzin, E., Pani, P.: Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon? Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(171101), 116 (2016)
Carnap, R.: Logische Syntax der Sprache (1968). ISBN 978-3-662-25376-2(e-book), ISBN 978-3-662-23331-3; 1934 by Julius Springer, 2. Auflage
Chakravartty, A.: A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable (2010) ISBN 978-0-521-13009-7; 2015 Paperback: ISBN-10: 1508932867, ISBN-13: 978-1508932864
Chandrasekhar, S.: The mathematical theory of black holes. Oxford University Press
Chapline G (2003) Quantum Phase Transitions and the Failure of Classical General Relativity. International Journal of Modern Physics A 18:3587–3590, gr-qc/0012094
Christodoulou, M., Rovelli, C., Speziale, S., Vilensky, I.: Planck star tunneling time: An astrophysically relevant observable from background-free quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 94(8), 084035 (2016)
Clavel, M., Terrier, R., Goldwurm, A., Morris, M.R., Ponti, G., Soldi, S., Trap, G.: Echoes of multiple outbursts of Sagittarius A revealed by Chandra. A&A 558, A32 (2013). 1307.3954
Cleland, C.: Living with the abstract: realism and models. Philosophy of Science 69, 474–496 (2002)
Colbert, E.J.M., Mushotzky, R.F.: The Nature of Accreting Black Holes in Nearby Galaxy Nuclei. ApJ 519, 89–107 (1999). astro-ph/9901023
Colpi, M., Shapiro, S.L., Wasserman, I.: Boson stars - Gravitational equilibria of self-interacting scalar fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2485–2488 (1986)
Colyvan, M.: Can the eleatic principle be justified? Canad. J. Philos. 28, 313–335 (1998)
Colyvan, M.: The Indispensability of Mathematics; Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)(1983). ISBN 0-19-513754-X
Contini, M.: The low-luminosity active galactic nucleus in the centre of the Galaxy. MNRAS 418, 1935–1947 (2011). arXiv:1104.1282
Cumpa, J., Tegtmeier, E.: Phenomenological Realism Versus Scientific Realism. In: Cumpa, J., Tegtmeier, E. (eds.) Metaphysical Correspondences. Ontos Verlag, Heusenstamm (2009). ISBN 978-3-86838-051-4
Cunha, P.V.P., Herdeiro, C.A.R., Radu, E., Rúnarsson, H.F.: Shadows of Kerr Black Holes with Scalar Hair. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115(21), 211102 (2015). arXiv:1509.00021
Danzmann, K.: ELISA and the Gravitational Universe. In: IAU General Assembly , vol. 22, p. 2248153 (2015)
De Paolis, F., Ingrosso, G., Nucita, A.A., Orlando, D., Capozziello, S., Iovane, G.: Astrophysical constraints on a possible neutrino ball at the Galactic Center. A&A 376, 853–860 (2001). arXiv:astro-ph/0107497
Deccock, L., Horsten, L.: Quine, Naturalized Epistemology, Perceptual Knowledge and Ontology. In: Lieven, D., Leon, H. (eds.). Editions Rodopi B.V. Amsterdam, Atlanta, GA (2000). ISBN 90-420-1241-2
Dékány, I., Minniti, D., Catelan, M., Zoccali, M., Saito, R.K., Hempel, M., Gonzalez, O.A.: VVV survey near-infrared photometry of known bulge RR lyrae stars: the distance to the galactic center and absence of a barred distribution of the metal-poor population. ApJL 776, L19 (2013)
DeWitt C, DeWitt BS (1973) Black holes. In: DeWitt, C., DeWitt, B.S. (eds.)Lectures Delivered at the Summer School of Theoretical Physics of the University of Grenoble at Les Houches. Gordon and Breach, New York
Dexter, J., Fragile, P.C.: Tilted black hole accretion disc models of Sagittarius A*: time-variable millimetre to near-infrared emission. MNRAS 432, 2252–2272 (2013)
Dexter, J., O’Leary, R.M.: The peculiar pulsar population of the central parsec. ApJL 783, L7 (2014)
Dexter, J., Agol, E., Fragile, P.C., McKinney, J.C.: The submillimeter bump in Sgr A* from relativistic MHD simulations. ApJ 717, 1092–1104 (2010)
Dexter, J., Agol, E., Fragile, P.C., McKinney, J.C.: Radiative models of Sagittarius A* and M87 from relativistic MHD simulations. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 372(1), 012023 (2012a). 1202.0348
Dexter, J., McKinney, J.C., Agol, E.: The size of the jet launching region in M87. MNRAS 421, 1517–1528 (2012b). arXiv:1109.6011
Do, T., Ghez, A.M., Morris, M.R., Lu, J.R., Matthews, K., Yelda, S., Larkin, J.: High angular resolution integral-field spectroscopy of the galaxy’s nuclear cluster: a missing stellar cusp? ApJ 703, 1323–1337 (2009). arXiv:0908.0311
Do, T., Martinez, G.D., Yelda, S., Ghez, A., Bullock, J., Kaplinghat, M., Lu, J.R., Peter, A.H.G., Phifer, K.: Three-dimensional stellar kinematics at the galactic center: measuring the nuclear star cluster spatial density profile, black hole mass, and distance. ApJL 779, L6 (2013)
Dobler, G., Finkbeiner, D.P., Cholis, I., Slatyer, T., Weiner, N.: The fermi haze: a gamma-ray counterpart to the microwave haze. ApJ 717, 825–842 (2010). arXiv:0910.4583
Doeleman, S.S., Lonsdale, C.J., Greenhill, L.J.: VLBI imaging of the 86 GHz SiO maser emission in the circumstellar envelope of VX sagittarii. ApJ 494, 400–408 (1998)
Doeleman, S.S., Weintroub, J., Rogers, A.E.E., Plambeck, R., Freund, R., Tilanus, R.P.J., Friberg, P., Ziurys, L.M., Moran, J.M., Corey, B., Young, K.H., Smythe, D.L., Titus, M., Marrone, D.P., Cappallo, R.J., Bock, D.C.J., Bower, G.C., Chamberlin, R., Davis, G.R., Krichbaum, T.P., Lamb, J., Maness, H., Niell, A.E., Roy, A., Strittmatter, P., Werthimer, D., Whitney, A.R., Woody, D.: Event-horizon-scale structure in the supermassive black hole candidate at the galactic centre. Nature 455, 78–80 (2008)
Doeleman, S.S., Fish, V.L., Broderick, A.E., Loeb, A., Rogers, A.E.E.: Detecting flaring structures in Sagittarius A* with high-frequency VLBI. ApJ 695, 59–74 (2009)
Dvali, G., Gomez, C.: Black Hole’s Quantum N-Portrait. (2011). FortschPhys. 61 742–767 (2013) arXiv:1112.3359
Dvali, G., Gomez, C.: Black hole’s 1/N hair. Phys. Lett. B 719, 419–423 (2013). arXiv:1203.6575
Dvali, G., Gomez, C., Lüst, D.: Black hole quantum mechanics in the presence of species. Fortsch. Phys. 61(7–8), 768–778 (2013). arXiv:1206.2365
Dvali, G., Gomez, C., Lüst, D.: Classical limit of black hole quantum N-portrait and BMS symmetry. Phys. Lett. B 753, 173–177 (2016). arXiv:1509.02114
Earnshaw, H.M., Roberts, T.P., Heil, L.M., Mezcua, M., Walton, D.J., Done, C., Harrison, F.A., Lansbury, G.B., Middleton, M.J., Sutton, A.D.: A variable ULX and possible IMBH candidate in M51a. MNRAS 456, 3840–3854 (2016). arXiv:1512.04825
Eatough, R., Lazio, T.J.W., Casanellas, J., Chatterjee, S., Cordes, J.M., Demorest, P.B., Kramer, M., Lee, K.J., Liu, K., Ransom, S.M., Wex, N.: Observing radio pulsars in the galactic centre with the square kilometre array. Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), vol. 45 (2015). arXiv:1501.00281
Eatough, R.P., Falcke, H., Karuppusamy, R., Lee, K.J., Champion, D.J., Keane, E.F., Desvignes, G., Schnitzeler, D.H.F.M., Spitler, L.G., Kramer, M., Klein, B., Bassa, C., Bower, G.C., Brunthaler, A., Cognard, I., Deller, A.T., Demorest, P.B., Freire, P.C.C., Kraus, A., Lyne, A.G., Noutsos, A., Stappers, B., Wex, N.: A strong magnetic field around the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Galaxy. Nature 501, 391–394 (2013). arXiv:1308.3147
Eckart, A., Genzel, R.: Observations of stellar proper motions near the Galactic Centre. Nature 383, 415–417 (1996)
Eckart, A., Genzel, R.: Stellar proper motions in the central 0.1 PC of the galaxy. MNRAS 284, 576–598 (1997)
Eckart, A., Genzel, R., Ott, T., Schödel, R.: Stellar orbits near Sagittarius A*. MNRAS 331, 917–934 (2002)
Eckart, A., Moultaka, J., Viehmann, T., Straubmeier, C., Mouawad, N., Genzel, R., Ott, T., Schödel, R., Baganoff, F.K., Morris, M.R.: Monitoring Sagittarius A* in the MIR with the VLT. Astron. Nachr. Suppl. 324, 557–561 (2003)
Eckart, A., Schödel, R., Straubmeier, C.: The black hole at the center of the Milky Way / Andreas Eckart, Rainer Schödel, Christian Straubmeier. Imperial College Press, London (2005)
Eckart, A., Baganoff, F.K., Schödel, R., Morris, M., Genzel, R., Bower, G.C., Marrone, D., Moran, J.M., Viehmann, T., Bautz, M.W., Brandt, W.N., Garmire, G.P., Ott, T., Trippe, S., Ricker, G.R., Straubmeier, C., Roberts, D.A., Yusef-Zadeh, F., Zhao, J.H., Rao, R.: The flare activity of Sagittarius A*. New coordinated mm to X-ray observations. A&A 450, 535–555 (2006a)
Eckart, A., Schödel, R., Meyer, L., Trippe, S., Ott, T., Genzel, R.: Polarimetry of near-infrared flares from Sagittarius A*. A&A 455, 1–10 (2006b)
Eckart, A., Schödel, R., Straubmeier, C., Bertram, T., Pott, J.U., Muzic, K., Meyer, L., Moultaka, J., Viehmann, T., Rost, S., Herbst, T.: Interferometric observations of the galactic center: LBT and VLTI. In: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 6268 (2006c)
Eckart, A., Zamaninasab, M., Straubmeier, C., Fischer, S., Araujo-Hauck, C., Garcia-Marin, M., Wiest, M., Witzel, G., Buchholz, R.M., Sabha, N., Muzic, K., Eisenhauer, F., Paumard, T., Yazici, S., Perrin, G., Brandner, W., Perraut, K., Amorim, A., Schöller, M.: Signatures of strong gravity with GRAVITY. In: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol . 7734 (2010)
Eckart, A., Britzen, S., Horrobin, M., Zamaninasab, M., Muzic, K., Sabha, N., Shahzamanian, B., Yazici, S., Moser, L., Zuther, J., Garcia-Marin, M., Valencia-S, M., Bursa, M., Karssen, G., Karas, V., Jalali, B., Vitale, M., Bremer, M., Fischer, S., Smajic, S., Rauch, C., Kunneriath, D., Moultaka, J., Straubmeier, C., Rashed, Y.E., Iserlohe, C., Busch, G., Markakis, K., Borkar, A., Zensus, A.J.: The Galactic Center as a pradigm for low-luminosity nuclei? What can be learned from SgrA* for the central engine and conditions of star formation in nuclei of Seyfert galaxies and low luminosity nearby QSOs. The K-band identification of the DSO/G2 source from VLT and Keck data. In: Proceedings of Nuclei of Seyfert galaxies and QSOs—Central Engine and Conditions of Star Formation (Seyfert 2012), 6–8 November, 2012. Max-Planck-Insitut fuer Radioastronomie (MPIfR), Bonn, Germany (2012a). arXiv:1311.2743
Eckart, A., García-Marín, M., Vogel, S.N., Teuben, P., Morris, M.R., Baganoff, F., Dexter, J., Schödel, R., Witzel, G., Valencia-S, M., Karas, V., Kunneriath, D., Straubmeier, C., Moser, L., Sabha, N., Buchholz, R., Zamaninasab, M., Mužić, K., Moultaka, J., Zensus, J.A.: Millimeter to X-ray flares from Sagittarius A*. A&A 537, A52 (2012b)
Eckart, A., García-Marín, M., Vogel, S.N., Teuben, P., Morris, M.R., Baganoff, F., Dexter, J., Schödel, R., Witzel, G., Valencia-S, M., Karas, V., Kunneriath, D., Straubmeier, C., Moser, L., Sabha, N., Buchholz, R., Zamaninasab, M., Mužić, K., Moultaka, J., Zensus, J.A.: Millimeter to X-ray flares from Sagittarius A*. A&A 537, A52 (2012c)
Eckart, A., Sabha, N., Witzel, G., Straubmeier, C., Shahzamanian, B., Valencia-S, M., García-Marín, M., Horrobin, M., Moser, L., Zuther, J., Fischer, S., Rauch, C., Rost, S., Iserlohe, C., Yazici, S., Smajic, S., Wiest, M., Araujo-Hauck, C., Wank, I.: Beating the confusion limit: the necessity of high angular resolution for probing the physics of Sagittarius A* and its environment: opportunities for LINC-NIRVANA (LBT), GRAVITY (VLTI) and and METIS (E-ELT). In: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 8445 (2012d). arXiv:1208.1129
Einstein, A.: Lens-like action of a star by the deviation of light in the gravitational field. Science 84, 506–507 (1936)
Einstein, A.: On a stationary system with spherical symmetry consisting of many gravitating masses. Ann. Math. 40, 922 (1939)
Eisenhauer, F., Schödel, R., Genzel, R., Ott, T., Tecza, M., Abuter, R., Eckart, A., Alexander, T.: A geometric determination of the distance to the galactic center. ApJL 597, L121–L124 (2003)
Eisenhauer, F., Genzel, R., Alexander, T., Abuter, R., Paumard, T., Ott, T., Gilbert, A., Gillessen, S., Horrobin, M., Trippe, S., Bonnet, H., Dumas, C., Hubin, N., Kaufer, A., Kissler-Patig, M., Monnet, G., Ströbele, S., Szeifert, T., Eckart, A., Schödel, R., Zucker, S.: SINFONI in the galactic center: young stars and infrared flares in the central light-month. ApJ 628, 246–259 (2005). arXiv:astro-ph/0502129
Eisenhauer, F., Perrin, G., Brandner, W., Straubmeier, C., Richichi, A., Gillessen, S., Berger, J.P., Hippler, S., Eckart, A., Schöller, M., Rabien, S., Cassaing, F., Lenzen, R., Thiel, M., Clénet, Y., Ramos, J.R., Kellner, S., Fédou, P., Baumeister, H., Hofmann, R., Gendron, E., Boehm, A., Bartko, H., Haubois, X., Klein, R., Dodds-Eden, K., Houairi, K., Hormuth, F., Gräter, A., Jocou, L., Naranjo, V., Genzel, R., Kervella, P., Henning, T., Hamaus, N., Lacour, S., Neumann, U., Haug, M., Malbet, F., Laun, W., Kolmeder, J., Paumard, T., Rohloff, R.R., Pfuhl, O., Perraut, K., Ziegleder, J., Rouan, D., Rousset, G.: GRAVITY: getting to the event horizon of Sgr A*. In: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 7013 (2008). arXiv:0808.0063
Ellis, H.G.: Ether flow through a drainhole: a particle model in general relativity. J. Math. Phys. 14, 104–118 (1973)
Emmanoulopoulos, D.: Pinpointing the base of the AGN jets through general relativistic X-ray reverberation studies. In: Massaro, F., Cheung, C.C., Lopez, E., Siemiginowska, A. (eds.) IAU Symposium, vol. 313, pp. 346–351 (2015). arXiv:1411.0727
Esteban, E.P., Ramos, E.: Rotating black hole in an external electromagnetic field. Phys. Rev. D 38, 2963–2971 (1988)
Ewing, E.A.: ’Black Holes’ in Space for Science S, the Public (edn) Science News Letters, January 18, p. 39 (1964)
Falcke, H., Markoff, S.: The jet model for Sgr A*: radio and X-ray spectrum. A&A 362, 113–118 (2000)
Falcke, H., Melia, F., Agol, E.: Viewing the shadow of the black hole at the galactic center. ApJL 528, L13–L16 (2000)
Falcke, H., Markoff, S., Bower, G.C.: Jet-lag in Sagittarius A*: what size and timing measurements tell us about the central black hole in the Milky Way. A&A 496, 77–83 (2009)
Ferrarese, L., Côté, P., Dalla Bontà, E., Peng, E.W., Merritt, D., Jordán, A., Blakeslee, J.P., Haşegan, M., Mei, S., Piatek, S., Tonry, J.L., West, M.J.: A fundamental relation between compact stellar nuclei, supermassive black holes, and their host galaxies. ApJL 644, L21–L24 (2006). arXiv:astro-ph/0603840
Ferré-Mateu, A., Mezcua, M., Trujillo, I., Balcells, M., van den Bosch, R.C.E.: Massive relic galaxies challenge the co-evolution of super-massive black holes and their host galaxies. ApJ 808, 79 (2015). arXiv:1506.02663
Finkelstein, D.: Past-future asymmetry of the gravitational field of a point particle. Phys. Rev. 110(965), 110 (1958)
Fish, V.L., Doeleman, S.S., Beaudoin, C., Blundell, R., Bolin, D.E., Bower, G.C., Chamberlin, R., Freund, R., Friberg, P., Gurwell, M.A., Honma, M., Inoue, M., Krichbaum, T.P., Lamb, J., Marrone, D.P., Moran, J.M., Oyama, T., Plambeck, R., Primiani, R., Rogers, A.E.E., Smythe, D.L., SooHoo, J., Strittmatter, P., Tilanus, R.P.J., Titus, M., Weintroub, J., Wright, M., Woody, D., Young. K.H., Ziurys, L.M.: 1.3 mm wavelength VLBI of Sagittarius A*: detection of time-variable emission on event horizon scales. ApJL 727, L36 (2011)
Fish, V.L., Johnson, M.D., Lu, R.S., Doeleman, S.S., Bouman, K.L., Zoran, D., Freeman, W.T., Psaltis, D., Narayan, R., Pankratius, V., Broderick, A.E., Gwinn, C.R., Vertatschitsch, L.E.: Imaging an event horizon: mitigation of scattering toward Sagittarius A*. ApJ 795, 134 (2014). arXiv:1409.4690
Fish, V.L., Johnson, M.D., Doeleman, S.S., Broderick, A.E., Psaltis, D., Lu, R.S., Akiyama, K., Alef, W., Algaba, J.C., Asada, K., Beaudoin, C., Bertarini, A., Blackburn, L., Blundell, R., Bower, G.C., Brinkerink, C., Cappallo, R., Chael, A.A., Chamberlin, R., Chan, C.K., Crew, G.B., Dexter, J., Dexter, M., Dzib, S.A., Falcke, H., Freund, R., Friberg, P., Greer, C.H., Gurwell, M.A., Ho, P.T.P., Honma, M., Inoue, M., Johannsen, T., Kim, J., Krichbaum, T.P., Lamb, J., León-Tavares, J., Loeb, A., Loinard, L., MacMahon, D., Marrone, D.P., Moran, J.M., Mościbrodzka, M., Ortiz-León, G.N., Oyama, T., Özel, F., Plambeck, R.L., Pradel, N., Primiani, R.A., Rogers, A.E.E., Rosenfeld, K., Rottmann, H., Roy, A.L., Ruszczyk, C., Smythe, D.L., SooHoo, J., Spilker, J., Stone, J., Strittmatter, P., Tilanus, R.P.J., Titus, M., Vertatschitsch, L., Wagner, J., Wardle, J.F.C., Weintroub, J., Woody, D., Wright, M., Yamaguchi, P., Young, A., Young, K.H., Zensus, J.A., Ziurys, L.M.: Persistent asymmetric structure of Sagittarius A* on event horizon scales. ApJ 820, 90 (2016)
Francis, C., Anderson, E.: Two estimates of the distance to the Galactic Centre. MNRAS 441, 1105–1114 (2014)
Franklin, A.: What Makes a Good Experiment? University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (2016). ISBN-13 9780822944416
Freitag, M.: Gravitational waves from stars orbiting the Sagittarius A* black hole. Astrophys. J. Lett. 583(1), L21 (2003)
Fritz, T.K., Gillessen, S., Dodds-Eden, K., Martins, F., Bartko, H., Genzel, R., Paumard, T., Ott, T., Pfuhl, O., Trippe, S., Eisenhauer, F., Gratadour, D.: GC-IRS13E—a puzzling association of three early-type stars. ApJ 721, 395–411 (2010). arXiv:1003.1717
Gair, J.R., Barack, L., Creighton, T., Cutler, C., Larson, S.L., Phinney, E.S., Vallisneri, M.: Event rate estimates for LISA extreme mass ratio capture sources. Class. Quantum Gravity 21, S1595–S1606 (2004)
Gair, J.R., Vallisneri, M., Larson, S.L., Baker, J.G.: Testing general relativity with low-frequency, space-based gravitational-wave detectors. Liv. Rev. Relat. 16, 7 (2013)
Galison, P.: How Experiments End. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987). ISBN: 9780226279152
García Díaz, A.: Magnetic generalization of the Kerr-Newman metric. J. Math. Phys. 26, 155–156 (1985)
Genzel, R., Pichon, C., Eckart, A., Gerhard, O.E., Ott, T.: Stellar dynamics in the Galactic Centre: proper motions and anisotropy. MNRAS 317, 348–374 (2000). arXiv:astro-ph/0001428
Genzel, R., Schödel, R., Ott, T., Eckart, A., Alexander, T., Lacombe, F., Rouan, D., Aschenbach, B.: Near-infrared flares from accreting gas around the supermassive black hole at the Galactic Centre. Nature 425, 934–937 (2003). arXiv:astro-ph/0310821
Genzel, R., Eisenhauer, F., Gillessen, S.: The Galactic Center massive black hole and nuclear star cluster. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3121–3195 (2010) arXiv:1006:0064
Ghez, A., Morris, M., Lu, J., Weinberg, N., Matthews, K., Alexander, T., Armitage, P., Becklin, E., Brown, W., Campbell, R., Do, T., Eckart, A., Genzel, R., Gould, A., Hansen, B., Ho, L., Lo, F., Loeb, A., Melia, F., Merritt, D., Milosavljevic, M., Perets, H., Rasio, F., Reid, M., Salim, S., Schödel, R., Yelda, S.: The galactic center: a laboratory for fundamental astrophysics and galactic nuclei. In: astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, Astronomy (2009). arXiv:0903.0383
Ghez, A.M., Klein, B.L., Morris, M., Becklin, E.E.: High proper-motion stars in the vicinity of Sagittarius A*: evidence for a supermassive black hole at the center of our galaxy. ApJ 509, 678–686 (1998). arXiv:astro-ph/9807210
Ghez, A.M., Duchene, G., Morris, M., Becklin, E.E., Hornstein, S.D., Tanner, A., Kremenek, T., Matthews, K., Thompson, D., Soifer, B.T., Larkin, J., McLean, I.: Full 3-D orbital solutions for stars making a close approach to the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy. In: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, vol. 34, p. 1219 (2002)
Ghez, A.M., Wright, S.A., Matthews, K., Thompson, D., Le Mignant, D., Tanner, A., Hornstein, S.D., Morris, M., Becklin, E.E., Soifer, B.T.: Variable infrared emission from the supermassive black hole at the Center of the Milky Way. ApJL 601, L159–L162 (2004). arXiv:astro-ph/0309076
Ghez, A.M., Salim, S., Weinberg, N.N., Lu, J.R., Do, T., Dunn, J.K., Matthews, K., Morris, M.R., Yelda, S., Becklin, E.E., Kremenek, T., Milosavljevic, M., Naiman, J.: Measuring distance and properties of the Milky Way’s central supermassive black hole with stellar orbits. ApJ 689, 1044–1062 (2008)
Ghisellini, G., Foschini, L., Volonteri, M., Ghirlanda, G., Haardt, F., Burlon, D., Tavecchio, F.: The blazar S5 0014+813: a real or apparent monster? MNRAS 399, L24–L28 (2009). arXiv:0906.0575
Ghisellini, G., Della Ceca, R., Volonteri, M., Ghirlanda, G., Tavecchio, F., Foschini, L., Tagliaferri, G., Haardt, F., Pareschi, G., Grindlay, J.: Chasing the heaviest black holes of jetted active galactic nuclei. MNRAS 405, 387–400 (2010). arXiv:0912.0001
Giannios, D., Lorimer, D.R.: Flares from Galactic Centre pulsars: a new class of X-ray transients? MNRAS 459, L95–L99 (2016)
Giddings, S.B.: Possible observational windows for quantum effects from black holes. Phys. Rev. D 90(12), 124033 (2014). arXiv:1406.7001
Gillessen, S., Eisenhauer, F., Quataert, E., Genzel, R., Paumard, T., Trippe, S., Ott, T., Abuter, R., Eckart, A., Lagage, P.O., Lehnert, M.D., Tacconi, L.J., Martins, F.: Variations in the Spectral Slope of Sagittarius A* during a Near-Infrared Flare. ApJL 640, L163–L166 (2006). arXiv:astro-ph/0511302
Gillessen, S., Eisenhauer, F., Fritz, T.K., Bartko, H., Dodds-Eden, K., Pfuhl, O., Ott, T., Genzel, R.: The orbit of the star S2 Around SGR A* from very large telescope and keck data. ApJL 707, L114–L117 (2009a)
Gillessen, S., Eisenhauer, F., Trippe, S., Alexander, T., Genzel, R., Martins, F., Ott, T.: Monitoring stellar orbits around the massive black hole in the Galactic Center. ApJ 692, 1075–1109 (2009b)
Graham, A.W., Scott, N., Schombert, J.M.: Super-massive black hole mass scaling relations. Publ. Kor. Astron. Soc. 30, 335–339 (2015). arXiv:1411.1438
Grenzebach, A., Perlick, V., Lämmerzahl, C.: Photon regions and shadows of accelerated black holes. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1542024 (2015)
Guedes, J., Madau, P., Mayer, L., Callegari, S.: Recoiling massive black holes in gas-rich galaxy mergers. ApJ 729, 125 (2011). arXiv:1008.2032
Gwinn, C.R., Kovalev, Y.Y., Johnson, M.D., Soglasnov, V.A.: Discovery of Substructure in the Scatter-broadened Image of Sgr A*. ApJL 794, L14 (2014). arXiv:1409.0530
Hacking, I. (ed.): Representing and Intervening, p. 24. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)
Hacking, I.: Extragalactic reality: the case of gravitational lensing. Philos. Sci. 56, 555–581 (1989)
Haggard, H.M., Rovelli, C.: Quantum-gravity effects outside the horizon spark black to white hole tunneling. Phys. Rev. D 92(10), 104020 (2015)
Hawking, S.: Information preservation and waether forcasting for black holes (2014). arXiv:1401.5761
Hawking, S., Penrose, R.: The Nature of Space and Time. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1996)
Hawking, S.W., Israel, W.: Three Hundred Years of Gravitation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)
Herdeiro, C.A.R., Radu, E.: Kerr black holes with scalar hair. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(22), 221101 (2014). arXiv:1403.2757
Heusler, M.: Black Hole Uniqueness Theorems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)
Hoefer, C., Smeenk, C.: Philosophy of the physical sciences. In: Humphreys, P. (ed.) Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016)
Hopman, C., Alexander, T.: Resonant relaxation near a massive black hole: the stellar distribution and gravitational wave sources. ApJ 645, 1152–1163 (2006)
Horrobin, M., Eisenhauer, F., Tecza, M., Thatte, N., Genzel, R., Abuter, R., Iserlohe, C., Schreiber, J., Schegerer, A., Lutz, D., Ott, T., Schödel, R.: First results from SPIFFI. I: the galactic center. Astron. Nachr. 325, 88–91 (2004)
Hughes, S.A.: Evolution of circular, nonequatorial orbits of Kerr black holes due to gravitational-wave emission. Phys. Rev. D 61(8), 084004 (2000)
Hughes, S.A.: Evolution of circular, nonequatorial orbits of Kerr black holes due to gravitational-wave emission. II. Inspiral trajectories and gravitational waveforms. Phys. Rev. D 64(6), 064004 (2001)
Israel, W.: Dark stars: the evolution of an idea. In: Hawking, S.W., Israel, W. (eds.) Three Hundred Years of Gravitation, pp. 199–276 (1987)
Iwata, K., Yamazaki, S., Mutombo, P., Hapala, P., Ondráček, M., Jelínek, P., Sugimoto, Y.: Chemical structure imaging of a single molecule by atomic force microscopy at room temperature. Nat. Commun. 6, 7766 (2015)
Jaroszynski, M.: Prospects for the Determination of Star Orbits near the Galactic Center. ApJ 521, 591–596 (1999). arXiv:astro-ph/9903354
Johannsen, T.: Sgr A* and general relativity. (2015) arXiv:1512.03818
Johannsen, T.: Testing the no-hair theorem with observations of black holes in the electromagnetic spectrum. Class. Quantum Gravity 33(12), 124001 (2016). arXiv:1602.07694
Johnson, M.D., Fish, V.L., Doeleman, S.S., Marrone, D.P., Plambeck, R.L., Wardle, J.F.C., Akiyama, K., Asada, K., Beaudoin, C., Blackburn, L., Blundell, R., Bower, G.C., Brinkerink, C., Broderick, A.E., Cappallo, R., Chael, A.A., Crew, G.B., Dexter, J., Dexter, M., Freund, R., Friberg, P., Gold, R., Gurwell, M.A., Ho, P.T.P., Honma, M., Inoue, M., Kosowsky, M., Krichbaum, T.P., Lamb, J., Loeb, A., Lu, R.S., MacMahon, D., McKinney, J.C., Moran, J.M., Narayan, R., Primiani, R.A., Psaltis, D., Rogers, A.E.E., Rosenfeld, K., SooHoo, J., Tilanus, R.P.J., Titus, M., Vertatschitsch, L., Weintroub, J., Wright, M., Young, K.H., Zensus, J.A., Ziurys, L.M.: Resolved magnetic-field structure and variability near the event horizon of Sagittarius A*. Science 350, 1242–1245 (2015). arXiv:1512.01220
Karas, V., Vokrouhlický, D.: On interpretation of the magnetized Kerr-Newman black hole. J. Math. Phys. 32, 714–716 (1991)
Karas, V., Huré, J.M., Semerák, O.: TOPICAL REVIEW: Gravitating discs around black holes. Classical and Quantum Gravity 21, 1 (2004). arXiv:astro-ph/0401345
Karas, V., Kopáček, O., Kunneriath, D.: Influence of frame-dragging on magnetic null points near rotating black holes. Class. Quantum Gravity 29(3), 035010 (2012). arXiv:1201.0009
Kardashev, N.S., Andreyanov, V.V., Gromov, V.D., Buyakas, V.I., Gvamichava, A.S., Kotik, A.N., Kurt, V.G., Lazareva, G.S., Mironova, E.N., Myshonkova, N.V., Slysh, V.I., Trubnikov, A.G., Vinogradov, I.S., Troitsky, V.F., Puryaev, D.T., Usyukin, V.I.: The millimetron project. In: Kardashev, N.S., Dagkesamanskii, S.A. (eds.) Radioastronomical Tools and Techniques, p 111 (2007)
Kardashev, N.S., Novikov, I.D., Lukash, V.N., Pilipenko, S.V., Mikheeva, E.V., Bisikalo, D.V., Wiebe, D.S., Doroshkevich, A.G., Zasov, A.V., Zinchenko, I.I., Ivanov, P.B., Kostenko, V.I., Larchenkova, T.I., Likhachev, S.F., Malov, I.F., Malofeev, V.M., Pozanenko, A.S., Smirnov, A.V., Sobolev, A.M., Cherepashchuk, A.M., Shchekinov, Y.A.: Review of scientific topics for the Millimetron space observatory. Phys. Usp. 57, 1199–1228 (2014)
Kaup, D.J.: Klein-Gordon geon. Phys. Rev. 172, 1331–1342 (1968)
Kerr, R.P.: Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237–238 (1963)
Kiefer, C.: Thermodynamics of black holes and Hawking radiation. In: Fré, P., Gorini, V., Magli, G., Moschella, U. (eds.) Classical and Quantum Black Holes, pp. 17–74. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol (1999)
Kiefer, C.: Quantum Gravity, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)
Kiefer, C.: Quantum black hole without singularity. In: BH6 Session at the Marcel Grossmann Conference MG14 on General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, WSPC Proceedings (2015). arXiv:1512.08346
Kiefer, C., Marto, J., Moniz, P.V.: Indefinite oscillators and black hole evaporation. Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 18, 722 (2009)
King, A.: How big can a black hole grow? MNRAS 456, L109–L112 (2016)
Kiziltan, B., Baumgardt, H., Loeb, A.: An intermediate-mass black hole in the centre of the globular cluster 47 Tucanae. Nature 542, 203–205 (2017). arXiv:1702.02149
Kormendy, J., Ho, L.C.: Coevolution (Or Not) of supermassive black holes and host galaxies. ARA&A 51, 511–653 (2013)
Krabbe, A., Genzel, R., Eckart, A., Najarro, F., Lutz, D., Cameron, M., Kroker, H., Tacconi-Garman, L.E., Thatte, N., Weitzel, L., Drapatz, S., Geballe, T., Sternberg, A., Kudritzki, R. The nuclear cluster of the milky way: star formation and velocity dispersion in the central 0.5 parsec. ApJL 447, L95 (1995)
Laudan, L., Leplin, J.: Empirical equivalence and underdetermination larry laudan & jarrett leplin journal of philosophy 88 (9):449–472 (1991). J. Philos. 88, 449–472 (1991)
Leinert, C., Graser, U.: MIDI: a mid-infrared interferometric instrument for the VLTI. In: Reasenberg, R.D. (ed) Astronomical Interferometry, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 3350, pp 389–393 (1998)
Li, Z., Morris, M.R., Baganoff, F.K.: Evidence for a parsec-scale jet from the galactic center black hole: interaction with local gas. ApJ 779, 154 (2013)
Löckmann, U., Baumgardt, H.: Tracing intermediate-mass black holes in the Galactic Centre. MNRAS 384, 323–330 (2008). arXiv:0711.1326
Lu, R.S., Roelofs, F., Fish, V.L., Shiokawa, H., Doeleman, S.S., Gammie, C.F., Falcke, H., Krichbaum, T.P., Zensus, J.A.: Imaging an event horizon: mitigation of source variability of Sagittarius A*. ApJ 817 173 (2016). arXiv:1512.08543
Lu, Y., Torres, D.F.: The Relativistic Iron K\(\alpha \) Line from an Accretion Disc Onto a Static Non-Baryonic Compact Object. International Journal of Modern Physics D 12, 63–77 (2003). arXiv:astro-ph/0205418
Luminet, J.P.: Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk. A&A 75, 228–235 (1979)
Maillard, J.P., Paumard, T., Stolovy, S.R., Rigaut, F.: The nature of the Galactic Center source IRS 13 revealed by high spatial resolution in the infrared. A&A 423, 155–167 (2004)
Majaess, D.J., Turner, D.G., Lane, D.J.: Characteristics of the galaxy according to cepheids. MNRAS 398, 263–270 (2009)
Malkin, Z.M.: Analysis of determinations of the distance between the sun and the galactic center. Astron. Rep. 57, 128–133 (2013)
Maoz, E.: Dynamical constraints on alternatives to supermassive black holes in galactic nuclei. ApJL 494, L181–L184 (1998). arXiv:astro-ph/9710309
Marcus, R.: The eleatic and the indispensabilist. THEORIA 30(3), 415–429 (2015)
Markakis, K., Dierkes, J., Eckart, A., Nishiyama, S., Britzen, S., García-Marín, M., Horrobin, M., Muxlow, T., Zensus, J.A.: Subaru and e-Merlin observations of NGC 3718. Diaries of a supermassive black hole recoil? A&A 580, A11 (2015)
Markoff, S.: Sagittarius A* in context: daily flares as a probe of the fundamental X-ray emission process in accreting black holes. ApJL 618, L103–L106 (2005)
Markoff, S., Bower, G.C., Falcke, H.: How to hide large-scale outflows: size constraints on the jets of Sgr A*. MNRAS 379, 1519–1532 (2007)
Markoff, S., Nowak, M.A., Maitra, D., Wilms, J., Gallo, E., Hynes, R., Plotkin, R.: Fitting along the fundamental plane: new comparisons of jet physics across the black hole mass scale. In: Romero, G.E., Sunyaev, R.A., Belloni, T. (eds.) Jets at All Scales, IAU Symposium, vol. 275, pp. 250–254 (2011)
Matsuoka, Y., Strauss, M.A., Shen, Y., Brandt, W.N., Greene, J.E., Ho, L.C., Schneider, D.P., Sun, M., Trump, J.R.: The sloan digital sky survey reverberation mapping project: post-starburst signatures in quasar host galaxies at z \({<}\) 1. ApJ 811, 91 (2015). arXiv:1506.07535
Mazur, P.O., Mottola, E.: Gravitational condensate stars: an alternative to black holes. ArXiv General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology arXiv:gr-qc/0109035 (2001)
Melia, F., Falcke, H.: The supermassive black hole at the galactic center. ARA&A 39, 309–352 (2001)
Menten, K.M., Reid, M.J., Eckart, A., Genzel, R.: The position of Sagittarius A*: accurate alignment of the radio and infrared reference frames at the galactic center. ApJL 475, L111–L114 (1997)
Merritt, D.: The distribution of stars and stellar remnants at the Galactic Center. ApJ 718, 739–761 (2010). arXiv:0909.1318
Merritt, D., Alexander, T., Mikkola, S., Will, C.M.: Testing properties of the Galactic center black hole using stellar orbits. Phys. Rev. D 81(6), 062002 (2010)
Meyer, L., Schödel, R., Eckart, A., Karas, V., Dovčiak, M., Duschl, W.J.: K-band polarimetry of an Sgr A* flare with a clear sub-flare structure. A&A 458, L25–L28 (2006)
Meyer, L., Schödel, R., Eckart, A., Duschl, W.J., Karas, V., Dovčiak, M.: On the orientation of the Sagittarius A* system. A&A 473, 707–710 (2007)
Mielke, E.W., Schunck, F.E.: Boson stars: alternatives to primordial black holes? Nucl. Phys. B 564, 185–203 (2000) arXiv:gr-qc/0001061
Mielke, E.W., Schunck, F.E.: Boson and Axion Stars. In: Gurzadyan, V.G., Jantzen, R.T., Ruffini, R. (ed.). The Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, pp. 581–591 (2002)
Miller, J.M., Tomsick, J.A., Bachetti, M., Wilkins, D., Boggs, S.E., Christensen, F.E., Craig, W.W., Fabian, A.C., Grefenstette, B.W., Hailey, C.J., Harrison, F.A., Kara, E., King, A.L., Stern, D.K., Zhang, W.W.: New constraints on the black hole low/hard state inner accretion flow with NuSTAR. ApJL 799, L6 (2015). arXiv:1411.1921
Miller, M.C.: Constraints on alternatives to supermassive black holes. MNRAS 367, L32–L36 (2006). arXiv:astro-ph/0512194
Misner, C., Thorne, K., Wheeler, J.: Gravitation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco (1973). ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0
Montero, B.: Varieties of causal closure. In: Walter, S., Heckmann, H.-D. (eds.) Physicalism and Mental Causation: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action, Chapt. 8. Imprint Academic, Charlottesville, VA (2003). ISBN 0907845460
Mori, K., Gotthelf, E.V., Zhang, S., An, H., Baganoff, F.K., Barrière, N.M., Beloborodov, A.M., Boggs, S.E., Christensen, F.E., Craig, W.W., Dufour, F., Grefenstette, B.W., Hailey, C.J., Harrison, F.A., Hong, J., Kaspi, V.M., Kennea, J.A., Madsen, K.K., Markwardt, C.B., Nynka, M., Stern, D., Tomsick, J.A., Zhang, W.W.: NuSTAR discovery of a 3.76 s transient magnetar near Sagittarius A*. ApJL 770, L23 (2013). arXiv:1305.1945
Morris, M., Howard, C., Muno, M., Baganoff, F.K., Park, S., Feigelson, E., Garmire, G., Brandt, N.: The hot interstellar medium of the galactic center: observations with Chandra. In: Pfalzner, S., Kramer, C., Staubmeier, C., Heithausen, A. (eds.) The Dense Interstellar Medium in Galaxies. Springer, Berlin (2004)
Mościbrodzka, M., Falcke, H.: Coupled jet-disk model for Sagittarius A*: explaining the flat-spectrum radio core with GRMHD simulations of jets. A&A 559, L3 (2013)
Mościbrodzka, M., Falcke, H., Shiokawa, H., Gammie, C.F.: Observational appearance of inefficient accretion flows and jets in 3D GRMHD simulations: application to Sagittarius A*. A&A 570, A7 (2014)
Mossoux, E., Grosso, N., Vincent, F.H., Porquet, D.: Study of the X-ray activity of Sagittarius A* during the 2011 XMM-Newton campaign. A&A 573, A46 (2015)
Mou, G., Yuan, F., Bu, D., Sun, M., Su, M.: Fermi Bubbles Inflated by Winds Launched from the Hot Accretion Flow in Sgr A*. ApJ 790, 109 (2014). arXiv:1403.2129
Mou, G., Yuan, F., Gan, Z., Sun, M.: The accretion wind model of fermi bubbles. II. Radiation. ApJ 811, 37 (2015). arXiv:1505.00892
Mužić, K., Eckart, A., Schödel, R., Meyer, L., Zensus, A.: First proper motions of thin dust filaments at the Galactic center. A&A 469, 993–1002 (2007)
Mužić, K., Eckart, A., Schödel, R., Buchholz, R., Zamaninasab, M., Witzel, G.: Comet-shaped sources at the Galactic center. Evidence of a wind from the central 0.2 pc. A&A 521, A13 (2010)
Nakamura, M., Asada, K.: The parabolic jet structure in M87 as a magnetohydrodynamic nozzle. ApJ 775, 118 (2013). arXiv:1308.1436
Narayan, R., Yi, I., Mahadevan, R.: Explaining the spectrum of Sagittarius A\(^{*}\) with a model of an accreting black hole. Nature 374, 623–625 (1995)
Narayan, R., Mahadevan, R., Grindlay, J.E., Popham, R.G., Gammie, C.: Advection-dominated accretion model of Sagittarius A\(^{*}\): evidence for a black hole at the Galactic center. ApJ 492, 554–568 (1998)
Natarajan, P., Treister, E.: Is there an upper limit to black hole masses? MNRAS 393, 838–845 (2009). arXiv:0808.2813
Nayakshin, S., Power, C., King, A.R.: The observed M-\(\sigma \) relations imply that super-massive black holes grow by cold chaotic accretion. ApJ 753, 15 (2012). arXiv:1203.3450
Neilsen, J., Markoff, S., Nowak, M.A., Dexter, J., Witzel, G., Barrière, N., Li, Y., Baganoff, F.K., Degenaar, N., Fragile, P.C., Gammie, C., Goldwurm, A., Grosso, N., Haggard, D.: The X-ray flux distribution of Sagittarius A* as seen by Chandra. ApJ 799, 199 (2015a)
Neilsen, J., Markoff, S., Nowak, M.A., Dexter, J., Witzel, G., Barrière, N., Li, Y., Baganoff, F.K., Degenaar, N., Fragile, P.C., Gammie, C., Goldwurm, A., Grosso, N., Haggard, D.: The X-ray flux distribution of Sagittarius A* as Seen by Chandra. ApJ 799, 199 (2015b). arXiv:1412.3106
Nelson, O.J.: Hume’s ’new scene of thought’ and the several faces of David Hume in the dialogues concerning natural religion; with a preface by Jeff Broome; University Press of America, New York (2010). ISBN 978-0-7618-4735-9
Neugebauer, G., Meinel, R.: The Einsteinian gravitational field of the rigidly rotating disk of dust. ApJL 414, L97–L99 (1993)
Newmann, A.: The correspondence theory of truth; an essay on the metaphysics of predication; part of Cambridge studies in philosophy. University of Nebraska, Omaha (2002). ISBN: 9780521811392
Nordström, G.: On the energy of the gravitation field in Einstein’s theory. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Proc. Ser. B 20, 1238–1245 (1918)
Oka, T., Mizuno, R., Miura, K., Takekawa, S.: Signature of an intermediate-mass black hole in the central molecular zone of our galaxy. ApJL 816, L7 (2016)
Oppenheimer, J.R., Snyder, H.: On continued gravitational contraction. Phys. Rev. 56, 455–459 (1939)
Oppenheimer, J.R., Volkoff, G.M.: On massive neutron cores. Phys. Rev. 55, 374–381 (1939)
Ostriker, J.: The equilibrium of self-gravitating rings. ApJ 140, 1067 (1964)
de Oteyza, D., Gorman, P., et al.: Direct imaging of covalent bond structure in single-molecule chemical reactions. Science 340, 1434 (2013)
Parsa, M., Eckart, A., et al.: Investigating relativistic motion of stars near the supermassive black hole in the Galactic center. A&A (2017, in preparation)
Pasham, D.R., Strohmayer, T.E., Mushotzky, R.F.: A 400-solar-mass black hole in the galaxy M82. Nature 513, 74–76 (2014)
Paumard, T., Perrin, G., Eckart, A., Genzel, R., Lena, P., Schoedel, R., Eisenhauer, F., Mueller, T., Gillessen, S.: Scientific prospects for VLTI in the Galactic Centre: getting to the Schwarzschild radius. Astron. Nachr. 326, 568–568 (2005)
Paumard, T., Perrin, G., Eckart, A., Genzel, R., Léna, P., Schödel, R., Eisenhauer, F., Müller, T., Gillessen, S.: Scientific prospects for VLTI in the Galactic Centre: getting to the Schwarzschild radius. In: Richichi, A., Delplancke, F., Paresce, F., Chelli, A. (eds.) The Power of Optical/IR Interferometry: Recent Scientific Results and 2nd Generation (2008)
Peters, P.C., Mathews, J.: Gravitational radiation from point masses in a Keplerian orbit. Phys. Rev. 131, 435–440 (1963)
Pierro, V., Pinto, I.M., Spallicci, A.D., Laserra, E., Recano, F.: Fast and accurate computational tools for gravitational waveforms from binary stars with any orbital eccentricity. MNRAS 325, 358–372 (2001). arXiv:gr-qc/0005044
Plewa, P.M., Gillessen, S., Eisenhauer, F., Ott, T., Pfuhl, O., George, E., Dexter, J., Habibi, M., Genzel, R., Reid, M.J., Menten, K.M.: Pinpointing the near-infrared location of SgrA* by correcting optical distortion in the NACO imager. MNRAS 453, 3234–3244 (2015). doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1910
Poisson, E.: A Relativist’s Toolkit—the Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics. A Relativist’s Toolkit—The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Pollney, D., Reisswig, C.: Gravitational memory in binary black hole mergers. ApJL 732, L13 (2011) arXiv:1004.4209
Porquet, D., Grosso, N., Predehl, P., Hasinger, G., Yusef-Zadeh, F., Aschenbach, B., Trap, G., Melia, F., Warwick, R.S., Goldwurm, A., Bélanger, G., Tanaka, Y., Genzel, R., Dodds-Eden, K., Sakano, M., Ferrando, P.: X-ray hiccups from Sagittarius A* observed by XMM-Newton. The second brightest flare and three moderate flares caught in half a day. A&A 488, 549–557 (2008)
Pott, J.U., Eckart, A., Glindemann, A., Viehmann, T., Schodel, R., Straubmeier, C., Leinert, C., Feldt, M., Genzel, R., Robberto, M.: VLTI Observations of IRS 3: The brightest compact MIR source at the Galactic Centre. Messenger 119, 43–44 (2005). arXiv:astro-ph/0505189
Pott, J.U., Eckart, A., Glindemann, A., Schödel, R., Viehmann, T., Robberto, M.: The enigma of GCIRS 3. Constraining the properties of the mid-infrared reference star of the central parsec of the Milky Way with optical long-baseline interferometry. A&A 480, 115–131 (2008)
Price, H.: Quining naturalism. J. Philos. 104, p375–p402 (2007)
Psaltis, D.: The influence of gas dynamics on measuring the properties of the black hole in the center of the Milky Way with stellar orbits and pulsars. ApJ 759, 130 (2012). arXiv:1112.0026
Psaltis, D., Narayan, R., Fish, V.L., Broderick, A.E., Loeb, A., Doeleman, S.S.: Event horizon telescope evidence for alignment of the black hole in the center of the Milky Way with the inner stellar disk. ApJ 798, 15 (2015)
Psaltis, D., Wex, N., Kramer, M.: A quantitative test of the no-hair theorem with Sgr A* using stars, pulsars, and the event horizon telescope. ApJ 818, 121 (2016a). arXiv:1510.00394
Psaltis, D., Wex, N., Kramer, M.: A quantitative test of the no-hair theorem with Sgr A* using stars, pulsars, and the event horizon telescope. ApJ 818, 121 (2016b). arXiv:1510.00394
Psillos, S.: Living with the abstract: realism and models. Synthese 180, 3–17 (2011a)
Psillos, S.: Making contact with molecules: on Perrin and Achinstein. In: Morgan, G.J. (ed.) Philosophy of Science Matters: The Philosophy of Peter Achinstein, pp. 177–190. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011b)
Quataert, E.: Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flow Models of Sgr A*. Astron. Nachr. Suppl. 324, 435–443 (2003). arXiv:astro-ph/0304099
Quine, W.: On what there is. Rev. Metaphys. 2(1948/1949), p21–38 (1948)
Rauch, C., Ros, E., Krichbaum, T.P., Eckart, A., Zensus, J.A., Shahzamanian, B., Mužić, K.: Wisps in the Galactic center: near-infrared triggered observations of the radio source Sgr A* at 43 GHz. A&A 587, A37 (2016)
Rees, M.J.: Black hole models for active galactic nuclei. ARA&A 22, 471–506 (1984)
Reid, M.J.: The distance to the center of the Galaxy. ARA&A 31, 345–372 (1993)
Reid, M.J., Menten, K.M., Genzel, R., Ott, T., Schödel, R., Brunthaler, A.: The position, motion, and mass of Sgr A*. Astron. Nachr. Suppl. 324, 505–511 (2003a)
Reid, M.J., Menten, K.M., Genzel, R., Ott, T., Schödel, R., Eckart, A.: The position of Sagittarius A*. II. Accurate positions and proper motions of stellar SiO masers near the Galactic Center. ApJ 587, 208–220 (2003b). arXiv:astro-ph/0212273
Reissner, H.: Über die Eigengravitation des elektrischen Feldes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie. Ann. Phys. 355, 106–120 (1916)
Renn, J., Sauer, T.: In the limelight of stars. Einstein, Mandl, and the origins of gravitational lens research (German Title: Im Rampenlicht der Sterne. Einstein, Mandl und die Ursprünge der Gravitationslinsenforschung). Acta Hist. Astron. 27, 210–239 (2005)
Revnivtsev, M.G., Churazov, E.M., Sazonov, S.Y., Sunyaev, R.A., Lutovinov, A.A., Gilfanov, M.R., Vikhlinin, A.A., Shtykovsky, P.E., Pavlinsky, M.N.: Hard X-ray view of the past activity of Sgr A* in a natural Compton mirror. A&A 425, L49–L52 (2004)
Reynolds, C.S.: Measuring black hole spin using X-ray reflection spectroscopy. Space Sci. Rev. 183, 277–294 (2014). arXiv:1302.3260
Ricarte, A., Dexter, J.: The event horizon telescope: exploring strong gravity and accretion physics. MNRAS 446, 1973–1987 (2015)
Roedig, C., Sesana, A.: Origin and implications of high eccentricities in massive black hole binaries at sub-pc scales. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 363(1), 012035 (2012). arXiv:1111.3742
Rovelli, C., Vidotto, F.: Planck stars. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23, 1442026 (2014)
Rozanska, A., Kunneriath, D., Czerny, B., Adhikari, T.P., Karas, V.: Multiphase environment of compact galactic nuclei: the role of the nuclear star cluster. MNRAS 464, 2090–2102 (2017)
Rubilar, G.F., Eckart, A.: Periastron shifts of stellar orbits near the Galactic Center. A&A 374, 95–104 (2001)
Ruffini, R., Bonazzola, S.: Systems of self-gravitating particles in general relativity and the concept of an equation of state. Phys. Rev. 187, 1767–1783 (1969)
Sabha, N., Eckart, A., Merritt, D., Zamaninasab, M., Witzel, G., García-Marín, M., Jalali, B., Valencia-S, M., Yazici, S., Buchholz, R., Shahzamanian, B., Rauch, C., Horrobin, M., Straubmeier, C.: The S-star cluster at the center of the Milky Way. On the nature of diffuse NIR emission in the inner tenth of a parsec. A&A 545, A70 (2012)
Sakai, N., Saida, H., Tamaki, T.: Gravastar shadows. Phys. Rev. D 90(10), 104013 (2014). arXiv:1408.6929
Salpeter, E.E.: Accretion of interstellar matter by massive objects. ApJ 140, 796–800 (1964)
Sandell, M.: Astronomy and experimentation. Techné 14, 252–269 (2010)
Schnittman, J.D.: Astrophysics of super-massive black hole mergers. Classical and Quantum Gravity 30(24), 244007 (2013). arXiv:1307.3542
Schödel, R., Ott, T., Genzel, R., Hofmann, R., Lehnert, M., Eckart, A., Mouawad, N., Alexander, T., Reid, M.J., Lenzen, R., Hartung, M., Lacombe, F., Rouan, D., Gendron, E., Rousset, G., Lagrange, A.M., Brandner, W., Ageorges, N., Lidman, C., Moorwood, A.F.M., Spyromilio, J., Hubin, N., Menten, K.M.: A star in a 15.2-year orbit around the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way. Nature 419, 694–696 (2002)
Schödel, R., Eckart, A., Iserlohe, C., Genzel, R., Ott, T.: A black hole in the Galactic Center complex IRS 13E? ApJL 625, L111–L114 (2005). arXiv:astro-ph/0504474
Schödel, R., Eckart, A., Alexander, T., Merritt, D., Genzel, R., Sternberg, A., Meyer, L., Kul, F., Moultaka, J., Ott, T., Straubmeier, C.: The structure of the nuclear stellar cluster of the Milky Way. A&A 469, 125–146 (2007)
Schödel, R., Gallego-Cano, E., Dong, H., Nogueras-Lara, F., Gallego-Calvente, A.T., Amaro-Seoane, P., Baumgardt, H.: The distribution of stars around the Milky Way’s central black hole II: diffuse light from sub-giants and dwarfs. A&A (2017). arXiv:1701.03817
Schwarzschild, K.: Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einstein’schen Theorie (On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory). Abh Königl Preuss Akad Wissenschaften, math-phys Klasse, 424 (1916). arXiv:physics/9912033 [physics.hist-ph]
Sellars, W.: Science, perception and reality. Ridgeview Publishing Company, Atascadero, CA (1963)
Sesana, A., Gair, J., Berti, E., Volonteri, M.: Reconstructing the massive black hole cosmic history through gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. D 83(4), 044036 (2011). 1011.5893
Shahzamanian, B., Eckart, A., Valencia-S, M., Witzel, G., Zamaninasab, M., Sabha, N., García-Marín, M., Karas, V., Karssen, G.D., Borkar, A., Dovčiak, M., Kunneriath, D., Bursa, M., Buchholz, R., Moultaka, J., Straubmeier, C.: Polarized light from Sagittarius A* in the near-infrared K\(_{s}\)-band. A&A 576, A20 (2015a)
Shahzamanian, B., Eckart, A., Valencia-S, M., Witzel, G., Zamaninasab, M., Sabha, N., García-Marín, M., Karas, V., Karssen, G.D., Borkar, A., Dovčiak, M., Kunneriath, D., Bursa, M., Buchholz, R., Moultaka, J., Straubmeier, C.: Polarized light from Sagittarius A* in the near-infrared K\(_{s}\)-band. A&A 576, A20 (2015b)
Shapiro, S., Teukolsky, S.: Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars: The Physics of Compact Objects. Wiley, New York (1983). ISBN 0-471-87317-9
Shcherbakov, R.V., Penna, R.F.: McKinney JC (2012) Sagittarius A* accretion flow and black hole parameters from general relativistic dynamical and polarized radiative modeling. ApJ 755, 133 (2012). arXiv:1007.4832
Shen, Y., Greene, J.E., Ho, L.C., Brandt, W.N., Denney, K.D., Horne, K., Jiang, L., Kochanek, C.S., McGreer, I.D., Merloni, A., Peterson, B.M., Petitjean, P., Schneider, D.P., Schulze, A., Strauss, M.A., Tao, C., Trump, J.R., Pan, K., Bizyaev, D.: The sloan digital sky survey reverberation mapping project: no evidence for evolution in the M -\(\sigma \) relation to z 1. ApJ 805, 96 (2015). arXiv:1502.01034
Shen, Z.Q., Lo, K.Y., Liang, M.C., Ho, P.T.P., Zhao, J.H.: A size of \(\sim \)1AU for the radio source Sgr A* at the centre of the Milky Way. Nature 438, 62–64 (2005)
Slaný, P., Kovář, J., Stuchlík, Z., Karas, V.: Charged Tori in spherical gravitational and dipolar magnetic fields. ApJS 205, 3 (2013). arXiv:1302.2356
Smeenk, C.: False vacuum: early universe cosmology and the development of inflation. In: Eisenstaedt, J., Kox, A.J. (eds.) The Universe of General Relativity. Einstein Studies, vol. 11. Birkhauser, Boston (2005)
Spitler, L.G., Lee, K.J., Eatough, R.P., Kramer, M., Karuppusamy, R., Bassa, C.G., Cognard, I., Desvignes, G., Lyne, A.G., Stappers, B.W., Bower, G.C., Cordes, J.M., Champion, D.J., Falcke, H.: Pulse broadening measurements from the Galactic Center pulsar J1745–2900. ApJL 780, L3 (2014). arXiv:1309.4673
Su, M., Slatyer, T.R., Finkbeiner, D.P.: Giant gamma-ray bubbles from fermi-LAT: active galactic nucleus activity or bipolar galactic wind? ApJ 724, 1044–1082 (2010). arXiv:1005.5480
Sunyaev, R., Churazov, E.: Equivalent width, shape and proper motion of the iron fluorescent line emission from molecular clouds as an indicator of the illuminating source X-ray flux history. MNRAS 297, 1279–1291 (1998). arXiv:astro-ph/9805038
Synge, J.L.: The escape of photons from gravitationally intense stars. MNRAS 131, 463 (1966)
Terrier, R., Ponti, G., Bélanger, G., Decourchelle, A., Tatischeff, V., Goldwurm, A., Trap, G., Morris, M.R., Warwick, R.: Fading hard X-ray emission from the Galactic Center molecular cloud Sgr B2. ApJ 719, 143–150 (2010). arXiv:1005.4807
The eLISA Consortium: Seoane PAea: The Gravitational Universe. (2013). arXiv:1305.5720
The L.I.G.O. Scientific Collaboration; The Virgo Collaboration.: Properties of the binary black hole merger GW150914. (2016). arXiv:1602.03840
Torres, D.F., Capozziello, S., Lambiase, G.: Supermassive boson stars: prospects for observational detection. (2000). ArXiv:gr-qc/0012031
Trippe, S., Paumard, T., Ott, T., Gillessen, S., Eisenhauer, F., Martins, F., Genzel, R.: A polarized infrared flare from Sagittarius A* and the signatures of orbiting plasma hotspots. MNRAS 375, 764–772 (2007). arXiv:astro-ph/0611737
Tsupko, O.Y., Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G.S.: Gravitational lensing in plasma: relativistic images at homogeneous plasma. Phys. Rev. D 87(12), 124009 (2013)
van Fraassen, C.: Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism; Churchland, P.M. (ed.). University Of Chicago Press, Chicago (1985). ISBN-13: 978-0226106540
Vanhollebeke, E., Groenewegen, M.A.T., Girardi, L.: Stellar populations in the Galactic bulge. Modelling the Galactic bulge with TRILEGAL. A&A 498, 95–107 (2009)
Vasudevan, R.V., Fabian, A.C.: Piecing together the X-ray background: bolometric corrections for active galactic nuclei. MNRAS 381, 1235–1251 (2007)
Verozub, L.: Sgr A* as probe of the theory of supermassive compact objects without event horizon. Astron. Nachr. 327, 355 (2006)
Vincent, F.H., Paumard, T., Perrin, G., Mugnier, L., Eisenhauer, F., Gillessen, S. (2011a) Astrometric study of the complex environment of Sgr A* in imaging mode with the VLTI/GRAVITY instrument. In: Morris, M.R., Wang, Q.D., Yuan, F. (eds.) The Galactic Center: A Window to the Nuclear Environment of Disk Galaxies, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, vol. 439, p. 275
Vincent, F.H., Paumard, T., Perrin, G., Mugnier, L., Eisenhauer, F., Gillessen, S.: Performance of astrometric detection of a hotspot orbiting on the innermost stable circular orbit of the Galactic Centre black hole. MNRAS 412, 2653–2664 (2011b). arXiv:1011.5439
Vincent, F.H., Paumard, T., Perrin, G., Varniere, P., Casse, F., Eisenhauer, F., Gillessen, S., Armitage, P.J.: Distinguishing an ejected blob from alternative flare models at the Galactic Centre with GRAVITY. MNRAS 441, 3477–3487 (2014). arXiv:1404.6149
Vincent, F.H., Meliani, Z., Grandclement, P., Gourgoulhon, E., Straub, O.: Imaging a boson star at the Galactic center. (2015). arXiv:1510.04170
Viollier, R.D., Leimgruber, F.R., Trautmann, D.: Halos of heavy neutrinos around baryonic stars. Phys. Lett. B 297, 132–137 (1992)
Wald, R.: General Relativity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1984). ISBN: 9780226870335
Walker, S.A., Fabian, A.C., Russell, H.R., Sanders, J.S.: The effect of the quasar H1821+643 on the surrounding intracluster medium: revealing the underlying cooling flow. MNRAS 442, 2809–2816 (2014). arXiv:1405.7522
Walsh, J.L., Barth, A.J., Ho, L.C., Sarzi, M.: The M87 black hole mass from gas-dynamical models of space telescope imaging spectrograph observations. ApJ 770, 86 (2013). arXiv:1304.7273
Wang, X., Loeb, A.: Detecting floating black holes as they traverse the gas disc of the Milky Way. MNRAS 441, 809–812 (2014)
Wharton, R.S., Chatterjee, S., Cordes, J.M., Deneva, J.S., Lazio, T.J.W.: Multiwavelength constraints on pulsar populations in the Galactic Center. ApJ 753, 108 (2012). arXiv:1111.4216
Will, C.M.: Perturbation of a slowly rotating black hole by a stationary axisymmetric ring of matter. I. Equilibrium configurations. ApJ 191, 521–532 (1974)
Witzel, G., Eckart, A., Bremer, M., Zamaninasab, M., Shahzamanian, B., Valencia-S, M., Schödel, R., Karas, V., Lenzen, R., Marchili, N., Sabha, N., Garcia-Marin, M., Buchholz, R.M., Kunneriath, D., Straubmeier, C.: Source-intrinsic near-infrared properties of Sgr A*: total intensity measurements. ApJS 203, 18 (2012a)
Witzel, G., Eckart, A., Bremer, M., Zamaninasab, M., Shahzamanian, B., Valencia-S, M., Schödel, R., Karas, V., Lenzen, R., Marchili, N., Sabha, N., Garcia-Marin, M., Buchholz, R.M., Kunneriath, D., Straubmeier, C.: Source-intrinsic near-infrared properties of Sgr A*: total intensity measurements. ApJS 203, 18 (2012b). arXiv:1208.5836
Wollman, E.R., Geballe, T.R., Lacy, J.H., Townes, C.H., Rank, D.M.: NE II 12.8 micron emission from the galactic center. II. ApJL 218, L103–L107 (1977)
Wrobel, J.M., Miller-Jones, J.C.A., Middleton, M.J.: A very large array search for intermediate-mass black holes in globular clusters in M81. Astron. J. 152, 22 (2016)
Wu, Q., Czerny, B., Grzedzielski, M., Janiuk, A., Gu, W.M., Aj, Dong, Cao, X.F., You, B., Yan, Z., Sun, M.Y.: The universal heartbeat; oscillations in black hole systems across the mass-scale. ApJ 833, 79 (2016)
Wyithe, J.S.B., Loeb, A.: Low-Frequency Gravitational Waves from Massive Black Hole Binaries: Predictions for LISA and Pulsar Timing Arrays. ApJ 590, 691–706 (2003). arXiv:astro-ph/0211556
Yagi, K., Stein, L.C.: Black hole based tests of general relativity. Class. Quantum Gravity 33(5), 054001 (2016). arXiv:1602.02413
Yuan, F., Narayan, R.: Hot accretion flows around black holes. ARA&A 52, 529–588 (2014)
Yuan, F., Quataert, E., Narayan, R.: Nonthermal electrons in radiatively inefficient accretion flow models of Sagittarius A*. ApJ 598, 301–312 (2003). arXiv:astro-ph/0304125
Yuan, F., Bu, D., Wu, M.: Numerical simulation of hot accretion flows. II. Nature, origin, and properties of outflows and their possible observational applications. ApJ 761, 130 (2012) arXiv:1206.4173
Yunes, N., Siemens, X.: Gravitational-wave tests of general relativity with ground-based detectors and pulsar-timing arrays. Liv. Rev. Relat. 16, 9 (2013)
Yusef-Zadeh, F., Wardle, M., Miller-Jones, J.C.A., Roberts, D.A., Grosso, N., Porquet, D.: Rapid intrinsic variability of SGR A* at radio wavelengths. ApJ 729, 44 (2011)
Yusef-Zadeh, F., Arendt, R., Bushouse, H., Cotton, W., Haggard, D., Pound, M.W., Roberts, D.A., Royster, M., Wardle, M.: A 3 pc scale jet-driven outflow from Sgr A*. ApJL 758, L11 (2012a)
Yusef-Zadeh, F., Wardle, M., Dodds-Eden, K., Heinke, C.O., Gillessen, S., Genzel, R., Bushouse, H., Grosso, N., Porquet, D.: An inverse compton scattering origin of X-ray flares from Sgr A*. AJ 144, 1 (2012b)
Yusef-Zadeh, F., Wardle, M., Cotton, W., Schödel, R., Royster, M.J., Roberts, D.A., Kunneriath, D.: Tidal distortion of the envelope of an AGB star IRS 3 near Sgr A*. (2017)
Zajacek, M., Karas, V., Kunneriath, D.: Galactic Center minispiral: interaction modes of neutron stars. Acta Polytech. 55, 203–214 (2015)
Zakharov, A.F.: Constraints on a charge in the Reissner-Nordström metric for the black hole at the Galactic Center. Phys. Rev. D 90(6), 062007 (2014)
Zamaninasab, M., Eckart, A., Witzel, G., Dovciak, M., Karas, V., Schödel, R., Gießübel, R., Bremer, M., García-Marín, M., Kunneriath, D., Mužić, K., Nishiyama, S., Sabha, N., Straubmeier, C., Zensus, A.: Near infrared flares of Sagittarius A*. Importance of near infrared polarimetry. A&A 510, A3 (2010)
Zeh, H.D.: The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time, Fifth edn. Springer, Berlin (2007). ISBN 978-3-540-68000-0
Zel’dovich, Y.B., Novikov, I.D.: The radiation of gravity waves by bodies moving in the field of a collapsing star. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 9, 246 (1964)
Zubovas, K., Nayakshin, S., Markoff, S.: Sgr A* flares: tidal disruption of asteroids and planets? MNRAS 421, 1315–1324 (2012). arXiv:1110.6872
Acknowledgements
We thank Sybille Anderl (IPAG Grenoble) for valuable comments and support on the philosophy of science sections, Georgi Dvali (LMU Munich) for constructive and valuable discussions and input, and Grischa Karssen (University of Cologne) for contributing Fig. 12 and part of the corresponding discussion. We also thank Rainer Schödel (IAA Granada, CSIC Spain) for valuable comments. This work was supported in part by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) via the Cologne Bonn Graduate School (BCGS), the Max Planck Society through the International Max Planck Research School (IMPRS) for Astronomy and Astrophysics. Part of this work was supported by fruitful discussions with members of the European Union funded COST Action MP0905: Black Holes in a Violent Universe and the Czech Science Foundation DFG collaboration (No. 14-37086G) and with members of the European Union Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement No. 312789, Strong Gravity: Probing Strong Gravity by Black Holes Across the Range of Masses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: An Example for Establishing Existence Claims
As an example for establishing existence claims in the (recent) history of physics, we look at the case of atoms and molecules. We consider this case—because it has been widely discussed in philosophy of science—is the final acceptance of the existence of molecules/atoms due to the work of Jean Perrin on Brownian motion in the early 20th century as the collision with the quick atoms or molecules in the gas or liquid. Brownian motion itself was first discovered by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown in 1827 as random motion of particles.
Perrin received the Nobel Prize for physics in 1926 for his work that “put a definite end to the long struggle regarding the real existence of molecules” (C.W. Oseen, member of the Nobel Committee for Physics). So, how was Perrin able to establish the existence of molecules/atoms and what can we learn from this for the question of the existence of black holes? Atoms and molecules among other places played a major role in the kinetic theory of heat. However, there were debates about whether atoms/molecules were merely a useful fiction that yielded (in many cases) the right result or whether they should be accepted as real. For some time it appeared to be the case that this question could not be resolved by experimental means. In the early 20th century (partly through the work of Einstein) atoms and molecules became accessible, i.e. new theoretical means were devised so as to bring the hypothesis into the reach of established experimental methods (see [247], “Making Contact with Molecules: On Perrin and Achinstein”).
In making the question of atoms/molecules not only experimentally accessible but to decide it positively, three features proved to be important:
-
i.
The assumption that atoms/molecules exist puts constraints on observational data: The assumptions could only be true if some observable magnitudes had certain very definite values (Avogadro’s number/constant). This appears to be an essential point in a number of cases. What is asked for here are novel predictions, i.e. the prediction of phenomena, which would be very unlikely if atoms/molecules did not exist (compare the prediction of the deflection of light by the sun as evidence for GR; Karl Popper tried to capture this by his notion of a high degree of falsifiability). The prediction has to be risky.
-
ii.
On rival accounts, i.e. on the denial of atoms/molecules, the value of Avogadro’s number would have been completely different. Hence, the value of Avogadro’s constant is dependent on the existence of atoms.
-
iii.
The relevant value was experimentally established in a number of different/independent ways. Avogadro’s constant is tested in several different ways and today there are about 60 different and independent ways to measure it [25], making use of e.g. electrical charge and current, in determinating the properties of gas, liquids and crystals.
Following the ground breaking work of Perrin, today the acceptance of atoms is supported by direct imaging of molecules, atoms or even their bounds (e.g. [154, 228]).Footnote 27
Appendix 2: From (Anti)realism and Underdetermination to a Causal Principle
How for theory and observations the concepts of “Realism” and “Underdetermination” may be linked to causation is outlined in the following:
Theory Taken Literally as Being True Black holes are extremely simple objects and hence, ideally suited to be regarded as a kind of theoretical concept that historically has the tendency to be taken literally as real by realists (see below and statements by Psillos [246] and Sellars [275]). The problem is that other theories could be regarded as being similarly simple (although they are often more complex as they require the definition of additional quantities like particle masses and interaction forces etc.). The fact that one cannot easily distinguish between them experimentally, leaves enough freedom to being unable to decide if some other entities implied by a literal reading of the theory, e.g. a compact object like a black hole and its possible alternatives, are indeed real (e.g. the shadow of such a compact object, i.e. the presence, depth and size of an emission free or sparse region close to the position of the compact object; see Sect. 4.10).
Here, also the possibility of an experimental comparison between theory and implied entities (if interpreted as predicted phenomena like speeds of stars or emitting blobs, timescales associated with consecutive events, or structures like the shadow) in a way relieves many philosophers (especially if facts or statements are being taken literally) from the “commitment to a host of entities with a (to say the least) questionable ontic status: numbers, geometrical points, theoretical ideals, models and suchlike” [246].
Therefore, we must clarify that at this point we are not concerned with the question of whether there is reality to the theoretical concept of a black hole as such, for instance as a concept within the theory or relativity. The goal of the observational and experimental astrophysics is to test the properties of an observable entity against a theoretical concept in order to identify it in a commonly agreeable way with the object described by this very theoretical concept.
Reality of Entities Derived from Theory The entities implied by the theory of black holes (here taken as observational results or as implied physical scenarii, i.e. how stars orbit the black hole or—in the near future—how exactly the black hole shadow looks like) can also be regarded as real, as they all come (are derived) indeed “from theory and \(\ldots \) there is no theory-free standpoint from which” [246], these entities can be viewed. This means, as valuable observational predictions are usually all derived from theory there is no theory-independent criterion of reality that can be used in an accepted way. The goal is to define and successfully observe entities i.e. predictions, for which a black hole plays an indispensable role in their explanation.
While this is clearly the preferred situation for the physicist (i.e. a successful comparison between observational results or the properties of implied physical scenarii) this is also true for theory as such from the viewing angle of realists that historically tend to read (take) theories literally as real. As this can be explained out of theory it can be regarded as a permissive criterion [275] that particularly does not disallow abstract entities from being real. Psillos [246] points out that “this explanatory criterion should not be confused with a causal criterion”, e.g. in the form of the Eleatic Principle (see below), “according to which being causally active, that is having causal powers, is a criterion of objecthood. Causal efficacy may well be a mark of reality, but not everything that is real is causally efficacious” [246]. The former would be good for experimentalists, the latter would be supported by black hole theory. Here, Psillos points at entities that are causally idle but causally relevant. Hence, he describes Colyvan’s “rounded out” version of the Eleatic Principle (Colyvan [54] and the following Appendix 3).
Causation as a Clue to Probe Existence For observed entities, may they be derived from theory or not, causation may be taken as a clue to make their existence plausible beyond doubt. David M. Amstrong states in his reply to Reinhardt Grossmann in the correspondence on the “Ontology and the Physical Universe” [57] that if one does not “postulate an entity [...] which is not required in ones account of causation”, then indeed causation can be used as a partial clue to the existence. The word “partial” is used here as it needs to be seen how the analysis of the causation needs to be done in every particular case. Goal of the observational astrophysics is to optimize this aspect.
As Andrew Newman states: “Talking about existing and talking about being real are just different ways of talking about the same thing” [222]. As supporting examples he quotes Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell who are guided to things that are real by syntax (e.g. in [45]), Quine, who demands that something must be quantifiable if it is called real (e.g. in [61]), and D.M. Amstrong demanding causal significance for real things (e.g. in [222]). Causal significance or relevance is an essence of any form of the Eleatic Principle (see below).
Andrew Newman points out [222]: “Alex Oliver claims that the Eleatic Principle is ambiguous because there is an epistemological reading of ‘reason’ and a metaphysical reading of ‘reason’, mostly worried about the existence of causally inactive entities.” This criticism might appear to be applicable to aspects of the black hole physics, however, all experiments aim at consolidating causal activity.
Reality and the Eleatic Principle In the case of black holes, we may make use of the possible claim that the physical world is causally closed, i.e. that all genuine causes of physical events are physical causes (e.g. [203]). Hence, in the case of black holes we do not run into the problem that this particular science entity is not reducible to a physical entity. Even if the reduction to such an entity is currently not fully conducted, all instrumental and observational efforts aim at improving the performance of that reduction.
Appendix 3: The Eleatic Principle
If underdetermination can be fought or even partially overcome, then causation may be used to further underline the realism or existence of an entity in a generally acceptable way. This involves the usage of a causal criterion that may be in the form of the Eleatic Principle (for a general overview see e.g. [54, 55]). Colyvan [54] gives a consice definition of the classical Eleatic Principle “An entity is to be counted as real if and only if it is capable of participating in causal processes”.
The principle is named after a Greek school in lower Italy Elea (’\(E \lambda \acute{\epsilon } \alpha \)) closely linked to the philosophers Parmenides, Zeno and Xenophanes of Colophon (going back to a figure in Plato’s dialogue Sophistes). As a philosophical conceptual aspect, the School of Elea rejects any epistemological criteria simply based on sensual experiences (Fig. 2). According to the Eleatic Principle, we should be realists about whatever manifests itself in virtue of having effects (in ‘A World of States of Affairs’ by Amstrong [11], see also the discussion in “Quining Naturalism” by Price [241]). The use of the Eleatic Principle in our context needs some clarification. The classical version of the Eleatic Principle uses and connects (in a more time-like fashion) mainly causally active entities. In this version non-causal entities like abstract mathematical and physical concepts are regarded as causally idle and therefore they are not considered as suitable entities. This problem has been explained in detail by Colyvan in his article “Can the Eleatic Principle be Justified?” [54]. He investigates several justification attempts and shows how and when they fail or what their drawbacks are. In order to avoid these problems he suggests to use a “rounded out” version of the Eleatic Principle in which also causally idle entities can be used. This “rounded out” version contains the classical version of the Eleatic Principle (Fig. 2). In the case of the Galactic Center and supermassive black holes in general, involvement of at least the “rounded out” version of the Eleatic Principle is justified (see below and [54]).
Mark Colyvan’s version of the “rounded out” Eleatic Principle does not stand alone. He points out that this more general principle that he proposes has great similarities to Quine’s thesis that “we are only ontologically committed to all and only the entities that are indispensable to our current best scientific theories” (see [249]). Indispensable entities then include both causally idle and causally efficacious entities. A critical discussion of the Eleatic Principle with a focus on the role of mathematical objects and Colyvan’s defense of Quine’s indispensability argument is given by Marcus [185]. It should also be mentioned that the entities we connect in the synthesis Sect. 7 have by themselves a rather complex nature. In most cases they are the result of a logical combination of causally idle and active entities and have a structure similar to that shown in Eq. (9). Causally idle (but ally relevant) entities occur e.g. through the theory of image formation in all wavelength domains or in relativistic concepts that are used to extract expected situations and compare them to measurements. In particular the “data inversion” problem in the image formation theory of interferometry might well serve as an example of true “underdetermination” in astrophysics. Causally efficacious entities occur e.g. in the form of stars, pulsars, emitted radiation or astrophysical instruments and telescopes, all of which can be located in spacetime in contrast to the causally idle entities.
Appendix 4: Time Scales and Luminosities of Gravitational Wave “Ringing”
The analysis is done based on the formalism presented in Misner et al. [202] and Shapiro and Teukolsky [279]. The tidal disruption radius \(r_\mathrm{{T}}\) for main-sequence stars with mass \(m_{\star }\) and radius \(R_{\star }\) is larger than the Schwarzschild radius \(R_\mathrm{{S}}\) of the supermassive black hole,
so we cannot expect any gravitational wave event from main-sequence star inspirals, since they will be tidally disrupted. On the other hand, Schwarzschild radius is larger than tidal disruption radius for white dwarfs with \(R_{\star }=0.01\,R_{\odot }\), neutron stars with \(R_{\star }=10^{-5}\,R_{\odot }\), and stellar black holes, so these are not subject to tidal disruption.
A circularized orbit of a compact star with the semimajor axis \(a_{\star }\) around the supermassive black hole emits gravitational waves at a frequency
reaching \(\sim 1.1\,\mathrm {mHz}\) at the innermost stable circular orbit.
The characteristic scaling amplitude for the EMRI event at the distance of the Galactic center is
and the effective metric perturbation is given by the amplitude \(h_0\) times the square root of the number of cycles the EMRI spends in the band with a bandwidth \(\Delta \nu \) centered at the frequency \(\nu \). The number of cycles N is given by \(N=\nu ^2/\dot{\nu }=\nu \tau \), where the characteristic evolution time-scale \(\tau \equiv \nu /\dot{\nu } = 8/3(t_\mathrm{coal}-t) \propto \mathcal {M}^{-5/3} \nu ^{-8/3}\) and \(t_\mathrm{coal}\) is the coalescence time. The ‘chirp mass’ may be expressed as , where the approximation holds for the EMRI. Finally, the metric perturbation or basically the signal is proportional to .
The expected luminosity \(L_\mathrm{GW}\) averaged over one period and evaluated at the innermost stable circular orbit [233] is
which is valid for circular orbits. In general, the equation 23 depends strongly on the orbital eccentricity [233]. The incoming flux \(F_\mathrm{GW}\) may be expressed as a function of the amplitude \(h_0\) and the observed frequency \(\nu _\mathrm{{GW}}\),
The coalescence (merger) time-scale \(\tau _\mathrm{{merge}}\) depends on the eccentricity of the orbit e. For a circular orbit,
where \(a_0\) is an initial semi-major axis. For initially highly eccentric orbits, \(e\approx 0.99\), it reduces to \(\tau _\mathrm{{merge}}=768/425 \tau _0(a_0)(1-e_0)^{7/2}\approx 0.016\,\mathrm {year}\).
The detection of an EMRI event associated with the Galactic center black hole would enable us to precisely measure the mass and the spin of the black hole with an independent measurement. The waveform could also reveal deviations from the Kerr metric as well as a possibly different character of a central compact object (e.g. a boson star). An exemplary waveform for an EMRI event for the ratio and the black hole spin \(J=0.998\) is depicted in Fig. 9. The inspiral starts at four gravitational radii.
The EMRI events from the Galactic center will be within the detection sensitivity limits of the planned LISA and eLISA space-base interferometers that will be capable to detect the gravitational wave events with low frequencies in the range \(\nu _\mathrm{{GW}}=0.1\)–\(1\,\mathrm {mHz}\). Although the likelihood to detect an EMRI event for the Galactic center is rather low during the mission lifetime, [117] estimate that LISA will be able to detect \({\sim }2\) EMRI events of \(1.4\,M_{\odot }\) compact objects (white dwarfs and neutron stars) per cubic Gpc per year for black holes with similar masses as Sgr A*.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eckart, A., Hüttemann, A., Kiefer, C. et al. The Milky Way’s Supermassive Black Hole: How Good a Case Is It?. Found Phys 47, 553–624 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-017-0079-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-017-0079-2