Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic Analysis of Building Fire Severity Based on Fire Load Density Models

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the compilation of 35 fire load density surveys for office and residential buildings. Limited data can be obtained for contemporary buildings. Using recent fire load survey results and the Bayesian inference theory, probabilistic fire load density models are proposed for office buildings (up to 120 m2 floor area) and for residential buildings (up to 35 m2 floor area). These models predict that the mean fire load density decreases when the floor area becomes larger. Meanwhile, given floor area, the models indicate that the fire load density follows the lognormal distribution. Statistics of fire load density are then calculated and explicitly presented for a direct reference in fire safety design. Afterwards, these models are incorporated in the parametric temperature model presented in the Eurocode to predict the maximum temperature within fire compartments. Parameter uncertainties are also considered, including the variations in opening factor and thermal absorptivity of enclosure that are observed from 57 experiments. Based on the proposed fire load density models, building fire severity is estimated using empirical equation in the Eurocode considering the influence of these parameters. Monte Carlo simulations are performed to obtain the statistical values of the maximum temperature and fire severity. The results in this work can be used in a performance-based fire safety design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gardoni P, LaFave JM (2016) Multi-hazard approaches to civil infrastructure engineering. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Xiao JZ (2015) Fire safety design principle of high performance concrete structures. Science Press, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hassanain MA (2009) On the challenges of evacuation and rescue operations in high-rise buildings. Struct Surv 27(2):109–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800910956443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eurocode (2002) Eurocode 1: actions on structures part 1–2: general actions—actions on structures exposed to fire

  5. Melinek SJ (1993) The distribution of fire load. Fire Saf J 20(1):83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(93)90013-g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thauvoye C, Zhao B, Klein J, Fontana M (2008) Fire load survey and statistical analysis. Fire Saf Sci 9:991–1002. https://doi.org/10.3801/iafss.fss.9-991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas PH (1986) Design guide: structure fire safety CIB W14 workshop report. Fire Saf J 10(2):77–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(86)90041-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zalok E, Eduful J (2013) Assessment of fuel load survey methodologies and its impact on fire load data. Fire Saf J 62:299–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar S, Rao C (1997) Fire loads in office buildings. J Struct Eng ASCE 123(3):365–368. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1997)123:3(365)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Culver CG (1976) Survey results for fire loads and live loads in office buildings. US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards

  11. Bwalya A (2008) An overview of design fires for building compartments. Fire Technol 44(2):167–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-007-0031-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma ZC, Makelainen P (2000) Parametric temperature–time curves of medium compartment fires for structural design. Fire Saf J 34(4):361–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-7112(00)00008-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lennon T, Moore D (2003) The natural fire safety concept—full-scale tests at Cardington. Fire Saf J 38(7):623–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-7112(03)00028-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Su JZ, Taber BC (2005) Full-scale fire study of spatial separation. Research Report: IRC-RR-195

  15. Feasey R, Buchanan A (2002) Post-flashover fires for structural design. Fire Saf J 37(1):83–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-7112(01)00026-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johansson N (2014) Numerical experiments and compartment fires. Fire Sci Rev 3(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40038-014-0002-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harmathy TZ (1987) On the equivalent fire exposure. Fire Mater 11(2):95–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.810110206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Law M (1971) A relationship between fire grading and building design and contents. Fire Saf Sci 877:1–45

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pettersson O (1973) The connection between a real fire exposure and the heating conditions according to standard fire resistance tests: with special application to steel structures. Lund Institute of Technology, Division of Structural Mechanics and Concrete Construction

  20. Kodur VKR, Pakala P, Dwaikat MB (2010) Energy based time equivalent approach for evaluating fire resistance of reinforced concrete beams. Fire Saf J 45(4):211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2010.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. SFPE (2016) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eduful J (2012) Correlation of fire load survey methodologies towards design fires for office buildings. Carleton University, Ottawa

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar S, Rao CVSK (1995) Fire load in residential buildings. Build Environ 30(2):299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(94)00043-r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bwalya A, Lougheed G, Kashef A, Saber H (2011) Survey results of combustible contents and floor areas in Canadian multi-family dwellings. Fire Technol 47(4):1121–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-009-0130-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bwalya AC, Sultan MA, Bénichou N (2004) A pilot survey of fire loads in Canadian homes. Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bwalya AC (2004) An extended survey of combustible contents in Canadian residential living rooms. Institute for Research in Construction, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dunham JW, Connor WJO, Ingberg SH, Thorud MB, Diener CN (1942) Fire resistance classifications of building constructions. Buildings Materials and Structures Report BMS 92. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC

  28. Ingberg SH, Dunham JW, Thompson JP (1957) Combustible contents in buildings. US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards

  29. Bryson J, Gross D (1968) Techniques for the survey and evaluation of live floor loads and fire loads in modern office buildings. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  30. Baldwin R, Law M, Allen G, Griffiths LG (1970) Survey of fire loads in modern office buildings-some preliminary results. Fire Saf Sci 808:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  31. Barnett CR (1984) Pilot fire load survey. Project Report No. 3580. New Zealand Fire Protection Association, MacDonald Barnett Partners, Auckland, New Zealand

  32. Narayanan P (1995) Fire severities for structural fire engineering design. BRANZ

  33. Caro TC, Milke JA (1996) A survey of fuel loads in contemporary office buildings. US Department of Commerce, Technology Administration

  34. Yii HW (2000) Effect of surface area and thickness on fire loads. Research report 00/13, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

  35. Korpela K, Keski-Rahkonen O (2000) Fire loads in office buildings. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 3rd international conference on performance-based codes and fire safety design methods, society of fire protection engineers, Bethesda, MD

  36. Wang N (2013) Performance-based design of high-rise buildings of the fire load. Chongqing University, Chongqing. https://doi.org/10.7666/d.d355339

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhai Y (2013) Survey and statistical parameters of office building fire load. Build Sci 29(07):122–123. https://doi.org/10.13614/j.cnki.11-1962/tu.2013.07.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Issen LA (1980) Single-family residential fire and live loads survey. US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards Washington, DC

  39. Campbell JA (1981) Confinement of fire in buildings. In: Fire protection handbook. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA

  40. Kose S, Motishita Y, Hagiwara I (1989) Survey of movable fire load in Japanese dwellings. Fire Saf Sci 2:403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bush B, Anno G, McCoy R, Gaj R, Small RD (1991) Fuel loads in US cities. Fire Technol 27(1):5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Li T, Zhang M, Xue YH (2009) Survey and statistical analysis of live fire loads of residential building bedrooms in Central Plains region. J Nat Disasters 18(2):39–43. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-4574.2009.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang JP, Zhu J, Liu HT, Zhao XF (2010) The investigation analysis of live fire load for beijing residential building and the characteristic value determination. Build Sci 26(01):24–27. https://doi.org/10.13614/j.cnki.11-1962/tu.2010.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu YC, Liu DD, Wang JP, Chen WH, Zhao B (2012) Probability model of Beijing residential fire load. Adv Mater Res 368:993–1002. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.368-373.993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Culver CG (1978) Characteristics of fire loads in office buildings. Fire Technol 14(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01997261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Khorasani NE, Garlock M, Gardoni P (2014) Fire load: survey data, recent standards, and probabilistic models for office buildings. Eng Struct 58:152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gardoni P, Der Kiureghian A, Mosalam KM (2002) Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations. J Eng Mech 128(10):1024–1038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Efron B, Hinkley DV (1978) Assessing the accuracy of the maximum likelihood estimator: observed versus expected Fisher information. Biometrika 65(3):457–482. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/65.3.457

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu P, Der Kiureghian A (1986) Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances. Probab Eng Mech 1(2):105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hamada MS, Wilson A, Reese CS, Martz H (2008) Bayesian reliability. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77950-8

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Vassart O, Zhao B, Cajot LG, Robert F, Meyer U, Frangi A, Poljanšek M, Nikolova B, Sousa L, Dimova S (2014) Eurocodes: background and applications structural fire design. JRC science and policy records. European Union

  52. Box GE, Tiao GC (2011) Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118033197

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Lonnermark A, Blomqvist P, Mansson M, Persson H (1996) Toxfire-fire characteristics and smoke gas analysis in under-ventilated large-scale combustion experiments. Tests in the ISO 9705 room. SP Report 45

  54. Lonnermark A, Babrauskas V (1996) Toxfire-fire characteristics and smoke gas analyses in under-ventilated large-scale combustion experiments. Storage configuration tests. SP report 46

  55. Blackmore J, Brescianini C, Collins G, Delichatsios MA, Everingham G, Ralph R, Thomas I, Beever P (1999) Room and furnace tests of fire rated construction, New South Wales, Australia

  56. Kirby BR, Wainman DE, Tomlinson TL, Kay TR, Peacock BN (1999) Natural fires in large scale compartments. Int J Eng Perform Based Fire Codes 1(2):43–58

    Google Scholar 

  57. Girgis N (2000) Full-scale compartment on fire experiments on “upholstered furniture”. University of Canterbury, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bailey CG, Lennon T (2008) Full-scale fire tests on hollowcore floors. Struct Eng 86(6):33–39

    Google Scholar 

  59. Helton JC, Davis FJ (2003) Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 81(1):23–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951-8320(03)00058-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Bisby L, Gales J, Maluk C (2013) A contemporary review of large-scale non-standard structural fire testing. Fire Sci Rev 2(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-0414-2-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hopkin D (2017) A review of fire resistance expectations for high-rise UK apartment buildings. Fire Technol 53(1SI):87-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0571-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the research grants from the China Scholarship Council and from the Chinese National 973 Plan (2012CB719703).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianzhuang Xiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, Q., Xiao, J., Gardoni, P. et al. Probabilistic Analysis of Building Fire Severity Based on Fire Load Density Models. Fire Technol 55, 1349–1375 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0716-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0716-0

Keywords

Navigation