Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rapid experimental shift in host use traits of a polyphagous marine herbivore reveals fitness costs on alternative hosts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The host breadth of any particular herbivore reflects a compromise between evolutionary forces that promote specialism and those that promote polyphagy. Because most terrestrial herbivorous insects specialize, explorations of this evolutionary balance have focused largely on specialist than on polyphagous herbivores. Here, we experimentally tested whether fitness-based tradeoffs in utilizing alternative hosts can be detected within a polyphagous marine herbivore. The marine amphipod Ampithoe longimana occurs on multiple seaweeds year-round (especially the genera Sargassum, Ulva and Hypnea), but is particularly abundant on the diterpene-rich genus Dictyota during warmer summer months. If fitness-based tradeoffs in using these alternative hosts are present, A. longimana may experience fluctuating selection across seasons. To test this possibility, we performed a controlled natural-selection experiment in which amphipods were isolated on Dictyota or a mixed seaweed assemblage that did not include Dictyota. Within 15 weeks (less than five overlapping generations), Dictyota-lines had greater feeding tolerance for Dictyota and its secondary metabolites than did mixed-seaweed-lines. Dictyota-line females reproduced more quickly than did mixed-seaweed-line females on Dictyota, but mixed-seaweed-line juveniles had greater growth on Sargassum and Ulva and higher fecundity on all hosts than did Dictyota-line juveniles. While experimental shifts in preference and performance are likely genetically-mediated, our experimental protocol does not preclude a role for phenotypic plasticity. The presence of a fitness cost to evolving greater preference for Dictyota suggests that fluctuating selection may operate on feeding preference across seasons, but our test of this hypothesis was equivocal. We suggest that one reason that polyphagy persists within A. longimana and potentially other marine grazers is because polyphagy broadens resource use across seasons, and this benefit outweighs the fitness-based costs that can favor specialism. Our results also reinforce the notion that timescales of ecological and evolutionary dynamics can overlap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amsler CD, Fairhead VA (2006) Defensive and sensory chemical ecology of brown algae. Adv Botanical Res 43:1–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson M (2001) Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:626–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Graham M (1988) On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods. Ecology 69:886–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Minkenberg O (1997) Insect herbivores: different reasons for being a generalist. Ecology 78:1157–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolser RC, Hay ME (1996) Are tropical plants better defended? Palatability and defenses of temperate vs tropical seaweeds. Ecology 77:2269–2286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RA, Bell SS (2001) Mobile corridors in marine landscapes: enhancement of faunal exchange at seagrass/sand ecotones. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 264:67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno JF, O’Connor MI (2005) Cascading effects of predator diversity and omnivory in a marine food web. Ecol Lett 8:1048–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno JF, Boyer KE, Duffy JE, Lee SC (2008) Relative and interactive effects of plant and grazer richness in a benthic marine community. Ecology 89:2518–2528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cannicci S, Gomei M, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Rorandelli R, Terlizzi A (2007) Influence of seasonal food abundance and quality on the feeding habits of an opportunistic feeder, the intertidal crab Pachygrapsus marmoratus. Mar Biol 151:1331–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canuel EA, Spivak AC, Waterson EJ, Duffy JE (2007) Biodiversity and food web structure influence short-term accumulation of sediment organic matter in an experimental seagrass system. Limnol Oceanogr 52:590–602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cates RG (1980) Feeding patterns of monophagous, oligophagous, and polyphagous insect herbivores: the effect of resource abundance and plant chemistry. Oecologia 46:22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cates RG (1981) Host plant predictability and the feeding patterns of monophagous, oligophagous, and polyphagous insect herbivores. Oecologia 48:319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements KD, Choat JH (1993) Influence of season, ontogeny and tide on the diet of the temperate marine herbivorous fish Odax-pullus (Odacidae). Mar Biol 117:213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colin SP, Dam HG (2004) Testing for resistance of pelagic marine copepods to a toxic dinoflagellate. Evol Ecol 18:355–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin G, Lindquist N, Hay ME, Fenical W (1995) Effects of storage and extraction procedures on yields of lipophilic metabolites from the brown seaweeds Dictyota ciliolata and D. menstrualis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 119:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Rivera E, Hay ME (2001) Macroalgal traits and the feeding and fitness of an herbivorous amphipod: the roles of selectivity, mixing, and compensation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 218:249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Rivera E, Hay ME (2003) Prey nutritional quality interacts with chemical defenses to affect consumer feeding and fitness. Ecol Monogr 73:483–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport AC, Anderson TW (2007) Positive indirect effects of reef fishes on kelp performance: the importance of mesograzers. Ecology 88:1548–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE (1989) Ecology and evolution of herbivory by marine amphipods. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Harvilicz AM (2001) Species-specific impacts of grazing amphipods in an eelgrass-bed community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 223:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Hay ME (1991) Food and shelter as determinants of food choice by an herbivorous marine amphipod. Ecology 72:1286–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Hay ME (1994) Herbivore resistance to seaweed chemical defense - the roles of mobility and predation risk. Ecology 75:1304–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Hay ME (2000) Strong impacts of grazing amphipods on the organization of a benthic community. Ecol Monogr 70:237–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Richardson JP, Canuel EA (2003) Grazer diversity effects on ecosystem functioning in seagrass beds. Ecol Lett 6:637–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Richardson JP, France KE (2005) Ecosystem consequences of diversity depend on food chain length in estuarine vegetation. Ecol Lett 8:301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • France KE, Duffy JE (2006a) Consumer diversity mediates invasion dynamics at multiple trophic levels. Oikos 113:515–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • France KE, Duffy JE (2006b) Diversity and dispersal interactively affect predictability of ecosystem function. Nature 441:1139–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fry J (1996) The evolution of host specialization: are trade-offs overrated? Am Natur 148:S84–S107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry JD (2003) Detecting ecological trade-offs using selection experiments. Ecology 84:1672–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma DJ (1976) Food plant specialization and environmental predictability in Lepidoptera. Am Nat 110:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma D, Moreno G (1988) The evolution of ecological specialization. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 19:207–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamfeldt L, Hillebrand H, Jonsson PR, Chase J (2005) Species richness changes across two trophic levels simultaneously affect prey and consumer biomass. Ecol Lett 8:696–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston NG, Holtmeier CL, Lampert W, Weider LJ, Post DM, Fischer JM, Caceres CE, Fox JA, Gaedke U (2001) Natural selection for grazer resistance to toxic cyanobacteria: Evolution of phenotypic plasticity? Evolution 55:2203–2214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hairston NG, Ellner SP, Geber MA, Yoshida T, Fox JA (2005) Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecol Lett 8:1114–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Steinberg PD (1992) The chemical ecology of plant-herbivore interactions in marine versus terrestrial communities. In: Rosenthal G, Berenbaum M (eds) Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites: ecological and evolutionary processes. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 371–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Duffy JE, Pfister CA, Fenical W (1987) Chemical defense against different marine herbivores: are amphipods insect equivalents? Ecology 68:1567–1580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand H, Gamfeldt L, Jonsson PR, Matthiessen B (2009) Consumer diversity indirectly changes prey nutrient content. Marine Ecol Prog Ser 380:33–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike J (1978) Resource predictability and niche breadth in the Drosophila quinaria species group. Evolution 32:676–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike J (1990) Host specialization in phyophagous insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:243–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaschinski S, Sommer U (2008) Functional diversity of mesograzers in an eelgrass-epiphyte system. Mar Biol 154:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaschinski S, Aberle N, Gohse-Reimann S, Brendelberger H, Wiltshire K, Sommer U (2009) Grazer diversity effects in an eelgrass–epiphyte–microphytobenthos system. Oecologia 159:607–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jormalainen V, Honkanen T (2008) Macroalgal chemical defenses and their roles in structuring temperate marine communities. In: Amsler CD (ed) Algal chemical ecology. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 57–89

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jormalainen V, Honkanen T, Heikkila N (2001) Feeding preferences and performance of a marine isopod on seaweed hosts: cost of habitat specialization. Marine Ecol Prog Ser 220:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassen R (2002) The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity. J Evol Biol 15:173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotta J, Orav-Kotta H, Paalme T, Kotta I, Kukk H (2006) Seasonal changes in situ grazing of the mesoherbivores Idotea baltica and Gammarus oceanicus on the brown algae Fucus vesiculosus and Pylaiella littoralis in the Central Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea. Hydrobiologia 554:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments; some theoretical explorations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 132

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty AT (2008) Regional variation in feeding preferences of the marine herbivore Ampithoe longimana Biology. College of Charleston, Charleston, p 89

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J, Ingersoll C, McDonald L, Boyce M (1986) Estimating uncertainty in population growth rates: jackknife vs. bootstrap techniques. Ecology 67:1156–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson WG (1980) The biology of eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) amphipods. Crustaceana 39:59–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotny V, Basset Y (1998) Seasonality of sap-sucking insects (Auchenorrhyncha, Hemiptera) feeding on Ficus (Moraceae) in a lowland rain forest in New Guinea. Oecologia 115:514–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny V, Basset Y (2005) Review: Host specificity of insect herbivores in tropical forests. Proc R Soc Ser B 272:1083–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny V, Basset Y, Miller SE, Weiblen GD, Bremer B, Cizek L, Drozd P (2002) Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature 416:841–844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla D (1985) Structural resistance of algae to herbivores. Mar Biol 90:103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul VJ, Cruz-Rivera E, Thacker RW (2001) Chemical mediation of seaweed-herbivore interactions: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. In: McClintock JB, Baker B (eds) Marine chemical ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 227–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Poore AGB (2004) Spatial associations among algae affect host use in a herbivorous marine amphipod. Oecologia 140:104–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poore AGB, Hill NA (2006) Sources of variation in herbivore preference: among-individual and past diet effects on amphipod host choice. Mar Biol 149:1403–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poore AG, Hill NA, Sotka EE (2008) Phylogenetic and geographic variation in host breadth and composition by herbivorous amphipods in the family ampithoidae. Evolution 62:21–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poore A, Campbell A, Steinberg PD (2009) Natural densities of mesograzers fail to limit growth of macroalgae or their epiphytes in a temperate algal bed. J Ecol 97:164–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price PW (2003) Macroevolutionary theory on macroecological patterns. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 302

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1992) Natural selection and the evolution of plant-insect interactions. In: Roitberg K, Isman MB (eds) Insect chemical ecology: an evolutionary approach. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 20–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson JP (1979) Overwintering of Dictyota dichotoma (Phaeophyceae) near its northern distribution limit on the east coast of North America. J Phycol 15:22–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainte-Marie B (1991) A review of the reproductive bionomics of aquatic gammaridean amphipods—variation of life-history traits with latitude, depth, salinity and superfamily. Hydrobiologia 223:189–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven LM, van Loon JJA, Dicke M (2005) Insect-plant biology. Oxford University Press, New York, p 440

  • Singer MS (2008) Evolutionary ecology of generalism. In: Tilmon KJ (ed) Specialization, speciation, and radiation: the evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York

  • Sotka EE (2003) Genetic control of feeding preference in the herbivorous amphipod Ampithoe longimana. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 256:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotka EE, Giddens H (2009) Seawater temperature alters feeding discrimination by cold-temperate but not subtropical individuals of an ectothermic herbivore. Biol Bull 216:75–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sotka EE, Hay ME (2002) Geographic variation among herbivore populations in tolerance for a chemically-rich seaweed. Ecology 83:2721–2735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotka EE, Wares JP, Hay ME (2003) Geographic and genetic variation in feeding preference for chemically defended seaweeds. Evolution 57:2262–2276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sotka EE, Forbey J, Horn M, Poore AGB, Raubenheimer D, Whalen KE (2009) The emerging role of pharmacology in understanding consumer-prey interactions in marine and freshwater systems. Integr Comp Biol 49:291–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE (1978) Ecological methods, with particular reference to the study of insect populations. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Steneck RS, Watling L (1982) Feeding capabilities and limitation of herbivorous molluscs: a functional group approach. Mar Biol 68:299–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Zangerl AR (2002) Plant-insect interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. In: Pellmyr O, Herrera CM (eds) Plant-animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, pp 77–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR, Lawton JH, Southwood SR (1984) Insects on plants: community patterns and mechanisms. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegner MJ, Dayton PK (1987) El Niño effects on southern California kelp forest communities. Adv Ecol Res 17:243–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J (1998) Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends Ecol Evol 13:329–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilmon KJ (2008) Specialization, speciation, and radiation: the evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects. University of California Press, Berkeley, p 360

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge CD (1991) Diet specialization limits herbivorous sea slug’s capacity to switch among food species. Ecology 72:1880–1888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge CD, Todd CD (2001) Host-plant change in marine specialist herbivores: ascoglossan sea slugs on introduced macroalgae. Ecol Monogr 71:219–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesakoski O, Rautanen J, Jormalainen V, Ramsay T (2009) Divergence in host use ability of a marine herbivore from two habitat types. J Evol Biol 22:1545–1555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C, Friberg M (2009) The evolutionary ecology of generalization: among-year variation in host plant use and offspring survival in a butterfly. Ecology 90:3406–3417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H (1988) Insect seasonality: why? Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:1–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Artur Veloso, John Bruno and the University of North Carolina’s Institute of Marine Sciences for logistical support, Tina Bell, Mark Hay and Bob Podolsky for thoughtful discussions, and the National Science Foundation for funding (OCE-0550245; DEB-0919064). This is Grice Publication Number 364.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Pamela L. Reynolds

    Present address: The College of William and Mary, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, 1208 Greate Road, Gloucester Point, VA, 23062-1346, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology and Grice Marine Laboratory, College of Charleston, 205 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC, 29412, USA

    Erik E. Sotka

  2. Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Pamela L. Reynolds

Authors
  1. Erik E. Sotka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pamela L. Reynolds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik E. Sotka.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3 Raw lifetable data (summarized in Fig. 3e)
Full size table
Table 4 A survey of published studies that use closed-system mesocosms and small marine herbivores
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sotka, E.E., Reynolds, P.L. Rapid experimental shift in host use traits of a polyphagous marine herbivore reveals fitness costs on alternative hosts. Evol Ecol 25, 1335–1355 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9473-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9473-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation