Abstract
An understudied aspect of couple relationship education (CRE) effectiveness is participant factors, including their changing needs over time. This study investigated the influence of changing needs over time on CRE outcomes. Participants (n = 692) self-selected to a CRE course and completed pre- and posttests. Family life stages were utilized to reflect changing needs, and participants were also assessed whether they fit family development theory’s expected (traditional) stage progression. Using linear mixed-effects models, we estimated the impact of family life stage on the posttest scores of three outcomes: commitment, relationship knowledge, and control rejection. We further tested whether a traditional progression interacted with family life stage. Related to our first hypothesis, if CRE outcomes differed by life stage, results indicated that the CRE outcome of commitment was different for those in the establishment and transition to parenthood stages, and the CRE outcome of knowledge differed for those in the transition to parenthood and preschool stages. The second hypothesis, an interaction between life stage and traditional (versus nontraditional) form of that stage, was supported for commitment and knowledge. Those who were in non-traditional earlier life stages and scored low on the pretest did not do as well on the posttest as their traditional counterparts. It may be that what couples need varies based on life stage and traditionality, and typical CRE courses may be less effective for non-traditional participants. Curricula should be carefully considered, to ensure it applies to the targeted participants. Theoretical implications are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahituv, A., & Lerman, R. (2011). Job stability, earnings, marital stability: How are they related? Review of Economics of the Household, 9, 221–249.
Allen, K. (2012). I hope: A phenomenological study of the lived experiences of fragile families. Marriage & Family Review, 48, 621–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2012.691084.
Allen, T. D., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2014). Work–family conflict among members of full-time dual-earner couples: An examination of family life stage, gender, and age. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(3), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036941.
Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x.
Amato, P. R. (2014). Does social and economic disadvantage moderate the effects of relationship education on unwed couples? An analysis of data from the 15-month Building Strong Families evaluation. Family Relations, 63, 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12069.
Azur, M. J., Stuart, E. A., Frangakis, C., & Leaf, P. J. (2011). Multiple imputation by chained equations: What is it and how does it work? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.329.
Backer, E., & Lynch, D. (2017). Understanding the proclivity of visiting friends and relatives (VFR) travel across family life cycle stages in Australia. International Journal of Tourism Research, 19(4), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2087.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Bouchard, G., & McNair, J. L. (2016). Dyadic examination of the influence of family relationships on life satisfaction at the empty-nest stage. Journal of Adult Development, 23(3), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-016-9233-x.
Bradford, A., Drean, L., Adler-Baeder, F., Ketring, S. A., & Smith, T. (2017). It’s about time! Examining received dosage and program duration as predictors of change among non-distressed and distressed married couple and relationship education participants. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 43, 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12209.
Bradford, K., Stewart, J. W., Pfister, R., & Higginbotham, B. (2016). Avoid falling for a jerk(ette): Effectiveness of the premarital interpersonal choices and knowledge program among emerging adults. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42, 630–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12174.
Bradford, K., Stewart, J., Higginbotham, B. J., & Skogrand, L. (2015). The perceived relationship knowledge scale: An initial validation. Family Relations, 64, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12116.
Carroll, J. S., Badger, S., & Yang, C. (2006). The ability to negotiate or the ability to love?: Evaluating the developmental domains of marital competence. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1001–1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X06287248.
Carlson, R. G., Rappleyea, D. L., Daire, A. P., Harris, S. M., & Liu, X. (2017). The effectiveness of couple and individual relationship education: Distress as a moderator. Family Process, 56, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12172.
Cherlin, A. J. (2000s). Demographic trends in the united states: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage & Family, 72, 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00710.x.
Coontz, S. (2008). American families: A multicultural reader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98.
Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (1992). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. New York: Basic Books.
Duvall, E. M. (1957). Family development. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
Duvall, E. M. (1971). Family development (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.
Fincham, F. D., Cui, M., Braithwaite, S., & Pasley, K. (2008). Attitudes toward intimate partner violence in dating relationships. Psychological assessment, 20, 260. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.3.260.
Fowers, B. J. (2001). The limits of technical concept of a good marriage: Exploring the role of virtue in communication skills. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2001.tb00328.x.
Fuhrmans, F., von der Lippe, H., & Fuhrer, U. (2014). Couples’ evaluations of fatherhood in different stages of the family life cycle. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2013.876402.
Hawkins, A. J. & Ooms, T. (2010). What works in marriage and relationship education? A review of lessons learned with a focus on low-income couples. National Healthy Marriage Resource Center. Retrieved from: https://www.healthymarriageinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/What-Works-in-Marriage-and.pdf
Hawkins, A. J., & Erickson, S. E. (2015). Is couple and relationship education effective for lower income participants? A meta-analytic study. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000045.
Hawkins, A. J., Blanchard, V. L., Baldwin, S. A., & Fawcett, E. B. (2008). Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 723–734. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012584.
Hawkins, A. J., Carroll, J. S., Doherty, W. J., & Willoughby, B. (2004). A comprehensive framework for marriage education. Family Relations, 53, 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0197-6664.2004.00064.x.
Hawkins, A. J., Stanley, S. M., Blanchard, V. L., & Albright, M. (2012). Exploring programmatic moderators of the effectiveness of marriage and relationship education programs: A meta-analytic study. Behavior Therapy, 43, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.12.006.
Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 980–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.980.
Johnson, M. D. (2012). Healthy marriage initiatives: On the need for empiricism in policy implementation. American Psychologist, 67, 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027743.
Jory, B. (2004). The Intimate Justice Scale: An instrument to screen for psychological abuse and physical violence in clinical practice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2004.tb01220.x.
Klausli, J. F., & Owen, M. T. (2009) Stable maternal cohabitation, couple relationship quality, and characteristics of the home environment in the child's first two years. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(1), 103–106.
Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michaels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919.
Larson, J. H. (2003). The great marriage tune-upbook: A proven program for evaluating andrenewing your relationship. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
Laszloffy, T. A. (2002). Rethinking family development theory: Teaching with the systemic family development (SFD) model. Family Relations, 51, 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.206098.x.
Lavee, Y., Sharlin, S., & Katz, R. (1996). The effect of parenting stress on marital quality: An integrated mother-father model. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017001007.
Li, W. D. H., & Huang, J.-W. (2017). Housing the intergenerational families: Married couples coresident with parents in Taiwan. Journal of Family History, 42(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363199016681607.
Luthar, S. S., & Ciciolla, L. (2016). What it feels like to be a mother: Variations by children’s developmental stages. Developmental Psychology, 52, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev000006.
Manning, W. D., & Cohen, J. A. (2012). Premarital cohabitation and marital dissolution: An examination of recent marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(2), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00960.x.
Markman, H. J., & Rhoades, G. K. (2012). Relationship education research: Current status and future directions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00247.x.
Martinengo, G., Jacob, J. I., & Hill, E. J. (2010). Gender and the work-family interface: Exploring differences across the family life course. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 1363–1390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10361709.
McGeorge, C. R., & Carlson, T. S. (2006). Premarital education: An assessment of program efficacy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 28, 165–190.
Montgomery, M. J., & Sorell, G. T. (1997). Differences in love attitudes across family life stages. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 46(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/585607.
Neulinger, A., & Radó, M. (2018). The impact of household life-cycle stages on subjective well-being: Considering the effect of household expenditures in Hungary. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12397.
O’Leary, K. D. (1999). Psychological abuse: A variable deserving critical attention in domestic violence. Violence and Victims, 14, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.14.1.3.
Office of Family Assistance (2018). Healthy marriage and responsible fatherhood. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ofa/programs/healthy-marriage
Pew Research Center. (2013). A rising share of young adults live in their parents’ home. Retrieved from https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2013/07/SDT-millennials-living-with-parents-07-2013.pdf
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.5.1) [Computer Software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
Schumm, W. R., Nichols, C. W., Schectman, K. L., & Grigsby, C. C. (1983). Characteristics of responses to the Kansas marital satisfaction scale by a sample of 84 married mothers. Psychological Reports, 53, 567–572. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.567.
Silverstein, M., & Marenco, A. (2001). How Americans enact the grandparent role across the family life course. Journal of Family Issues, 22(4), 493–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251301022004006.
Simpson, D. M., Leonhardt, N. D., & Hawkins, A. J. (2018). Learning about love: A meta-analytic study of individually-oriented relationship education programs for adolescents and emerging adults. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0725-1.
Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/353245.
Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., & Whitton, S. W. (2002). Communication, conflict and commitment: Insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey. Family Process, 41, 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.00659.x.
Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Whitton, S. W. (2010). Commitment: Functions, formation, and the securing of romantic attachment. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2, 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00060.x.
Sprecher, S. (2001). Equity and social exchange in dating couples: Associations with satisfaction, commitment, and stability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00599.x.
Tach, L., & Halpern-Meekin, S. (2009). How does premarital cohabitation affect trajectories of marital quality? Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(2), 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00600.x.
Teachman, J. (2008). Complex life course patterns and the risk of divorce in second marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(2), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00482.x.
Treas, J., & Widmer, E. D. (2000). Married women’s employment over the life course: Attitudes in cross-national perspective. Social Forces, 78(4), 1409–1436. https://doi.org/10.2307/3006179.
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2003). Parenthood and marital satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00574.x.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). America’s Families and Living Arrangements: 2012. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/p20-570.pdf
van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03.
Van Epp Cutlip, M. C. (2013). A qualitative examination of the relationship attachment model (RAM) with married individuals (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 1646158378). Retrieved from https://dist.lib.usu.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1646158378?accountid=14761
Van Epp, J. (2014). Couple LINKS instructor manual. USA: Love Thinks.
Wadsworth, M. E., & Markman, H. J. (2012). Where’s the action? Understanding what works and why in relationship education. Behavior Therapy, 43, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.01.006.
Wells, W. D., & Gubar, G. (1966). Life cycle concept in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 3, 355–363. https://doi.org/10.2307/3149851.
White, J. M. (1991). Dynamics of family development: A theoretical perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
Wood, R. G., Moore, Q., Clarkwest, A., & Killewald, A. (2014). The long-term effects of building strong families: A program for unmarried parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 446–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12094.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grants from the Office of Family Assistance, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the Utah Department of Workforce Services. We thank the course instructors for their work, as well as those who participated in the relationship education classes.
Funding
This study was funded by grants from the Office of Family Assistance, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (90FM0001) and the Utah Department of Workforce Services (142617).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (USU IRB 7570) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants via a Letter of Information as approved by the IRB.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crapo, J.S., Bradford, K., Barrett, T.S. et al. Couple Relationship Education Outcomes Predicted by Family Life Stage and Traditionality. Contemp Fam Ther 42, 422–435 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-020-09541-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-020-09541-x