Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Influence of Abusive Supervision and Job Embeddedness on Citizenship and Deviance

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper draws from the turnover and emotions literatures to explore how job embeddedness, in the context of abusive supervision, can impact job frustration, citizenship withdrawal, and employee deviance. Results indicate that employees with abusive supervisors were more likely to be frustrated with their jobs and engage in more deviance behaviors. And yet, the relationship between abusive supervision and job frustration was moderated by job embeddedness such that the relationship was weaker and negative for those higher in job embeddedness and stronger and positive for those lower in job embeddedness. In other words, contrary to our original predictions, individuals who were more embedded in their jobs with an abusive supervisor were actually less likely to experience job frustration or engage deviance behaviors. Important implications for management research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14, 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B., Howell, J., & Sosik, J. (1999). A funny thing happened on the way to the bottom line: Humor as a moderator of leadership style effects. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsade, S., Brief, A., & Spataro, S. (2003). The affective revolution in organizational behavior: The emergence of a paradigm. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 3–52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R., & Robinson, S. (2003). The past, present, and future of workplace deviance research. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of science (2nd ed., pp. 247–281). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briner, R., & Kiefer, T. (2005). Psychological research into the experience of emotion at work: Definitely older, but are we any wiser. In N. M. Ashkanasy, W. J. Zerbe, & C. E. J. Hartel (Eds.), The effect of affect in organizational settings (Vol. 1, pp. 281–307). Boston: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L., & Centerbar, D. (2004). Analyzing anger: How to make people mad. Emotion, 4, 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., et al. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 199–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, C., Bennett, R., Jex, S., & Burnfield, J. (2007). Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1031–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A., Yammarino, F., & Jolson, M. (1995). An examination of linkages between personality characteristics and dimensions of transformational leadership. Journal of Business and Psychology, 9, 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberly, M., Holtom, B., Lee, T., & Mitchell, T. (2009). Control voluntary turnover by understanding its causes. In Handbook of principles of organizational behavior, vol. 123. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

  • Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. (1972). Exchange theory part I: A psychological basis for social exchange. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 38–57). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., & Spector, P. (1999). A model of work frustration-aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 915–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N., & Mesquita, B. (1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In S. Kitayama & H. R. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 51–87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garber, J., & Seligman, M. (1980). Human helplessness: Theory and applications (p. 402). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, D., & Callister, R. (2007). Crossing the lines: A dual threshold model of anger in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 721–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, D., & Callister, R. (2010). Anger in Organizations: Review and Integration. Journal of Management, 36, 66–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtom, B., Mitchell, T., Lee, T., & Eberly, M. (2008). 5 Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 231–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 61, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. (1989). Motivation and cognitive–abilities: An integrative aptitude treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. (1991). Progress on a cognitive–motivational–relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Allen, N. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T., Mitchell, T., Sablynski, C., Burton, J., & Holtom, B. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 711–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1159–1168.

  • Mitchell, T., Holtom, B., Lee, T., Sablynski, C., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1102–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molm, L. (1988). The structure and use of power: A comparison of reward and punishment power. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 108–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 176–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedlhauzer, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, L., & O’Connor, E. (1980). Situational constraints and work outcomes: The influence of a frequently overlooked construct. Academy of Management Review, 5, 391–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., & Bennett, R. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D., McCance, A., & Grandey, A. (2007). A cognitive–emotional theory of customer injustice and emotional labor. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of justice and affect (pp. 205–232). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D., McCance, A., Spencer, S., & Sonntag, K. (2008). Customer (in)justice and emotional labor: The role of perspective taking, anger, and emotional regulation. Journal of Management, 34, 903–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D., & Spencer, S. (2006). When customers lash out: The effects of customer interactional injustice on emotional labor and the mediating role of discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 971–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1978). Organizational frustration: A model and review of the literature. Personnel Psychology, 31, 815–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storms, P., & Spector, P. (1987). Relationships of organizational frustration with reported behavioral reactions: The moderating effect of perceived control. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60, 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33, 261–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B., Duffy, M., Henle, C., & Lambert, L. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59, 101–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B., Duffy, M., Hoobler, J., & Ensley, M. (2004). Moderators of the relationship between coworkers’ organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees’ attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 455–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B., Henle, C., Lambert, L., Giacalone, R., & Duffy, M. (2008). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organization deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 721–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thau, S., Aquino, K., & Wittek, R. (2007). An extension of uncertainty management theory to the self: The relationship between justice, social comparison orientation, and antisocial work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 840–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thau, S., & Mitchell, M. (2010). Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1009–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 786–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA, USA

    James B. Avey, Keke Wu & Erica Holley

Authors
  1. James B. Avey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keke Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erica Holley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James B. Avey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avey, J.B., Wu, K. & Holley, E. The Influence of Abusive Supervision and Job Embeddedness on Citizenship and Deviance. J Bus Ethics 129, 721–731 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2192-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2192-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation