Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of invasiveness in plants following hybridization

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the fact that invasion biology started as a science grounded almost exclusively in ecology, it rapidly embraced evolutionary research in the last decade. As the contents of this Special Issue testify, the subfield of evolution of invasiveness by hybridization has received increasing attention. Hybrid derived invasives have proved to be an excellent opportunity for the study of the evolution of invasiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott RJ, Brennan AC, James JK, Forbes DG, Hegarty MJ, Hiscock SJ (2008) Recent hybrid origin and invasion of the British Isles by a self-incompatible species, Oxford ragwort. Biol Inv. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9382-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainouche ML, Fortune PM, Salmon A, Parisod C, Grandbastien M-A, Fukunaga K, Ricou M, Misset M-T (2008) Hybridization, polyploidy and invasion: lessons from Spartina (Poaceae). Biol Inv. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9383-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres D, Ryan FJ, Grotkopp E, Bailey J, Gaskin J (2008) Tumbleweed (Salsola, section Kali) species and speciation in California. Biol Inv. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9380-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey JP, Bímová K, Mandák B (2008) Asexual spread versus sexual reproduction and evolution in Japanese Knotweed s.l. sets the stage for the “Battle of the Clones”. Biol Inv. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9381-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH (1983) Crop mimicry in weeds. Econ Bot 37:255–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossey B, Nötzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM, Laurenson MK (1994) Ecological and genetic factors in conservation: a cautionary tale. Science 263:485–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Culley TM, Hardiman NA (2008) The role of intraspecific hybridization in the evolution of invasiveness. A case study of the ornamental pear tree Pyrus calleryana. Biol Inv. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9386-z

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wet JMJ, Harlan JR (1974) Weeds and domesticates: evolution in the man-made habitat. Econ Bot 29:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Schierenbeck K (2000) Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc Nat Acad Sci 97:7043–7050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin JF, Kazmer DJ (2008) Introgression between invasive saltcedars (Tamarix chinensis and T. ramosissima) in the USA. Biol Inv. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9384-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray AJ, Marshall DF, Raybould AF (1991) A century of evolution in Spartina anglica. Adv Ecol Res 21:1–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall RJ, Ayres DR (2008) What can mathematical modeling tell us about hybrid invasions? Biol Inv. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9387-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Martins PS (1979) Ecological genetics of the colonizing ability of rose clover (Trifolium hirtum All.). Am J Bot 66:361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17:386–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin MM, Harding J (1981) Evidence for the evolution of competition between two species of annual plants. Evolution 35:975–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison SL, Molofsky J (1998) Effects of genotypes, soil moisture, and competition on the growth of an invasive grass, Phalaris arundinacea (reed canary grass). Can J Bot 76:1939–1946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panetsos CA, Baker HG (1967) The origin of variation in “wild” Raphanus sativus (Cruciferae) in California. Genetica 38:243–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughmann S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O’Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SC (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schierenbeck K, Ellstrand NC (2008) Hybridization and the evolution of invasiveness in plants and other organisms. Biol Inv. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9388-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloop CM, Ayres DR, Strong DR (2008) The rapid evolution of self-fertility in Spartina hybrids (Spartina alterniflora × foliosa) invading San Francisco Bay, CA. Biol Inv. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9385-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JD (1991) The biology of an invasive plant. Bioscience 41:393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney KD, Ahern JR, Campbell LG (2008) Hybridization-prone plant families do not generate more invasive species. Biol Inv. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9390-3

    Google Scholar 

  • US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1993) Harmful Non-indigenous species in the United States. OTA-F-565 US Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funding from a USDA NRI CSREES Grant (2003-35320-13559), and National Science Foundation Biocomplexity Grant (DEB-0409984). The manuscript improved with comments from Debra Ayres and Ingrid Parker.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norman C. Ellstrand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ellstrand, N.C. Evolution of invasiveness in plants following hybridization. Biol Invasions 11, 1089–1091 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9389-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9389-9

Keywords

Navigation