Skip to main content
Log in

Paraphilic Coercive Disorder: An Unresolved Issue

  • Commentary on DSM-5
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abel, G. G., Blanchard, E. B., Becker, J. V., & Djenderedjian, A. (1978). Differentiating sexual aggressives with penile measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 5, 315–332. doi:10.1177/009385487800500404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2010). DSM-5 development. Retrieved from http://www.dsm5.org

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2011). DSM-5 development. Retrieved from http://www.dsm5.org

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Doren, D. M. (2002). Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitments and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earls, C. M., & Proulx, J. (1986). The differentiation of Francophone rapists and nonrapists using penile circumferential measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 13, 419–429. doi:10.1177/0093854886013004004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frances, A. J. (2011, May 26). DSM-5 rejects coercive paraphilia: Once again confirming that rape is not a mental disorder. Psychiatric Times. Retrieved from www.psychiatrictimes.com

  • Knight, R. A. (1999). Validation of a typology for rapists. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 297–323. doi:10.1177/088626099014003006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, J., Aubut, J., McKibben, A., & Côté, M. (1994). Penile responses of rapists and non-rapists to rape stimuli involving physical violence or humiliation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 295–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, D. (2010). Evidence regarding the need for a diagnostic category for a coercive paraphilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 411–418. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9583-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wollert, R. (2007). Poor diagnostic reliability, the Null-Bayes Logic Model, and their implications for sexually violent predator evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 167–203. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.13.3.167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollert, R. (2011). Paraphilic coercive disorder does not belong in DSM-5 for statistical, historical, conceptual, and practical reasons [Letter to the Editor]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1097–1098. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9814-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanne-Lucine Rouleau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agalaryan, A., Rouleau, JL. Paraphilic Coercive Disorder: An Unresolved Issue. Arch Sex Behav 43, 1253–1256 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0372-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0372-5

Keywords

Navigation